Fireball during protest in Egypt?

[rise]

And if people don't figure it out and do something about it early enough, then everybody dies. The Universe doesn't play favorites and the living system is so abundant that it can afford to extinct a line that is not turning out well.

This reminds me of shaping a garden and removing weeds, except now the weeds are humans . Very well put...

 

[Pierre]

That's an interesting "coincidence". Indeed, one can wonder if those mass protests modulated in any way those cosmic phenomena. There's plenty of historical evidence showing a positive correlation between periods of intense cometary activity and social unrest.

Yup. And while the materialists explain it away by saying 1) it's a coincidence even if the correlation occurs over and over again; or 2) the cometary activity CAUSES the unrest, it seems that unrest usually manifests FIRST, and is usually due to increasing dominance of an elite over the masses of the population, oppression, abrogation of rights, etc. So it seems to me that this oppression of the elite has a direct cause-effect relationship to planetary disaster. And if people don't figure it out and do something about it early enough, then everybody dies. The Universe doesn't play favorites and the living system is so abundant that it can afford to extinct a line that is not turning out well.

That's a fascinating topic. Somehow human consciousness seems to trigger, or at least to increase the probabilities of the occurrence of cataclysmic events, which are, according to science, "random" events unrelated to human activity.

Professor Robert Jahn and Brenda Dunnes conducted over 25.000 trials testing the influence of human intent on "random" events. They discovered some very interesting things:
1/ Humans' influence is sometimes contrary to their intent (particularly amongst people suffering from low self confidence)
2/ Human beings do have an influence on "random" events, however this influence is very tiny
3/ Group of humans, when they are related (spouse, relatives) have an increased influence on "random events"

The first point is interesting because it suggests that what really influence "random" events is not the intent per se but the deeply held, conscious or not, beliefs. Point 2/ shows that most of the time the influence of individuals on "random" events is negligible, but point 3/ suggests that when people are "close" some synergistic effects appear and their influence might not be negligible anymore.

Related people mentioned in point 3/ include couples which, de facto, have different genotypes. Instead of genetic similarities the noted "resonance" might refer to shared cultural references, knowledge, beliefs i.e. shared information whether it's true or false.

Apparently, past cataclysmic episodes followed periods of intense despotic ruling exerted to maintain and increase privileges. One specifics of such regime is the people's extreme suffering because of violence, hunger, exploitation, poverty, injustice... The other specifics of these regimes are the lies necessary to make people accept the unacceptable by maintaining the illusion that the elites protect them. In this sense, it might very well be this amount of widely believed lies about the nature of the imperial regime that affect the probabilities of cosmic reactions occurring.

in the past, humanity because of its small size and the variety of its beliefs led a weak and incoherent signal. Today, humanity, because of its exceptional size (more than 7 billion people) and the universality of its beliefs (global medias) sends a strong and very coherent signal.

The weak and incoherent signal emitted in the past was sufficient to trigger several major cataclysmic episodes. Thus, one can wonder if the current size of human population and the coherence of its (wrong) beliefs might increase substantially the probability and the intensity of an incoming cosmic reaction.

Interestingly some negative feedback loop might also appear. At first the elites spread lies in people's mind in order to maintain power and oppression, in turn the "lie signal" increases the probability of cataclysmic events. Once the cataclysms start, the elites spread even more lie to cover up what's really on and that threatens their power. They call related cosmically-induced phenomenon " unrelated and man-made" phenomena which are therefore (see for example global warming, chemtrail, missile tests, erosion induced sink holes, Gulf Stream weakening, etc.).

The people believing the lies aiming at hiding the cosmic reaction increase even more the "lie signal" and the cosmic reaction. That's an example of "you create a reality opposite to what you (wrongly) believe".