13 Twirling Triskeles said:
There's also another dynamic which I neglected to mention and which can occur -- both in dreams and during hypnosis sessions. It's called, "Top Dog vs. Underdog". I can make a separate post about that because that phenomenon can sometimes get into a war-like stand-off with each side wanting to be the "winner".
Flow said:
Great, I would like to know more about that. Thank you. :)
13 Twirling Triskeles said:
Ok. I will post that Top Dog vs. Underdog information in a separate post.
OK Flow -- below is that Top Dog vs. Underdog information I promised to post.
Top Dog vs. Underdog
I found the following article which I think sums up the concept of Top Dog vs. Underdog fairly well. The quoted portion below is not the entire article — only the portion which applies to the Top Dog vs. Underdog concept.
The last part — regarding the Authentic Voice and references to Lao Tzu’s writings — are included as well, although I’m not specifically agreeing or dis-agreeing with those statements -- nor any of Nina Bingham’s interpretations or conclusions either for that matter.
I typed it out myself as I was unable to copy/paste it — so any errors, typos, etc., are my own. I have taken the liberty of breaking the text up into smaller paragraphs and changed some basic punctuation for easier reading. The link is included if you wish to read the original.
Article by Nina Bingham
June 20, 2011
Link: _http://www.booksie.com/health_and_fitness/article/nina_bingham/expressing-your-authentic-voice:-how-phony-roles-prevent-us-from-experiencing-vitality
* * *
In Gestalt Therapy, the two facets of personality seen most often are referred to as the Top Dog and the Underdog. Dr. Frederick (Fritz) S. Perls described these trouble-makers as, “The two fighting clowns,” because we can dialectically “play” both roles at different times and they both vie for control of the personality.
The Top Dog role can be described as: superior, judgmental, demanding, perfectionist, and mostly righteous, or having to be right. It’s the part of the human personality which insists his view is the right view, his religion is the only religion, and his politics are the best.
The second role we can play is the Underdog, who apologizes for her existence, second-guesses her decisions, feels insecure, tries hard to be polite and say the right thing, puts others' needs ahead of her own, and tries desperately to meet others’ expectations of her.
Dr. Perls often worked with these two polarized (opposite) expressions of the fragile Ego when facilitating therapy. Examples of the Top Dog role would be the supervisor who treats employees as if they are his possessions, with disrespect or unfairness, instead of leading by example.
He might lead with his head and seldom his heart, and as he commandeers the role of Top Dog, he forgets his humanity while playing the important supervisor, too busy to notice his employee’s struggles.
The Underdog might work for the Top Dog, and realizing her mortality, she apologizes for it. She is hyper-critical of herself, while excusing the behavior of others. She is ultra-polite, self-abasing and subservient. Her behavior expresses, “You are more important than I.”
Examples of the Underdog role are seen in the “seen and not heard” demeanor of the maid who “cleans up” after other people’s messes (mothers, wives and minorities favor this role).
Playing Top Dog or Underdog creates a psychopathological problem: we are not free to be ourselves. We are busy playing a phony role, “living up” to someone else’s expectation of us. The Top Dog supervisor wants to be a skilled leader, but doesn’t know how, so he resorts to a phony authoritarian role in discharging his duties. He “lives up” to his idea of what a boss “should be.”
Because of his pretending, he denies his potential to learn to be a real leader. He substitutes a “dummy role” for the real thing, with which he falsely bolsters his fragile sense of Ego.
This substituting what is not real for what is real is to cheat himself out of the opportunity to learn and grow. It is to cheat those around him as well.
The Underdog has been conditioned by her environment (family and culture) to, as the song says, “Take what is given (‘cause I’m working for a livin” …).” She has been taught not to hope or ask for more. She has been conditioned to show gratitude, and not to question authority, so she “keeps her head down” and tries not to make trouble.
The trouble with playing this phony role is that she denies herself the freedom of expression. While the Top Dog over-expresses his demands and wants, she under-expresses. She keeps her thoughts to herself. In playing the silent observer, the submissive, her potential is diminished. Ever so slowly, like the tide that sneaks the sand from the shore, her potential and vitality are washed out to sea.
The Three Virtues of the Authentic Voice
Lao Tzu said, “At the center of your being you have the answer; you know who you are and you know what you want.”
If this is true, if we know what we want, why can just being ourselves prove to be so challenging?
Becoming an authentic and free person is not as easy as it may sound. It requires three virtues: Openness, Teachableness, and Honesty.
Openness is the ability to consider alternatives. It is the opposite of having to be right. There is a flexibility inherent in openness; I must be willing to change my position and consider others’ opinions or alternatives.
Teachableness is the quality of eagerness to learn. To learn is to discover that something is possible (Perls). To learn is to explore, and the willingness to question our assumptions and try alternative methods.
Honesty is the undisturbed self. It is the essence of who we are; at the core of everyone is the unmolested self. This self is the self that Lao Tzu spoke of: this self knows the truth about us. This self knows what it wants, knows what it should be doing, and knows its thoughts and desires.
Of the three authentic virtues, honesty is the one which is most important to cultivate, and here is why: Without acknowledgement and expression of the undisturbed self, we have no inner compass by which to guide our lives. If we remain inhibited by denying our thoughts and desires, we will become a slave; institutionalized. We will conform and constrict our expressions to please the institutions of religion, government, society … sometimes even a partner becomes that institution.
Vitalness and Your Authentic Voice
When we stop thinking for ourselves, we stop dreaming … a moratorium is placed upon our vitalness … we are diminished. Though a certain amount of law-abiding is appropriate and necessary to live in society, to give up one’s birth-right to self-expression helps no one. There has never been another person exactly like you, nor will there be. When we consider this truism, we see clearly that each person has a responsibility to contribute in their own way that which is uniquely theirs to contribute. To say only that which has already been said is an echo, and not a voice.
End of quoted material.
And the point of all this? Just to realize that it is possible for our psyches to get into these internal little dogfights which can seemingly go on forever with no resolution — which re-emphasizes the need for a network such as this Forum which can give us feedback when we get stuck in an argumentative inner dialogue loop from which it can be difficult to extricate ourselves.
It’s not just two individuals who can play out these Top Dog vs. Underdog roles in our lives. We can internalize both these roles within our own psyches as well and become quite frustrated with ourselves and these two inner “i” voices when attempting to resolve these inner clashes.
I’ve observed this can sometimes happen while doing these Gestalt dream-work dialogues.
If we notice we’re caught up in one of these endless inner spirals, it’s probably a good idea to just stop and ask for some feedback from other Forum Members here.
At any rate, Flow, since you asked for some info regarding the Top Dog vs. Underdog concept, I hope this lengthy excerpt helps explain it satisfactorily for you.
Cheers!
[Edited to correct one punctuation error -- to delete several excess carrier returns at the end of my Reply -- and to explain my editions.]