Interesting quote on pathology

Thanks for the comments. I've checked into the 8 volumes of the wave, only one has a mention of A. Lobaczewski. Laura put it in perspective, but it's not extensive. I've read Topper, it's great, it helped me a lot. The work on "bidding" made a lot of sense. Laura's article on Ibn'Al Arabi is a nogo for me since it's AI. I will pursue my studies on my own, as I can, and post if anything nice pops up.

Perhaps - back to the quote! Isn't there anything to say about it? Doesn't anybody want to react to the fact that being antifa, antizionist - could turn one's existence towards the STS world? That was the goal of the thread. A discussion. Why is it so, how come that going antizionist will have the effect of ruining the mind? We could apply this to anti-Trump-ism...

Fascinating quote, containing a huge microcosm for extended studies.

The common world view believes that building one's character around "fighting Nazism" (or fascism), in the mind will ultimately, definitely, 100% - lead to a positive outcome. Variations exist - and this would be like an infinite possibility of extending the basic idea. "Fighting a bad element is just fine and there is no limit in this". A process can short-wire that good intention. Most people believe they simply have to be against Nazism - and there you are - I am a good person & society will reward myself. In fact, some people end up being worse humans than people who are lukewarm in the matter of Nazism.
 
Also, evil is a subjective term. Are we evil because we kill and eat cows? We have been there before , having suffered the effects of ponerisation under patholocal leaders and committing shameful acts. STS is a more accurate description and a framework to understand why evil exists, psychopathy being one facet of such. Fwiw
Thanks, that would be exactly the kind of theories I would like to discuss here. Simply framing "evil", "STS" and "psychopathology" - in one model. I think it can be done.

I agree with this:
Also, evil is a subjective term.

But here, when reading this idea which makes much sense (evil is a subjective concept) - I immediately remind myself of A. Lobaczewski, who says: "Since philosophy and else did not care on the opposite side of the coin, let me introduce you to a new scientifical disciplien - ponerology - the study of evil". I cannot prevent myself from ponderingg the fact that evil may be a subejctive concept, indeed, and the fact that A. Lobaczewski managed to spot the mechanism of "Pathocracy", which would be hiding above:
  • DNA psychopathies
  • psychopathology
  • social & political phenomenons
It makes the word "relevant", since a professional psychiatrist who managed to perhaps pierce the veil of 4thD STS with 3D concepts - borrowed it. Asking you if you wouldn't change your mind on that one, under the light of those considerations. Of course that I amn't trying to convince you... but rather to show you an equation whose solution I don't have.

STS is a more accurate description

This has been my hypothesis too. One problem I have been facing is that STS is, too, a precise and 3D "trait" (when sombody starts to serve the self). I think even an animal can start serving the self. Perhaps "STS" amounts to a sort of metaphysical pool, too, and both cases (3D precise trait, cosmic pool) could yield distinctions or studies.

So, asking myself, too, if STS is a more accurate description, so that the word "evil" should be freely subordinated to "STS". It could be so, and this is specifically a matter that I would like to find an answer to. In order, perhaps, to sketch a something... A sort of A. Lobaczewski C cosmology

That would be because A. Lobaczewski's principles seem to be objective, of value, and matching reality in a high-precision level. Cannot let it like that, even if C's provide a model. Trick would be to "combine". Perhaps there is no hierarchy of quality between the C model and A. Lobaczewski; they would be describing different things, or the same thing in a different way.

Perhaps,
it's right than to subordinate "evil" to "STS". I have no clue since nothing has been written on it, in a 1+1=2 way. Hence, why I have been asking (hey guys - I stumble upon this - I don't understand the how's and why's - what is - please). Finally, thanking you for your input precisely adressing the matter!
 
Perhaps, it's right than to subordinate "evil" to "STS". I have no clue since nothing has been written on it, in a 1+1=2 way. Hence, why I have been asking (hey guys - I stumble upon this - I don't understand the how's and why's - what is - please). Finally, thanking you for your input precisely adressing the matter!
My two cents.

Just as a cat in a box can be alive or dead, and the observer (consciousness) determines its quantum state, the concept of "evil" is likewise determined by this.

The law of three, stated in this forum, states that good exists, evil exists, and the situation that determines it exists (I've paraphrased).

Let's suppose there's a forum for STO people, and someone responds to a comment from another forum member with a thumbs down, showing their rejection of that comment. The STO people on the forum would see it as a negative or evil act, and that person would be STS.

If the forum were STS, the thumbs down would be seen as something negative or evil by the forum, and the person would be categorized accordingly as being of the opposite polarity.

