Imminent Alien Disclosure?

It seems that for 75 years the national security factions and the STS aliens were hell-bent on keeping the subject secret.

The PTB were interested in having people believe that they are at the top of the hierarchy and keeping it secret that they have made shady deals with ETs to the detriment of the common people.

The aliens seem to have been interested in secrecy as well as they were working on taking over this planet surreptitiously.
I understand that disclosure could mean billions of earthlings refusing an alien takeover that might lead to karmic repercussions for the ETs if they execute it openly.

On the other hand there has been an unofficial disclosure by Star Wars movies and the like for decades.
There must be a large percentage of the population accepting UFOs, 'Jedis' and 'Chewbaccas' as some part of their reality.

I'm prepared to believe in a primed disclosure though, in preparation of a faked 'alien invasion' mimicking the appearance of ETs by the use of sophisticated secret technology.
 
I don't understand what's good about "disclosure". People who know, know. Those who depend on the government for telling them about UFOs will be fed narratives and lies anyway when the PTB and handlers will decide to "disclose" something about it.
 
mkrnhr said:
I don't understand what's good about "disclosure". People who know, know. Those who depend on the government for telling them about UFOs will be fed narratives and lies anyway when the PTB and handlers will decide to "disclose" something about it.
Click to expand...
Good point! Disclosure means to disclose something, to make it known, to tell the truth. What motivates someone to tell the truth, and what kind of people do this, vs what kind of people are running the show? In what universe does anyone expect a bunch of psychopaths to go from always lying, manipulating, and killing to inexplicably have a change of heart and announce the truth about some deep dark secret? And if they ever tell any truth, it's always only partial and with a manipulation agenda. But yet people expect them to be like "Ok look we know we treat you like cattle, have no respect for any of you, want you to eat bugs, trick you into wars, impoverish and poison your minds and bodies, and ultimately want to reduce your numbers dramatically, but I guess we care about you and you deserve the truth and we just can't live with ourselves keeping all of these secrets from you anymore, so yeah there's aliens and we've been talking to them and stuff".

It's like being in a toxic abusive relationship with someone who keeps you isolated from the world, and you start figuring out the situation and start learning about the world, but still somehow expect or demand that your abuser pauses everything about who they are for a minute, and tells you yes you're right - I've been totally abusing you and lying to you this whole time, and you really deserve much better and there's a whole world out there and you should just go and explore it and be yourself and be free. Isn't it more reasonable that the abuser will gaslight you, and even if you force their hand, they'll find a way to convince you that that the world does exist but is dangerous and you're only safe with them? And the only reason they'll say something nice about another person and encourage you to trust them is because it's a fellow abuser.

So if there's any "disclosure" it has to be a lie. Bad aliens will be presented as good. Good aliens would be presented as bad. Their abilities and their nature and the nature of their interaction with us and our world will also be lies in service of an agenda. They will only tell you what they want you to think, and how they want you to think about it, and only if they feel they must, or it benefits them.

I think a better attitude is "screw you, we don't need you, we'll figure it out ourselves, and we'll decide what it means to us, and what we want to do about it". Anything coming out of their mouths should be irrelevant, and largely disregarded. We don't need their "permission" to learn the truth. We don't need their approval, or blessing, or advice. We don't need their opinions or ideas or anything else they want to express. They're the abuser - and the only way out of this situation and into the light is never through them, or with them. The sooner people disabuse (funny word in this context) themselves of the notion that they need anything from these psychopaths, the better.
 
mkrnhr said:
I don't understand what's good about "disclosure". People who know, know. Those who depend on the government for telling them about UFOs will be fed narratives and lies anyway when the PTB and handlers will decide to "disclose" something about it.
Click to expand...
Good point. @skymargo recently made a good observation. Publics she used to follow-politics, holistic/homeopaths doctors, covid antiterror channels etc etc-after unknown ballons/ufo’s -all professionals in their spheres, basically ‘promoters’ of Cs approaches to different subjects, just got stuck with aliens. Blocking even possibilities of such ‘higher’ existence. Then goes the dilemma-unsign from them, as this might reveal the ‘limitations’ of the authors, or - continue following them for good ‘life hacks’ in their spheres?! How many people, even clever ones, can even acknowledge their 👆 presence here?
We think that the speeding up life rollercoaster will give them chance to finally see the world as it is....🙏
 
mkrnhr said:
I don't understand what's good about "disclosure". People who know, know. Those who depend on the government for telling them about UFOs will be fed narratives and lies anyway when the PTB and handlers will decide to "disclose" something about it.
Click to expand...
That's one of the considerations that Richard Dolan takes into account in the video of his summarization of disclosure from 2013.
 

White House weighs possibility of Biden addressing UFOs​

White House aides are weighing whether to have President Biden address the public about a series of unidentified flying objects that were shot down by the U.S. military in recent days, according to an official familiar with the conversations.

Biden has faced an onslaught of criticisms by Republicans in particular who have said the president needs to be more communicative with the public about the issue, particularly after three separate unknown aerial objects were shot down three days in a row last weekend.

One White House official said there has been growing chatter in the building about Biden addressing the issue at some point, possibly this week before he leaves the country for Poland on Monday.

But the White House and its allies also believe there is little to gain from rushing Biden out when officials are still gathering information about the weekend’s incidents, deferring instead to Pentagon officials and White House national security spokesperson John Kirby to be the public faces addressing the actions.

Biden hasn’t spoken of the objects that were shot down over the weekend, fueling criticism by some lawmakers on Capitol Hill dissatisfied with his administration’s briefings on the matters.

“The president owes the American people an explanation, direct and on camera, of what we know about these ‘objects’ and what steps he’s taking to protect American’s sovereign airspace,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said in a statement

“You know, in the absence of information, people will fill that gap with anxiety and other stuff. So, I wish the administration was a little quicker to tell us everything they know,” Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said on Sunday just hours before the third object was shot down..
thehill.com

White House weighs possibility of Biden addressing UFOs

White House aides are weighing whether to have President Biden address the public about a series of unidentified flying objects that were shot down by the U.S. military in recent days, according to…
thehill.com thehill.com
 

White House weighs possibility of Biden addressing UFOs​

White House aides are weighing whether to have President Biden address the public about a series of unidentified flying objects that were shot down by the U.S. military in recent days, according to an official familiar with the conversations.

Biden has faced an onslaught of criticisms by Republicans in particular who have said the president needs to be more communicative with the public about the issue, particularly after three separate unknown aerial objects were shot down three days in a row last weekend.

One White House official said there has been growing chatter in the building about Biden addressing the issue at some point, possibly this week before he leaves the country for Poland on Monday.

But the White House and its allies also believe there is little to gain from rushing Biden out when officials are still gathering information about the weekend’s incidents, deferring instead to Pentagon officials and White House national security spokesperson John Kirby to be the public faces addressing the actions.

Biden hasn’t spoken of the objects that were shot down over the weekend, fueling criticism by some lawmakers on Capitol Hill dissatisfied with his administration’s briefings on the matters.

“The president owes the American people an explanation, direct and on camera, of what we know about these ‘objects’ and what steps he’s taking to protect American’s sovereign airspace,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) said in a statement

“You know, in the absence of information, people will fill that gap with anxiety and other stuff. So, I wish the administration was a little quicker to tell us everything they know,” Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said on Sunday just hours before the third object was shot down..
Click to expand...

When I see something like this, my immediate thoughts go back to Wag the Dog movie.
Politicians want to appear as statesmen and "peoples guys/gals" but in reality all they are after is keeping their seat and gaining more power. The real issue gets carefully avoided. Finger pointing, accusations, demands. Just look at him, he wants our best, challenging president and his administration. Really?

If that was true, there would be not only accusatory questions or demands but actions in their own states/counties about food and food plants security, train derailments, vaccination injuries, drug addictions, eduaction etc. just to name a few.

Distracting public to non-existent or not important problems only shows they are part of the same club.

UFOs/aliens. OK, if there was real interest in general public or the country overall, the so far classified materials would be made public so people could form their own opinions about who is coming and what disposition they might have towards humankind. It has been said earlier in this thread, those who know, do know. And they know that what is coming is not our saviors.
 
The U.S. government is giving the subject a spin, the UAPs are not Chinese, they are not terrestrial, who knows if they are extraterrestrial... but the opposite....

Check this out:

White House Press Secretary on the 3 downed UFOs:

"No evidence they originated in China; not operated by U.S. government; President Biden to address public at 14:00 hrs."

February 16, 2023.
Original audio.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1626296186834411520

President of the United States, Joe Biden:

"We don't know exactly what these 3 objects were / My Secretary of State will lead an effort to help establish common global standards on largely unregulated unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs)."

Original audio.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1626315124628758532

To me that means an imminent alien disclosure, once the effort is "global" to understand that which they dare not yet call "aliens".

National Geographic’s New Docuseries Gives Insight Into UFO Sightings

National Geographic's new docuseries, UFO's: Investigating the Unknown, examines the United States government's past and present history with UFO reporting and research. Through five episodes, the series explores both historical and contemporary perspectives efforts of the US Air Force to silence reports and ultimately stigmatize the subject of UFOs.

According to the docuseries producer and director Ricki Stern, the series was inspired by the reporting published in the New York Times and Harry Reid's admission that the government was indeed funding a program and taking reports from military pilots of UFOs.

Alejandro Rojas, Head of Content and Research at EnigmaLabs - a data and community platform for UAP sightings; and Board Member of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies, said a series like this is perfectly timed.

"As members of congress continue to ask for more information about UAP, and the Pentagon continues to confirm it is a valid area of study, those who want serious and credible information will look to outlets like National Geographic," said Rojas in an email interview. "Because the series is inspired by the work of Leslie Kean, one of the co-authors of the New York Times article, which broke the Elizonodo and Nimitz stories, the interviews and information will be very eye-opening to viewers. This series is an example of the high standard of reporting they expect."

www.forbes.com

National Geographic’s New Docuseries Gives Insight Into UFO Sightings

This new docuseries from National Geographic explores through historical and contemporary perspectives, the efforts of the US Air Force to silence reports and ultimately stigmatize the subject of UFOs.
www.forbes.com www.forbes.com
 
Pentagon officials told about possible alien contacts with Earth

Aliens can visit our Solar System and launch small probes, similar to the missions that NASA conducts when exploring other planets. This was stated by Pentagon officials in the draft research report, Fox News reports.

The document was prepared by Sean Kirkpatrick, Director of the Pentagon's Anomaly Resolution Office, and Abraham Loeb, Head of the Department of Astronomy at Harvard University. According to the report, Congress commissioned NASA to find 90 percent of all objects near Earth larger than 140 meters in 2005, which led to the creation of Pan-STARRS telescopes.

On October 19, 2017, Pan-STARRS discovered an unusual interstellar object, which was later named "Oumuamua", or scout in Hawaiian. The object had a cigar-shaped shape, seemed flat and flew away from the Sun without showing a comet tail, which led scientists to believe that it was artificial.

"An artificial interstellar object could potentially be a lead ship that releases many small probes during its close pass to Earth, an operational design not too dissimilar from NASA missions," the report says.

The report also said that six months before Oumuamua got as close to Earth as possible, the meter-sized interstellar meteor IM2 fell to Earth and showed an identical speed relative to the Sun at long distances and a shape identical to Oumuamua.

US military personnel are increasingly warning about the threat of real unidentified flying objects (UFOs) that have nothing to do with spy balloons. According to numerous reports from the US military, UFOs capable of accelerating to the speed of sound and hovering motionless in the air regardless of weather conditions, without any visible engines or fuselage shape resembling modern aircraft, regularly appear in the airspace of the United States.

earth-chronicles.ru

Чиновники Пентагона рассказали о возможных контактах инопланетян с Землей

Чиновники Пентагона рассказали, что инопланетяне могут посещать Солнечную систему
earth-chronicles.ru earth-chronicles.ru

We remember that Oumuamua was not a spaceship, but officials task to move forward ufo disclosure narrative is obvious. Step by step
 
Antony said:
We remember that Oumuamua was not a spaceship, but officials task to move forward ufo disclosure narrative is obvious. Step by step
Click to expand...
That's what it seems.. like little drips every now and then, and one day I am sure we will look and say.. "ohhhh that's what they were trying to do" and I do have a feeling that if we do get to see that day, it'll be a deceptive narrative,
 
94-11-19

Q: (T) Is the government planning to stage an invasion by
aliens to cause the populace of the world to go into such
a fear state that they will accept total control and
domination? A: Open. But if so, will "flop".

Q: (T) Why?

A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and
will have "glitches". 2. Real invasion may take place
first. 3. Other events may intercede.

Q: (T) Such as what?

A: Earth changes.

Q: (T) Am I correct in assuming that some of these hot-shot,
big-wig guys in the government who have plans for taking
over the whole world and making everything all happy and
hunky-dory with them in charge, are just simply not in
synch with the fact that there are some definite earth
changes on the agenda? Are they missing something here?

A: Close. They are aware but in denial.

Q: (T) Are these earth changes going to occur prior to the
arrival of the cometary cluster?

A: No. But "time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined.

Q: (T) Am I correct in saying that if they knew what was
really going to happen that they would still continue with
their stupid little plans to make money and try to control
the world?

A: Yes. Greed is a sickness.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom