Interesting Videos....
- Thread starter Ninas
- Start date
shijing
The Living Force
Hi M.A.O. --
Can you explain what O.C. is, and why the videos you posted in your last post may be of interest to other members? Without a bit of information from you, we can't know why we should be watching them. It may help to review the previous discussion with ninas on this thread about external consideration and posting video links.
M.A.O. said:
Can you explain what O.C. is, and why the videos you posted in your last post may be of interest to other members? Without a bit of information from you, we can't know why we should be watching them. It may help to review the previous discussion with ninas on this thread about external consideration and posting video links.
Hi Shijing, Yes the shire-wind and the force of nature. And yes it may have not had much to offer. I can understand if it is considered static. And after reading the remarks of the observation of the form member having posted what was thought as nothing of discerning interest for knowledge, it made more sense in understanding the uselessness of the first 2 videos. O.P.C. is to Operation Paper Clip it is my thought that when the U.S. took in ex-NAZIS in return for techno information and hardware that it sealed its fate in one of the biggest Trojan horses ever pulled off by the Nazis and feel that effects are being felt now in the states. The Interest is of the bell anti gravity or time machine. I thought the Kecksburg incident as appeared in the 60s and thought, what if had time traveled and had not fallen from the heaven's but appeared from another time frame from the 40s when before it been secured for picked by the U.S. The C's give a (session 950708) few clues that had me think this could have been a probability. Other than that weapons and what seem like hints of cloning super solders aka killing machines. But this would be considered conjecture and at best guess to make sense and it maynot have merit here ether. Any Suggestion?
shijing
The Living Force
M.A.O. said:
No, but thanks for posting an explanation about the above. In your previous post you had omitted the "P" from "O.P.C.", so that was why I was confused about the acronym. As far as the Kecksburg incident goes, you may be on the right track as far as I know based on the C's session that you are referring to.
Shijing First "Thanks" for the correction. I have to say that it is a little intimidating to bring up the subject O.P.C. As it's one of those subjects if we were alive (O.P.C.) when it happen, and like of the Iran contra affair you might have thought as I did that this is B.S. As with the Contra affair, both were quickly buried and no one was held Accountable of what the consequence's would be, with some connected to the affair disappearing. Like Keyser Sose, (character, from the film"The Usual Suspects") both affair's vanished into thin air. So by tyring to beat around the bush only convoluted the post. It comes down to, say what you mean, and mean what you say, or don't or say anything at all. And that is quite understandably so.
Hello anart. I couldn't agree with you more. I also appreciate the impute and understand the point of being relevant, and clear, to avoid form members from being miss lead or confused. And will make the recommend as something that will be brought under the wing when posting in the future for the consideration of all concerned. "Thanks" again, to you both!
Hi MAO, may I ask why you always put the word "thanks" in quotes? I'd generally use quotes when there's another meaning to the word I'm using, or if it's sarcasm, and I just can't seem to figure out what the quotes mean as you use them. To me it almost comes off like you don't really mean it when you say thanks, so that's why I ask.M.A.O. said:
shijing
The Living Force
M.A.O. said:
I can understand this feeling in everyday life, but you don't need to be shy about it on the forum. I think that the general idea behind OPC is recognized as valid here, and it certainly isn't the strangest thing that we discuss, so you can talk about it all you want and no one is going to look at you crosswise!
Ok, thanks for clarifying! :)M.A.O. said:
After much thought, and 2 inquiries to my use of the quotes, and the reason for its use, I've come to understand the static that I have possibly have created and from this point will discontinue its use. Until SAO, Shijing, brought it to my attention I had no idea that it had been or could be used as a subtle means of insult, or intimidation. As a result it become's less effective in expressing thanks or appreciation and I've feel I have put myself in dilemma as well as promoting possible static if I should forget to add it.. Thanks SAO and Shijing for bring this to my attention.
Thanks also Anart, for helping me come to my senses, as to importance for maintaining a clear understand from the get go. This will avoid wasting space, and energy, as well being direct, for the better to Form members and Service To Others.
Thanks also Anart, for helping me come to my senses, as to importance for maintaining a clear understand from the get go. This will avoid wasting space, and energy, as well being direct, for the better to Form members and Service To Others.
