palestine
The Living Force
Quote from Ponerology.substack.com
I've posted it before but wanted to head back at it, because of the bolded part, which carries on the whole A. Loabczewski's microcosm IMO.
This part explains, in a nutshell, the basics of psychopathology.
It shows that going the road of anti-Zionism is not something that which grants a golden ticket to paradise & the world of "good people". Danger lurks there, too. I think we could ponder this "knowledge", even if we cannot really fathom this reality - as a starting point... to know what & how to watch out.
- Starting up with anti-Zionism, we end up with a pathocracy...
- Starting up with Communism, or Nazism - at some point - we need to change our views and stop considering the ideology. Fully. Something else came by.
The italic part provides the reason, but it is complex. I am not even sure I can explain it correctly.
I believe we are not used to such motion, in reality. An intrinsic change took place, in a structure, to the extent that we have to "switch tools" - all of this taking place within the same element. I understand this has been the challenge for historians (and scientists): they could not reach the understanding of the phenomenon because their world view has no room for such a process / motion.
- First is that we end up, within the initial object - with a new element. A completely independent element. This is quite an aspect.
- Second is that this takes place within a "linear motion" and within the same object. History & science have no room for that, and it's perhaps why it is difficult to understand. An element could change, after all, and the motion here is a sort of parazitism.
- Third is that this refers to psychopathology, a domain that is not considered as susceptible to have anything to do in politics, country's structures, civilizations, etc etc - when it does. (I am wondering if science could make it a new "law" - corruption in regard of the initial state... If it takes place in groups - why not in other biological elements? Unless it's a human aspect only.)
Pathocracy is a macrosocial expression of psychopathy. It has no fundamental relationship with either zionism or anti-zionism. In other words, a Jewish pathocracy is just as possible as an anti-Jewish pathocracy, or a pathocracy that has no relation to either.
I've posted it before but wanted to head back at it, because of the bolded part, which carries on the whole A. Loabczewski's microcosm IMO.
This part explains, in a nutshell, the basics of psychopathology.
It shows that going the road of anti-Zionism is not something that which grants a golden ticket to paradise & the world of "good people". Danger lurks there, too. I think we could ponder this "knowledge", even if we cannot really fathom this reality - as a starting point... to know what & how to watch out.
- Starting up with anti-Zionism, we end up with a pathocracy...
- Starting up with Communism, or Nazism - at some point - we need to change our views and stop considering the ideology. Fully. Something else came by.
The italic part provides the reason, but it is complex. I am not even sure I can explain it correctly.
I believe we are not used to such motion, in reality. An intrinsic change took place, in a structure, to the extent that we have to "switch tools" - all of this taking place within the same element. I understand this has been the challenge for historians (and scientists): they could not reach the understanding of the phenomenon because their world view has no room for such a process / motion.
- First is that we end up, within the initial object - with a new element. A completely independent element. This is quite an aspect.
- Second is that this takes place within a "linear motion" and within the same object. History & science have no room for that, and it's perhaps why it is difficult to understand. An element could change, after all, and the motion here is a sort of parazitism.
- Third is that this refers to psychopathology, a domain that is not considered as susceptible to have anything to do in politics, country's structures, civilizations, etc etc - when it does. (I am wondering if science could make it a new "law" - corruption in regard of the initial state... If it takes place in groups - why not in other biological elements? Unless it's a human aspect only.)
Last edited: