Is naturally fermented bread the way to avoid gluten toxicity?

slavronin

The Force is Strong With This One
Although I have experimented with some cleanses and diets before, I'm starting to explore the idea of removing gluten from my diet. From what I can tell, I'm not wheat or gluten sensitive but I'm curious about removing gluten from my diet to see how much of a difference it would make to my metabolism and energy levels (Currently, they seem pretty good anyway). I did a quick search on the internet and came across the following article which proposes that gluten sensitivity and illness (from bread anyway) are not a result of the gluten itself but a result of the lack of fermentation time.

From http://nourishedmagazine.com.au/blog/articles/bread-dread-are-you-really-gluten-intolerant :

Bread Dread: Are you Really Gluten Intolerant?

By I. N. Cognito

The following story is, unfortunately, true.

Before the 1950’s, most bakeries in Australia, indeed the world, ran 2 shifts of workers because the dough was fermented throughout the night, long and slow. That bread was made from plain, unbleached wheat flour, and now, seen in retrospect, was superior to most breads of today.

I would often visit our local bakery with my uncle, who home-delivered bread for many years. During the 50’s, the US-based bakery giant Tip Top came to Brisbane, and started to buy up all the small bakeries it could; other giants competed with them, meaning that in very quick time we had only 2 or 3 bakers in the entire city, ditto in all parts of Australia.

One of the very first actions these corporate bakers were to take was to introduce the fast loaf (3 hours from start to finish), effectively eliminating the need for half, or one entire shift, of their labour force. This was actually required by a new law called The Bread Act.

This seemingly innocuous cost-cutting decision would relentlessly impact and compromise the health of each and every bread lover since – that’s virtually everybody since the 50’s – and would cause countless deaths, bestow myriad miseries, as it continues to do. The first act of a major tragedy that still plays, everywhere, everyday.

Very basic bread that had once been fermented for a healthy 8 hours or more was now brewing in just 2 hours! Yeast levels were increased, accelerants and proving agents introduced. Glutens, starches and malts were not given the remotest opportunity to convert to their digestible potentials, in a sickly anti-nutrient-laden, gluepot stew. Breads are still made this way, even the so-called health breads!

Fast-made bread is one of the most destructive implementations into the modern diet. It has become normal fare, and poorly-prepared and poorly-digested wheat is the chief contributor to the current plague of “gluten-intolerance”, obesity, diabetes, candida diseases and many allergenic conditions.

Gluten (once properly fermented) is a wonderful vegetable protein. It is actually a mix of the two elastic proteins, gliadin and glutenin. So-called gluten-intolerant adults and kids are eating my long-ferment bread with amazement at, delight in, the taste, the clarity and the painless, satisfactory satiety.

Sure, be intolerant of gluten in its under-prepared, expedient form. It most certainly is toxic. Such sensitivity is wise and self-preserving, but do not condemn gluten and wheat via this premise. We are not gluten-intolerant; we are allergic to the accelerating haste of modern life!

Wheat is, yes, potentially one of the most highly allergenic foods on the planet, but like soya beans, converts to a truly great food once it is fermented long enough.

All current breads, pastas, pizzas, cakes, biscuits, and on and on and on, contain complex proteins which have not been given the requisite fermentation time to convert to their excellent, digestible alter-egos.
Wheat also contains a difficult starch and a highly allergenic maltose, but within that same complexity, when correctly fermented, there lies varied and splendid nutrients – 18 amino acids (proteins), complex carbohydrate (a super efficient source of energy), B vitamins, iron, zinc, selenium and magnesium, and maltase.

From a demon to a god in one ferment.

The catastrophic changes in bakery procedures were a disaster that went largely unnoticed in the 50’s, except by my baker/uncle and a few other observant souls. He became aware that from that fateful change onwards, many of his customers began to grow ill. Amy MacGrath made the same observation in her book “One Man’s Poison.”

Of course the 50’s also saw the introduction of mass pasteurisation of milk and other food perversions, so there were several developing culprits. This period marked the beginning of the end for bread and milk as healthy, nutritious staples, and signalled the onset of the demise of food in general.

Today, the absolute extreme of this perfidy is found in Hot Bread kitchens, which produce loaves of very toxic, allergy-inducing crud, in just 40 minutes from start of dough to baked finish!
Long Ferment Bread

The longer the ferment, the less yeast is required. Over time, even the smallest amount of yeast will slowly grow and spread throughout a dough. The addition of ginger powder (instead of sugar) to the original mix helps to create a strident growth network for even and healthy leavening to occur.

Sourdough leaven is a fine option to baker’s yeast, but bear in mind that sourdough is also yeast, also a leavening agent. It’s just that in sourdough the yeasts are attracted, gathered wild from the atmosphere.

Remember, whether you employ baker’s yeast or sourdough as the leaven, the actual dough fermenting time must be longer than 6 hours!

I have not only gluten-intolerants enjoying my wheat/granulated yeast bread, but also yeast-sensitive folk are also reporting no reaction – not 100% success of course, but enough to suggest that, just as proteins and starches transform in the long ferment process, the yeast positively alters also.

The tremendous upsurge in cases of gluten, carbohydrate and lactose sensitivity is a totally modern phenomena, and finds its origins in quick, economically convenient, and incorrect food preparation - forging a delusional, diversionary path that we have charted in just the last 50 years, far far away from traditional lines.

So my question is: are bread, wheat, gluten, etc. okay in the diet if they are just allowed fermentation time to break down or is gluten something inherently detrimental to one's health in any form no matter how it is prepared?

I also wondered about the yeast and found the following website which proposes that a naturally fermented sourdough bread is better because other breads use an unnatural and unhealthy yeast.

From http://earthstar.newlibertyvillage.com/fermentedbreads.htm

Facts about
Naturally Leavened Sourdough Bread

Absolutely Incredible Bread!

Home-baked bread is truly a gift from the heart and sourdough bread is an especially satisfying and healthy choice. Free of commercial yeast, sourdough breads have an aroma and a distinctive flavor all their own and are naturally leavened by a fermented starter.

Bread was first leavened by the Egyptians around 2300 BC. They discovered that a mixture of flour and water left uncovered for several days bubbled and expanded. If mixed into unleavened dough and allowed to stand for a few hours before baking, it yields a light sweet bread. This kind of natural leavening remained the basis of Western bread baking until the 20th century when bread made from commercially prepared yeast was introduced.

Naturally leavened breads rise over time (6 to 8 hours) by the action of wild yeast spores drawn into the sourdough starter from the air. Mixing the starter with more flour and water and a little salt forms bread dough. As the unique and complex family of friendly bacteria thrives on the nutrient-rich whole grain flour and mineral-rich salt, they produce carbon dioxide gas. Fermentation continues, and the leavening or expansion of the bread dough creates a fine-grained, moist texture.

In addition to being naturally leavened, home-baked sourdough breads offer other nutritional benefits because it contains only the highest quality ingredients such as organic whole-grain flours, purified water, and unrefined mineral-rich Celtic Sea Salt®. With great-tasting flours, the addition of oil and sweetener is unnecessary because the grain itself tastes rich from the oil in the germ, and sweet from the natural complex sugars in the grain, especially when it is freshly ground.

Why Naturally Leavened Bread?

The fermented quality of naturally leavened bread has several healthful advantages over yeasted breads. Yeasted breads are risen very quickly by a refined yeast strain that has been isolated in a laboratory under controlled conditions, using a process we could never duplicate in our kitchens.

In the process of making sourdough bread, during the rising time (called proofing), bran in the flour is broken down, releasing nutrients into the dough. In particular, the phytic acid (phytin) in grain needs to be 90% neutralized in order for the minerals, concentrated in the bran, to be absorbed by the human body. According to the experiments done in Belgium, phytin can be neutralized by natural bacterial action and to a lesser extent, by baking. In naturally leavened bread, the combination eliminates all phytin, while in yeasted bread about 90% remains.

Furthermore, with sourdough bread, complex carbohydrates are broken down into more digestible simple sugars and protein is broken down into amino acids. Enzymes develop during proofing which are not lost in baking since the center of the loaf remains at a lower temperature than the crust.

It’s the fermentation, partly from lactobacillus, that makes eating good quality bread an aid to digestion of all complex carbohydrate foods including other grains, beans, and vegetables. It helps restore the functioning of the digestive tract, resulting in proper assimilation and elimination. These beneficial bacteria help control

candida albicans, whereas baker’s yeast is a pro-candida organism. This is a brown bread that truly is "the staff of life" as it enhances the whole immune system.

Allergies?

People with allergies to commercially yeasted breads may not have the same sensitivities to naturally leavened whole grain sourdough bread. The cause may be either the wheat and/or the yeast. Often, people who are sensitive to yeasted white bread do not react to whole wheat bread. Others, who are sensitive to whole wheat bread, do not react when the leavening used is natural sourdough starter, and especially when the flour is freshly ground. Another approach is spelt flour instead of wheat flour. Spelt is the original strain of bread wheat from Europe, and it has not been hybridized. Rye flour is another choice that is nice used in small amounts.

Digestibility

Bread and grain-based diets, especially at the beginning, give the illusion that they do not readily digest. Natural leaven bread, because of its inherent beneficial ferments, slowly recreates the population of friendly lactobacillus digestive bacteria in the absorption tract. The end result is a recovery of digestion and proper elimination by the effective action of friendly bacteria. Natural leaven bread provides more stable nutrition than that obtained mechanically by non-fermented (and thus non- pre-digested) bran and other raw or cooked roughage diets, since these only succeed in physically abrading and irritating the colon.

Modern Breads as a Potential Cause of Cancer

You may be surprised to learn that conventionally yeasted breads have been linked to cancer. True sourdough bread is naturally fermented. It is yeast free and requires several hours to rise before baking. In contrast, conventionally yeasted bread uses a high concentration of an isolated yeast strain to make bread rise within minutes. In an article, published in 1984 in East-West Journal, Ronald Kotsch describes why conventionally yeasted bread contributes to disease.

"In (conventional) yeast fermentation, the starch cells of the bread actually explode. The patterns they form are identical to those of cancer cells. According to French researcher Jean Claude Vincent, the bio-electrical energy of the dough also is identical to that of cancer cells."

German and Swiss researchers concur with Vincent that this fast-acting yeast sends an electrical message to the body for the cells to mimic this exploding replication. This is cancer. Beyond these facts, sourdough bread may win you over by its taste alone. It is wonderful, chewy, old-world bread.
 
Hi slavronin. You might want to check out these two articles about wheat.

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/page/dark-side-wheat-new-perspectives-celiac-disease-wheat-intolerance-sayer-ji
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/content/opening-pandoras-bread-box-critical-role-wheat-lectin-human-disease

They've been discussed on the forum in this thread - http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=16891.0
 
slavronin,

There was actually a discussion about this some while back.

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=12491.0

From a personal perspective, I consumed sourdough breads for about 2 years straight. This was about the only source of gluten in my diet since I used other forms of gluten-free pastas at the time. I tried to make sure that all my wheat flour was fermented as per the book Nourishing Traditions by Sally Fallon.

Anyways, long story short, I decided to go gluten free about a couple months ago. I was amazed at the difference it has made, despite the fact that all the wheat I was consuming prior to this was fermented. The mental fog is starting to lift. I feel I can watch my emotional center much easier now. I don't feel as tired after meals as I used to. I also noticed that I don't feel the need to eat as much at meals. I can eat smaller portions and not feel hungry afterward. Ironically, I also managed to gain a modest amount of weight too.

I have read in many places that fermented wheat is tolerable by those with celiacs disease. However, I think the pharmacological and even some physiological properties of wheat are still present even in fermented wheat products. It might also be that the fermentation process in most sourdough bread recipes isn't long enough to transmute all the harmful effects of gluten, but still enough to make some difference for those who suffer severe reactions to wheat products. I'm not an expert here, just my own personal experience, FWIW.
 
RyanX said:
I have read in many places that fermented wheat is tolerable by those with celiacs disease. However, I think the pharmacological and even some physiological properties of wheat are still present even in fermented wheat products. It might also be that the fermentation process in most sourdough bread recipes isn't long enough to transmute all the harmful effects of gluten, but still enough to make some difference for those who suffer severe reactions to wheat products. I'm not an expert here, just my own personal experience, FWIW.

