Gold, Dollar, USA and the World: A new Global Financial System Ahead? J.D. Vance and Trump fundamentally changing the US toward Multipolarity?

Another thing I noticed about Vance:

While at times he is much better than most politicians to not appear that way he still does; He gives of the vibes of “a typical political robot“ in his speech patterns and body language for a lack of a better description. That is also something that I noticed about Tulsi, who is one of the people I was and continue to be skeptical about. Of course talking and behaving in such manners doesn’t have to mean anything, although I have to note it when I see it. What seems to stand out for me with some if not most of the people in high positions that we can be fairly certain that they are at the very least decent is that they don’t seem to exhibit such typical “political robot“ like behaviors.
 
Last post here dated Sep 20?!! And the thread name changed?

Like most, became consumed by the Kirk assassination and this is the first I've gotten back to this thread. And of course, the new session posted as well. Deciding which thread is most appropriate for which posts has gotten a bit complicated. Israel/Palestine Gaza, Ukraine/Russia, Venezuela all now in the mix! :nuts:

OK, so here's this which I assume is the best place to post it:

Judge drops bomb on Trump's Gaza deportation drive in stunning First Amendment showdown
A federal judge has ruled that Donald Trump's push to deport students and academics opposed to Israel's war in Gaza is a deliberate attack on free speech.

US District Judge William Young, a Reagan appointee, said: 'The effect of these targeted deportation proceedings continues unconstitutionally to chill freedom of speech to this day.'

The scathing 161-page ruling, which the judge described as the most significant of his career, halts an 'ideological deportation' campaign which plaintiffs argued was designed to suppress dissent on college campuses.

Young rebuked Trump personally in the fiery ruling, claiming that the president sought only 'retribution' with 'disdain' for the constitution.

Sorry, Donald - you can't EO the First Amendment or otherwise proclaim it null and void for whatever situation you deem!

It is a back and forth, and I just don't know what to make of him.
I'm hoping Vance is a for real white hat, but the verdict is still out at this point. Have to watch out for wishful thinking.

On another note, I was wondering who could possibly pick up Charlie's mantle and effectively carry it on. Serious doubts regarding Erika for that. Well, it looks like that person instead is going to be Tucker Carlson! And isn't that quite the surprise hit to the ones who took Charlie out! Doubled teamed by Tucker and Candace!! :wow:

I suppose that's not the "stranger than can be imagined" reference, but still, what a shocker!
 
On another note, I was wondering who could possibly pick up Charlie's mantle and effectively carry it on.
Don't worry. An enthusiastic and young replacement has just crawled out of the woodwork, and straight into the lime-light, with a funny-looking name at that (Brilyn Hollyhand).


That's sort of a lesson here. If you're forever goaded to follow the politics and philosophies of another, you will find yourself treading through a trail not of your own making, and you will emerge into a strange clearing of wonders re-told!

The alternative is just to go with the flow of what your heart tells you to be true (beyond the whole shock and awe spectacles, you know).
 
Notice how Vance perhaps pretty cleverly navigated the following recent question about Israel on a TPUSA event:


Also remember what I earlier said what Tucker Carlson seems to think of Vance and that Vance chose to talk to Tucker at the first Kirk show after his death. Also remember how much Kirk seemed to admire Vance and how Kirk seemed to be the primary force that enabled Vance to get where he is now in the first place.

Now notice that Tucker Carlson’s son Buckley works for Vance and how (and in which way) Vance recently decided to defend Buckley publicly (notice the Judeo-Christian inclusion in his words):

 
Last edited:
I‘m now at a point of being willing to bet on Vance being the real deal and possibly quite interesting and capable. I would really like to see what he could do as president. I also keep in mind that he alluded towards him possibly being killed in the future when he spoke about Kirk after the assassination.

He is probably in a pretty difficult situation currently which prevents him to say too much and also to appear “to go against Trump“. If he is smart, which seems to be the case, he probably already notices the shifting sentiments in America and especially in the youth and at some point he will make it more clear that “Israel first“ is a no for him, probably trying at the same time to keep Trump and Trumpers on friendly terms.
 
Back
Top Bottom