CELEBRATE "X-MAS" AND DIE
Go back to the anti-"X-mas" flier:
http://www.noahide.com/xmas.htm
I have cached the page at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-xmas1
"A gentile . . . is liable for the death penalty . . . if he has invented a religious holiday for himself . . . The general principle is we do not allow them to make new religious rituals and to make 'mitzvahs' ["commandment;" sometimes "good deed or blessing"] for themselves by their own devices . . . if he does make some new 'mitzvah,' we lash him, punish him, and inform him that he is obligated [sic] with the death penalty for this." (Rambam Mishne Torah--Hilchose Melachim 10:9)
So Christians or non-Christian Gentiles, according to the "Rambam Mishne Torah" should be lashed, punished, and put to death if they insist on following their own religious practices, including celebration of non-Jewish religious holidays, such as Christmas.
What is the Rambam Mischne Torah? The Rambam is none other than Maimonides, the well-known Sephardic Jewish writer who lived in Spain between 1135 and 1204 AD, one of the great fathers of Judaic thought; the Mishne Torah is one of his best known works. See the "Sephardic Sages" webpage,
http://www.sephardicsages.com/rambam.html
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-rambam
"Maimonides [Rambam] was the author of the Mishneh Torah, one of the greatest codes of Jewish law, compiling every conceivable topic of Jewish law in subject matter order and providing a simple statement of the prevailing view in plain language. In his own time, he was widely condemned because he claimed that the Mishneh Torah was a substitute for studying the Talmud," Sephardic Sages tells us.
Maimonides is regarded as a great teacher throughout Judaism. Yet these are his words:
" . . . A gentile . . . is liable for the death penalty . . . if he has invented a religious holiday for himself. "
So to be fair to the Reeb, the idea that Christmas celebrants be put to death did not originate with him. Indeed, we need to go back further to understand the roots of the "Gentiles must be put to death" phenomena.
KILL THEM ALL
The central book in Judaism is the Talmud, which contains the teachings of the Pharisees -- those people on whom the New Testament spends so many words. Jesus called their teachings "the ways of men," an abomination, and he condemned them; for doing so, He was crucified. At the time Jesus lived and up until several hundred years after His death, we are told, the teachings of the Pharisees were not written down, but were memorized, added to, and passed around by word of mouth. This is called the "oral law."
"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single piece of literature . . . and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." --Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, 1948, Vol. 8, pg. 474.
The original Hebrew Babylonian Talmud (Soferim 15, Rule 10) cites Rabbi Simon ben Yohai: "Tob shebe goyyim harog." Translation: "Even the best among the Gentiles deserves to be killed."
This passage is not taken from the commonly available and accepted Soncino edition of the Talmud. According to the Jewish Encyclopedia of 1903, the phrase "the best among the Gentiles" has been altered to read "the best among the Egyptians." Quite an improvement, eh?
(See the 1903 Jewish Encyclopedia, published by Funk and Wagnalls and compiled by Isidore Singer, under the entry, "Gentile," Vol. 5, p. 617).
Thus we see that the "Gentiles must be put to death" concept was originated before the Reeb, and even before the Rambam. The "kill all Gentiles" concept can be found in the Talmud, the basic book of Judaism.
OTHER GENTILE HOLIDAYS TO BE DECLARED VERBOTEN
See: "The Law Is Only a Minimum," and you will learn that observance of other Christian religious holidays constitute idolatry and will be banned. Christian holidays to be banned include:
* Good Friday
* Easter
* Ash Wednesday
* All Saints Day,
* And "probably even the 'new year.'"
http://www.noahide.com/minimum.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-minimum
SPECIAL DEAL ON ANTI X-MAS FLIERS
Later, we will learn that the "idol-worshippers" who refuse to give up their religious observances will be put to death by beheading. But for now, be aware that Jews and Hasidic Gentiles—United to Save America (JHG-USA) are offering a special discount on those anti-"X-mas" fliers. Normally they sell for 25 cents a piece -- now they are selling for 15 cents a piece. Hurry to order!
http://www.noahide.com./xmas2.htm
mirrord at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-xmas2
THE LUBAVITCHERS ON JESUS
Bush II claims to be a Christian. Want to know what Bush's Lubavitcher friends think about Jesus? Read the "Who Was Jesus" page:
http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-jesus
You will see that Jesus is called a "dangerous" false prophet who "repeatedly broke the Law by committing terrible sins, while openly challenging the G-d given authority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin."
