In Time (2011)

Zadius Sky

The Living Force
From IMDb:

In a future where people stop aging at 25, but are engineered to live only one more year, having the means to buy your way out of the situation is a shot at immortal youth. Here, Will Salas finds himself accused of murder and on the run with a hostage - a connection that becomes an important part of the way against the system.

I just watched a film, In Time, via DVD, starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried. At first glance via the trailer, I figured it would be just one of those sci-fi action flicks. Big deal. But, then, I saw that it was written, directed, and produced by Andrew Niccol, who also did the films like The Truman Show, Gattaca, S1m0ne, and Lord of War. So, I gave it a watch-ahead.

It takes place in the year 2161 when a genetic alteration has allowed humanity to stop aging at 25 but the people are required to earn more time after turning 25 or die within a year. "Time" has now become a world-wide currency. There is something called "Living time," which can to be transferred from individuals to individuals. And, one can see their own time's availability as displayed on an implant on their lower arm. So, when that clock reaches zero, you die instantly. The more "time" you earn, trade, or even steal, the more you survive. You have to "pay" with your "time," such as a bus fare, a meal, a rent, etc.

The society appears to be divided based on how much "time" you have. The rich have more time than the "poor" whom have to live day to day to keep earning "times" or they would die. The rich of course just live their life without worrying about dying and plans to be "immortals." You can live up to 105 or 2,000 and still looks like 25.

There is an interesting catch phrase in this film where a "rich" character has said to Will (played by Timberlake): "For few to be immortal, many must die." That, to me, implies a huge "time" or energy drain from the "poor," whom had to died, so that rich can live forever. In the "poor" area, the prices has been increasing enough to the point that the people cannot even pay anything with their "time," so they'd died. The more they died, the "rich" endures. That is what Will do not want to have happened - so he sought out to "drain" the immortals from their "time" and distribute it among the poor (and of course collapse the "System" in the process).

This film has that somewhat a typical theme such as hero meets the girl, they are being chased by a bad guy (Timekeeper), who didn't win in the end (there is a twist in this regard), and the hero and the girl moving on together to rob more "Time banks."

It may have been based on some science fiction novels or elements, but I've found this film to be interesting. The lesson is, of course, don't waste any "time" or letting others to waste/steal yours.
 
I saw it recently, of course it wasn't mind blowing and the story is pretty linear but I finally enjoyed it as well.
I thought it would be worse than I thought.

There is an interesting catch phrase in this film where a "rich" character has said to Will (played by Timberlake): "For few to be immortal, many must die." That, to me, implies a huge "time" or energy drain from the "poor," whom had to died, so that rich can live forever. In the "poor" area, the prices has been increasing enough to the point that the people cannot even pay anything with their "time," so they'd died. The more they died, the "rich" endures. That is what Will do not want to have happened - so he sought out to "drain" the immortals from their "time" and distribute it among the poor (and of course collapse the "System" in the process).

The concept of time defining your wealth and longevity was the strongest idea behind the movie.
The main idea behind the movie was borrowed from there though :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%22Repent,_Harlequin!%22_Said_the_Ticktockman

That reminds me as well of Buried inside, a sludge like metalcore band, with the "Chronoclast" album (which revolved around this theme)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jnd5q3Feui0
 
I saw this awhile back, and enjoyed it, though I felt it to be a little oversimplistic. However, contemplating time as currency (rather than money) definitely made for some interesting comparisons/perspectives.
 
Saw this posting so I watched it earlier today. The idea of time is money, was an interesting comparison to today's world. And how people in society are essentially slaves to it. Also the dichotomoy between the rich and the poor and how the controlling few have an abundance of life at the expense of everyone else who are on borrowed time, figuratively and literally in the movie. It was like Robin Hood, steal from the rich, give to the poor. But I enjoyed it.
 
I watched this movie a while back and didn't enjoy it as much as I thought I would. I didn't make the connection to the movie being made by Andrew Niccol, because I love all the other movies listed by him but not this one. I found this movie to be very disappointing in comparison to his other works.

I remember thinking after the end of this movie.. there goes 2 hrs of my "time" I'll never get back... ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom