Greenland - a geopolitical space on the global chess board?

[Nienna]

I have merged the two thread on the acquiring of Greenland.

 

[axj]

Interesting!... What you describe here is something I saw in a series called “A Murder at the End of the World,” set in 2023.

It is also the plot of the "Greenland 2" movie which just came out. It is about people surviving in a US-built doomsday underground city in Greenland, while the first movie was about getting there before large impacts destroyed almost everything on the surface of Earth.

 

[Laurentien2]

For entertainment purpose only. Here is another leaked video.

 

[sid]

I was telling the guys at work that the Ice in Greenland is pristine and rich with trace minerals. Trumps needs it for his soft drinks.

 

[Laurentien2]

The French rooster to boost the pinguin army in the defense of Greenland,

How far will Macron go to defend Greenland?

 

[Miracle]

Hard to say if the following is actually part of the real motivation for wanting to "buy" Greenland - as opposed to it being an intended distraction, for more geopolitical control, or the other reasons mentioned here - but its an interesting angle on it nonetheless:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2011059321786843212

_Greenland ‘Freedom City’? Rich donors push Trump for a tech hub up north

This interesting angle also aligns with Israel's efforts to buy up Patagonia where wealthy Israelis seem to be pushing to do something down south, close to Antarctica. As you suggest, I think that controlling key strategic resources would be the first priority for the American Empire or Greater Israel but their desire to create some sort of super-tech-super-elite city, as a secondary but parallel objective, has merit IMO.

 

[Adobe]

Speculation on: Why Greenland? (I use local AI for some of the research)

This is to speculate that TPTB are aware to some degree of the earth changes that are coming. And are planning for:

The earth's mantle to quake, shake, crack.

The oceans to become unstable due to earth's mantle movement and catastrophic storms. Not to mention piracy is back in vogue.

The seas are no longer a stable—insurable commerce route.

US land mass instability.


A few points:

To go half way around the world from the equator = a long way. Half way around the world from the arctic = shorter. (more economical)

Arctic less susceptible to hurricanes and earth-change storms, and tsunamis.

Russia has built several Nuclear Ice Breakers that not only break ice, but can become a portable generator able to supply energy for a entire town.

China belt road > mainly land, not sea.

US corridor in Azerbaijan / Armenia > land, not sea.


As the Arctic opens:

• it becomes a more stable, storm‑free corridor

• it avoids equatorial turbulence

• it shortens Asia–Europe routes

• it reduces piracy risk

• it bypasses all major choke-points


Present day choke points:

Top 8 Maritime Choke-points

1. Strait of Malacca

2. Strait of Hormuz

3. Bab el‑Mandeb

4. Suez Canal

5. Panama Canal

6. Strait of Gibraltar

7. Turkish Straits (Bosporus & Dardanelles)

8. Cape of Good Hope


If commerce is taken through the arctic where is the new choke point? GIUK Gap > Greenland.

The waters between Greenland → Iceland → UK form a natural funnel.

If a submarine or surface fleet leaves Russia’s northern bases (Murmansk, Kola Peninsula), it must pass through this gap to reach:

• the Atlantic
• North America
• Europe
• global shipping lanes

There is no alternate deep‑water route.
This is what makes it a true choke point.

Control of the GIUK Gap = control of the North Atlantic.

Also, "IF" TPTB are speculating on the prophecies of Edgar Cayce, and their own science about the destruction coming to the US (quakes and such) then an elite dooms-day city sounds right too.

 

[Persej]

We have subsidized Denmark, and all of the Countries of the European Union, and others, for many years by not charging them Tariffs, or any other forms of remuneration. Now, after Centuries, it is time for Denmark to give back — World Peace is at stake! China and Russia want Greenland, and there is not a thing that Denmark can do about it. They currently have two dogsleds as protection, one added recently. Only the United States of America, under PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, can play in this game, and very successfully, at that! Nobody will touch this sacred piece of Land, especially since the National Security of the United States, and the World at large, is at stake. On top of everything else, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland have journeyed to Greenland, for purposes unknown. This is a very dangerous situation for the Safety, Security, and Survival of our Planet. These Countries, who are playing this very dangerous game, have put a level of risk in play that is not tenable or sustainable. Therefore, it is imperative that, in order to protect Global Peace and Security, strong measures be taken so that this potentially perilous situation end quickly, and without question. Starting on February 1st, 2026, all of the above mentioned Countries (Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, The United Kingdom, The Netherlands, and Finland), will be charged a 10% Tariff on any and all goods sent to the United States of America. On June 1st, 2026, the Tariff will be increased to 25%. This Tariff will be due and payable until such time as a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.

