I have a dilemma

Hello,
I am to go meet my new granddaughter in Colorado next week. an exciting time for me. My son just requested that I get a tdap vaccine before we come out. I do not want to do this but I'm afraid they will see it as me not caring about her health. I don't want to lie to them but I really don't want to get a vaccine either. My entire family has bought into the whole allopathic paradigm and I am afraid for them, but they think I'm crazy so I don't even bring it up any more. How would some of you handle this situation?

Thank you,
Laurie
 
IMHO

Stand by your beliefs and the your wisdom of what vaccines really represent.

If they don't respect your freewill (and have given you an ultimatum) then your not fighting them, but the your fighting the vaccine propaganda.

It is a tough call but the possible debilitating effects at your age could be catastrophic.

Perhaps if you decide not to attend a hand written letter to your son and granddaughter explaining your beliefs, might help them appreciate the meaning of freewill through your Knowledge.

Others will have much more insight and recommendations with hard science that your doing the right thing to stand by your convictions.

And your not crazy, just educated thus they (your family), lack knowledge which promotes fear.
FWIW
 
Laurelayn said:
Hello,
I am to go meet my new granddaughter in Colorado next week. an exciting time for me. My son just requested that I get a tdap vaccine before we come out. I do not want to do this but I'm afraid they will see it as me not caring about her health. I don't want to lie to them but I really don't want to get a vaccine either. My entire family has bought into the whole allopathic paradigm and I am afraid for them, but they think I'm crazy so I don't even bring it up any more. How would some of you handle this situation?

Thank you,
Laurie

Hi Laurie, if the choice is between lying to them (or rather, telling them what they want to hear) and getting a potentially dangerous vaccine, I'd go with telling them what they want to hear. I think it's absolutely ridiculous that parents expect that a perfectly healthy adult should not come within a few feet of their child without having some (dead) bacteria injected into them along with mercury . :headbash:

I know it isn't pleasant to lie to your son in this way, but he is the one who is creating this situation through his ignorance (although he is unaware of it). Whooping cough is NOT very common. From January to June 2016, 6,000 cases of whooping cough in children were reported by all 50 states and Puerto Rico. That's 0.008% of all children in the USA. So it's kind of ridiculous for him to get worked up about this to the extent of asking you to get vaccinated.

If you really don't want to lie, there is an alternative I suppose. Since it seems likely that your son will get the Tdap vaccine for his daughter at age 2 months, you could wait until then to visit. That's assuming, of course, that he wouldn't still ask you to get your own shot even then.

I know you know this already, but it's abundantly clear that the hysteria over vaccinations is a money spinner for the pharma corps, and nothing else.
 
I think whether you lie or not only matters to you at this point. They cannot be harmed from contact by an unvaccinated person, and how will they ever know? It sounds to me like you don't want to lie because it will make you feel like a bad person - but would it really be true? How much resentment would that cause as opposed to clashing with their beliefs and making them fear for their safety?

I think they have chosen to believe in the illusion given to them and even if you were to succeed in breaking it, they would resent you for it because it would be a violation of their free will choice.
 
Joe said:
Laurelayn said:
Hello,
I am to go meet my new granddaughter in Colorado next week. an exciting time for me. My son just requested that I get a tdap vaccine before we come out. I do not want to do this but I'm afraid they will see it as me not caring about her health. I don't want to lie to them but I really don't want to get a vaccine either. My entire family has bought into the whole allopathic paradigm and I am afraid for them, but they think I'm crazy so I don't even bring it up any more. How would some of you handle this situation?

Thank you,
Laurie

Hi Laurie, if the choice is between lying to them (or rather, telling them what they want to hear) and getting a potentially dangerous vaccine, I'd go with telling them what they want to hear.

Hi Laurelayn

For what it's worth, that was my first thought, too. Sometimes weighing up external considering, strategic enclosure and acting in favour of your own destiny puts us in situations where we just have to lie.

I appreciate your struggle, but if I was in your situation, for me, lying would be the right thing to do and so I wouldn't feel guilty about it.

Hope that helps.
 
What's really crazy, is it would be more of a danger to your grand-daughter if you are recently vaccinated, as you would likely still be shedding the virus. :scared:

Sorry you have such a situation! You can say you have all the vaccines you NEED.
 
I don't think you should get the vaccine.

After that, your choice is telling your son that you will not get the vaccine, or lying to him. I don't think you should lie to him, but if you tell the truth then you would also need accept the possibility that he might not let you see your granddaughter. Your son unfortunately has the free will to decide that he will have his children vaccinated. If you decide to lie to him, then you would need to accept the possibility that you might incur bad karma or his anger if he finds out that you lied. It's one thing to lie defensively to protect yourself. It's another thing to lie offensively.
 
hlat said:
I don't think you should get the vaccine.

