On another thought, anyone willing to bet $5 that he is
I hope this won't be left un-noticed (and un-adressed); people ain't no gambling material and it's offending than to stare at such low-level consideration. Even a psychopath wouldn't deserve it. It's like an idiot dinner where people invite people they estimate to be idiots.
Yes, TC I have been thinking on that thread too. I appreciated your comment. I have a couple of things to say, unless you found a way to write to another person without the requirement to proceed to a bi-directional way(?).
Your way of interacting with people is nice and formal and polite. This is to keep people ‘sweet’
That's a take, man... This is subjective and there are no fundation for you to jumpr from the fact that a person is polite - to the conclusion you draw! If you had asked me, I would have told you I resumed reading books, especially early 19's British authors such as Dickes, and that I've resumed my ancient self I had left in adolescence. Before, I wwas reading much. In addition, Switzerland is acountry prone to the analphabetisation phenomenon which is caracteristic of "the thug", "the mob boss" and it has been spreading to adults here. Result is a lower than average "British" mode, literary - in people. "Hey bro", and girls call themselves "cousin, brother". I used That's a take, man because that's an old cow-boy & virile one.
The rest of your comment is built upon the yellow to orange. From a polite guy who isn't because ... you then find additional things. I think you cannot.
If you do get challenged then your ego can’t handle it.
I believe that, on the opposite, I have been remaining calm, and have been discussing the matters simply (when challenged).
So I was thinking before I went to bed that it makes sense you’re so interested in Lobaczewski’s work on psychopathy
And of course, instead of, for instance, asking me, or read in other threads the reason I am (which I did) - you came up with a conclusion, after a polite person appeared to you to be something negative. Worst fear confirmed: you label me a psychopath.
Yes. Freedom to do whatever you want.
Well, what you did is hiding in plain sight and I cannot invent something else. On that note you have not amended the matter of PM'ing, which would be the relevant thing to do before anything else.
The above comment does not need expansion. You need to ask me to define freedom before you bind this sort of freedom to what my mind considers, in terms of the word. That's putting yourself a bit too much in another shoes, to the extent of speaking for the other person without having been granted that ability. This is unnacceptable.
You say ‘freedom’ is the most important thing to you. What you really mean is your freedom.
This shows you being better than another person, to qulify what the person feels, thinks and is. Is this hubris or self-importance? We all have our flaws so instead of pushing and exacerbating the traits you would have to improve, I wish you good luck and am just pointing those things out. You, too, are bound to a fast-pace time -too fast. Today, we are here, tomorrow, we're old. This may provide you an answer as to if I want to become a ponerologist. I don't think so, I don't want to. I consider I will become anything once the environment makes me become anything, a process I count on, natural. So I am simply studying a couple of things and matters, and, one day, the sky decides and puts me where required. I think there is no such thing as "wanting to become" anything in this world any more, and perhaps it has never been. Time flies too fast. Best to focus on important matters, and then see what comes out of it. We are what we are. Too many prime matters, such as praying STO, being and other things. Or at least too many disciplines to be put in the first place before willing to become X or Y.
Seems you want to defend people out there, but the freedom bit was a red flag to me. Perhaps, you did not know PM'ing was something that can possibly happen, in rare instances. But your attitude has been manipulative and result would have been to abide freedom, out of my self initiative. This is a process on which STS counts a lot and a terrible one. One can become familiarized with it, and normal people can developp feelings for it and then go manipulate others to do so.
I am surprized to look at that many people engaging in here, on the matter of a disagreement and a conflict, while the simple topic of "why going anti-Nazism can make your day worse" - has
zero comments, as of now. This shows people available for discussion and intervention; people, even neophytes, have the ability to express a couple of takes on "the idea of opposing Hitler", and this is potentially a simple and productive road (basically, the concept of "a thread" with a sepcific "topic"). I reserve myself on the conclusions that make it so. Virtue signaling would be a too easy pick. Even an imbecile can express a take on the basic fact that opposing Hitler can lead to disastrous events. So it's not stupidity. It would, then, be "malice". Malice is not forcibly the culprit straight on the people who don't participate, but could be expressing itself at another location. I end up thinking that something prevents people from discussing some matters, and that the knowledge distribution is biased, becaue of a negative element, making it so. Possibilities can vary. In any case, people won't discuss a couple of matters and we are being told it's packed up:
(Mark7) Is there anything we are missing about the psychopath/narcissist/cluster B spectrum of individuals from a hyperdimensional sense that would be worth some investigation?
A: Nothing that investigation would expose.
I think I could make you a list - one full page - of elements that deserve attention and finding.
I will opt for the middle road here and tend to believe that something made this answer appear so, instead of going to think that the channel is corrupt or something like that. Too easy perhaps, and something else could produce this.
Hey guys this is what's taking place right now:
On another thought, anyone willing to bet $5 that he
There is something running on; "let us stop studying psychopath cuz we know it all" shows you there is a road block here. That the session says so does not mean that it's a corrupted channel, or that they are chanelling wrong entities. Just pointing that out; creative people can find part of the answer here.
Please, people, stop trying to find the small beast in myself this is as ridiculous than it is disturbing.
Palestine you've made nearly 1200 posts in just over a year of membership. Many of them seem to be requests for information or clarification about subjects that have been extensively discussed.
But who did not found an answer, hence my questionings. I think if you gather the messages in question, there may be a ratio of 1/10 that fall into what you describe. The rest, nope. I invite you not to neglect this aspect if you are to get an objective overview. Why trying to make all things appear negative? Because it's "unusual"? That's not enough I think.
