Incoming! Southwestern US stunned by MoCF - US military claims missile test

Bar Kochba said:
Here is another one, this time zoomed out.

_https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151099423889132&set=a.10150089087024132.280850.614924131&type=1&theater
Click to expand...

Thanks Bar Kochba.
So here it is:

 
Compare this:

_http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49026286/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.UFOfL65vVm6

The Juno missile was then targeted by advanced versions of the Patriot missile fired from White Sands, about 350 miles (560 kilometers) away, as part of a test. Two of the missiles were fired and hit the incoming Juno missile, said Dan O'Boyle, a spokesman for the Redstone Arsenal in Alabama, which was in charge of the Patriots used in the test.

The Patriot missiles kill incoming targets by direct strike and don't explode. [Kniall: "Don't explode"?? What do they do when they hit targets? Demolecularise?!
Click to expand...

...with this:

_http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=22125997

It was the 14th missile launched from the Fort Wingate, NM area since the mid ‘90s. Depending on the sunlight, it's visible at times. The rising sun backlit the Juno missile's contrail and provided a spectacular morning sight for early risers across the region.

The winds in the various layers of atmosphere skewed the missile contrail, creating a swirly cloud pattern seen in the sky. The missile then returned to base.
Click to expand...

Notice the contradiction?
 
Kniall said:
Compare this:

_http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49026286/ns/technology_and_science-space/#.UFOfL65vVm6

The Juno missile was then targeted by advanced versions of the Patriot missile fired from White Sands, about 350 miles (560 kilometers) away, as part of a test. Two of the missiles were fired and hit the incoming Juno missile, said Dan O'Boyle, a spokesman for the Redstone Arsenal in Alabama, which was in charge of the Patriots used in the test.

The Patriot missiles kill incoming targets by direct strike and don't explode. [Kniall: "Don't explode"?? What do they do when they hit targets? Demolecularise?!
Click to expand...

...with this:

_http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=22125997

It was the 14th missile launched from the Fort Wingate, NM area since the mid ‘90s. Depending on the sunlight, it's visible at times. The rising sun backlit the Juno missile's contrail and provided a spectacular morning sight for early risers across the region.

The winds in the various layers of atmosphere skewed the missile contrail, creating a swirly cloud pattern seen in the sky. The missile then returned to base.
Click to expand...

Notice the contradiction?
Click to expand...

Sounds like the "Juno missile" was impervious to two "advanced patriot missiles" hitting it without exploding! :scared: That's totally amazing, and utterly laughable. They really are getting desperate with their explanations! :rolleyes:
 
I see the contradiction, but then again, who
has ever heard of "The missile then returned
to base"? Is the missile a drone or what?

edit: mistyped word.
 
Nothing to see here, folks. Return to your regular scheduled programming; everything is under control and going as planned. :rolleyes:

I had arrived at work and was going around the maintenance facility yard unlocking everything...I looked up and got a little chill when I saw that (to me) huge streak in the sky. I have never in my life seen anything like it except in pictures on SOTT.

Very exciting to me.
 
"The missile then returned to base"

Yes, returned, like every nice missile usually do. :P And it was running on the swamp gas ;D
 
dant said:
I see the contradiction, but then again, who has ever heard of "The missile then returned to base"?
Click to expand...

I've never heard of a missile returning to base (after being launched). It's usually a drone that does. Perhaps they are confusing the two in the reports. Thinking of the one with the other.

Great shot, Bar Kochba, by the way.
 
From my (limited) understanding of such events, I think that missiles do not leave contrails behind but purely a smoke trail which varies in size depending on the amount of mass that is emitted from the back. Smoke trails tend to drift apart fairly quickly.

The US trail is very reminiscent of the supposed"Russia missile" going astray over Israel a couple of months ago (which we can safely assume to be a meteor):

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVv449Jkoc0

Instead, the trail left by the Russian missile in Norway back in 2009 didn't leave any such visible trail:

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNh8b_0elw

Just my 2 cents.
 
Cheers, Kniall. The article could not spell it out more clearly, hard to rationalise it away when the dust/smoke trail looks almost identical to confirmed meteorites.

Still, even knowing that this was a MoCF doesn't mean much to most people that will probably consider them a totally harmless phenomena. I get the feeling it won't be long until we start to see they are more than just a cool light show.

It's a strange feeling when it dawns on you that this is really happening, unfolding right before our eyes. I am on the edge of my seat..
 
Ya'll check out the PTB brainwashed or funded comet deniers that have appeared to comment on the article. It really is amazing to see the damage control in action!
 
Thanks for the picture. These are very exciting news! Really 2012 is a very strange year. And we are just in September!
 
Laura said:
Ya'll check out the PTB brainwashed or funded comet deniers that have appeared to comment on the article. It really is amazing to see the damage control in action!
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, I second that!

loreta said:
Thanks for the picture. These are very exciting news! Really 2012 is a very strange year. And we are just in September!
Click to expand...

Indeed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom