Human Energy Fields, by Colin Ross

Approaching Infinity

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Human Energy Fields
by Colin A. Ross (2009)

Human Energy Fields collects and distills Ross's four decades of work on the subject. He argues that what other cultures and religions have called the soul, aura, spirit, chi, etc. is actually the human electromagnetic field. He acknowledges that it's almost impossible to think about such things using a Western, scientific framework or language. In order to see the parallels and develop his theory, he had to do a type of philosophical cognitive therapy on himself, rooting out the cognitive errors he had taken for granted. So in the first chapters, Ross shows the deep inner contradictions of materialism, reductionism, and the Cartesian dualism out of which they were born. In short, dualism posits an interaction between two substances that cannot interact. And reductionism posits a worldview in which consciousness and sentience do not exist. (If there is no distinction on the chemical level between animate and inanimate matter, and reductionism is true, there is no distinction between 'living' and 'dead.' By speaking of 'living' processes or even life in general, reductionism introduces a kind of back-door dualism that contradicts its own philosophical implications.) To smooth out the logic, only two possibilities remain: either everything is dead, and there is no difference between you and a corpse, or all things are alive or sentient in some way. To say that life 'emerged' is similarly to introduce dualism. If 'life' or 'mind' does not exist among physics at a basic level, saying that it emerges from physics is unintelligible. Ross thus concludes that some form of animism must be true (i.e., panpsychism). As he puts it, mind is a general property of matter.

He identifies this property as the electromagnetic field. (EEG when alive, no EEG when dead.) Just as organizations of matter become more complex, so do types of mind. So-called inanimate objects will have a certain EM signature, as will humans. Ross then gets into the scientific background, e.g., known sources of EM and known instances of biological systems being affected by sources of electromagnetism (e.g., bird migration, honeybee dances), hypothesizing that similar processes may apply to humans. The implication, of course, is that any source of EM might affect human minds and/or bodies, including the earth's field, the solar wind, atmospheric wind, EM radiation, etc. He then describes his first empirical test: that the brain's EM field, measurable by EEG, is stronger in front of the eyes and may be able to be directed. This might account for the 'sense of being stared at', and Ross has developed technology to show that such a process is scientifically sound. He shows a similar process may be involved in 'gut feelings,' again sharing results from his own preliminary research and tests.

Next he makes a series of predictions, relating his ideas to medical problems like heart attacks, seizures, migraines, cancer, CFS, Parkinson's, phantom limbs, mental disorders, as well as 'fringe' practices like acupuncture, meditation, OBEs, aura reading, 'energy work', massage, chiropractic, and yoga. As he points out, there are therapeutic potentials in this practices, and it's possible that they are all pre-scientific ways of describing a real phenomenon, the EM field and the ways it interacts with the world to promote health or disease. Some practices and practitioners may be exposed as having no real effect, but others may not. Such an idea may also be able to account for 'pre-scientific' beliefs in such things as telepathy, fertility rituals, prayer, etc. Lastly, Ross looks at the potential future research possibilities in fields such as agriculture, medicine (diagnosis and treatment) and technology. I'm not sure if Ross's theory can account for all the things he proposes (e.g., I don't think an EM-based theory can account for all the phenomena in the psi literature), but it will be interesting to see how his research progresses and what comes out of it.

Some details that stood out for me: the possible links between this and the electric universe theory (Ross doesn't touch on this). The idea the SSRI's can't work based on a 'lock-and-key' model, but more probably work on an EM signature/resonance model. The possible relation between chakras and the EM/EEG signatures of nerve nexuses (e.g., in the heart, solar plexus, gastric nerve networks, genitals). The possible relation between this and Levine's idea of trauma in the body; Ross hypothesizes a bundle of anger stored in the solar plexus in cases of depression (his ideas of EM signatures for various diseases and mental illnesses is pretty cool). The idea that phantom limbs are shadow EM fields. EM synchronization during sex. (This is a short book, just around 100 pages.)
 
Impressive and sounds like a "must read" as it relates to some personal interests.

Approaching Infinity said:
(his ideas of EM signatures for various diseases and mental illnesses is pretty cool)

Years ago I somehow became convinced, from a technological standpoint, that there would one day be booths or something you could walk into and have EM signatures identified for just about any kind of ailment. This idea is sounding more and more plausible.

Thank you, A.I.
 
That's interesting. EM fields can be measured and mapped. So I'd be interested to see whether a measurement of someone's EM field, using aura photography or something, resembles the description in the literature of what the energy fields of people look like.

If this were to be the case, then this would mean that our everyday senses that we use for perception aren't the limits of what we can perceive. This is because people have been able to expand their perceptive range without technology, and then they were able to write about what they saw, which is then confirmed scientifically using technology.

I don't suppose Ross included pictures in his book, or if anyone knows of any pictures that are available of people's EM fields?
 
whitecoast said:
All that crammed into 100 pages... Sounds incredible! I'm looking forward to reading it. :)

It's available at Amazon - paperback :$14.50 & kindle edition :$4.88 - 119 pages. 10 left in stock. Thanks to Approaching Infinity for the info.
 
Archaea said:
That's interesting. EM fields can be measured and mapped. So I'd be interested to see whether a measurement of someone's EM field, using aura photography or something, resembles the description in the literature of what the energy fields of people look like.

If this were to be the case, then this would mean that our everyday senses that we use for perception aren't the limits of what we can perceive. This is because people have been able to expand their perceptive range without technology, and then they were able to write about what they saw, which is then confirmed scientifically using technology.

I don't suppose Ross included pictures in his book, or if anyone knows of any pictures that are available of people's EM fields?

No pictures. I don't think the technology has been developed yet (Ross was working on patents at the time of writing).
 
No pictures. I don't think the technology has been developed yet (Ross was working on patents at the time of writing).

In this thread Advice needed - reoccurring OBE:s (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,11354.15.html) angelburst29 describes what (he/she?) sees around people. angelburst29 also mentions Kirlian Photography. So I ran an image search on Google for "Human EM field Kirlian photo" and found this:

1000x1000_4f5678b00a42c.jpg


I don't know if it's a real Kirlian Photo though, the website (www.inspiringhealth.net) it links to doesn't give a caption. The photo though, looks similar to the description of the human aura given by William Walker Atkinson (Yogi Ramacharaka) which Mal7 brings up in the thread Carlos Castenada (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,6992.15.html) here's a quote from Mal7's post:

The human aura, wrote William Walker Atkinson, is shaped like an egg. [quote from William Walker Atkinson, also known as Ramacharaka:] "To the psychic vision it appears to be 'streaked' by numerous fine lines extending like stiff bristles from the body outward. In normal health and vitality these 'bristles' stand out stiffly, while in cases of impaired vitality of poor health they droop like the soft hair on an animal, and in some cases present the appearance of a ruffled coat of hair, the several 'hairs' standing out in all directions. . . ". [quote from Castaneda:] "Fibers, like white cobwebs," don Juan said, "Very fine threads that circulate from the head to the navel. Thus a man looks like an egg of circulating fibres. And his arms and legs are like luminous bristles, bursting out in all directions."

So there seem to be some similarities.

I'm on the case...
 
Approaching Infinity said:
Human Energy Fields collects and distills Ross's four decades of work on the subject. He argues that what other cultures and religions have called the soul, aura, spirit, chi, etc. is actually the human electromagnetic field.[...]
If 'life' or 'mind' does not exist among physics at a basic level, saying that it emerges from physics is unintelligible. Ross thus concludes that some form of animism must be true (i.e., panpsychism). As he puts it, mind is a general property of matter.

He identifies this property as the electromagnetic field.
(EEG when alive, no EEG when dead.) Just as organizations of matter become more complex, so do types of mind. So-called inanimate objects will have a certain EM signature, as will humans. Ross then gets into the scientific background, e.g., known sources of EM and known instances of biological systems being affected by sources of electromagnetism (e.g., bird migration, honeybee dances), hypothesizing that similar processes may apply to humans. The implication, of course, is that any source of EM might affect human minds and/or bodies, including the earth's field, the solar wind, atmospheric wind, EM radiation, etc. He then describes his first empirical test: that the brain's EM field, measurable by EEG, is stronger in front of the eyes and may be able to be directed. This might account for the 'sense of being stared at', and Ross has developed technology to show that such a process is scientifically sound. He shows a similar process may be involved in 'gut feelings,' again sharing results from his own preliminary research and tests.

I wonder how he will explain a phenomenon told in the book "The Scalpel and the Soul" by neurosurgeon Allan J. Hamilton.

I'm quoting this book review to tell the story:

Review: The Scalpel and the Soul by Allan J. Hamilton M.D., FACS

_http://www.examiner.com/review/review-the-scalpel-and-the-soul-by-allan-j-hamilton-m-d-facs

The last story in the book is entitled “Soul Survivor”. This involved a patient of another doctor, but it had a profound impact on Dr. Hamilton. The case involved a thirty-four year old woman that had experienced a basilar tip aneurysm, which is a blood vessel exploding at the base of her brain.

She was treated by Dr. Thomas Reed, a well-known neurovascular surgeon at the Barrow Neurological Institute near Phoenix. The surgery was complicated, but absolutely necessary to save her life. The doctors decided to use a heart-lung machine to cool her body to the point where she was in suspended animation.

Her body was cooled down to less than 90 degrees, which caused the heart to stop. The heart-lung machine was then shut off for the surgery that had to be completed in 20 minutes or less. During this time, the woman would be clinically dead, i.e. flat-lined on the EEG brain monitor and no heartbeat.

The operation was recorded on both video and audio recorders. The operation proceeded and it was completed in 17 minutes, just below the threshold of 20 minutes that the brain could survive and be revived. At the end of the operation, there were several conversations that were also recorded.

One recorded conversation was the perfusionist explaining to Dr. Reed what was required to blow out the bubbles in the blood before he could restart the heart-lung machine to warm the patient. The second conversation was an announcement by one of the surgical nurses that she had just gotten engaged, with details of how and where the proposal was done and where her 1 ½ caret diamond was purchased.

When Dr. Reed did the post-operative exam, there was a video tape recording done. The patient asked Dr. Reed how the operation went. He responded that it was “text-book perfect”. She responded, “Well, I remembered hearing something “blow” during the case. Did the aneurysm blow?” She also remembered the conversation about the 1 ½ caret diamond ring, the location and the specifics of the proposal.

Dr. Reed was amazed, and called in the anesthesiologist, who was convinced that it was impossible for a patient with no brain activity whatsoever to be “conscious” of a detailed conversation. The recordings proved it. Consciousness can be achieved by those that are totally brain dead.

There were two theories generated from this event. One theory held that the consciousness existed outside of the body, and was then transferred back to the neurons in the patient’s brain after she was revived. The other theory was that the conversation was preserved in the Universe at a quantum energy level, and then she recovered the energy and stored it as a memory. Neither theory adequately explains the miracle of a temporarily deceased woman remembering a recorded conversation.

The cosmic giggle portion of this story is that this woman, Sarah Gideon, recovered from her surgery. She had told Dr. Hamilton that she had survived because of her faith. One year later while driving from her job, Sarah was hit by a large truck that ran a red light and she was instantly killed. God does indeed work in mysterious ways.

For those that require scientific proof of life after death, or consciousness that does not involve the brain, this book is a wonderful testimony that something that seemed impossible did happen.

For spiritualists that come in contact with those that have passed over, we know that the soul continues and that consciousness is also forever.

The book has more details of everything recorded, the "crime-scene", interviews done, and how the author was among the first on the scene to make his inquiries as objectively as he could. It basically shows that Sarah was by all means clinically and officially dead, with a flat line on her EEG when she heard what was going on in the operating room, and that she had no way of knowing.

That made me chuckle with the idea of how little is known about consciousness and if it is supposed to exist outside everything we know that could be measurable in material terms so to speak.

Yeah, I liked the book and I was immediately reminded of it after reading this book review. Thanks :)
 
Psyche said:
I wonder how he will explain a phenomenon told in the book "The Scalpel and the Soul" by neurosurgeon Allan J. Hamilton.

I'm quoting this book review to tell the story:

Review: The Scalpel and the Soul by Allan J. Hamilton M.D., FACS

_http://www.examiner.com/review/review-the-scalpel-and-the-soul-by-allan-j-hamilton-m-d-facs

Her body was cooled down to less than 90 degrees, which caused the heart to stop. The heart-lung machine was then shut off for the surgery that had to be completed in 20 minutes or less. During this time, the woman would be clinically dead, i.e. flat-lined on the EEG brain monitor and no heartbeat. ...

Dr. Reed was amazed, and called in the anesthesiologist, who was convinced that it was impossible for a patient with no brain activity whatsoever to be “conscious” of a detailed conversation. The recordings proved it. Consciousness can be achieved by those that are totally brain dead. ...

For those that require scientific proof of life after death, or consciousness that does not involve the brain, this book is a wonderful testimony that something that seemed impossible did happen.

Forgot to mention that Ross speculates that perhaps during an OBE or NDE, some portion (or all) of the EM field might dissociate from the body. Of course, he'd like to have this tested. Perhaps terminally ill patients can volunteer to die while being measured in a whole-body EM scanner, or it can be used on animals, etc. His point is really that everything is alive, in some sense. So when your EEG flatlines, your body is technically dead, since the EM field is no longer associated with it. But technically, your atoms and a lot of molecules and stuff will still be 'alive'. Just not 'human' alive.
 
