Wandering Star
The Living Force
And I don't think I'm very wrong, in that offering unequivocal proof that what the C's offer is true or let's say valid, solving an unresolved case thanks to their indications, is not something very desirable for them (sixth density Cassiopaea people) .That's not "the way the Cs choose to help," nor is it something we want anyone in France - or anywhere else - to do with any answers to questions we may ask about missing persons cases. If any particular case seems like it may be of universal interest, such that asking about it could yield useful information to all, perhaps because it was a big story in the news and many people are following it, and has unusual or mysterious aspects to it, then we may ask about it, but as a general rule we do not use the sessions to 'solve' cold cases.
What we have done through the overall body of sessions is provide a range of questions and answers about unusual cases, such that if anyone is interested in a particular case, they can find our work (and the work of other researchers, like David Paulides) and use it for clues or ideas about the particular case(s) they are investigating. We will not become directly involved in 'solving' those particular cases.
Faith and work, but without proof. That is what was offered in my opinion.