Home to alter as you please

[Alada]

Of course that cuts both ways, if 4th density feeds more on the psychic energies that are produced by various beings rather than physical sustenance as we understand it, then you could also turn into some type of scary dragon thing with big claws and "play" with your food a bit before you consume it if that is the type of energy you eat.

On a side note thinking along those lines, I guess it would take a certain amount of energy to begin with for 4d sts critters to hook into our realm in order to attach and feed. So, thoughts go then to the importance of applying Will and discipline to everything we do. If we are constantly being fed upon and yet that requires energy to be invested by 4d sts in order to establish the hookup into 3d, then making that connection ever more 'expensive' to maintain through discipline and consistency would make it not a worthwhile if it costs more energy to stay connected than they get in return if we learn to make ourselves unpalatable.

 

[Neil]

I view technology as a crutch at best and as a "cheat" at worst. I saw Laura's idea about processes being no more than 50% automated brought up again in Pierre's article about creating a new world. STS tends to rely on technology as a short cut to more power so that they can fulfill their archetypal desire to go back to sleep. We don't know much about STO technology, Laura has hypothesized that the circle people/megalith builders preserved some vestiges of STO technology. If it is true that Stonehenge functioned as a gateway to some kind of cosmic internet, look at how much simpler and elegant it is compared to the electronic internet, which still doesn't even match the capabilities. The catch was that you had to have a certain quality of mind in order to tune into it, while our internet can be used by any old bloke with a minimum of intelligence.

To build Stonehenge you needed a rock quarry and then could apparently just "sing" the stones into place. To build the internet you need large strip mines to gather rare earths and copper, which requires big equipment which requires fossil fuels to run, which must be refined or assembled in other factories. All of this stuff is transported by trucks which require more mining and fuel just to maintain the roads. Then after you have shipped the refined goods to an assembly plant, it must be run through an automated production line, because most of the components are too small to be built by human hands, which requires more energy and strip mining to build the robots. Finally after the computer is built, it is loaded with coding that almost no one understands, and shipped to a distributor. All of these processes require a certain degree of urban development and generate a rather substantial amount of pollution.

While it is much easier for the end user to use a computer, we have outsourced our consciousness to machines and created this entropic environment to compensate for our laziness. The amount of work must balance. The more that is delegated to mechanization, the more resources they consume and the weaker human minds become, until at some point the machines enslave you and destroy everything. If there ever is some kind of cosmic pulse that fries all of the electronics, all of human power will evaporate in the blink of an eye because it is reliant on external objects.

Let's look at another example, telepathy. It appears that some people and many other types of beings have this capability naturally, it is part of their own mind and exists because of their will, discipline, and genetics. We could try to strengthen the mind, which really only requires knowledge, being, and proper nutrition, or we could just implant everyone's brain with a Wi-Fi antenna that is always connected to the internet and be done with it. No discipline, no work, just a transhumanist upgrade. You are pretty much defenseless if someone is broadcasting mind control signals into the network, not to mention the side effects of Wi-Fi radiation, but hey it sounds like a great shortcut on the surface.

I believe that all technology can eventually be replaced by mentalism, or psychism, however that is probably at a level higher than 4D. It would be interesting to see how much an STO civilization relies on technology, I believe the Cassiopaeans were asked this once and they didn't want to tell us because we had to find out for ourselves. My personal opinion is that it plays sort of an ancillary support role, until it is no longer needed. I think that 4D STO has an easier time modifying their physicality because they have a greater well of creative energy to draw from. With enough creativity, anything can be manifested. STS has a much narrower focus and has to rely on vast hierarchical schemes to concentrate energy to try and force the universe to do it for them. I think the goal is to eliminate the need for machines, but in moving from STS to STO, they can be used as a crutch if used responsibly.

I remember Ra saying something about beings that could teleport across the universe by concentrating on it without the use of technology. As I recall the ability was much higher in STO than STS. I'll see if I can find the passage when I get back home.

 

[BHelmet]

First, thanks for all the replies! Good food for thought. I think I have been looking at the idea of altering physicality in terms of the total environment and not just my personal physicality as Avala and Alada mentioned.

And as Ruth said - right, I am conjecturing on a potential state of existence I have no current real experience of. (but no, not wishful thinking - I am looking for what I am not seeing by asking, otherwise I would 'think' I have it figured out and not ask anything!)

I guess, in questioning this, I am leery of the trap of creating a subjective bubble. And Joe, yeah - the idea that you don't get to 'play with the toys' until you demonstrate a certain degree of wisdom and responsibility is a good one. (although 4D STS certainly has no trouble playing with the toys or the sand in the box) OR rather, STO plays with the sand and the toys in a different manner and that is what we are trying to learn. As far as where I got the STS-ishness: it is from the limiting thought that 'as I please' automatically means to please myself which is what sounds STS to me, but I can see now that this is not necessarily so. I could please myself by operating in an STO manner, as well.

So, again, thanks! I actually feel better about this - perhaps the splinter is out and now I just need to put some peroxide and a band-aid on it.

 

[bjorb]

[quote author=BHelmet]So, this idea that the variable physicality of 4th density will be a home to "alter as you please"...sounds...well...STS-ish to me.[/quote]

It depends on the intent. If it is for pleasure for the self. Its STS. But that’s not how STO would spend its ''time''

Like the C’ said:

Q: (L) How do you spend your 'time?'
A: Teaching, sharing, assisting.
Q: (L) What do you do for fun?
A: That is fun!
Q: (PZ) With each other?
A: No.
Q: (PZ) With who?
A: Densities 1,2,3,4,5.

A: Want is an STS concept.
Q: So, you seem to be suggesting that the real trick is to just become non-attached to anything and anybody, do nothing, and just dissolve into nothing? No thought, no want, no do, no be, no anything!
A: If you are STS, that does not fit, but, if you did exactly that, you would reincarnate in an STO realm, where such energy does fit.

Doing nothing for pleasure for the self that is. Only spending your 'time' teaching, sharing, assisting.

 

[Neil]

Here's the session I was thinking of, for what it's worth.

Ra: I am Ra. I greet you in the love and in the light of the one infinite Creator. We communicate now.
Questioner: In the previous session you stated: “The other type of experience is the fourth, fifth, and sixth densities of other galaxies and some within your own galaxy which have learned necessary disciplines of personality to view the universe as one being are able to proceed from locus to locus by thought alone, materializing the necessary craft.” I would like to ask you when you say fourth, fifth, and sixth densities of other galaxies,some within your own galaxy, are you stating here that more of the entities in other galaxies have developed the abilities of personality than have those in this galaxy for this type of travel? I am using the term galaxy with respect to the lenticular shape of billions of stars.

Ra: I am Ra. We have once again used a meaning for this term, galaxy, that does not lie within your vocabulary at this time, if you will call it so. We referred to your star system.It is incorrect to assume that other star systems are more able to manipulate the dimensions than your own. It is merely that there are many other systems besides your own.

Questioner: Thank you. I think that possibly I am on an important point here because it seems to me that the great work in evolution is the discipline of personality, and it seems that we have two types of entities moving around the universe, one stemming from disciplines of personality, and the other stemming from what you call the slingshot effect. I won’t even get into the sub-light speeds because I don’t consider that too important. I only consider this material important because of the fact that we are considering disciplines of the personality.
Is the use of the slingshot effect for travel what you might call an intellectual or a left brain type of involvement of understanding rather than a right brain type?

Ra: I am Ra. Your perception on this point is extensive. You penetrate the outer teaching. We prefer not to utilize the terminology of right and left brain due to the inaccuracies of this terminology. Some functions are repetitive or redundant in both lobes, and further, to some entities the functions of the right and left are reversed. However, the heart of the query is worth some consideration. The technology of which you, as a social complex, are so enamored at this time is but the birthing of the manipulation of the intelligent energy of the sub-Logos which, when carried much further, may evolve into technology capable of using the gravitic effects of which we spoke. We note that this term is not accurate but there is no closer term. Therefore, the use of technology to manipulate that outside the self is far,far less of an aid to personal evolution than the disciplines of the mind/body/spirit complex resulting in the whole knowledge of the self in the microcosm and macrocosm.To the disciplined entity, all things are open and free. The discipline which opens the universes opens also the gateways to evolution. The difference is that of choosing either to hitchhike to a place where beauty may be seen or to walk, step by step, independent and free in this independence to praise the strength to walk and the opportunity for the awareness of beauty. The hitchhiker, instead, is distracted by conversation and the vagaries of the
road and, dependent upon the whims of others, is concerned to make the appointment in time. The hitchhiker sees the same beauty but has not prepared itself for the establishment, in the roots of mind, of the experience.

