Assuming that is really a brain scan from Killary (which we can't verify I think) it almost looks like, if it is true that the spot shows a damage or degeneration of brain tissue, that it is located somewhere arround the frontal lobes.
When you look at the picture:
and compare it with the parts of the brain and their functions, it appears as if it is located somewhere around where I put the yellow circles:
So it looks to me (layman perspective) that the area is likely located somwhere in the Frontal Lobe (13), the Broca's area (4), Olfactory Area (8), Emotional Area (6), Association Area (2), or Cerebral Cortex (12). Or between some of those.
If you look at the left of the last picture, you can see the functions of those areas:
Frontal Lobe (13):
Higher Mental Function;
-Concentration
-Planning
-Judgment
-Emotional Expression
-Creativity
-Inhibition
Broca's area (4):
-Muscles of speech
Olfactory Area (8):
-Smelling
Emotional Area (6):
-Pain
-Hunger
-"Fight or flight" response
Association Area (2):
-Short term-memory
-Equilibrium
-Emotion
Cerebral Cortex (12):
Motor Function Area;
-Eye movenment and oriantation
So judging from the picture, for me it seems like the frontal lobe (13) is the most likely area and/or the Broca's area (4), Association Area (2) , Olfactory Area (8) and/or the Cerebral Cortex (12).
If you look at their functions, it seems to fit of what we have heard about Hillarys problems recently and seen from her over the years.
Lobaczewski wrote about frontal characteropathy (which seems to be located somwhere around in the area from the brain scan):
The most active cases, in terms of ponerological activity (and here we do no necessarily mean overt criminal behavior, though that can also play a part even ifundetected) appeared in my cases to be the frontal characteropathy. (I believe that characteropathies are often referred to in the West as “personality disorders”.)
The damage of the centers 10 A and B is predominantly caused in newborns as a result of neonatal hypoxia or various diseases that are common at that crucial age. The pathological features are not noticeable in pre-school children. However, the problems augment throughout the life until, usually, after the age of fifty, there is a severe ponerogenic personality. A good and typical example is Stalin [...]
Further he writes about frontal characteropathy:
Frontal characteropathy: The frontal areas of the cerebral cortex (10A and B acc. to the Brodmann division) are virtually present in no creature except man; they are composed of the phylogenetically youngest nervous tissue. Their cytoarchitecture is similar to the much older visual projection areas on the opposite pole of the brain. This suggests some functional similarity. The author has found a relatively easy way to test this psychological function, which enables us to grasp a certain number of imaginary elements in our field of consciousness and subject them to internal contemplation. The capacity of this act of internal projection varies greatly from one person to another, manifesting a statistical correlation with similar variegation in the anatomical extent of such areas. The correlation between this capacity and general intelligence is much lower.
As described by researchers (Luria et al.), the functions of these areas, thought-process acceleration and coordination, seem to result from this basic function. Damage to this area occurred rather frequently: at or near birth, especially for premature infants, and later in life as a result of various causes. The number of such perinatal brain tissue lesions has been significantly reduced due to improved medical care for pregnant women and newborns. The spectacular ponerogenic role which results from character disorders caused by this can thus be considered somewhat characteristic of past generations and primitive cultures.
Brain cortex damage in these areas selectively impairs the above mentioned function without impairing memory, associative capacity, or, in particular, such instinct-based feelings and functions as, for instance, the ability to intuit a psychological situation. The general intelligence of an individual is thus not greatly reduced. Children with such a defect are almost normal students; difficulties emerge suddenly in upper grades and affect principally these parts of the curriculum which place burden on the above function.
The pathological character of such people, generally containing a component of hysteria, develops through the years. The non-damaged psychological functions become overdeveloped to compensate, which means that instinctive and affective reactions predominate. Relatively vital people become belligerent, risk-happy, and brutal in both word and deed.
Persons with an innate talent for intuiting psychological situations tend to take advantage of this gift in an egotistical and ruthless fashion. In the thought process of such people, a short cut way develops which bypasses the handicapped function, thus leading from associations directly to words, deeds, and decisions which are not subject to any dissuasion. Such individuals interpret their talent for intuiting situations and making split second oversimplified decisions as a sign of their superiority compared to normal people, who need to think for long time, experiencing self-doubt and conflicting motivations. The fate of such creatures does not deserve to be pondered long.
Such “Stalinistic characters” traumatize and actively spellbind others, and their influence finds it exceptionally easy to bypass the controls of common sense. A large proportion of people tend to credit such individuals with special powers, thereby succumbing to their egotistic beliefs. If a parent manifests such a defect, no matter how minimal, all the children in the family evidence anomalies in personality development.
Lobaczewski mentions the Brodmann division and that the locations 10A and B acc. are associated with frontal characteropathy.
Here is a full list of the Brodmann division:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brodmann_area#Brodmann_areas_for_humans_and_other_primates
When you click "10" you see in which part of the brain that is located (could be were the brain damage is on the brain scan). You can also click on the other parts that could be damaged (described above with the yellow circles).
So the brain scan seems to fit with we know so far about Killary.
So if the reports about Killary are true and the brain scan as well and we combine it with our observastions of her over the years , I think it could be that Killary is some kind of characteropath, maybe mixed with other traits. Which would mean (and also fits with what Lobaczewski wrote) that she is just the front person and behind her the real psychopaths and/or essential Psychopaths pull the strings. As I understand it, essential psychopaths and other such types prefer to stay in the backround to control and direct things.
