ICE agent fatally shoots protester in Minneapolis: Self-defense or police brutality?

mabar

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Please continue to gather more information because ... I cannot believe she just that.

Seems to me the woman in the SUV just wanted to flee.
Video with audio

From RT News
’It’s obviously very concerning whenever there’s a shooting into a vehicle of someone who’s not armed’ — Minneapolis police say, before claiming it is possible to be JUSTIFIED

There have been multiple cases of vehicles being used to attack and impede DHS law enforcement
It is understandable that they are on the defensive, but if they want to do their job effectively and without interruptions, more discernment would be beneficial to ICE forces. I think.

It seems the protestors are growing in numbers.
 
It doesn't seem that the woman was trying to run over the officer at all. Rather, she was trying to get away. The tires are pointing to the right. It's also not clear that the car even touches the guy who shoots, and if it does, it's just barely.

Now, perhaps the officer did think the car was going to run over him, or rather, he had an instinctive reaction that this was the case. But the car being so close already and just starting to move, it does seem like a total disproportionate thing to do to shoot at her three times on the head - at least the last 2 shots as the car had already cleared his path. If she had really meant to hit him, the shooting wouldn't have prevented it and he would have been mildly injured at most.

If this is one of those things that cops are primed to do due to training, then they are trained to react way too violently. I mean, in how many other countries can you find cops who seeing a car just starting to move right in front of them after an argument decide to shoot the driver on the head three times?

The previous interaction of her being asked to open the door and she trying to move back, then forward, should have made it clear that she was on the run, not on the attack, so chances are they were quite aware of her actual intent.

Something I do find quite infuriating - and lots of people on X too as far as I can see - is that Trump quite blatantly lied about it. Here's the tweet:


We can see in the videos that the officer who shot is calmly walking down the street after the event. He wasn't run over "violently, willfully and viciously" and was not injured at all, so if he went to the hospital it was for show. And no, it's not "hard to believe he is alive" at all. Trump says he watched the video himself so it's not like he was misinformed of the events. Actually, I don't see how he thinks he can get away with lying like that. Does he think people don't have eyes? This is going to bite him back. It already is, in fact, and the democrats will make the most of it.
 
The militarization of police forces has been an issue discussed for decades, and this incident is a predictable outcome. The most amazing is that some people would side and try to justify an armed paramilitary rather than an unarmed murdered civilian. It must be a local culture maybe.
 
I don't see how he thinks he can get away with lying like that. Does he think people don't have eyes?
He's got away with much worse things and crimes. He's just happened to get away with taking over Venezuela and a few other achievements in this barely started new year. People must like this bloody show with a new episode day by day.
 
It doesn't seem that the woman was trying to run over the officer at all. Rather, she was trying to get away. The tires are pointing to the right. It's also not clear that the car even touches the guy who shoots, and if it does, it's just barely.

Now, perhaps the officer did think the car was going to run over him, or rather, he had an instinctive reaction that this was the case. But the car being so close already and just starting to move, it does seem like a total disproportionate thing to do to shoot at her three times on the head - at least the last 2 shots as the car had already cleared his path. If she had really meant to hit him, the shooting wouldn't have prevented it and he would have been mildly injured at most.

If this is one of those things that cops are primed to do due to training, then they are trained to react way too violently. I mean, in how many other countries can you find cops who seeing a car just starting to move right in front of them after an argument decide to shoot the driver on the head three times?

The previous interaction of her being asked to open the door and she trying to move back, then forward, should have made it clear that she was on the run, not on the attack, so chances are they were quite aware of her actual intent.

Something I do find quite infuriating - and lots of people on X too as far as I can see - is that Trump quite blatantly lied about it. Here's the tweet:


We can see in the videos that the officer who shot is calmly walking down the street after the event. He wasn't run over "violently, willfully and viciously" and was not injured at all, so if he went to the hospital it was for show. And no, it's not "hard to believe he is alive" at all. Trump says he watched the video himself so it's not like he was misinformed of the events. Actually, I don't see how he thinks he can get away with lying like that. Does he think people don't have eyes? This is going to bite him back. It already is, in fact, and the democrats will make the most of it.