The "Who Was Jesus" page also cites the Talmud -- the references in parentheses are the specific books. The quote begins here:
The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of 'Jesus the Nazarene':
1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).
2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), and was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).
3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh -- which is also explicitly banned in the Bible. (Shabbos 104b).
Such is the blasphemy against Jesus coming from the friends of Bush II. If Jesus Christ stepped into the America Bush is helping to create, Jesus would be put to death again -- by Jewish law.
A LUBAVITCH WHITE HOUSE RECEPTION
Not only did Bush issue a proclamation, he actually held a White House reception for the Lubavitchers to celebrate the Reeb's 100th birthday.
Bush Meets Lubavitch Rabbis to Mark Rebbe's 100th Birthday.
U.S. President George W. Bush hosted a delegation of 10 leading rabbis and officials from the Lubavitch Hasidic movement at the White House yesterday. The 90-minute meeting took place in the framework of events organized by the movement to mark the 100th birthday of the late Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson . . . Bush added his signature to a document declaring the late Rebbe's birthday 'The day of education and charity.' [Avraham] Rabbi Shem-Tov thanked the president for his support of Israel and presented him with a Passover Haggadah.
--Reported in Haaretz [Israeli newspaper], March 26, 2002, as quoted by The Jewish Tribal Review
http://jewishtribalreview.org/cha.htm
mirrored at:
http://Public-Action.com/x/nh-jtr
(Original article not to hand.)
Now let's step back for a moment and imagine we are one of these Lubavitchers at Bush's 90-minute reception on March 25. Recall that the fundamental book of the Chabad Lubavitch movement is the Tanya or Hatanya. The late Hebrew University professor Israel Shahak says this about the Hatanya:
According to this book, all non-Jews are totally satanic creatures 'in whom there is absolutely nothing good.' Even a non-Jewish embryo is qualitatively different from a Jewish one. The very existence of a non-Jew is 'inessential,' whereas all of creation was created solely for the sake of the Jews.
(Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion , Pluto Press, London, 1994, pg. 27.)
Several years later, Shahak cooperated with Norton Mezvinsky to write the "Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel." The authors said this of Schneerson:
The late, highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the 'Lubavitcher Rebbe' who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well as in the U.S., explained that, 'The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world [i.e., Gentile people] . . . A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. It is written, ‘And the strangers shall guard and feed your flocks’ (Isaiah 61:5). The entire creation [of a non-Jew] exists only for the sake of the Jews . . . '
("Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel," by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky. London. Pluto Press, 1999; as quoted by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2000.)
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0300/0003105.html
mirrored at:
http://Public-Action.com/x/nh-wrmea-brownfeld
So here is my question: Why are these pure and G-dly Lubavitcher rabbis willing to hang out with a satanic, pork-gobbling idol-worshipper from . . .Texas? Or was the stink of Bush's Christianity covered up by the perfume of Raw Power?
I wonder if the rabbis explained to Bush their plans for him and his kind? Perhaps they did not need to do that. Perhaps George W. Bush is not really a Christian but is secretly a Hasidic Gentile. He sure acts that way.
THE SON OF GOD IS . . .
So we have now learned Jesus was not the Son of God, but a false prophet. Who is the Son of God, then?
In the book of Exodus, G-d openly proclaims His son to the world: "Thus says the L-rd: My firstborn son is Israel. 'Israel' is the Jewish people -- all of them. The Jews were chosen by G-d to be His special 'son,' to be, in the words of the Bible, 'a kingdom of priests and a holy nation' for the whole world . . .
Read "Who is the Son of G-d?"
http://www.noahide.com/son.htm
mirrored at:
http://Public-Action.com/x/nh-sonofgod
So the Jewish people -- individually and collectively -- "a kingdom of priests and an holy nation" whose jurisdiction is the whole, wide world . . .
But once more, out of fairness, I must point out that this view that the Jewish people are the Son of God is not specifically Lubavitcher. Let's return to the Talmud once more:
If a heathen smites a Jew, he is worthy of death . . . He who smites an Israelite on the jaw, is as though he had thus assaulted the Divine Presence; for it is written, 'One who smiteth man [I.e., an Israelite] attacketh the Holy One.' (Sanhedrin, 58b.)
A Jew -- any Jew -- is the Divine Presence, the Holy One. Get it, dummy?
KING REEB . . .
The Rebbe is a direct descendant of King David and has received a true prophecy from G-d that we who are alive in this generation shall be the first in history to see the coming of the true messiah. Many Jews are eagerly anticipating the Rebbe's resurrection from the grave, ready to re-establish the Sanhedrin and anoint the king.
http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-jesus
Do you think we need courts run by rabbis to give us trials like they gave Jesus (Matt. 26:57-67)? Do you think we need a King to rule over us? No thank-yew. We are AMERICANS. We do not recognize an established state religion, and we are a republic, not a kingdom.
HE HAS THE WHOLE WORLD IN HIS HANDS
In our generation, the spiritual leader of the Jewish people--and therefore of the whole world--is Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (known as the "Lubavitcher Rebbe"), in New York . . .Did you catch that -- the Reeb is the leader of the Jewish people AND THEREFORE THE WHOLE WORLD. So now we see how the Pyramid of Power is shaking out. From "Who is the Son of G-d?"
http://www.noahide.com/son.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-sonofgod
CONGRESS AND BUSH INVENT HISTORY
Now let's go back in time to the reign of Bush I, when Congress passed, and Bush signed, Joint House Resolution 104, Public Law 102-14. In House Joint Resolution 104, the birthday of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, March 26, 1991, was designated as "Education Day, USA." You may have noticed that in 2002, the Rebbe's birthday was on March 25, not March 26. More of that later. Here is JHR 104, Public Law 102-14:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.J.RES.104.ENR:
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-hjr104
Let's look at the first clause:
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded . . .
Ah! You think they're going to mention, perhaps, the great Christian precept "do unto others as you would have them do unto you," or even the Ten Commandments?
Or perhaps the principles of liberty espoused by Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, or George Mason? Or quote the words of Thomas Jefferson in a letter to his friend Charles Thompson, dated January 9, 1816, when he said:
I am a real Christian . . . a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus . . .
To see Jefferson's comments in context, go to: < http://christianparty.net/tjchristian.htm >.
Certainly Congress had wonderful material at their fingertips to reaffirm the "ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded . . . "
But let's see what Congress did. Here is the second clause of HJR 104:
Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws . . .
Naugahyde Laws? No, that's not Naugahyde, that's Noahide . . . Never heard of them! What are they?
WOULD YOU BELIEVE . . .
Explanation No. 1: "Noahide" is the adjectival form of "Noah." So perhaps God passed down laws to Noah that somehow we overlooked? No, I just scrutinized Genesis in my King James version, and on two Bible Internet search engines. God did not pass down seven laws to Noah, and Noah did not pass down seven laws to anyone else.
Explanation No. 2: Let's go to a Lubavitcher website -- surely they know from where these laws came.
http://www.noahide.com/7laws.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-7laws
All of these laws are derived from specific passages in the Torah, which G-d gave to the Jewish people at Mt. Sinai.
Let's try to be logical. Noah lived and died in Genesis. Mt. Sinai is not mentioned in Genesis. Moses lived in Exodus and beyond. God handed over the Ten Commandments to Moses at Mt. Sinai, in Exodus. Therefore God could not have given Noah these laws at Mt. Sinai, for Noah had already died, back in Genesis.
It seems that Bush's friends, the Lubavitchers, the people who call Jesus a false prophet and idol worshipper, can't even keep the Bible time-line straight. I wonder what Bush's pastor would think of Bush lavishing praise on the Lubavitchers?
Explanation No. 3: According to the Encyclopedia Brittanica, the Talmud claims the Noahide laws were given to Adam. ". . . also called Noachian Laws, a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind."
http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?eu=57402&query=noahide
Let's be realistic. These seven laws which God (allegedly) gave to Adam were never ever written down in the Bible. However, the descendants of Adam passed the laws down verbally to their descendants ("oral law"), and so on and so on . . . until several hundred years after the death of Jesus the Pharisees started writing them down in the Talmud.
If your Grandma told you a story she claimed had been passed down through the family -- orally -- from the time of Adam, would you believe her? No, of course not. The story is preposterous.
Explanation No. 4: So now let's turn to the Talmud for an explanation of the Noahide laws. In a footnote to Yebamoth 62a, the Talmud gives the Scriptural source of these seven Noahide laws: Genesis 9:7. In Genesis 9:7, God says to Noah:
And you, be ye fruitful, and multiply; bring forth abundantly in the earth, and multiply therein.
But as you can see, there is not one mention of seven laws in that verse, despite what the Talmudic sages tell us.
Explanation No. 5: Wait, I've overlooked something. Let's return to the Jews and Hasidic Gentiles (JHG USA) website:
http://www.noahide.com/7laws.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-7laws
All of these laws are derived from specific passages in the Torah, which G-d gave to the Jewish people at Mt. Sinai.
Ah! The operant word is "derived." The Pharisee scholars derived, or reasoned, the laws into existence. So . . . just as Athena sprang from the head of Zeus, so the Noahide laws sprang from the heads of the Pharisees.
Naugahyde is man-made, vinyl coated-fabric; it is artificial leather. These Noahide laws are man made, Pharisee-coated, artificial laws. As Naugahyde is to leather, so the Noahide Laws are to the Bible.
Explanation 6: This is proof of the pudding: Sanhedrin 56a and 56b says:
Our Rabbis taught: seven precepts were the sons of Noah commanded: social laws; (5) to refrain from blasphemy, idolatry; adultery; bloodshed; robbery; and eating flesh cut from a living animal (1) . . .
Footnote 5, for the above passage, says: "I.e., to establish courts of justice, or, perhaps, to observe social justice (Nahmanides on Gen. XXXIV, 13): Hast. Dict. (s.v. Noachian precepts) translates 'obedience to authority.'"
Listen up here, fellow Gentile! "Obedience to authority" is your moral duty. Guess who the "authority" is?
Footnote 1, for the above passage, says:
These commandments may be regarded as the foundations of all human and moral progress. Judaism has both a national and a universal outlook in life. In the former sense it is particularistic, SETTING UP A PEOPLE DISTINCT AND SEPARATE FROM OTHERS (emphasis added) by its peculiar religious law. But in the latter, it recognises that moral progress and its concomitant Divine love and approval are the privilege and obligation of all mankind. And hence the Talmud lays down the seven Noachian precepts, by the observance of which all mankind may attain spiritual perfection, and without which moral death must inevitably ensue. That perhaps is the idea underlying the assertion (passim) that a heathen is liable to death for the neglect of any of these . . .
Let's pause here for a moment and notice the phrase I put in emphasis: " . . . setting up a people distinct and separate from others . . . "
Now we can put at least some of it together. The rabbis derived the Naugahyde laws from Genesis 9:7, by which they grant to themselves the power to establish courts and demand obedience to their authority from all other races and nations. Later on, in Exodus, God gives Moses the Ten Commandments.
You don't have to be a triple Ph.D. to figure out that, theologically speaking, laws given by God supersede any laws derived by men. But the Pharisee Talmudists still prefer the laws derived by men (themselves.) That's why they mention these man-made laws in JHR 104 PL 102-14 and ignore the Ten commandments.
In Footnote 5, the rabbis have granted themselves the authority ". . . to establish courts of justice, or, perhaps, to observe social justice . . . translates obedience to authority." In Footnote 1, " . . . That perhaps is the idea underlying the assertion (passim) that a heathen is liable to death for the neglect of any of these . . . "
Now we see why JHR 104 PL 102-14 did not cite the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments don't give authority to rabbis to set up courts and rule over the rest of mankind, nor give the rabbis the authority to put to death those who will not follow their dictates.
The Naugahyde laws do exactly that. The purpose of the Naugahyde laws is to establish the supremacy of Jews over others, under pain of death. House Joint Resolution 104 (PL 102-14) seems to have granted the Naugahyde laws the status of THE fundamental law of the land, only to be tested by the US courts.
Now we can also understand why, in 1964, the Reeb wrote that intermarriage between Jews and Gentiles was "spiritual cremation" for Jews, while at the same time organized Jewry was urging forced integration between Gentiles of different races. One race/religion will be permitted to survive, and that is the race/religion of the Jews. All Gentiles must lose their sense of belonging to a distinct race, owning a distinct culture, owning a distinct history, and practicing a distinct religion. The Gentiles must be homogenized. The Gentiles must be made Naughahydes, and Naughahydes only.
No White Pride. No Black Pride. No Yellow Pride. That is racism. Only Jewish Pride. That's not racism. That is God's will. [Footnote 2. ]
MEET YOUR NEW RELIGION, PART II
NO PRACTICING YIDDONI
NO MEETING WITH GHOSTS
The seven Naugahyde laws can be found here:
http://www.noahide.com/7laws.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-7laws
For an insightful discussions of the Naugahyde laws, visit:
http://www.watch.pair.com/law.html
and
http://www.truthbeknown.com/theocracy.htm
But for now visit Lubomyr Prytulak's Ukranian Archives with me.
http://www.ukar.org/gore10.shtml Mr. Prytulak points out that the seven laws have "proliferated into 30, and even 66," and that "Americans may be filled with unease, or even outright trepidation, at some of these laws. Some of the laws are mysterious . . . " See what he is talking about:
http://www.noahide.com/lawslist.htm
mirrored at
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-lawlist
Now the 30 Naugahyde laws prohibit conjurers (Law 25); prohibit consulting with the dead (Law 30), and prohibit eating a limb taken from a living creature (Law 15), prohibit Molech worship (22), but permit the offering of ritual sacrifices (19).
Phew! That's a relief. We might not be able to live without being permitted to offer ritual sacrifices.
In case you think this is all funny, try this: Rabbinical courts will administer the death penalty by decapitation (Law 16). That's not so funny.
In the set of 66 laws, there is a prohibition against practicing Ov (Law 7); against practicing Yiddoni (Law 9); and "Against causing our children to pass [through the fire] in the worship of Molech" (Law 7). So we see Molech worship is a no-no in both sets of laws -- at least for the Naugahydes.
Molech worship may not have been a big problem for Christians, but remember, it has been a big problem for the Jews. Read Isaiah or the other Biblical prophets to corroborate this.
But don't believe for a moment that rabbis prohibit Jews from worshiping Molech. Read the Talmud, (Sanhedrin 64a-64b) to discover the conditions under which Jews may sacrifice their children to Molech.
The Talmud always provides a way around the rules. That's the Talmud's job -- to split hairs and twist original intent, just as the supreme Court splits hairs and twists the original intent of our Bill of Rights. It's a coincidence, isn't it, that Talmudist Jews are so heavily represented in American jurisprudence?
FREEMASONS ARE NAUGAHYDES
The entry Noachidae, found in the ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FREEMASONRY states the following: 'The descendants of Noah. A term applied to Freemasons on the theory, derived from the 'legend of the craft,' that Noah was the father and founder of the Masonic system of theology. And hence the Freemasons claim to be his descendants, because in times past they preserved the pure principles of his religion amid the corruptions of surrounding faiths.'
Notice how closely the Masonic symbol resembles the Star of David. Trace its outlines. It resembles one half of the Star of David. Does that make the Freemasons half-baked Jews?
http://tracingboard.com/noachites.htm
(search in google cache)
mirrored at
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-freemasontracbrd
So in their own words, Freemasons declare themselves Naugahydes.
NO OBJECTIONS TO CONGRESSIONAL AND
PRESIDENTIAL ENDORSEMENT OF TALMUDISM
Search for official protests to the 1991 Joint House Resolution 104 Pl 102-14 and the Congressional and Presidential endorsement of the Talmudist Noahide laws from the mainstream Christian churches, the evangelical churches, and the Catholic Church. I could find none.
The US Government endorsement of Talmudism should have brought cries of protest from the American Civil Liberties Union on the grounds that JHR 104 PL 102-14 violated church-state separation. The ACLU was silent. And what of Conservative, Reform, and Orthodox rabbis and congregations, who are so sensitive to establishment of religion when it comes to the public displays of Christmas crèches? No, they did not object to JHR 104 either. What of the American Jewish Congress, the Anti Defamation League, the Jewish Defence League? Not a whisper . . .
SCHNEERSON-MAS IS A MOVABLE FEAST
Ours is the last generation of the year of sin and evil and the first of the Messianic Era. Indeed, for the first time in history, there is a growing consensus of leading rabbis willing to name the most suited to be the Messiah, and they are agreeing that he is the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson . . .
http://www.noahide.com/yeshu.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-jesus
In 1978, the House of Representatives declared the Reeb's 76th birthday as "Education Day, USA." According to the Chabad webpage, "President Jimmy Carter signed the proclamation into law and Education Day U.S.A. has become an annual tradition."
http://www.chabadcenter.org/dedication.htm
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-chabadcntr
Did you notice that Congress and Bush I celebrated "National Education Day USA" and the Reeb's birthday on March 26, 1991:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.J.RES.104.ENR:
(Make sure to include the colon at the end.)
mirrored at:
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-hjr104
Bush II celebrated the now transmogrified "National Education and Sharing Day U.S.A." and the Reeb's birthday on March 24, 2002:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020325-4.html
and
http://www.Public-Action.com/x/nh-bush-2002
If you go to: http://www.ukar.org/gore10.shtml you will see Ronald Reagan (who mentioned the Naughahyde laws in his Proclamation) announced April 2, 1985, was National Education Day. Reagan says " . . .in honour of his [the Reeb's] 83rd birthday, which falls this year on April 2 ."
March 26, March 24, April 2 . . . The Lubavitchers obviously keep the Jewish/Babylonian lunar calendar, and therefore the American presidents keep it, too. That's why the Reeb's birthday wanders and that's why National Education and Sharing Day wanders, too.
For "Education and Sharing Day" is merely the deceitfully disguised celebration of Schneerson's birthday. Plan on Christmas being dropped as a public holiday soon, and replaced by Schneersonmas, a/k/a Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.
OK. All together now, let's practice : "I'm dreaming of a White Schneerson-mas . . . la la la."
FREEDOM, EQUALITY ARE "MISCONCEIVED IDEALS"
Hey, let's think back to Bush's March, 2002, proclamation again, just to savor his words . . . words to the effect that EVERY child, no matter what his BACKGROUND, ETHNICITY, or FAITH, get the best education possible, and Bush's praise of Schneerson in the same breath. Schneerson was adamant: he wrote that equality was a misconceived ideal. How the Lubavitchers must have laughed and joked among themselves after they left the pork-gobbler's little party on March 25.
Later on, we will have a chance to examine the Lubavitcher's own ideas about education. Once we do, you'll probably laugh at George Bush with the Lubavitchers -- he is one dumb pork-gobbler.