The United States has been trying to do this transaction for over 150 years. Many Presidents have tried, and for good reason, but Denmark has always refused. Now, because of The Golden Dome, and Modern Day Weapons Systems, both Offensive and Defensive, the need to ACQUIRE is especially important. Hundreds of Billions of Dollars are currently being spent on Security Programs having to do with “The Dome,” including for the possible protection of Canada, and this very brilliant, but highly complex system can only work at its maximum potential and efficiency, because of angles, metes, and bounds, if this Land is included in it. The United States of America is immediately open to negotiation with Denmark and/or any of these Countries that have put so much at risk, despite all that we have done for them, including maximum protection, over so many decades. Thank you for your attention to this matter!

DONALD J. TRUMP
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115911344443637897

This is gonna be fun.

 

[SOTTREADER]

I saw Trump was threatening his beloved European allies with tariffs for not being willing to give up Greenland.

Can I check something - does the US president have the constitutional power to add a new state to the US? Presumably Greenland would need to be integrated into the US, or is the idea for it to just be an occupied territory?

Trump is acting more and more like an Emperor with each passing day.

 

[SOTTREADER]

Maybe the elites have already decided Greenland needs to be given to the US and Denmark is OK with that, and what we are seeing is just theatre for the masses?

 

[Andrian]

Hard to say if the following is actually part of the real motivation for wanting to "buy" Greenland - as opposed to it being an intended distraction, for more geopolitical control, or the other reasons mentioned here - but its an interesting angle on it nonetheless:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2011059321786843212

_Greenland ‘Freedom City’? Rich donors push Trump for a tech hub up north

I had a similar thought recently, why now? Why the US is meddling with the internal politics in Venezuela, why are they looking at Greenland as the future 51st US state? Is it for geopolitical reasons only, due to the inevitable uprising of a multipolar world? Or is it due to something else, that is, as a preparation for upcoming worldwide events and changes the C's are mentioning for the last 30 years?

Maybe the elites have already decided Greenland needs to be given to the US and Denmark is OK with that, and what we are seeing is just theatre for the masses?

It could be.

 

[Laurentien2]

The idea of acquiring Greenland was introduced to Trump in 2019 by a certain "Ronald Lauder". His wikipedia page says lots of interesting things. In any case, its not for the average american peasantry.

And as far as I can remember, the Biden administration never mentioned any thing about annexing Greenland. If it was for national security, the agenda would have been passed to the next administration, I think, so for me it look more like a land grab for the natural resource potential and exploitation . Like the C's said, it is all about the economy.
It sure seem to have awaken the political center of Europe anyway as now they are ready to reopen dialogue with Russia. Is this cause and effect, maybe to early to say, but wouldn't it be funny that peace in Ukraine come from all of this.

The EU has made a huge about-turn on Russia – did you notice?​

The EU has made a huge about-turn on Russia – did you notice?

 

[Nachtweide]

Perhaps a different perspective. Last night, I watched the movie “Greenland 1,” and part 2 had just premiered. Although the movie is pretty average, it got me thinking. Plot: While a comet is on a collision course with Earth, global chaos breaks out. Time is running out, but one family fights bitterly for survival. In the end, they save themselves in a large bunker complex in the ice of Greenland.
Now came my fiction: Greenland could be a refuge with huge bunkers that could be used by Europe and the US in the event of a disaster. What if Trump claimed it for his country—perhaps mineral resources or shipping routes are not the reason, but rather an unknown danger coming from the sky. Strangely enough, the main character is called Gerard Butler—the same name as the place where Trump was shot. Is this the universe speaking?

Just my 2 cents...

 

[Kika]

Trump is acting more and more like an Emperor with each passing day.

Well, that's not a surprise. PTB predicted it and showed us back in 2017, 2017 Economist Cover.

The second picture in a row. Here I was playing tarot fortune teller and now that I read what I wrote, I wasn't very wrong.

Second card - "The Difficult Path"
"The Difficult Path" position gives insights into those forces that oppose the "Quester" (position 1). What forces or individuals stand in the way? Or, what qualities are currently lacking?

Judgment
This card shows the Trump sitting; in a black suit, black tie (black in Tarot = end, ending, night, darkness, sadness, death, corresponding to Saturn and Pluto), in the pose of an absolute ruler / King (holding symbols the reign). The background is yellow (yellow = color of concentration and intelligence, spirituality, worship, awakening, religion, divine love; refers to the sun and gold.)
Sit on the globe (Earth), the American flag, which extends / covers the location where it should be Europe / Middle East. I guess that shows the influence of the United States in this part of the world. The flag is not flying in the breeze. There are no ideals, not ideology. The message is clear. The United States and the rest of the world (which is influenced by the United States) will be in the service of Trump's ass (read: in favor of his personal gain and economic benefits).

Tarot:
Judgment is card: drastic changes, layoffs and reviews the past.
It says that our current phase of life come to an end. Now is the time to objectively look at what has come before. How we make it? Where did we go wrong? What valuable lessons have we learned?
This card symbolizes: a rite of passage (initiation), maturation, transition, judgment / consideration, reconstruction, human adventure, reincarnation after death, rebirth and awakening; world knowledge; awakening of universality, re-connect; the cult of the dead .... The Court suggests you a period of self-assessment, going into his own deficiencies and quality. Be sure that you are nearing a moment of life in which you reach the most important point in their life times, eventually you will feel that all the pieces of your life arranged exactly as you want. This card alerts you to the fact that you have to shake the feeling of guilt that accompanies you to give people a second chance (which you have so far been reluctant).