Questioner: I would ask this question in order to understand the mental disciplines and how they evolve. Does fourth, fifth, and sixth-density positive or service-to-others orientation of social memory complexes use both the slingshot and the personality disciplines type of effect for travel or do they use only one?

Ra: I am Ra. The positively oriented social memory complex will be attempting to learn the disciplines of mind, body, and spirit. However, there are some which, having the technology available to use intelligent energy forces to accomplish travel, do so while learning the more appropriate disciplines.

Questioner: Then I am assuming that in the more positively oriented social memory complexes a much higher percentage of them use the personality
disciplines for this travel. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. As positive fifth-density moves into sixth there are virtually no entities which any longer use outer technology for travel or communication.

Questioner: Could you give me the same information on the negatively oriented social memory complexes as to the ratios and as to how they use the slingshot effect or the disciplines of the personality for travel?

Ra: I am Ra. The fourth-density negative uses the slingshot gravitic light effect, perhaps 80% of its membership being unable to master the disciplines necessary for alternate methods of travel. In fifth-density negative approximately 50% at some point gain the necessary discipline to use thought to accomplish travel. As the sixth-density approaches, the negative orientation is thrown into confusion and little travel is attempted. What travel is done is perhaps 73% of light/thought.

Questioner: Is there any difference close to the end of fifth-density in the disciplines of personality between positive and negative orientation?

Ra: I am Ra. There are patent differences between the polarities but no difference whatsoever in the completion of the knowledge of the self necessary to accomplish this discipline.

Questioner: Am I correct, then, in assuming that discipline of the personality, knowledge of self, and control in strengthening of the will would be what any fifth-density entity would see as those things of
importance?

Ra: I am Ra. In actuality these things are of importance in third through early seventh densities. The only correction in nuance that we would make is your use of the word, control. It is paramount that it be understood that it is not desirable or helpful to the growth of the understanding, may we say, of an entity by itself to control thought processes or impulses except where they may result in actions not consonant with the Law of One. Control may seem to be a short-cut to discipline, peace, and illumination. However, this very control potentiates and necessitates the further incarnative experience in order to balance this control or repression of that self which is perfect. Instead, we appreciate and recommend the use of your second verb in regard to the use of the will. Acceptance of self, forgiveness of self, and the direction of the will; this is the path towards the disciplined personality. Your faculty of will is that which is powerful within you as co-Creator. You cannot ascribe to this faculty too much importance. Thus it must be carefully used and directed in service-to-others for those upon the positively oriented path. There is great danger in the use of the will as the personality becomes stronger, for it may be used even subconsciously in ways reducing the polarity of the entity.

Questioner: Thank you. Just as something that I am a little inquisitive about, but which is not of much importance, I would like to make a statement which I intuitively hunch. I may be wrong. You were speaking of the slingshot effect and that term has puzzled me. The only thing that I can see is that you must put energy into a craft until it approaches the velocity of light and this of course requires more and more energy. The time dilation occurs and it seems to me that it would be possible to, by moving at 90° to the direction of travel, somehow change this stored energy in its application of direction or sense so that you move out of space/time into time/space with a 90° deflection. Then the energy would be taken out in time/space and you would re-enter space/time at the end of this energy burst. Am I in any way correct on this?

Ra: I am Ra. You are quite correct as far as your language may take you and, due to your training, more able than we to express the concept. Our only correction, if you will, would be to suggest that the 90° of which you speak are an angle which may best be understood as a portion of a tesseract.

 

[latulipenoire]

I don't really understand why the idea of altering something as you please is STS....even ish! I mean, is it STS for a child to alter the sand in a sandbox, when the sand has been put there specifically for the purpose of alteration? Accessing objective reality does not mean doing nothing, or non interaction. What it means is understanding the basic polarities of reality, your own nature and emotions and thoughts and how you interact with reality. It also means having chosen, to a significant degree, a polarity with which you align. That choice, along with having mastered your own nature to an adequate level, is enough for you to be "eligible" to interact with reality in a more direct and consciously interactive way.

There's a comment from the Ra channel that speaks to this directly, but I can't find it right now. Maybe someone else knows the one I'm referring to.

I had similar thoughts - I don't see anything wrong with "altering" or "manipulating" physical reality, although of course we can't grasp what that means exactly. But we do know how we can "alter reality" here in 3D - by choosing and acting based on these choices! Which of course can lean more towards STS or STO.