To paraphrase the C's, sending love and light to someone STS has the same result as sending a bucket of vomit; it's an act of evil for the STS recipient.

One side manipulates and uses, the other respects and helps.

Both form the whole, but their energies are incompatible.
 
A fairly clear example of STS action would be the mafia portrayed in movies (which is surely the same in real life), which murders, traffics, abuses men and women, and it is seen as something perfectly normal for those who make up the mafia.

The police officers who prevent these acts and imprison the mafia members, are the ones committing the evil acts, as those people in the Mafia understand it.

If you haven't experienced it yet, saying a firm no to someone selfish immediately provokes a very interesting reaction.:-D
 
Last edited:
The law of three, stated in this forum, states that good exists, evil exists, and the situation that determines it exists

Yes, the forum appreciates (the danger / things / ...) in terms of "STS" and my personal situation has been that of having thought of this perspective for some years now. Added to it, in parrallel - A. Lobaczewski.

Years flying by, thinking of "STS" & thinking of "psychopaths" (and specifically the "evil of A. Lobaczewski) - I am starting to try to think of correlations... To draw parrallels. Really a natural road here, of thoughts. What's similar, what's exactly matching... ?
 
Best to address issues here on the open forum rather than sending me a personal message. So if you would like to post what you sent me here it can be discussed further the benefit of all.
I don't agree and felt the issue contained in my PM would be best adressed with it. I of course have no intention to "post what I've sent you" here, especially since if I wanted it there, I would have written it in plain sight. Too, I am not your personal butler and don't automatically carry on actions upon request: what I "would like to" is not up to you to push. So, no I don't "would like to ... and ... or ..."!
 
Best to address issues here on the open forum rather than sending me a personal message. So if you would like to post what you sent me here it can be discussed further the benefit of all.
gottathink, you were right to bring this up here. palestine, your response is rude and unnecessary. If you refuse to discuss something here, start your own forum or substack. Don't go around private messaging our members and then getting upset when they rightfully call you out on it. This is a discussion forum, not a place to find people to privately message. You've already been put on moderation before because of your disagreeable nature. You can either behave in a normal, polite way our you'll be back on moderation. It takes zero effort to be nice.
 
Thank you @Beau for chiming in and having applied an admin's stance.

Since some "friction" / "elements" have been raising your presence, at this stage, I feel I can ask you to consider the following:

and then getting upset when they rightfully call you out on it

... and ask you to double-check on the objectivity of @gottathink 's "rightful" attitude / action. IMo it's far from being rightful and it makes all the difference.

In addition, I am not upset; I don't care at all on this aspect - but since @gottathink has been, in my perspective, featuring un-necessary and counter-productive attitudes - I reserve myself the right to answer accordingly. Hence, my so-called rude tone, which is the strict alignment to an exchange:

Despite my free-will to let go a bit off his initial posts that seemed to be a bit off-track, lecturing and "superior", and not to answer to that (and getting along)... He has been doubling down.

This triggered a PM from me, to him, explaining him how I felt his posts were not spot on, and asking him to behave differently. He tripled down on what then fall down into being a "snitch" post (not aligned I'm afraid), and you can spot this via the objective lack of consideration:

So if you would like to post what you sent me here it can be discussed further the benefit of all.

Seems nobody should determine the needs of others, isn't it? That's what he does here; in fact, this post is manipulative... He makes me write a post when something does not suit him, under the guise of whatever. The precise matter here is that he has not been productive in the context of thsi thread, and his activity has been one of a dilution - rathe rthan a contribution. I think there is a border to the forum guidelines, and when a principle such as the one you explain - applies. @gottathink may have been flirting on that border, ending up with me being the bad duck. I won't accept that and will request impartiality.

I think.. we cannot put all & everything under the guise of forum's principles such as "do your own studies, maybe we could start a thread discussing the matter of ..." - those are to be framed into a precise context. Here, the context is ... missing.

So thank you for your action: I am, indeed, complaining and asking for a twist in this new moderation message. I invite you to have a look at the thread, and see if @gottathink is pristine, or if, by any occurence, he may have been giving into the easy way. I won't accept a blame scapegoating phenomenon.

I don't appreciate the commensurate energy that I am compelled to spend here, seemingly for a person having the feel for doing the cop (not you). This matters to me.
 
@palestine, you are clutching at the straws now. There are some mental gaps evident from the way you post or ask questions. Perhaps, re-read the feedback provided and reflect. You have a misunderstanding of this forum and community in general, which is expected when arriving freshly from the fake reality out there. This is not for everyone and that’s ok.

Something to note that you are not owed an explanation or a response by anyone about anything. Why? Because, It cannot be explained to your mind just yet because your mind is holding you a prisoner. And you don’t know this either which is a tragedy.