Message:
Do not dispute Trump's status president.
It should reconsider the initial opinion / judgment regarding Trump (from the perspective of economists = bankers, entrepreneurs, investors ....) And find opportunities for cooperation (common interests). He is a "player of our team."

 

[Miracle]

Maybe the elites have already decided Greenland needs to be given to the US and Denmark is OK with that, and what we are seeing is just theatre for the masses?

IMO, it is undoubtably primarily theatre, but not entirely. Kit Knightly put it in much better words than I ever could:

The New Year has dawned on a world bursting into chaos.

But is it genuine chaos? Or contrived chaos?

Regular readers know I would tend towards the latter. Fundamentally, I cannot reconcile the two worlds with which we are presented.

On the one hand, we have a set of nation-states wholly in concert on almost all the broader issues. They all work together to promote pandemics and climate catastrophes; they synchronise in passing near-identical legislation to tackle the same non-existent or heavily exaggerated problems.

They all have central banks "printing" fake money, they all have so-called "free-market" capitalism (in reality, a construct of state-protected monopolies that siphon public money into the private sector).

They all agree to pretend that Covid is a thing and the vaccines are safe and the climate is changing and the internet will be nothing but snuff films and child pornography if they don't put a digital surveillance chip in everyone's brain as soon as possible

Central bank digital currency, digital identity, genetically modified food...All of this is resolved supranational policy.

They tell the same lies to serve the same ends. They are all the same.

And yet, on the other hand, we're told they cannot work out a single territorial or political conflict or disagreement in anything but the most crude, base or violent ways.

Nowhere is the clash of apparent cooperation vs reported conflict more apparent than nuclear war - or rather the lack thereof. India and Pakistan went to war (briefly). Both reportedly have nukes, neither used them. The US is seizing Russian tankers in the Caribbean and the UK is considering putting British troops on the ground in Ukraine.

Is anyone talking about Nuclear war? What happened to Mutually Assured Destruction? When did that stop being a consideration?

The only explanation I can think of is that there is an agreement - either tacit or explicit - that these conflicts will be allowed to go so far and no further.

And that makes them fake. Unquestionably, irrefutably, fake.

If you can agree not to have a nuclear war, you can agree not to have a war at all. Any war you end up having, logically speaking, is a war both sides want to happen.

Although I would add a few caveats to the above as I view it to be overly simplistic. One, Russia seems to be genuinely leading the resistance against the, "resolved supranational policy". Two, Israel is completely psychopathic and seems to be hardly containable by any public or backroom agreements, and thus, might start a nuclear exchange with Iran through their hubris. So while it would appear that there is indeed a high degree of compliance among all countries with the, "resolved supranational policy", it is not total.

As to why this theater and, "resolved supranational policy" is "needed", I think we need to look no further than imminent earth changes as several members have previously mentioned:

As for potential clues, the below excerpt came to mind. This is from the May 2020 session, or just a few months after Covid-19 hit the news and not long after lockdowns began:

Q: (L) Alright. So, we didn't have a session in April because I swear... It was just too fascinating to watch what was going on in the world. Just unbelievable! To watch people going completely insane and... And the lies! Oh my god, the LIES! It's like we are swimming in a sea of lies. All the media, all the governing bodies... I don't think there are any exceptions for any of them. We used to - and possibly still do - admire Putin and Russia, but he's joined the whole gang, too. There are just very few that have not been completely taken in by the lies. It's been a roller coaster of a month.

A: Indeed, but it will get even more interesting before it is all over.

Q: (Artemis) "Over" as in the planet explodes, or what kind of "over" do you mean here?

A: Weather will play a more prominent role next.

Q: (L) So, it's going to be weather playing a more prominent role... What about a second wave of coronavirus in the fall? Is that a problem?

A: Not really, though what does come may be called by that name!

Q: (L) So there could be some other thing that comes as a wave of infection and they'll call it...

(Andromeda) ...the second wave of corona...

(L) But it will be something else. Is that it?

A: Yes

Q: (Artemis) Full on plague or something?

A: Not yet!

Q: (L) Not yet! [laughter]

(Artemis) Covid 1, Covid 2, Covid 3, the Return of Covid... [laughter]

(Joe) Son of Covid.

(Niall) Covid Strikes Back! [laughter]

(L) Covid: The Prequel

(Artemis) Covid: Origins [laughter]

Remember, "We do not need the celestial threat to disguise Cold War intentions; rather we nee the Cold War to disguise celestial intentions"! If we're at the point where one in a trillion events such as a meteor hitting a plane are occurring and the West is, "Very likely preparing for a new large scale European war" I think it is a good guess that, "strange weather and war as a cover up" is what is next on the menu.