I do think she was trying to turn and drive away, but this angle shows her left front bumper hitting the Ice agent. Of course it looks like it barely grazed him and he could have easily got out of the way. He then proceeds to fire one shot through the windshield and 2 more through the open driver side window.

It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out. The courts have ruled in the past that a vehicle can be considered a deadly weapon.
 
Slow motion.


This woman was there. She says the officers' midriff was touching the front of the womans car, he was leaning over and pointing his gun. So very close contact if she's correct. Rather creepy, she said she filmed the dead woman in her car....... One report said this man had been dragged by a car earlier in the year in a similar situation. It's true these obstruction tactics make things more dangerous for everyone.


These things will likely happen again in some way because of so many people trying to block what ICE is doing. Dedicated believers for the cause. What a waste of this young woman's life. It's regrettable. An unknowing pawn in the deep states game of conquest.

Renee Nicole Good—the 37-year-old Minneapolis shooting victim

1767844268677.png
 
It's starting to sound like this will be used to start another George Floyd riot.


Nick Sortor's post highlights a chaotic street takeover in snowy Minneapolis streets, captured in a 55-second video showing vehicles spinning donuts amid crowds, with state police vehicles visible but stationary about a mile away, allegedly under orders not to intervene despite 911 calls. The unrest stems from protests erupting after an ICE agent fatally shot Renee Nicole Good on January 7, 2026, during a Trump administration immigration raid in south Minneapolis, where she reportedly attempted to drive into officers; Gov. Tim Walz has activated the National Guard while calling for calm. This echoes criticisms of Walz's handling of the 2020 George Floyd riots, where delayed National Guard deployment led to widespread damage, positioning the post as a pointed rebuke amid ongoing debates over federal immigration enforcement and local response in Minnesota.
 
We can see in the videos that the officer who shot is calmly walking down the street after the event. He wasn't run over "violently, willfully and viciously" and was not injured at all, so if he went to the hospital it was for show. And no, it's not "hard to believe he is alive" at all. Trump says he watched the video himself so it's not like he was misinformed of the events. Actually, I don't see how he thinks he can get away with lying like that. Does he think people don't have eyes? This is going to bite him back. It already is, in fact, and the democrats will make the most of it.

She very clearly was turning to the right and trying to avoid hitting the man standing to the front and left of the vehicle. It's a complete denial of reality for anyone to say otherwise, whether they support ICE and want the illegals out or not. I guess we now get to watch the MAGA heads completely devolve into the same kind of brainless retards as the liberals we've watched for the past 10 years.

The comment thread on this tweet is a good gauge:
 
Another angle. It seems she was trying to escape and he didn't move. Stupidity all around, but imo starting with the driver. Perhaps the officer walking calmly was because the car had just crashed into another parked car a little ways down the road, so there was no need for a chase.

I agree that this could be whipped up into another George Floyd moment. Dangerous times in Minneapolis for sure.

 
Interesting poll on Godlike Production. Was The Ice Shooting Justified? Sixty-six percent of respondents said yes. From abroad, I see this as excessive, an abuse of authority. I think the officer had the option of shooting at the tires, but decided to kill, to act against the life of Renee Good, an American citizen.

Screenshot_20260108-105953_Chrome.jpg

Immigration agent fatally shoots driver in Minneapolis​


The Department of Homeland Security said the woman had weaponized her vehicle, but Minneapolis' mayor said video of the incident didn't show that.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, whose state won a Supreme Court victory about the Trump administration’s plans to deploy the National Guard to Chicago, tonight is calling on DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to resign.

“For months, Trump’s DHS has wreaked lawless havoc in our neighborhoods. Tear gassing infants, families, and police. Firing their weapons at peaceful citizens. Killing innocent people,” Pritzker said in a statement on social media.
“It’s brutal, unconstitutional, and out of control. It must stop. Kristi Noem must go. Now,” Pritzker wrote.​

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem defended the ICE agent, claiming that she had attempted to run him over. State and local authorities have refuted claims that the shooting was in self-defense. In fact, videos show that the driver never turned toward the agent, but rather tried to escape.

 
Some observations about the shooting (I'm just going to call the ICE guys "cops" for brevity):

After backing up slightly and putting the vehicle in drive, she straightens her wheels and accelerates while the shooter cop is in front of her vehicle. The wheels skid on the ice so the car doesn't lurch forward. (It would have on iceless road.) The cop would have heard this. It's reasonable to conclude that he made a snap judgment that the she was intentionally driving towards him. (An example from last year.) That doesn't mean that judgment was correct, of course. The driver appears to have been just attempting to flee, but her execution was poor. She accelerated while her wheels were still straight and someone was in front of her vehicle. She may not have even seen him. She too was probably "spooked" and running on adrenaline.

Apparently the same ICE agent had previously almost been killed by a car when executing a warrant.
The same ICE agent appears to have been dragged roughly 300 feet while executing an arrest warrant on an illegal alien, resulting in 33 stitches just six months ago.
If so, he was primed for just this type of scenario. That said, most law enforcement guidelines tell cops never to stand in front of a vehicle.

The driver should have complied with the cops' orders and not attempted to leave. And the cop shouldn't have been there and in retrospect was not in any real danger.
He may face charges, but could be acquitted, as in this similar case (Grok summary):
In August 2023, in a supermarket parking lot in Blendon Township, Ohio, near Columbus, 21-year-old Ta'Kiya Young, a pregnant Black woman accused of shoplifting liquor bottles from a Kroger store, was confronted by police officers. Body camera footage showed Officer Connor Grubb and another officer approaching her SUV, where she was seated in the driver's seat. Grubb positioned himself in front of the vehicle and drew his weapon after Young refused repeated commands to exit the car. As she began to drive forward toward him, Grubb fired a single shot through the windshield, striking Young in the chest. The vehicle then crashed into the store's exterior wall. Young and her unborn daughter died from the injuries.

Grubb was placed on administrative leave, fired from the police department, and later indicted on charges of murder, involuntary manslaughter, and felonious assault. He pleaded not guilty, with his defense arguing that Young's acceleration of the vehicle constituted a deadly threat, justifying the use of lethal force in self-defense. Prosecutors contended that Grubb unnecessarily escalated the situation and that the car was moving slowly enough for him to step aside.

After a trial in Franklin County, a jury acquitted Grubb on all counts on November 21, 2025, exonerating him of any criminal wrongdoing.


The case drew significant public attention and protests, with Young's family expressing outrage over the verdict and pursuing a civil lawsuit against the township.
 
In fact, videos show that the driver never turned toward the agent, but rather tried to escape.

The driver definitely tried to escape, but there’s another officer standing at the front corner of the car (the one who fired I guess) and any forward motion is going to basically hit that officer. If there was only the officer we see approach, I’d agree with you.

People should know in the US that if you make any sudden movements around law enforcement officers who are trying to interact with you, you’re likely to get shot. Driving a car at them is basically attempted murder.

Is it right that they got shot? Probably not. But it’s to be expected.
 
Another angle. It seems she was trying to escape and he didn't move. Stupidity all around, but imo starting with the driver
There is the possibility that perhaps she was looking at the other agent screaming and trying to open the door at her to her left, that she didn't see the officer coming from the right side, standing up almost in front of the car (more to the left) until or not even when he shot her...it happened too fast.


After backing up slightly and putting the vehicle in drive, she straightens her wheels and accelerates while the shooter cop is in front of her vehicle. The wheels skid on the ice so the car doesn't lurch forward. (It would have on iceless road.) The cop would have heard this. It's reasonable to conclude that he made a snap judgment that the she was intentionally driving towards him.
At the first shot, does not applies to the second and third shot, I think.
He moved out of the way almost at the same time of the first shot.
1767893964463.png
1767894028975.png

Sound of the first shot; next image, impact.

1767894734190.png

Second and third shot directly to her, him out of her harms way.

They are trained to kill not to disarm (in the narrative of the car using as a weapon) but he did not shoot at the tires, though. (Perhaps I had seen too many movies that police aim to the tires) because they want the suspect to be alive.

The driver should have complied with the cops' orders and not attempted to leave.
There are reports that one or more officers ordered her to leave and others to get out of the car. This will come out in the investigation. If true, which order should she have obeyed?
 
Back
Top Bottom