After that, your choice is telling your son that you will not get the vaccine, or lying to him. I don't think you should lie to him, but if you tell the truth then you would also need accept the possibility that he might not let you see your granddaughter. Your son unfortunately has the free will to decide that he will have his children vaccinated. If you decide to lie to him, then you would need to accept the possibility that you might incur bad karma or his anger if he finds out that you lied. It's one thing to lie defensively to protect yourself. It's another thing to lie offensively.

Hlat, I really don't think that this would be lying offensively at all. And I don't think it would incur bad karma either. It seems to me that this is external consideration for Laurel's son combined with consideration for her own health. All of that seems to be in line with the work as I understand it.
 
I agree with the majority, to tell them you received the vaccine. But surely seeing as they are, maybe they will ask you a proof for your vaccination? If not protect yourself is primordial.
 
Flashgordonv said:
hlat said:
I don't think you should get the vaccine.

After that, your choice is telling your son that you will not get the vaccine, or lying to him. I don't think you should lie to him, but if you tell the truth then you would also need accept the possibility that he might not let you see your granddaughter. Your son unfortunately has the free will to decide that he will have his children vaccinated. If you decide to lie to him, then you would need to accept the possibility that you might incur bad karma or his anger if he finds out that you lied. It's one thing to lie defensively to protect yourself. It's another thing to lie offensively.

Hlat, I really don't think that this would be lying offensively at all. And I don't think it would incur bad karma either. It seems to me that this is external consideration for Laurel's son combined with consideration for her own health. All of that seems to be in line with the work as I understand it.

I guess I don't understand why lying to the son is necessary in this situation. I don't see a threat to Laurie's survival and well being, such as losing a home, losing a job, losing food, going to prison. It's understandable the desire to be with a new grandchild. However, the son is in charge of his children. If the son has required certain conditions for his children, I would not break those conditions. That's his free will. If I was the son, and I somehow learned that my mom lied to me, I would be incredibly upset and justifiably so.

Not getting the vaccine and not seeing granddaughter is an option.

If I were in Laurie's position, I would explain to the son that I think a vaccine is harmful for my health so I won't get one. I would also express my desire to see my granddaughter. I would also say to the son that I understand if you won't let me see my granddaughter but I hope you reconsider and let me know if you decide that I can see her.
 
I think the situation seems strict, either Laurie gets vaccinated or she can't see her granddaughter. And I wouldn't let stand the vaccine between my granddaughter and personally would also chose to lie about it since the consequences of being vaccinated are too bad, beside I think for a granddaughter it is really important to be in contact with her grandmother and vice versa.
 
hlat said:
Flashgordonv said:
hlat said:
I don't think you should get the vaccine.

After that, your choice is telling your son that you will not get the vaccine, or lying to him. I don't think you should lie to him, but if you tell the truth then you would also need accept the possibility that he might not let you see your granddaughter. Your son unfortunately has the free will to decide that he will have his children vaccinated. If you decide to lie to him, then you would need to accept the possibility that you might incur bad karma or his anger if he finds out that you lied. It's one thing to lie defensively to protect yourself. It's another thing to lie offensively.

Hlat, I really don't think that this would be lying offensively at all. And I don't think it would incur bad karma either. It seems to me that this is external consideration for Laurel's son combined with consideration for her own health. All of that seems to be in line with the work as I understand it.

I guess I don't understand why lying to the son is necessary in this situation.

Seriously? Are you completely unable to put yourself in Laurelayn's position?

I don't see a threat to Laurie's survival and well being, such as losing a home, losing a job, losing food, going to prison. It's understandable the desire to be with a new grandchild.

Have you seen Start Trek? You sound like a Vulcan who is unlearned in the ways of the humans.

However, the son is in charge of his children. If the son has required certain conditions for his children, I would not break those conditions. That's his free will.

Through the son's lack of knowledge, he is putting his entire family at risk: physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, and risking the familial bond and relationship. The implied choice that he is making Laurelayn face is going to either hurt her physically or hurt her and the whole family emotionally.

A grandmother is supposed to be a part of a child's life, and her grandchild and her son cannot replace the enormous value that Laurelayn can bring to their lives.

So you have someone acting from sheer ignorance, putting his family at risk. And Laurelayn has the ability to mitigate the damage done to her and her family by telling one, little, white lie.

If I was the son, and I somehow learned that my mom lied to me, I would be incredibly upset and justifiably so.

Not getting the vaccine and not seeing granddaughter is an option.

Yes, but it's a horrible option - a horrible option which would then not just be caused by the son's ignorance, but by your arrogance - and it doesn't have to come to that.

