"FIRE THE GRID"

Fire the Grid

everyone does seem to left out the '20' of the year.
Yeah, true. Nevertheless it worked for the purposes of synchronicity - the 777 was in my mind, the crop circle announcement, and then 777 for my post about it. That's all that matters in this case; and it is really more personal to me and those associated.

For those trying to promote the grid thing, it IS important that it is not really 777, I think.
 
Fire the Grid

Laura said:
For those trying to promote the grid thing, it IS important that it is not really 777, I think.
Yes, that's true. There was confusion as to when to "fire the grid". Some say it was 07/07/07 or it was 07/17/07. It would become a matter of belief in a "scheduled date." It may have to do with the number of people who are doing the "firing the grid," and maybe it's never about the 777 itself. osit.
 
Fire the Grid

Hello to all
I am not the style new ager but can you tell me what is so wrong in sending love to the earth that needs it so badly. My father was an Indian and it has always been very normal to do so. The more people that can do that, the more results you have.
Patricia
 
Fire the Grid

aristar said:
Hello to all
I am not the style new ager but can you tell me what is so wrong in sending love to the earth that needs it so badly. My father was an Indian and it has always been very normal to do so. The more people that can do that, the more results you have.
Patricia
"Sending love to the earth" is quite all right. But trying to change anything about the earth is a violation of the free will of the earth to follow its own destiny. Sending love to those who have not asked for it is also a violation of their free will. More than anything, it depends on your motivations.

The following are some exchanges with the Cs on the subject of love:

A: Wanting to help others can often be STS if the reason, at deep levels is fear of loss.

Q: (L) Loss of what?

A: Respect, love, others opinions, and a big one self image.
Q: (L) Okay, now Eddie says:

'Laura brought up several comments about Love that
confused me. I do not understand how could giving love
when not being asked could harm instead of improve.' Can
you remark on this?

A: "Giving" love is not giving, in such a case.

Q: So, if you give love when you have not been asked, you are
NOT giving?

A: You are taking, as usual.

Q: When you say you are 'taking,' what are you taking?

A: Energy, a la STS.

Q: How does it come that you are taking energy from someone
by giving them love when not asked?

A: Because an STS vehicle does not learn to be an STO
candidate by determining the needs of another.

Q: I don't understand how that means you are taking energy?

A: Because the act is then one of self-gratification. If one
"gives" where there is no request, therefore no need, this
is a free will violation! And besides, what other
motivation could there possibly be in such a scenario?!?
Think carefully and objectively about this.

Q: My thought would be that, in such a scenario, that if one
gives love to someone who has not asked or requested, that
it seems to be a desire to change the other, i.e. a desire
to control.

A: You got it!!

Q: Now he says further:

'Yes, everything is lessons and if a
person has chosen a specific path they should be allowed
to go and learn their way. But, let's say this is
happening to someone you really love. And let's say that
the person may be in a period of his life that his/her
thoughts are probably taking her/him to commit, let's say,
a murder. Don't you think that if you send this person
love, even unconsciously, that it may provide the
necessary energy (influence) to stop that murder?'
Comment please.

A: No, no, no!!! In fact, if anything, such an energy
transference even could enhance the effect.

Q: In what way?

A: Imbalanced waves could be drawn upon by the receiver.

Q: I think that this word he used is a clue: 'Don't you think
that if you send the person love, it could provide the
person the necessary energy' and in parentheses he has the
word 'influence' which implies control of the other
person's behavior, to 'stop that murder.' So, it seems
that there is a desire to control the actions of another
person.

A: Yes.

Q: But, his intent is entirely benevolent because he wants to
stop a murder which is the saving of a life, as well as
prevent the loved one from going to prison. So, it SEEMS
to be benevolent in intent. Does this not make a
difference?

A: Have we forgotten about Karma?

Q: Well, both Sylvia and I mentioned the fact that one cannot
always judge these situations because we don't know. We
cannot know. For all we know the potential murder victim
is an Adolf Hitler type or the potential parent of one, or
something like that, and then the murder would save many
lives with the sacrifice of two lives, or that this murder
is supposed to happen because of some karmic interaction
that is essential between the murderer and victim, and
that we simply cannot KNOW these things and judge them.

A: Yes.

Q: Any other comment about that?

A: No.

Q: He says: 'I believe that if we do not send love energy to
the world that the egocentric STS energy will be
dominating.

A: Why would one choose to send this? What is the
motivation?

Q: To change it to your idea of what it is supposed to be.
To control it to follow your judgment of how things ought
to be.

A: Exactly. The students are not expected to be the
architects of the school.

Q: So, when you seek to impose or exert influence of any
kind, you are, in effect, trying to play God and taking it
upon yourself to decide that there is something wrong with
the universe that it is up to you to fix, which amounts to
judgment.

A: Yes, you see, one can advise, that is okay, but do not
attempt to alter the lesson.

Q: He also says: 'I believe that an enlightened being is
emanating love where ever that person is, and this is even
without being asked. It just happens because that is what
they are - love.' Comment, please.

A: An enlightened being is not love. And a refrigerator is
not a highway.

Q: What?! Talk about your mixed metaphors! I don't get that
one!

A: Why not?

Q: They are completely unrelated!

A: Exactly!!!

Q: What IS an enlightened being?

A: An enlightened being.

Q: What is the criteria for being an enlightened being?

A: Being enlightened!

Q: When one is enlightened, what is the profile?

A: This is going nowhere because you are doing the proverbial
round hole, square peg routine.

Q: What I am trying to get to is an understanding of an
enlightened being. Eddie and a LOT of other people have
the idea that an enlightened being IS LOVE, and that is
what they radiate, and that this is a result of being
enlightened.

A: No, no, no, no, no. "Enlightened" does not mean good.
Just smart.

Q: Okay, so there are STS and STO enlightened beings?

A: Yes, we believe the overall ratio is 50/50.

Q: Okay, what is the profile of an enlightened STO being?

A: An intelligent being who only gives.

Q: Well, since we have dealt with the idea of not giving love
to those who don't ask, what do they give and to whom do
they give it?

A: All; to those who ask.

Q: He says: 'As you can see, I believe in the power of love.
I am open to try to understand that which I have not yet
been able to. Perhaps that is why I am here with you
guys. So, could we talk more about this subject? Could
provide more of what the C's have said about Love?' I
collected the excerpts from the text about love and how
you had said that Knowledge was love and light was
knowledge and all that. Anything further you can add to
that?

A: No, because the receiver to this does not wish to receive.

Q: Okay. Sylvia responded:

'Eddie thank you for your
pointing out the paradox of the concept of the expression
of love between the C's and that as some of us think we
know, but KNOW what we experience. I feel that it may be
very difficult for the C's to deliver adequate
understanding into our 3rd density or dimension. [...] My
view of the paradox is thus: If one emanates love as a
natural course to the Universe it is not consciously
limited or directed - at least I, for one, cannot do this;
that simply is the way some of us are a lot of the 'time.'
To eliminate groups or individuals, is beyond my
comprehension to constantly define since a lot of this is
done unconsciously anyway; and it certainly would
compromise my experience of sending love. Unless one is
Bodhisattva, love is probably only directed with greater
intensity when focused toward an individual; how is one to
know whether the intended recipient is not ready/able to
receive?' [...] And 'receive,' I think is a clue: the
intended recipient can either remain oblivious or ward off
the love energy - free agency.

A: Yes.

Q: If it IS 'love energy' is it subsequently corrupted by
STS?

A: Maybe.

Q: She then says: 'If one directs love very specifically
toward an individual it can be directed freely,
judgementally, subjectively..... One challenge is to
direct love freely...'

A: No.

Q: 'Giving love to the Universe may be the best way
generally, but if one does focus toward a loved one and it
CAN be effective, could the general Universe be JUST as
effective?'

A: The universe is about balance. Nuff said!

Q: Next, in regard to this not giving of love when not asked,
she says: 'That does not mesh with networking to spread
KNOWLEDGE among those who care and love. THAT is
directed...'

A: What?

Q: Well, I DID point out that the only reason we have even
gotten anything is because we asked for a LONG time,
repeatedly and sincerely.

A: The bottom line is this: You are occupying 3rd density.
You are by nature, STS. You can be an STO candidate, but
you are NOT STO until you are on 4th density. You will
NEVER grasp the meaning of these attempted
conceptualizations until you are at 4th and above.
And another:

Q: (L) And there are people for whom STS is simply their
choice. It is their path.

A: Close.

Q: (L) So, it is a judgment and a disservice to try to
convert someone to your path, even if you perceive the end
result of the path they are on, that it leads to
dissolution? It is still their path?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And, if you send 'buckets of love and light' to such a
one, and that is their path, you are violating their free
will?

A: You might as well send "buckets" of vomit as that is how
they will react.

Q: (MM) Why send anything? Just be neutral?

A: Judgment is STS.
Q: (L) What is it that limits our awareness?

A: Your environment. And it is the environment that you have
chosen. By your level of progress. And that is what
limits everything. As you rise to higher levels of
density, limitations are removed.

Q: (L) What creates this environment of limitation?

A: It is the grand illusion which is there for the purpose of
learning.

Q: (L) And who put the illusion into place?

A: The Creator who is also the Created. Which is also you
and us and all. As we have told you, we are you and vice
versa. And so is everything else.

Q: (L) Is the key that it is all illusion?

A: Basically, yes.

Q: (L) So, essentially...

A: As we have told you before, if you will be patient just a
moment, the universe is merely a school. And, a school
is there for all to learn. That is why everything exists.
There is no other reason. Now, if only you understood the
true depth of that statement, you would begin to start to
see, and experience for yourself, all the levels of
density that it is possible to experience, all the
dimensions that it is possible to experience, all
awareness. When an individual understands that statement
to its greatest possible depth, that individual becomes
illumined. And, certainly you have heard of that. And,
for one moment, which lasts for all eternity, that
individual knows absolutely everything that there is to
know.

Q: (L) So, you are saying that the path to illumination is
knowledge and not love?

A: That is correct.

Q: (L) Is it also correct that emotion can be used to
mislead, that is emotions that are twisted and generated
strictly from the flesh or false programming?

A: Emotion that limits is an impediment to progress. Emotion
is also necessary to make progress in 3rd density. It is
natural. When you begin to separate limiting emotions
based on assumptions from emotions that open one to
unlimited possibilities, that means you are preparing for
the next density.

Q: (L) What about Love?

A: What about it?

Q: (L) There are many teachings that are promulgated that
Love is the key, the answer. They say that illumination
and knowledge and what-not can all be achieved through
love. A: The problem is not the term "love," the problem
is the interpretation of the term. Those on third density
have a tendency to confuse the issue horribly. After all,
they confuse many things as love. When the actual
definition of love as you know it is not correct either.
It is not necessarily a feeling that one has that can also
be interpreted as an emotion, but rather, as we have told
you before, the essence of light which is knowledge is
love, and this has been corrupted when it is said that
love leads to illumination. Love is Light is Knowledge.
Love makes no sense when common definitions are used as
they are in your environment. To love you must know. And
to know is to have light. And to have light is to love.
And to have knowledge is to love.
 
Fire the Grid

aristar said:
sending love to the earth that needs it so badly.
It sounds like an assumption. Finally does Earth really needs that human beings send her love ? What data can support this hypothesis ?

Laura said:
I do not understand how could giving love when not being asked could harm instead of improve. Can you remark on this?

A: "Giving" love is not giving, in such a case.

Q: So, if you give love when you have not been asked, you are
NOT giving?

A: You are taking, as usual.
If we take some distance we can see that tons of planets and stars are being eaten by black holes. This is somehow a very sad situation. Those stars and planets really need our help and love, don't they ? So why don't we focus our love towards those specific asteroids instead of focusing on planet Earth ?
 
Fire the Grid

aristar said:
can you tell me what is so wrong in sending love to the earth that needs it so badly.
C's said:
Q: How does it come that you are taking energy from someone
by giving them love when not asked?

A: Because an STS vehicle does not learn to be an STO
candidate by determining the needs of another.


[...]

A: Judgment is STS
Fix yourself. That is doing a service to this world far greater than trying to fix others.
 
Back
Top Bottom