Illuminati son warns of September EMP & biological false-flag attacks

[Mikey]

By being "quick to say that [you were] very familiar with secret societies and all they’re involved with", you just provided him the opening he was looking for by being the perfect receptacle to his "revelations".

I agree. Why was it "quick"? Sounds like subconscious impulse to me. Always keep Strategic Enclosure in mind!

 

[JGeropoulas]

By being "quick to say that [you were] very familiar with secret societies and all they’re involved with", you just provided him the opening he was looking for by being the perfect receptacle to his "revelations".

I agree. Why was it "quick"? Sounds like subconscious impulse to me. Always keep Strategic Enclosure in mind!

I can see how the wording in my post could be misleading so let me clarify. More accurate wording would have been "At my first opportunity, I let him know I was familiar with ...) But either way, it wasn't like I was caught up in his emotions or drama at all. I felt very calm and grounded like I was watching a scene in a movie. Thus I felt as if I were the one "in control" more than the one being set up or manipulated. (And I was doing a lot of self-observation during the entire encounter to maintain my groundedness.) It was from that position that I intentionally was "quick to say"... to nudge him to speak freely. It was a very deliberate, purposeful communication to him, and not an impulse at all.

Was that unwise? (Keep in mind that at that early point in the conversation, I didn't suspect he was some nefarious agent--and still am not convinced actually for the reasons listed in the spreadsheet above, as well as many subtle impressions I had that would be hard to express in words. :/ )

 

[RedFox]

Admittedly, this is a strange story, but I’m just going to share it so I can hear what others think about it, because I’m still not sure what to think. What follows describes the third unusual encounter I’ve had with a stranger since I began wearing my personal protection crystal. It’s based on notes I scribbled at my first opportunity and is related as closely as I can recall to the actual sequence of our conversation.
[..]
EPILOGUE

He and I exchanged texts right after that conversation so I had his phone number. Then 2 weeks later, in preparation for making this post, I thought I contact him to see how he was doing and what else he might say. The first reply to my text was “Who is this?” (which should’ve been obvious since it was a continuation of the earlier text dialogue). So I texted my name and the reply was “I think you have the wrong number.” I then texted details to refresh his memory of our conversation and the reply was “I just got this phone 2 weeks ago and that’s my number now—sorry”.

MY QUESTIONS

Why did we cross paths?
How is it possible that we crossed paths?
What should be concluded about what he told me—especially his warnings about the September false flag attacks?

Well the timing of starting to wear your personal protection crystal may be something to consider.

It reminds me of this:

From session November 19, 1994

[...]What I want to know is who has the power and
ability to set up these kinds of "confirmations" or synchronicities?

A: Same forces spreading disinformation: Brotherhood/ consortium/
Illuminati/ New World Order/ "Antichrist"/ Lizards.

Q: (T) But I'm just a nobody. Why would they go to all trouble to
send somebody in a Camaro to drive up on my lawn...

A: Several answers follow: Number One, Nobody is a "nobody."
Number two, it is no trouble at all for aforementioned forces to give
seemingly individualized attention to anybody. Number three, T***
has been targeted and so has J*** and others because you are on
the right track. Number four, This area is currently a "hot bed" of
activity and extremely rapidly expanding awareness. [Talk about the
Philadelphia Experiment during break]

https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,26582.msg319766.html#msg319766

A: Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the modes of same. Lesson number 3: Know how to counteract same.

Q: When a person is sick, old and one's mother... the only thing to do is take care of it. But, I guess that it is true that anything that tends to cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid falling off a bicycle and breaking his arm. It is all related to lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of attack.

A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going to cause problems...

Q: So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to happen.

A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to "head it off," thus neutralizing it. This is called vigilance, which is rooted in knowledge. And, what does knowledge do?

Q: Protects!

 

[Mikey]

Was that unwise? (Keep in mind that at that early point in the conversation, I didn't suspect he was some nefarious agent--and still am not convinced actually for the reasons listed in the spreadsheet above, as well as many subtle impressions I had that would be hard to express in words. :/ )

I didn't mean to imply that you were not in control, I just know from my own experience how easy it is to say too much and later have to clean up the mess ;)

 

[Zar]

That is indeed a strange encounter and I get the feeling like he intentionally lead the conversation towards his big "reveal". His opening statement

"When I was younger, I used to spend the summers here with my grandmother. Since then, I’ve lived in nearly every state traveling around with my father on all his assignments."

itself is a very big hook to get you to ask a question that seemingly naturally opens up dialogue. I've studied social dynamics/interactions and this seemingly "natural" conversation can all be faked(not saying it was but it's a possibility to consider). Also Because we are social creatures, we tend to reciprocate our emotional state with whomever we speak with, especially when we "open" up to others. Him opening up to you seems like he may have wanted you to open up to him and gain trust/open a doorway for further communication. It's good to hear you remained grounded and vigilant, but exchanging phone numbers and giving him a ride home was probably not the best choice IMO. It's not the tracking you that I think is the problem with exchanging phone numbers but the possibility of future meet ups. Better to er in the side of caution.

I don't think you are in any danger, but it's a lesson for future dialogues with strangers me thinks.

 

[JGeropoulas]

...
It reminds me of this:

From session November 19, 1994

[...]What I want to know is who has the power and
ability to set up these kinds of "confirmations" or synchronicities?

A: Same forces spreading disinformation: Brotherhood/ consortium/
Illuminati/ New World Order/ "Antichrist"/ Lizards.

Q: (T) But I'm just a nobody. Why would they go to all trouble to
send somebody in a Camaro to drive up on my lawn...

A: Several answers follow: Number One, Nobody is a "nobody."
Number two, it is no trouble at all for aforementioned forces to give
seemingly individualized attention to anybody. Number three, T***
has been targeted and so has J*** and others because you are on
the right track. Number four, This area is currently a "hot bed" of
activity and extremely rapidly expanding awareness. [Talk about the
Philadelphia Experiment during break]

https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,26582.msg319766.html#msg319766

A: Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the modes of same. Lesson number 3: Know how to counteract same.

Q: When a person is sick, old and one's mother... the only thing to do is take care of it. But, I guess that it is true that anything that tends to cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid falling off a bicycle and breaking his arm. It is all related to lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of attack.

A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going to cause problems...

Q: So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to happen.

A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to "head it off," thus neutralizing it. This is called vigilance, which is rooted in knowledge. And, what does knowledge do?

Q: Protects!

Thanks for those very relevant quotes from the C's -- especially the "I'm just a nobody" dialogue. I knew this had been discussed but wasn't sure which words to use in a search. And thanks to everyone else for the thought-provoking input so far.

 

[JGeropoulas]

...
It reminds me of this:

From session November 19, 1994

[...]What I want to know is who has the power and
ability to set up these kinds of "confirmations" or synchronicities?

A: Same forces spreading disinformation: Brotherhood/ consortium/
Illuminati/ New World Order/ "Antichrist"/ Lizards.

Q: (T) But I'm just a nobody. Why would they go to all trouble to
send somebody in a Camaro to drive up on my lawn...

Thanks for those very relevant quotes from the C's -- especially the "I'm just a nobody" dialogue. I knew this had been discussed but wasn't sure which words to use in a search. And thanks to everyone else for the thought-provoking input so far.

I read the context of the "nobody" quote and found even more sobering comments by the C's:

A: Beware of disinformation. It diverts your attention away from reality thus leaving you open to capture and conquest and even possible destruction.
...
A: Disinformation comes from seemingly reliable sources. It is extremely important for you to not gather false knowledge as it is more damaging than no knowledge at all. Remember knowledge protects, ignorance endangers. The information you speak of, Terry, was given to you deliberately because you and Jan and others have been targeted due to your intense interest in level of density 4 through 7 subject matter. You have already been documented as a "threat."
...
A: Remember, disinformation is very effective when delivered by highly trained sources because hypnotic and transdimensional techniques are used thereby causing electronic anomalies to follow suggestion causing perceived confirmation to occur.

 

[Laura]

Reminds me of Vinnie Bridges.

Could you say just a little bit more about which aspect of Vinnie Bridges you're thinking about so I can have some kind of narrowed filter for reviewing that material? Thanks.

Whole thing smells like a Vinnie type grifter op.

But then, you did sort of ask for it. Let's hope it comes to nothing and you aren't robbed and murdered in your own house.

 

[Joe]

Reminds me of Vinnie Bridges.

Could you say just a little bit more about which aspect of Vinnie Bridges you're thinking about so I can have some kind of narrowed filter for reviewing that material? Thanks.

Whole thing smells like a Vinnie type grifter op.

But then, you did sort of ask for it. Let's hope it comes to nothing and you aren't robbed and murdered in your own house.

They guy sounded like a new age grifter/BS artist to me. Or he could simply have been a bit nuts (no shortage of those around). I think you were pretty naive and pretty careless to get sucked into his nonsense.

 

[Joe]

Was that unwise? (Keep in mind that at that early point in the conversation, I didn't suspect he was some nefarious agent--and still am not convinced actually for the reasons listed in the spreadsheet above, as well as many subtle impressions I had that would be hard to express in words.

There's no reason to think he was some nefarious agent, in fact, there's every reason to think he wasn't. There are however lots of reasons to think that he was just a slightly crazy person. I mean, "illuminati son"? Gimme a break!

 

[JGeropoulas]

Was that unwise? (Keep in mind that at that early point in the conversation, I didn't suspect he was some nefarious agent--and still am not convinced actually for the reasons listed in the spreadsheet above, as well as many subtle impressions I had that would be hard to express in words.

There's no reason to think he was some nefarious agent, in fact, there's every reason to think he wasn't. There are however lots of reasons to think that he was just a slightly crazy person. I mean, "illuminati son"? Gimme a break!

Yeah I'm leaning much more toward that conclusion myself at this point.

 

[JGeropoulas]

...
I think you were pretty naive and pretty careless to get sucked into his nonsense.

Maybe so, but as I said earlier, "it wasn't like I was caught up in his emotions or drama at all. I felt very calm and grounded like I was watching a scene in a movie. Thus I felt as if I were the one "in control" more than the one being set up or manipulated. (And I was doing a lot of self-observation during the entire encounter to maintain my groundedness.)"

In my mind, the basic plot beneath all the wild content, was that a stranger extended typical Southern hospitality to me by offering to share his table. I accepted and he began pouring his heart out, so I listened. As the subject matter got stranger, I became more intrigued but also more skeptical, so I intensified my self-observation and took it all with a grain of salt. Then I reciprocated his hospitality by offering to drop him off (6 blocks away) on my way out of town. If that's naive and careless, then I'll have to rethink some things, I guess.

 

[Oxajil]

I think this encounter can be an important lesson to stay cautious.

I can’t see any incentive for him to weave such a tale for me, a complete stranger. I did think his behavior exhibited poor boundaries and was rather inappropriate in that he was so disclosing to someone he’d just met. But once I heard what he had to say, I could see how he might open up so much once he realized I “had ears to hear” about such things.

In that instance, you could've nodded and then when the conversation was over, say you have an important appointment and then leave, if possible. Your story reminds me a bit of an experience I had last year. An old man (who seemed genuine and kind) started talking to me about his abduction experiences (after having met him for 5 mins), and how he was working on very important alien technology 'with help from above' and which he hopes to finish soon. He gave me all kinds of details on how the secret agencies were going after him. And he claimed, the 'people from above' will be here to help us. I just nodded and said that's interesting. All he did was talk and didn't leave space for much of a response, which was good, because I think in such cases, it's probably wise and externally considerate to let them talk, while you look for a way or an excuse to excuse yourself (rather than engaging in it and encouraging their beliefs), especially when you get suspicious!

Then I reciprocated his hospitality by offering to drop him off (6 blocks away) on my way out of town. If that's naive and careless, then I'll have to rethink some things, I guess.

Perhaps a simple thank you would've been enough for his hospitality, or maybe offering to pay for his drink? I wouldn't give strangers a ride (unless you're absolutely certain they're ok), especially considering his stories.

My 2 cents. :)

 

[bjorb]

If you give unstable people attention, they might get hooked on you. And than it can get dangerous. Not only that, you might be feeding their illusions if you don't respond tactful. Best to leave it be at all times JGeropoulas. OSIT.

I once had a homeless person (or so I suspected) who out of the blue told me that he had the pin code of the eleventh dimension. I answered that I'm not interested in the eleventh dimension. But thanked him anyhow.

But yeah, I felt sorry for him. But engaging such conversations isn't helping anyone I think. Unless they are willing to seek out professional help.

 

[JGeropoulas]

I think this encounter can be an important lesson to stay cautious.

I can’t see any incentive for him to weave such a tale for me, a complete stranger. I did think his behavior exhibited poor boundaries and was rather inappropriate in that he was so disclosing to someone he’d just met. But once I heard what he had to say, I could see how he might open up so much once he realized I “had ears to hear” about such things.

In that instance, you could've nodded and then when the conversation was over, say you have an important appointment and then leave, if possible. Your story reminds me a bit of an experience I had last year. An old man (who seemed genuine and kind) started talking to me about his abduction experiences (after having met him for 5 mins), and how he was working on very important alien technology 'with help from above' and which he hopes to finish soon. He gave me all kinds of details on how the secret agencies were going after him. And he claimed, the 'people from above' will be here to help us. I just nodded and said that's interesting. All he did was talk and didn't leave space for much of a response, which was good, because I think in such cases, it's probably wise and externally considerate to let them talk, while you look for a way or an excuse to excuse yourself (rather than engaging in it and encouraging their beliefs), especially when you get suspicious!

Then I reciprocated his hospitality by offering to drop him off (6 blocks away) on my way out of town. If that's naive and careless, then I'll have to rethink some things, I guess.

Perhaps a simple thank you would've been enough for his hospitality, or maybe offering to pay for his drink? I wouldn't give strangers a ride (unless you're absolutely certain they're ok), especially considering his stories.

My 2 cents. :)

Normally I would have behaved exactly as you suggested, but I sensed absolutely no danger or threat from this young, small-framed guy--probably because his demeanor seemed very familiar to me, having spent the last 7 years of my 25 years as a psychologist working with veterans with PTSD.