I imagine that if it is possible to alter reality at will, a 4D STO being would do these things based on a clear assessment, understanding and thorough networking. He/she wouldn't just mess with stuff for pleasure. I even imagine that such a being would at times deliberately put/alter himself into dangerous trouble, STO-kamikaze-style, if it serves a specific purpose or if this is what is needed to learn a specific lesson - the very opposite of creating a fancy fantasy world for him/herself. There are probably a million things such a powerful STO being could engage in to serve others.

I guess STS beings, on the other hand, will try to create their fantasy kingdoms where they rule supreme and can feast on everything they wish by exploiting others. In fact, our world could very well be such a STS fantasy land

It's very interesting, IMO, to imagine how much a being can access of its reality depending on its polarity and intent. As others have said, a STO perspective on 4th density must be very different from a STS one, starting with the choice to either see things as they are or trying forever to just see what you want to see. The plant beings discussed on the last session show clearly this, I guess, as they utilized their abilities (technology) to alter reality without caring for the consequences of their actions, causing pain and harm to others.

Imagine wanting to soar to the top of that mountain; wings appear and you do it. Imagine you want to swim in the supercritical waters of a mini-Neptune class planet to observe the bioluminescent whale-birds that live there; you can morph into something which can tolerate that environment. Imagine you want to commune with the trees to see what they're saying about the planet you live on and how it should be improved, you project your consciousness into some kind of energy lattice that can connect with all the trees in the world and decode their impressions. The universe is yours to explore without the limitations of physicality to hold you back. There is nothing inherently STS about it. Of course that cuts both ways, if 4th density feeds more on the psychic energies that are produced by various beings rather than physical sustenance as we understand it, then you could also turn into some type of scary dragon thing with big claws and "play" with your food a bit before you consume it if that is the type of energy you eat.

The 3D body is woefully limited in what it can do, the only advantage you have over 2D is a bigger processor which allows you a bit more control over it. I've often thought about how close 2D physicality and 3D physicality really is, and in a physical sense I'm really nothing more than a chimp with a bigger brain.

Most people have fantasized over what it would be like to soar like a bird or swim in the deep oceans, but we can only approximate these things for brief periods of time through the use of expensive technology. It's not really much fun. The Cassiopaeans seem to be saying that in 4D these limitations are removed and you can have the best of both worlds, therefore physicality is your home instead of the prison it is for me. From a 3D perspective all of this is just a childish flight of fancy, but from a 4D perspective it is a possibility. That's what I got out of it.

Thanks Neil, for sharing your impressions on 4D so vividly! Liked the dragon...

 

[mkrnhr]

I think the most overlooked aspect from the first quote is "...4th density reality where physicality is no longer a prison...".
One can approach the issue by defining what medium the lessons in 3D are experienced through: physicality. From 1D to 3D consciousness deals with matter, and as such, deals with the limitations of the material realm. Even in 3D, a great part of the struggles, mental and emotional, are expressed through material manifestation. Thought for instance is immaterial in essence, but it is nevertheless canalized through the brain. The same can be said about emotions, and that why the Work proceeds through all the different aspects of the individual, including the body (diet, hygiene, detox, etc.), because everything is interdependent. Now, if one aspect of 4D existence is variable materiality, it means that the lessons (ans struggles) in that density are less dependent upon physicality. One could say "matter? that so 3D!". As for STS and STO, as usual it depends upon the energy exchange, the why, the how, and the to whom, of the things one eventually does. One always keeps in mind the law of three to avoid the pitfall of black and white thinking. OSIT.

 

[Neil]

This is the closest thing I could find addressing Joe's post on my pass through the book.

Questioner: You gave the values of better than 50% service-to-others for fourth-density positive and better than 95% service-to-self for fourth-density negative social memory complexes. Do these two values correspond to the same rate, shall I say, of vibration?

Ra: I am Ra. I perceive you have difficulty in expressing your query. We shall respond in an attempt to clarify your query. The vibratory rates are not to be understood as the same in positive and negative orientations. They are to be understood as having the power to accept and work with intelligent infinity to a certain degree or intensity. Due to the fact that the primary color, shall we say, or energy blue is missing from the negatively oriented system of power, the green/blue vibratory energies are not seen in the vibratory schedules or patterns of negative fourth and fifth rates of vibration. The positive on the other hand, shall we say, has the full spectrum of true color time/space vibratory patterns and thus contains a variant vibratory pattern or schedule. Each is capable of doing fourth-density work. This is the criterion for harvest.

Questioner: Did you say that blue was missing from fourth-density negative?

Ra: I am Ra. Let us clarify further. As we have previously stated, all beings have the potential for all possible vibratory rates. Thus the potential of the green and blue energy center activation is, of course, precisely where it must be in a creation of Love. However, the negatively polarized entity will have achieved harvest due to extremely efficient use of red and yellow/orange, moving directly to the gateway indigo bringing through this intelligent energy channel the in-streamings of intelligent infinity.

Questioner: Then at fourth-density graduation into fifth is there anything like that which you gave as the percentages necessary for third-density graduation into fourth in polarization?

Ra: I am Ra. There are, in your modes of thinking, responses we can make, which we shall make. However, the important point is that the graduations from density to density do occur. The positive/negative polarity is a thing which will, at the sixth level, simply become history. Therefore, we speak in an illusory time continuum when we discuss statistics of positive versus negative harvest into fifth. A large percentage of fourth-density negative entities continue the negative path from fourth to fifth-density experience, for without wisdom the compassion and desire to aid other-self is not extremely well informed. Thus though one loses approximately two percent moving from negative to positive during the fourth-density experience we find approximately eight percent of graduations into fifth density those of the negative.

Questioner: What I was actually asking was if 50% is required for graduation from third to fourth in the positive sense and 95% was required for graduation in the negative sense, does this have to more closely approach 100% for graduation in both cases for graduation from fourth to fifth density? Does an entity have to be 99% polarized for negative and maybe 80% polarized positive for graduation?

Ra: I am Ra. We perceive the query now. To give this in your terms is misleading for there are, shall we say, visual aids or training aids available in fourth density which automatically aid the entity in polarization while cutting down extremely upon the quick effect of catalyst. Thus the density above yours must take up more space/time. The percentage of service-to-others of positively oriented entities will harmoniously approach 98% in intention. The qualifications for fifth density, however, involve understanding. This then, becomes the primary qualification for graduation from fourth to fifth density. To achieve this graduation the entity must be able to understand the actions, the movements, and the dance. There is no percentage describable which measures this understanding. It is a measure of efficiency of perception. It may be measured by light. The ability to love, accept, and use a certain intensity of light thus creates the requirement for both positive and negative fourth to fifth harvesting.

Questioner: Can you define what you mean by a “crystallized entity”?

Ra: I am Ra. We have used this particular term because it has a fairly precise meaning in your language. When a crystalline structure is formed of your physical material the elements present in each molecule are bonded in a regularized fashion with elements in each other molecule. Thus the structure is regular and, when fully and perfectly crystallized, has certain properties. It will not splinter or break; it is very strong without effort; and it is radiant, traducing light into a beautiful refraction giving pleasure of the eye to many.

Basically the gist is that STO has a larger spectrum of experience because they have been developing their higher emotional center to understand the love=light=knowledge relationship. They have compassion and can empathize with many beings, allowing them to sense their place in the greater mosaic. STS seems to have a supercharged motor and sexual center, which is useful for giving them the energy to overpower others when they finally open the gateway to the higher intellectual center. They do not have compassion, and think they become God by dominating everyone else. With sufficient dedication, they can both continue to move up, but pure STS hits a wall when trying to penetrate the perfectly balanced reality of 6D. They can't conceive of themselves being part of a greater whole which cycles to maintain the balance of creation in the universe instead of some dominator god, and they either contract into nonexistence trying to deny that fact or cease to be STS entities.

I think it is fairly clear that when Ra speaks of crystallization, it is speaking of it in the 4th Way context. Once one has gained a certain degree of self knowledge and dedication to an aim, they take a step up the staircase. According to Ra, this process has different iterations at 3D-7D, but with greater tests and higher thresholds to cross.

 

[sitting]

Q: ... you seem to be suggesting that the real trick is to just become non-attached to anything and anybody, do nothing, and just dissolve into nothing?

A: ... if you did exactly that, you would reincarnate in an STO realm, where such energy does fit.

Non-attachment is a simple idea -- but the most non-simple attribute to attain, in my opinion. It's also the true meaning of love.

You love someone so deeply & intrinsically, that you're happy (joyful) to let go. Come what may.
(This idea has relevance, to the troubled 2 person relationship mentioned in another thread.)

The second part of the above question involves "dissolution." But I think it's dissolution into unity ... which comes after nothingness. It's unity that we seek. (This from Ra.)

