How World War II Came About

[Qbone]

Thank you for the clarification, I know my lesson.

I would like to suggest that you read the article more closely, It has nothing to do with the anti Jewish sentiments, only historical/international events caused by the (bankers) unfortunately most of them (Jews).

Qbone, it is time for you to do more reading and less posting. From your posts in this thread it is quite clear that you have no idea just how much time and effort this forum and it's associated web pages have put into covering the Zionist issue. Your ignorance is showing as are your biases.

And

Exactly. Qbone this forum is not your personal message board. You will be held accountable for what you post here - if you do not 'like' that you are very free to go elsewhere to forums where people are allowed post articles that spew all the hate they want to spew and are not held accountable.

Please understand that we KNOW that Zionism is a problem - but we also know WHY - and that is psychopathy - I really think if you spent more time reading the research already done, you might understand that.

I am not sure about what do you mean by the quotes above. It seems that your are the one who is biased not me as this sector of the SOTT forum says “ Suggest an Article for SOTT - and Discuss.

That’s why I brought up Noam Chomsky's quote in the first place.

Peace.

 

[anart]

I am not sure about what do you mean by the quotes above. It seems that your are the one who is biased not me as this sector of the SOTT forum says “ Suggest an Article for SOTT - and Discuss.

That’s why I brought up Noam Chomsky's quote in the first place.

Could you please clarify this statement? From what you've written it seems you are saying that you quoted Chomsky because this is a 'suggest an article' section on the forum - that makes little sense. Actually, if you apply Chomsky's statement to the Zionists, then it makes even less sense, in the context in which you applied it here.

It makes more sense that you quoted Chomsky because you are emotionally identified with the article you posted and took criticism of the article personally (as if it were criticism of you) and felt attacked - as if your 'free expression was not being honored' - though I suppose that doesn't really make sense either since you aren't hated here.

So - could you please clarify?

 

[Qbone]

And again..

What sort of evil occupy a country, whipping it out of the map, rename it, and then forcing the original inhabitants out of the area and put them into the ghettos and build walls around them and then denying access to the most basic human needs for months? And now holding 70 million Iranian under the everyday threat?

And international media/politics turn the blind eyes on the events.

Now, am I biased/ignorance or not is your perspective and I respecting that, but the historical facts are still remains like an ever growing alarm that what was happened before, is going to happen again.

That’s what I meant by posting the original article.

 

[PepperFritz]

Eleanor Wachtel had an interview with with Howard Jacobson last night on CBC radio one.... It caught my attention because of the general tone of the interview, take a listen and decide for yourself.... right after the Howard Jacobson interview they aired what I think was a "Hana's Suitcase" or "The Brown Suitcase" reading?

I listened to the Howard Jacobson interview the other night as well, and really enjoyed it, since I'm a big fan of his books. I am completely befuddled by your reference to the "general tone of the interview", and have no idea what you mean. Jacobson is a Jewish writer who has been called "the British Philip Roth", in that, like Roth, he writes very funny, self-deprecating books about the foibles of everyday modern life, from the perspective of a contemporary man of Jewish cultural heritage. His work does not promote Zionism, barely touches on it, as I recall. The interview was definitely "pro Howard Jacobson", in that it celebrates the writer and his work, but I fail to see how one could characterize it as being "pro-Jewish".

And, yes, I see that the CBC also re-aired the well-known documentary "Hana's Suitcase" (which I didn't listen to). Apparently it is the true story of a 14-year-old Jewish girl who died at Auschwitz. Again, I fail to see how just because a program is about a Jewish person/event, it is therefore characterized as being "pro-Jewish".

Anyway, it just seemed like 2 or 3 hours of this stuff got me wondering why now?

Why not now? Am I missing something? Out of the myriad of programs broadcast on the CBC that reflect our Canadian multicultural heritage, you seem unduly concerned about a mere couple of programs that happen to be about individuals who are Jewish. I really don't see why this seems "too much" Jewish content in your eyes, or representative of a conspiracy of some kind. You seem to have a marked antipathy towards anything that happens to have a Jewish person or event as its subject, regardless of whether it is in any way connected to the issue of Zionism. And that does not seem rational.

You seem to have trouble differentiating between something that is "Jewish" and something that is "Zionist". As long as you continue to equate them in your posts, you will continue to be held accountable here for flawed logic.

 

[anart]

Rather fascinating that you did not answer my question regarding the Chomsky quote. Why is that?

And again..

What sort of evil occupy a country, whipping it out of the map, rename it, and then forcing the original inhabitants out of the area and put them into the ghettos and build walls around them and then denying access to the most basic human needs for months? And now holding 70 million Iranian under the everyday threat?

That evil is PSYCHOPATHY (and its propagating effects).

And international media/politics turn the blind eyes on the events.

By design, because they are controlled by PSYCHOPATHS.

Now, am I biased/ignorance or not is your perspective and I respecting that, but the historical facts are still remains like an ever growing alarm that what was happened before, is going to happen again.

That’s what I meant by posting the original article.

And still you miss the point - completely - and still you have much reading to do before you post - else your posts are noise. Obstinately holding on to your 'point' despite mounds of evidence to the contrary - which you could read and understand if you so chose - is indicative of a closed mind.

What is so astounding about your responses is that if you actually did the reading and the research you might grasp that the understanding this forum has reached brings much more to the table than your own current understanding, and reaches a conclusion that you would probably wholly agree with -- but, as I stated earlier, you are emotionally invested (identified) with your own understanding and this is blinding you.

That is your choice - but this forum's purpose is to reach an objective understanding of reality - this requires an open mind, not a dogmatic, emotional and limited view of anything at all. So, please, Qbone, if you intend to contribute to this forum and it's associated web sites, do some reading and get up to speed.