You need to tear down everything you know or think about eveything, including the way you go about it. A full program of unlearning and relearning is needed if there is to be any hope for you. Fwiw
 
@palestine, you are clutching at the straws now. There are some mental gaps evident from the way you post or ask questions. Perhaps, re-read the feedback provided and reflect. You have a misunderstanding of this forum and community in general, which is expected when arriving freshly from the fake reality out there. This is not for everyone and that’s ok.

Something to note that you are not owed an explanation or a response by anyone about anything. Why? Because, It cannot be explained to your mind just yet because your mind is holding you a prisoner. And you don’t know this either which is a tragedy.

You need to tear down everything you know or think about eveything, including the way you go about it. A full program of unlearning and relearning is needed if there is to be any hope for you. Fwiw
Don't take it personally because we are all up to improving ourselves all the time - but I remember a thread in which you have been quite disagreable with another user (BlueKiwi) who turned out later to be right (and you wrong). In this exchange, you literally freely admonested him, lecturing him with firm takes, telling him how he was wrong etc. That thread on "Izzat".

I will thus take your message with a grain of salt. Please understand that with such a discrepancy that you have been featuring there, I cannot take what you tell me for granted. You have been failing once, so as a basic safety measure, it is preferable for me not to follow your suggestions. This does not engage you as a person, but since you found it okay than to freely chime in like that, I think I have a right to answer and tell you how I feel? You have been rude with the other user, and if I recall correctly, you did not even tell him sorry after that, or that he was right and you wrong. Is it this what we are dealing right now?

And you seem, too, qualified and assessing my own mental state?! Is this a joke?

I have been requesting an assessment of my exchange with gottathink, to an admin, and I feel that it would be best for you (and others who feel tempted to do the work of God) than to start up with this step, out of basic objectivity. A basic reason of the existence of admins is that they are qualified to undertake a couple of actions... for instance, assessing, and then judging. If you are to pose a judgment on something, that's a risky task and a very difficult one. Before concluding, I will remind you that the best way is to remain cautious and refrain from drawing conclusions. Judging is severe... It's a stamping and it has consequences. It says you came up with the "Truth".

Perhaps, re-read the feedback provided and reflect

It says "be nice all the time". Not exactly the best tool for reality. Gottathink has been pulling the rope a bit too much and I reminded him to mind his own business because he was giving into self-service rather than sincerely participating in the thread. Yes, that is unpleasant, yes that is "not nice". But that is a sane reaction and situations sometimes requires it. He has been asking for it, that's it end of the story. If one prefers to see else, no problem at all, it won't change the situation.
 
Hi palestine,

I remember a while ago Laura wrote (I don't recall where exactly) something about how people here on the forum use some concepts like STO, STS, 3D, 4D, etc., like they know exactly what they are talking about (I'm paraphrasing), while this is not the case, and I'm not saying this is your case, but to get a grasp of concepts like these, you really must read The Wave along with other recommended readings.

Based on gottathink's posts, I don't see anything offensive or wrong toward you; gottathink and other forum members were simply trying to point you in the right direction by recommending that you need to read more.

So, take a break, breathe, and remember that there are no personal "attacks" here and that our goal is to learn together through honest and constructive feedback.
 
@palestine, I can only laugh at what you’ve said. It didn’t take much scratching to draw out your real self. Nothing else to add. You are not here to learn.

Edit- wanted to add as just remembered that I actually got into an argument with ChatGPT once and it started complaining back to me and self-defending exactly like this. I was quite spooked fir a few minutes.
 
Last edited:
Gottathink has been pulling the rope a bit too much and I reminded him to mind his own business because he was giving into self-service rather than sincerely participating in the thread. Yes, that is unpleasant, yes that is "not nice". But that is a sane reaction and situations sometimes requires it. He has been asking for it, that's it end of the story. If one prefers to see else, no problem at all, it won't change the situation.

@palestine, it is not for the fact that you were asking questions in the thread you started, which is the modus of the forum (not that everyone will always like the answers or the answers may also be in error), it is that you deemed yourself above it that you can make a hidden personal statement (or whatever you did say) in a private PM to another member when that is not the done thing.

gottathink is a long time member who has not peached on what your wrote, and you are not saying, yet the fact remains that gottathink was exactly right to open this up.

So far in response, it may seem you have done some deflecting when the matter is pretty simple. Thus, exactly what in particular was said (your bolded above) in this short thread that every gave you that impression?

Based on gottathink's message 'best to address here..." where you wrote:
I don't agree and felt the issue contained in my PM would be best adressed with it.

Your feeling and subsequent action was simply wrong. Regardless, this is not your forum where these simple rules against PM'ing are made for very good reasons. Can you see where those reasons might make sense to the owner of the forum and the administrators/moderators who are charged with protecting members?

In response to Beau, and to gottathink especially, you could have simply offered a sincerely apology - maybe you did not know, or you forgot that PM'ing members is verboten.
 
It’s important to remember the terms and rules and what should be the primary understanding of being a member of this forum:

Terms and Rules
Okay people! Let's be clear on some things before you join up. Now, we know you are aching to get in there and comment on... stuff... but before you do you need to agree to some basic rules about politeness, kindness, and not being a total psycho. You also need to understand the philosophy of the owners of this forum and the associated websites.

First our Vision for this forum: To create an environment for the stimulation, development and then the alignment of objective consciousnesses in a manner similar to that defined and described by Georges Gurdjieff.

For this group, linear thinking is subjective and only nonlinear thinking can be objective.

Objective is "how the universe sees itself".

Our culture has co-opted the word "objective" and has made it to serve as an equivalent of "scientific materialism," but when you grok that scientism is for the most part NOT scientific, but is rather another subjective religion, then you see that no part of the word "objective" applies to science or "linear thinking."

Subjective is the story about the blind men and the elephant - they all think that the elephant is the part of it that they are feeling and that is all there is. Objective is when they begin to share their observations and come to the realization that the elephant is more than what each of them experiences independently. Someone who can see would experience more of the elephant than the blind men, though this seeing would still be limited. Objective is the elephant as it experiences itself added to the observations of the blind men added together with view of the one who can see. It takes a group to achieve such objectivity. But once each of them has shared their perceptions and experience, and all of the group have assimilated this information, they can all then achieve an objective understanding of the elephant - or very close.

Mission: The Evolution of Humanity. This is best described by Gurdjieff:

Contemporary culture requires automatons. And people are undoubtedly losing their acquired habits of independence and turning into automatons, into parts of machines. It is impossible to say where is the end of all this and where the way out - or whether there is an end and a way out. One thing alone is certain, that man's slavery grows and increases. Man is becoming a willing slave. He no longer needs chains. He begins to grow fond of his slavery, to be proud of it. And this is the most terrible thing that can happen to a man.

Everything I have said till now I have said about the whole of humanity. But as I pointed out before, the evolution of humanity can proceed only through the evolution of a certain group, which, in its turn, will influence and lead the rest of humanity.

Are we able to say that such a group exists? Perhaps we can on the basis of certain signs, but in any event we have to acknowledge that it is a very small group, quite insufficient, at any rate, to subjugate the rest of humanity. Or, looking at it from another point of view, we can say that humanity is in such a state that it is unable to accept the guidance of a conscious group.

"How many people could there be in this conscious group?" someone asked.

"Only they themselves know this," said G.

"Does it mean that they all know each other?" asked the same person again.

"How could it be otherwise?" asked G. "Imagine that there are two or three people who are awake in the midst of a multitude of sleeping people. They will certainly know each other. But those who are asleep cannot know them. How many are they? We do not know and we cannot know until we become like them. It has been clearly said before that each man can only see on the level of his own being. But two hundred conscious people, if they existed and if they found it necessary and legitimate, could change the whole of life on the earth. But either there are not enough of them, or they do not want to, or perhaps the time has not yet come, or perhaps other people are sleeping too soundly."
In other words, it is suggested that 200 fully conscious beings, who...

...have attained the highest development possible for man, each one of whom possesses individuality in the fullest degree, that is to say, an indivisible 'I,' all forms of consciousness possible for man, full control over these states of consciousness, the whole of knowledge possible for man, and a free and independent will. They cannot perform actions opposed to their understanding or have an understanding which is not expressed by actions. At the same time there can be no discords among them, no differences of understanding. Therefore their activity is entirely co-ordinated and leads to one common aim without any kind of compulsion because it is based upon a common and identical understanding.
...could change the course of our world.

A corollary goal is the accumulation and preservation of knowledge. Again, Gurdjieff on this subject:

There are periods in the life of humanity, which generally coincide with the beginning of the fall of cultures and civilizations, when the masses irretrievably lose their reason and begin to destroy everything that has been created by centuries and millenniums of culture. Such periods of mass madness, often coinciding with geological cataclysms, climatic changes, and similar phenomena of a planetary character, release a very great quantity of the matter of knowledge. This, in its turn, necessitates the work of collecting this matter of knowledge which would otherwise be lost. Thus the work of collecting scattered matter of knowledge frequently coincides with the beginning of the destruction and fall of cultures and civilizations.

This aspect of the question is clear. The crowd neither wants nor seeks knowledge, and the leaders of the crowd, in their own interests, try to strengthen its fear and dislike of everything new and unknown. The slavery in which mankind lives is based upon this fear. It is even difficult to imagine all the horror of this slavery. We do not understand what people are losing. But in order to understand the cause of this slavery it is enough to see how people live, what constitutes the aim of their existence, the object of their desires, passions, and aspirations, of what they think, of what they talk, what they serve and what they worship.
Methodology:

* Facilitation of the creation and the sharing of objective knowledge by providing the framework / resources / moderation and "elder brother guidance." As Gurdjieff has said:

On the fourth way there is not one teacher. Whoever is the elder, he is the teacher. And as the teacher is indispensable to the pupil, so also is the pupil indispensable to the teacher. The pupil cannot go on without the teacher, and the teacher cannot go on without the pupil or pupils. And this is not a general consideration but an indispensable and quite concrete rule on which is based the law of a man's ascending. As has been said before, no one can ascend onto a higher step until he places another man in his own place. What a man has received he must immediately give back; only then can he receive more. Otherwise from him will be taken even what he has already been given.
* Capitalisation, sharing, analysis of information on key topics

* Scientific approach. Collection of direct and indirect data (videos, articles, books extracts,...) , sources validation, elaboration and challenge of hypothesis and theories consistent with validated datas.

* Maximization of the signal to noise ratio

Main topics :

  • consciousness dimensions and alignments (STO VS STS or creativity vs entropy)
  • the Work (techniques and methods aiming towards the development of objective consciousness : shamanism, way of the warrior, diets, meditation,...)
  • description and analysis of creative vs entropic interactions
  • study of information collection, analysis and distribution (cointelpro, medias, disinformation,...)
  • psychopathology
  • objective analysis of major knowledge fields (astronomy, zoology, biology, UFOs, daemons history, religions,...)
  • analysis of key historical events (Israel-Palestine conflict, 3rd reich 9/11,...)
  • collection and evaluation of resources relating to those topics (blogs, websites, articles,...)
Values of this forum:

  • objectivity
  • respect
  • sharing
  • relevance
  • empathy
  • constructiveness
  • temperance
So, now that you understand what this forum is all about let's get on to the rules:

One
: Don't maliciously harass people, or flame them, or really make them want to flame you. If the moderators detect malice or manipulation (and they ARE experienced), and invitations to overcome such issues does not result in resolution, you will be deleted.

Two: Please don't post messages about your illegal pastimes and habits. Cassiopaea.org does not wish to appear to condone such practises, for reasons that should be pretty obvious if a little common sense is applied. If you do post such stuff, expect it to be deleted immediately.

Three: Don't spam.

Four: We have ZERO tolerance for profanity. If you aren't intelligent enough to say what you think without using language that is objectionable to most civilized people, you're on the wrong forum.

Five: Do not sign up for multiple accounts. Historically, the only reason any one person has signed up for multiple accounts was to cause trouble. You can modify your existing account information easily enough. If you have multiple accounts, all of them will be deleted.

Finally, the Legal Notice:

The providers ("we", "us", "our") of the service provided by this web site ("Service") are not responsible for any user-generated content and accounts. Content submitted express the views of their author only.

This Service is only available to users who are at least 18 years old. If you are younger than this, please do not register for this Service. If you register for this Service, you represent that you are this age or older.

All content you submit, upload, or otherwise make available to the Service ("Content") may be reviewed by staff members. All Content you submit or upload may be sent to third-party verification services (including, but not limited to, spam prevention services). Do not submit any Content that you consider to be private or confidential.

You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which is defamatory, abusive, hateful, threatening, spam or spam-like, likely to offend, contains adult or objectionable content, contains personal information of others, risks copyright infringement, encourages unlawful activity, or otherwise violates any laws. You are entirely responsible for the content of, and any harm resulting from, that Content or your conduct.

We may remove or modify any Content submitted at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice. Requests for Content to be removed or modified will be undertaken only at our discretion. We may terminate your access to all or any part of the Service at any time, with or without cause, with or without notice.

You are granting us with a non-exclusive, permanent, irrevocable, unlimited license to use, publish, or re-publish your Content in connection with the Service. You retain copyright over the Content.

These terms may be changed at any time without notice.

If you do not agree with these terms, please do not register or use the Service. Use of the Service constitutes acceptance of these terms. If you wish to close your account, please contact us.

And private messages are basically forbidden unless you need to contact a moderator about something. This is mentioned in many places on the forum over the years.
 
Back
Top Bottom