i know from personal experience that it’s as good as impossible to make someone look into information which they are not ready to look into. i’m aware that i can’t possibly prevent anyone from hurting themselves if they refuse to consider a given material out of their free will, and i just want to make clear that i fully respect other people’s choices in that regard and that if my appeals to reconsider the “andrew cutler ban” are unwelcome here, i will cease to continue in that vein.
i just hope that not too many people get hurt before they start looking into other chelation methods or that the damage incurred will be reversible. something that andrew cutler says cannot be taken for granted.
but maybe there would be value in discussing why some things, like finding the most efficient and safest way to restore one’s health and share that information with other people might be indeed worth a lot of trouble; including giving people who seem to know an awful lot about such health restoring protocols like andrew cutler, the benefit of the doubt, instead of dismissing him and his research based on a loosely and erroneously thrown out judgment of his person; which would be in direct opposition to RedFox’s original proposal that those things “simply aren't worth the trouble”.
if contributing to distributing freely available information which has proven to help restore people’s health and end a lot of suffering isn’t “worth the trouble”, then what is?
gaby:
given that you have read andrew cutler’s book it seems like you would be perfectly suited to discuss his theories and lay out why and how one can dismiss his protocol and why other protocols might be better.
as to diet and mercury poisoning:
i was on the ketogenic diet for over 1 year (mostly after having read many articles posted on sott.net together with the cassiopaean transcripts which seemed to point towards the potentially metaphysical and genetic benefits of such diet).
prior to that i had been on a gradually more low carb paleo diet for 3 years.
prior to that i underwent 1 year of ozone therapy including self-administered ozone IVs. ozone, being a potent antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, and anticancer agent, is the most potent detoxifier and immune booster known to medicine.
prior to that i did a water fast for 28 days. in total i didn’t have solid food for ca. 35+ days (i stopped counting the days from the 35th day on).
all those diets and procedures were not able to restore my health. on the contrary, i seemed to get worse on the ketogenic diet.
inspite of all those efforts i was still suffering from periodic debilitating fatigue, emotional and cognitive impairments.
symptoms which all those modalities and diets could not touch, and which only started improving once i started chelating with the andrew cutler approach.
although many people unquestionably draw definite health benefits from the ketogenic diet, i see some people who suffer profoundly for months or years and not only do the promised health benefits not materialize for them, but they seem to become more susceptible to infections and their health seems to deteriorate - just like in my case.
is it possible that, given that mercury is able to impair the human metabolism, that is the reason why some people do not seem to respond to the ketogenic diet as science would dictate? and that in order to be able to reap the ketogenic diet’s benefits one first needs to rid one's body of one of the most toxic compounds in existence?
gaby, you claim that what is being observed in health changes among the forum members regarding the ketogenic diet is “based on solid science and research”. can you quote the science or clinical observations which show or prove that the ketogenic diet can protect from ebola like viruses or other “black death” like infections? can you show research or clinical observations which show that the ketogenic diet can permanently protect the body from mercury induced damage? can you cite the research which explains why the fixing of the mtDNA would result in months or even years of debilitating fatigue, insomnia, increased mucus formation, shortness of breath, coughing, debilitating headaches, recurring infections, either diarrhea or constipation - which many people experience during the fat based diet?
based on what scientific research or clinical observation can you fully dismiss that those who have a hard time adapting to the ketogenic diet are not still mercury toxic? and that the suffering they are experiencing while seemingly not being able to keto-adapt is not due to mercury impairing, among others, their mtDNA? and that, instead of having removed any significant amount of mercury from their systems as the DAN! protocol promised, they have just moved it around in their body and are therefor not able to heal their DNA and are suffering continuously while unsuccessfully attempting to?