anart
A Disturbance in the Force
Jason (ocean59) said:And it most certainly does not fit in with the subject 'Films related to cassiopaea' osit.
True. I changed the title of the thread and moved it to 'movies'.
Jason (ocean59) said:And it most certainly does not fit in with the subject 'Films related to cassiopaea' osit.
Jason (ocean59) said:I'd really only recommend the film Requiem for a Dream for one of two reasons (I've seen it about 3 times, and have long since refused to ever watch it again):
1 - If you or someone you know if thinking about trying heroin, this film should be watched first by that person.
Approaching Infinity said:Actually, after reading Redirect, I'd question even that. It seems shock/scare tactics don't do very well to discourage people from such activities. They tend to just reinforce one category of people in their own motivations not to use drugs (leading to a lot of self-reports suggesting that the tactics actually work, when they don't - those people wouldn't have done the drugs in the first place). But for those who are really at risk, it just convinces them (or their unconscious) that they really ARE at risk of doing drugs. What actually works is to approach it from the side, not directly. E.g., by doing volunteer work, they come to see themselves as integral members of society, and thus acquire new motivations and personal narratives about themselves.
anart said:carlise said:I have not seen Requiem for a Dream so I can't really say much, however these comments have got me interested. Could it not sometimes be beneficial to see the darker side of life (especially when one is searching for objectivity)?
It's interesting that what has been said has 'interested you'. Why is that? Also, this is not about avoiding the dark side of life, this is about observing the fact that exposing oneself to psychic slime and emotional violence as a form of entertainment is hardly beneficial. Such things can be endured and seen for what they are, but, honestly, to spend two hours exposing oneself to what amounts to a psychological/emotional cesspool is questionable at best. But, that is, of course, my personal take and if you're interested, then I suppose that's up to you.
I take it you meant Stanislaw Lem: _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(novel)caballero reyes said:Based on the novel by Stanislaw Lam.
Palinurus said:I take it you meant Stanislaw Lem: _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaris_(novel)caballero reyes said:Based on the novel by Stanislaw Lam.
I wouldn't have mentioned this, were it not for the fact that there also exists a Polish writer called Stanislaw Lam: _http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanisław_Lam
The Solaris movie by Tarkovsky was one of my favorites too.
There is also an American remake directed by Steven Soderbergh, which I haven't seen. See: _http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0307479/
anart said:...I found The Fountain to be far too newagey for me - very disappointing, actually and not worth the watch. I found 'Requiem for a Dream' to be a horrific film - and I'm not exaggerating. It's an emotionally manipulative pain-fest and a film that I truly wish I had never seen. fwiw.
caballero reyes said:SOLARIS(Russia) 1972 Dir:Andrei Tarkovsky. Based on the novel by Stanislaw Lem.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcglyhUre4w