The C's seem to confirm this general line of thought. But still speak of reincarnation. I'm guessing that it takes something further still, to reach their realm. And escaping the samsaric cycle.

I could be wrong.

FWIW.

PS
I have looked into mat'l which addresses this escape. But managed so far only to scratch the surface. And I'm unsure if a leap from 3 to 6 (or non-reincarnating 5) is even possible. Even though C's have confirmed a jump from 2 to 4 is not impossible.

 

[know_yourself_1234]

Some writings about love :

From the Ra material, session 27, book 2:

Questioner:
I would like for you to define love in its sense as the second distortion.

Ra: I am Ra. This must be defined against the background of intelligent infinity or unity or the one Creator with the primal distortion of free will. The term Love then may be seen as the focus, the choice of attack, the type of energy of an extremely, shall we say, high order which causes intelligent energy to be formed from the potential of intelligent infinity in just such and such a way. This then may be seen to be an object rather than an activity by some of your peoples, and the principle of this extremely strong energy focus being worshipped as the Creator instead of unity or oneness from which all Loves emanate.

I am not sure I understood it correctly; would it mean that, first, we have to meditate on a kind of primary background, the Creator, unity, and then kind of trying to choose a secondary focus, a kind of aim, which would be love? I understand this as a kind of process, sustained conscious effort, very far away from the "feeling" we tend to identify as "love". Is it correct?

(sorry if I am off-track! Sitting threw the topic of love in, so I tought I may post about it)

 

[bjorb]

[quote author= sitting]Non-attachment is a simple idea -- but the most non-simple attribute to attain, in my opinion. It's also the true meaning of love.[/quote]

Very difficult to attain I would say. Our STS mode seeks attachments in everything. The places we visit. The people we engage in. Our stuff. We can literally attach ourselves to everything.

A: Possession is the key.
Q: What do you mean?
A: In STS, you possess.
Q: That's what I am saying here...
A: If you move through the beautiful flowers, the silk, the skin of another, but do not seek to possess...

Possession = attachment.

But indeed, like you said. Non-attachment is part of true (objective) Love. Only than can we see others as they really are. And only when we can see, can we help others.

 

[Neil]

I am not sure I understood it correctly; would it mean that, first, we have to meditate on a kind of primary background, the Creator, unity, and then kind of trying to choose a secondary focus, a kind of aim, which would be love? I understand this as a kind of process, sustained conscious effort, very far away from the "feeling" we tend to identify as "love". Is it correct?

(sorry if I am off-track! Sitting threw the topic of love in, so I thought I may post about it)

Here is how I understand it. Love is basically the will of the Prime Creator in it's purest most unbridled form. You could picture it as very bright white light. So strong that it would incinerate all but the purest and wisest of beings. So the beings that are closest to the creator absorb this light and slow down the vibrations a bit, and then transmit the energy so that it is resolvable by the next level down. This progresses through Gurdjieff's Ray of Creation all the way down to 1st density matter. Now each consciousness that it passes through is like a prism. It splits the white light/divine will into a spectrum of colors which are different manifestations of the creative force. This becomes the secondary focus. The further down the scale you go, the less perfect the prism of perception, and some beings can only separate out one or two of the colors, with the rest being incomprehensible.

We could speculate that at the far lower end of the spectrum, dark red, the energy could represent external consideration for other beings, treating them as you would want to be treated, and you would recognize that they were all connected, but maybe not on a very deep level. Maybe orange would represent an ability not just to respect other beings, but to be able to empathize with them as well. Yellow could represent the ability to join consciousness with another being and have a deep energetic bonding experience. The understanding these colors bring could then be applied to specific projects from planting gardens to raising children to designing a biosphere for a planet.

The Cassiopaeans say that love is light is knowledge, so your knowledge of the light and how to apply the different colors to various interactions in your life determines your capacity to love. It is not really a feeling at all, it is your experience in relation to the cosmic force, although the feeling could be a symptom. Ra describes it in a very abstract way, and I don't think it's something that can really be understood until it becomes "seated" in the higher emotional center. Until we get there we can only experience dim shades of the colors and theorize about their meaning.

 

[Ruth]

A can of worms, the last thing one wants to focus on in 4D. :D

Lol, it's an expression meaning that is probably how 3D sees 4D. When you're in 4D, said 'can of worms' will just be an amusing problem that is, or has been, easily solved. i.e. it no longer exists. Of course, if you're a bird with a can opener, and you know how to use it, it could mean something else entirely.