If I were in Laurie's position, I would explain to the son that I think a vaccine is harmful for my health so I won't get one. I would also express my desire to see my granddaughter. I would also say to the son that I understand if you won't let me see my granddaughter but I hope you reconsider and let me know if you decide that I can see her.

There are times when people are going to put us in situations where we, and even they, will be harmed because of their choices or views and opinions. In such situations, we have the right to act in the best interest of ourselves, and if there's a way to act in the best interest of ALL involved, then that is the correct way to act.

I don't think your approach of steadfastly and coldly declaring your position based on your rigid principles, to hell with everyone else in the world, is of benefit to anyone in this scenario.

Do you see that there are alternatives that don't involve anyone getting hurt?

On external considering:

In Fourth Way parlance, external considering is the practice of taking others into account when acting, seeing their situation as it is and accordingly making life easy both for oneself and for others. Internal considering is the opposite – acting out of a subjective inner state and view of the situation to which one is attached, with any of a number of consequences.

External considering involves making a realistic evaluation of another's situation and acting in ways which take this into account in a positive sense. It is however not the same thing as being socially polite or considerate, although it may be expressed in this manner.

The key concept is to be aware of and to adapt oneself to the level of being and knowledge of others. Thus, one of the things external considering involves is to avoid talking about things which would simply offend others' beliefs or simply not be understood. (See strategic enclosure for more on this.) More generally, external considering relates to an idea of good will towards the environment, in the sense of letting the environment be as it wishes and responding to its requests in a manner that honors its right to be as it will.

External considering is rooted in objective awareness of the environment. Its opposite, internal considering, is rooted in attachment to a subjective inner state, to one's own comfort of preconceptions or desires.

External and internal considering are not always outwardly distinguishable, although inwardly they are fundamentally different. One may for example be socially pleasing purely in order to uphold or reinforce one's own idea of oneself as a 'good person.' Or, be nice out of fear of being judged by others. This is internal considering and preoccupation with how others/the self perceive the self.

In some cases, external considering may involve withholding information that is seen as inappropriate, dangerous or simply unlikely to be well received. An internally considering person may also do this, but then again the motive is different.

We cannot codify with external criteria which action constitutes which kind of considering. The concepts are related to service to others vs service to self and to objectivity vs subjectivity. Usually the term considering is applied in the context of personal interactions.

Only through having external considering can one serve others. This requires responsiveness and a sense of objectivity and awareness of what is right action for the given situation. Serving in the sense of merely carrying out commands is not external considering.
 
Joe said:
If you really don't want to lie, there is an alternative I suppose. Since it seems likely that your son will get the Tdap vaccine for his daughter at age 2 months, you could wait until then to visit. That's assuming, of course, that he wouldn't still ask you to get your own shot even then.

Also by that time baby will have started coming into contact with lots of other people in the community as part of day to day life, lots of whom would not have been vaccinated.

It's totally unreasonable to request that you should be vaccinated, but they are hysterical and can't see it. I guess you know your family well enough to know how they would react to various scenarios, whether that be a little white lie, or waiting it out until they calm down from the initial over protective phase. Letting their hysteria guilt trip you into having the shot would not be a good choice imo.

It's crazy how much pressure and scaremongering is applied to parents to vaccinate, and that to them, making such a request of others then seems perfectly reasonable. So best be careful at the outset in how you respond. Making 'a stand' would most likely upset them, and that could very well carry over way past the point where things would have settled out naturally on their own, they could still be angry with you over it. So gently gently I think.
 
Thank you all for your replies, it is helpful. I had an emotional reaction to what I see as harsh conditions for me to meet my granddaughter. I have to put a lot of effort into not overreacting to a lot of things, I am working on that through therapy and EE and mindfully being kind and gentle with myself and others.
My son took a job in Georgia so the following week they will be moving to the other side of the country.
This is heartbreaking to me since I lack the financial ability to travel that far. even getting to Colorado is a stretch.
They made a choice to live in a motor home a few months ago, so there is no room for us to stay with them and we cant afford a hotel so we will be staying in a tent while we visit.
I hadn't considered the initial overprotective phase of new parents. I was kind of in shock that he even asked me to do this.
His mother in law just became paralyzed in June from guillian barre syndrome and I have wondered whether she got vaccinated before that happened.
 
hlat said:
If I were in Laurie's position, I would explain to the son that I think a vaccine is harmful for my health so I won't get one. I would also express my desire to see my granddaughter. I would also say to the son that I understand if you won't let me see my granddaughter but I hope you reconsider and let me know if you decide that I can see her.

That sounds like a reasonable third option to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom