Unfortunately, he is not the only one to have had misplaced pity for the Greys.I liked Dean as well, but I think he got quite a number of things wrong, especially his liking and feeling pity for Grays. I think he was quite a bit mislead there.
Unfortunately, he is not the only one to have had misplaced pity for the Greys.I liked Dean as well, but I think he got quite a number of things wrong, especially his liking and feeling pity for Grays. I think he was quite a bit mislead there.
Like Budd Hopkins and Robert Dean, Streiber has also had a few references in the transcripts as well. Perhaps what the C's said here may explain why the authorities have not bothered with him:Precisely my point! This is what caught my eye when re-reading the Adamski material and others. Most of these took place before RA, Bringers of the Dawn, Cass- So some of what these contactees may have experienced may have been genuine, at least at first- even if they were being had by 4D STS types. Agree about the spooks being perfectly okay with contactees making abject fools of themselves, allowing them to basically discredit their own stories. Take Whitley Strieber for example- I have read all of his books, but the very fact the man is a well written author of fiction basically brands him a liar right out of the gate. He made it all up.
If he has had the actual experience he has claimed with the grays, he probably knows more about them than anyone else on earth- but yet no one from any of the military or other agencies bothers with him ( at least not anymore, that was not the case originally if he is to be believed)
Perhaps it sounded like I did not believe Strieber was telling the truth in his books- on the contrary, I read them before I found the Cass material and hung on every word. I still believe there are elements of truth to his books, but knowing what we know about the phenomenon now they take on a different level of truth.Like Budd Hopkins and Robert Dean, Streiber has also had a few references in the transcripts as well. Perhaps what the C's said here may explain why the authorities have not bothered with him:
Session 1 January 1995:
Q: (L) Now, Whitley Strieber. (T) Can implants be removed?
A: No.
Q: (L) What is the energy fuelling Whitley Strieber and his work?
A: Grays.
Q: (L) He is an agent of the Grays?
A: No. Instrument of the Grays.
Q: (T) So, all his writing is compromised by the Grays?
A: Influenced by them.
Q: (T) Well, he says that, too. (L) Well, he now thinks he has learned how to be a companion of God through these experiences.
A: Wolfen reflects Lizzie reality.
Q: (L) Who's read the book, what's it about? (T) I saw the movie but I never read the book. I can't stand his Gothic style of writing. (L) I can't stand to read his stuff either. (T) I only got half-way through Communion and gave it up.
Robert Dea
haven’t read Wolfen, or watched the movie so can’t comment on that
I think maybe the "lizzies" and/or "grays" were trying to depict themselves as at least caring in the sense that a pack of wolves take care of each other. I thought it kept me interested to see how it would end. It may be a deliberate attempt to gain sympathy for their species. Whether that is a deserved sympathy or not is a big question I think.Q: (T) So, all his writing is compromised by the Grays?
A: Influenced by them.
Q: (T) Well, he says that, too. (L) Well, he now thinks he has learned how to be a companion of God through these experiences.
A: Wolfen reflects Lizzie reality.
Q: (L) Who's read the book, what's it about? (T) I saw the movie but I never read the book. I can't stand his Gothic style of writing. (L) I can't stand to read his stuff either. (T) I only got half-way through Communion and gave it up. (L) Well, let me ask, while we are on the subject of writing, is Anne Rice channeling her concepts in her vampire books?
A: She also is influenced by the Grays.
I think maybe the "lizzies" and/or "grays" were trying to depict themselves as at least caring in the sense that a pack of wolves take care of each other. I
Sorry this was supposed to be in response to Goyacobal -I don’t think the grays care for each other or us- they only do what they are programmed to do, they are more like automatons. Any semblance to caring is a byproduct of that programming designed to placate their test subjects, like a scientist stroking and cooing to a lab rat before paralyzing them and hacking into their brains while they’re still alive for their sordid experiments. The Lizards- I don’t think they care about anything but themselves, I imagine their personalities to be like the Skeksis from Dark Crystal- always scheming, conniving, looking for ways to put themselves first. They only cooperate when it’s absolutely necessary.
Q: (L) Anything else? (More discussion of answers and asking questions) (L) A****** also asks: Are there monsters in caves all over the world?
The mention of reptilian beings being found in caves all over the world reminds me of the strange creature supposedly photographed at the Cheddar Gorge cave system in England that provoked debate in the transcripts a few years ago.
A: No, not every one. P4 P3 P2 monsters are most usual.
Q: (L) What is a P4 P3 P2 monster?
A: Species designation.
Q: (L) Species designation by whom? Maybe I don't want to know!
A: Their creators aka 4D.
Q: (L) Was this little monster that we got this picture of that was supposed to be in the Cheddar Caves, was that one of these P4 P3 P2 monsters?
A: P3
Q: (L) Aaah! Creepy! Are P3 or P4 worse or creepier?
A: Depends on your perspective.
Q: (A*****) Are there monsters in the caves in Malta too?
A: Oh, yes.
And to think this one was supposed to be a juvenile. It kind of reminds me of the gargoyle statues you find at old churches.
The video ends with the astute observation that many of the UFO's we see in our skies may not be coming from outer space but rather from the inner earth. It is worth keeping in mind that In the Old Testament the Seraphim were known as "fiery flying serpents"
The picture I posted was directly from the transcripts and was the one Laura used when asking the C's to identify the creature. If it is a statue, then I must assume that it is a lifelike recreation of something very real for the C's described it as a P3 type, whatever that means. The Cheddar caves have been associated with strange phenomena from time immemorial, so I guess the statue was intended to depict a strong local tradition that relates to sightings of demonic like creatures.I'm not sure it's the right picture because it's a statue in the cheddar caves.
Here's another angle:
View attachment 103778
Looks a bit like this handsome creature, no? Certainly not something I would want to run into in a dark cave.The picture I posted was directly from the transcripts and was the one Laura used when asking the C's to identify the creature. If it is a statue, then I must assume that it is a lifelike recreation of something very real for the C's described it as a P3 type, whatever that means. The Cheddar caves have been associated with strange phenomena from time immemorial, so I guess the statue was intended to depict a strong local tradition that relates to sightings of demonic like creatures.