Got a mortage?

Meager1

Dagobah Resident
This is amazing!


The Defendants scheme was and continues to be a gigantic international money
laundering, âponziâ and racketeering enterprise in which Defendants and each of them as set forth herein deceived, defrauded, stole, laundered, transferred, hypothecated (collectively âponziâ enterprise) and then increased the level of theft by stealing from the United States of America and injecting into the ponzi enterprise a grand total (including monies stolen from all plaintiffs) of $43-Trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00) through the foregoing acts, through the acts set forth herein, and through supplemental acts continuing and ongoing as recently as the day prior to filing this complaint as follows (a) the deception in inducing Plaintiffs to enter into loans and mortgages and loan modification agreements and compromise agreements and other
undertakings of any and all kinds and nature, from approximately 2003 through 2009 and including the date of this First Amended Complaint, and (b) the fabrication of documentation, charges, lawsuits, investigations and other modalities against the founders of Plaintiffs counsel in this matter, lawyers throughout the United States, and any persons who were opposed to the theft of the entirety of at least 10X the United States of Americas entire money supply ($43 trillion), all pertaining to the ponzi and racketeering schemes and money laundering intentions by the defendants as follows:3.

To direct and then divert the attention of involuntary plaintiff the United States of America, and all plaintiffs in this case, against the stoppage of real estate foreclosures in America and other impending foreclosures nationwide, include through utilization of false records and documents, and to concomitantly divert their attention away from the facts that (a) Defendants and each of them had come into possession of, laundered, stolen, transferred, fraudulently conveyed, subsequently transferred, hypothecated, and secreted (collectively âstolenâ or âconvertedâ) (i) for their own personal use as set forth below and (ii) by transferring or subsequently converting the proceeds of the foregoing and other personalty into entities and
persons located in jurisdictions that lack sufficient treaties with the United States of America in the total sum of more than $43 Trillion ($43,000,000,000,000.00), and (b) Defendants and each of them â had as well stolen, converted and wrongfully utilized all personal financial
information of each person in the United States who either has a social security number or a
driverâs license (so-called persons on the âgridâ), all representing (a) some 10 (ten) times the entire money supply of the United States of America, (b) substantially all the paper money the United States of America was able to print in a non-counterfeit-setting as of the dates the money was unlawfully printed and in the total sum of at least $20 Trillion out of the entire $43 Trillion stolen.


http://archive.org/stream/Spire_Law_Federal_Complaint_2012.10/SpireLawFederalComplaintInNewYork#page/n9/mode/2up
 
Reading page 378, and comparing notes with our current paperwork!

I MUST CONCUR! THIS IS AMAZING!

THANK YOU, SOOOO MUCH FOR THIS INFO!!!

;D
 
Mortgage Info: CORELOGIC?

I have a document entitled ASSIGNMENT OF MORTGAGE

In the upper left hand corner there is Ver Batum:

Recording Requested By:
Bank of America
Prepared By: Aida Duenas
888-603-9011
When recorded mail to:
CoreLogic
490 E. Boundary St.
Attn: Release Dept.
Chapin, SC 29036

(all the caps and everything is shown as I see it in the paperwork, and typed it) Anything that you can provide is appreciated!
 
513, I merged your topic into the already existing topic on mortgage - no need to start another topic on this. Have you had a chance to read the forum guidelines yet? It's good to read them well to get a good understanding of the purpose of the forum.
 
Considering that some of the banks referred to in this particular law suit, were among those who donated 15 million to Obama`s campaign, I wouldn`t expect to much justice, in the end.

However, what is interesting is that while all these legal actions are occurring (and there are many law suits against banks presently), people are simply moving into bank owned and abandoned houses under the law of Adverse Possession.

Many home owners simply walked away and abandoned their houses through foreclosure, though all foreclosure has been frozen due to the many law suits.
People didn`t know that and just moved out. Many of these houses went to auction but didn`t sell, so the bank "bought" them back. This is called REO, or bank owned property.

Thing is, it is all illegal since the banks broke the chain of title by selling the mortgages on Wall Street as stock to hundreds of investors, who may own a portion of the house through the stock, but not the house itself, the frosting on the cake is that they destroyed the original note so it could be electronically recorded by MERS which has NO stake in the property itself, but has illegally foreclosed on numerous homeowners, regardless.

Due to such outrageous mishandling and illegal activity it has been exposed that the banks really don`t own these houses either, and not only that, but they have been paid through the mortgage insurance the actual cost of the house when they foreclosed!
Yet now through this REO deal, they own it again.. and restart the whole mortgage scam all over, on someone else!

So, it does seem as if the truth of all this could be a disaster for banks, but at the same time a rare opportunity for those who would take Adverse Possession and claim these REO houses as their own. I am not advocating this action and of course there might be risks involved like being evicted etc, but if enough people would do this, then it might be an impossible situation for the banks to deal with, due to the multiple legal problems they are already facing.

I don`t know, but it does seem like a good way for people to get even with these thief's.

Briefly; Adverse possession depends upon the intent of the occupant to claim and hold real property in opposition to all the world and the demonstration of this intention by visible and hostile possession of the land so that the owner is or should be aware that adverse claims are being made.
The legal theory underlying the vesting of title by adverse possession is that title to land must be certain. Since the owner has, by his or her own fault and neglect, failed to protect the land against the hostile actions of the adverse possessor, an adverse possessor who has treated the land as his or her own for a significant period of time is recognized as its owner.
 
Back
Top Bottom