I read this book last month and thoroughly enjoyed it. It's good to see credentialed scientist investigate these topics. I will say that I read this book prior to Ruper Sheldrake's "The presence of the past and morphic resonance" which basically explains how it could be possible that everything resides inside of a morphic field. The similarities between these two book were really interesting from my perspective.
 
trendsetter37 said:
I read this book last month and thoroughly enjoyed it. It's good to see credentialed scientist investigate these topics. I will say that I read this book prior to Ruper Sheldrake's "The presence of the past and morphic resonance" which basically explains how it could be possible that everything resides inside of a morphic field. The similarities between these two book were really interesting from my perspective.

Yeah, I saw some similarity with Sheldrake's work too. While I think they're both onto something, I think their theories are incomplete. Philosophically, they don't really explain free will (i.e., Sheldrake's theory is basically mechanistic). It's understandable in Ross's case, as he's simply trying to make and empirical and testable claim about EM fields being the unifying life-force. But for an overall worldview that makes sense of these things, I still haven't found anything better than Whitehead and David Ray Griffin's philosophy of panexperientialism (or panpsychism).
 
I agree. I picked up on the mechanistic vibe from them as well. I'll def. have to look into Griffin's panpsychism soon. Thanks for the suggestion
 
I have heard mention of this book a few times, most recently in the Colin Ross interview by GnosisMedia. Thank you Approaching Infinity for the book review, adding this to my read-list.

Approaching Infinity said:
Psyche said:
I wonder how he will explain a phenomenon told in the book "The Scalpel and the Soul" by neurosurgeon Allan J. Hamilton.

I'm quoting this book review to tell the story:

Review: The Scalpel and the Soul by Allan J. Hamilton M.D., FACS

_http://www.examiner.com/review/review-the-scalpel-and-the-soul-by-allan-j-hamilton-m-d-facs

Her body was cooled down to less than 90 degrees, which caused the heart to stop. The heart-lung machine was then shut off for the surgery that had to be completed in 20 minutes or less. During this time, the woman would be clinically dead, i.e. flat-lined on the EEG brain monitor and no heartbeat. ...

Dr. Reed was amazed, and called in the anesthesiologist, who was convinced that it was impossible for a patient with no brain activity whatsoever to be “conscious” of a detailed conversation. The recordings proved it. Consciousness can be achieved by those that are totally brain dead. ...

For those that require scientific proof of life after death, or consciousness that does not involve the brain, this book is a wonderful testimony that something that seemed impossible did happen.

Forgot to mention that Ross speculates that perhaps during an OBE or NDE, some portion (or all) of the EM field might dissociate from the body. Of course, he'd like to have this tested. Perhaps terminally ill patients can volunteer to die while being measured in a whole-body EM scanner, or it can be used on animals, etc. His point is really that everything is alive, in some sense. So when your EEG flatlines, your body is technically dead, since the EM field is no longer associated with it. But technically, your atoms and a lot of molecules and stuff will still be 'alive'. Just not 'human' alive.

In instances of brain stroke, does a similar thing occur re: consciousness being achieved by those that are totally brain dead? Jill Bolte Taylor spoke in Stroke of Insight as part of TED Talks & a lot of what she explained to capture her experience there resonates.
 
SMM said:
In instances of brain stroke, does a similar thing occur re: consciousness being achieved by those that are totally brain dead? Jill Bolte Taylor spoke in Stroke of Insight as part of TED Talks & a lot of what she explained to capture her experience there resonates.

Yeah, I think that's a possibility.
 
Approaching Infinity said:
Next he makes a series of predictions, relating his ideas to medical problems like heart attacks, seizures, migraines, cancer, CFS, Parkinson's, phantom limbs, mental disorders, as well as 'fringe' practices like acupuncture, meditation, OBEs, aura reading, 'energy work', massage, chiropractic, and yoga.

There might be some preliminary confirmation about the electrical nature of migraines based on a relatively recent theory about CSD (Cortical Spreading Depression) -- I mentioned it here when I was researching migraines earlier this year (click on the 'Cortical Spreading Depression' link to see an article about it). The parts below about neurotransmitters (serotonin, dopamine, etc) are also interesting from the viewpoint of Ross's critique of the lock-and-key mechanism of receptors and his alternative hypothesis.
 
Back
Top Bottom