In the latest Weston Price Journal in a series titled "Plants Bite Back" there is much evidence presented that even with rigorous soaking/fermentation processes it is difficult to remove all of the phytic acid let alone the residual effects of glutin/lectins. Just to get to around 90% phytic acid removal in brown rice requires extensive soaking and fermentations over several generations of starter. The bottom line of these articles is moderation and variety in foods. [The nightshades are also featured in the negative sense (by one author)]
 
LQB said:
In the latest Weston Price Journal in a series titled "Plants Bite Back" there is much evidence presented that even with rigorous soaking/fermentation processes it is difficult to remove all of the phytic acid let alone the residual effects of glutin/lectins. Just to get to around 90% phytic acid removal in brown rice requires extensive soaking and fermentations over several generations of starter. The bottom line of these articles is moderation and variety in foods. [The nightshades are also featured in the negative sense (by one author)]

I found this blog where the writer talks about soaking brown rice in such a way...
http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.com/2009/04/new-way-to-soak-brown-rice.html

A New Way to Soak Brown Rice

I've been looking for a way to prepare whole brown rice that increases its mineral availability without changing its texture. I've been re-reading some of the papers I've accumulated on grain processing and mineral availability, and I've found a simple way to do it.

In the 2008 paper "Effects of soaking, germination and fermentation on phytic acid, total and in vitro soluble zinc in brown rice", Dr. Robert J. Hamer's group found that soaking alone didn't have much of an effect on phytic acid in brown rice. However, fermentation was highly effective at degrading it. What I didn't realize the first time I read the paper is that they fermented intact brown rice rather than grinding it. This wasn't clear from the description in the methods section but I confirmed it by e-mail with the lead author Dr. Jianfen Liang. He added that the procedure comes from a traditional Chinese recipe for rice noodles. The method they used is very simple:

1. Soak brown rice in dechlorinated water for 24 hours at room temperature without changing the water. Reserve 10% of the soaking liquid (should keep for a long time in the fridge). Discard the rest of the soaking liquid; cook the rice in fresh water.
2. The next time you make brown rice, use the same procedure as above, but add the soaking liquid you reserved from the last batch to the rest of the soaking water.
3. Repeat the cycle. The process will gradually improve until 96% or more of the phytic acid is degraded at 24 hours.

This process probably depends on two factors: fermentation acidifies the soaking medium, which activates the phytase (phytic acid-degrading enzyme) already present in the rice; and it also cultivates microorganisms that produce their own phytase. I would guess the latter factor is the more important one, because brown rice doesn't contain much phytase.

You can probably use the same liquid to soak other grains and beans.

It doesn't actually seem all that difficult. Apparently just soaking overnight doesn't do that much for the phytic acid. It needs to be repeated a few times. As for the lectin content I'm not sure. With this method it seems that you can keep the liquid for a few weeks in the fridge before starting the next soaking. So for those that can tolerate brown rice (but not eat it often as per the updated diet) should be able to use this method of soaking... fwiw.
 
~Fabric~ said:
It doesn't actually seem all that difficult. Apparently just soaking overnight doesn't do that much for the phytic acid. It needs to be repeated a few times. As for the lectin content I'm not sure. With this method it seems that you can keep the liquid for a few weeks in the fridge before starting the next soaking. So for those that can tolerate brown rice (but not eat it often as per the updated diet) should be able to use this method of soaking... fwiw.

We are going to try this with successive generations of ferment starter. To get the first one going you might want to add a little organic apple cider vinegar to lower the pH. I doubt that the process has much effect on lectins. You can also dehydrate the result and grind it into flour. At least you may be left with a high mineral food as opposed to one that robs you of them. I had the same thought of using the starter for beans/legumes.
 
Here's an interesting article from the Weston Price Foundation website that talks about the ideal pH for soaking legumes. There's a really handy chart at the end that tells you the best soaking liquid for different types of beans. Unfortunately, it doesn't cover grains.

http://www.westonaprice.org/Putting-the-Polish-on-Those-Humble-Beans.html
 
Wow - I think the below quote is VERY telling. I really don't think that I even know what it's like to NOT live with a mental fog, etc....

I've made huge progress with cleaning up my diet over the years, and it's tough to let go of what you believe has worked.

Although, I find that once I give up a cruddy part of my daily routine (mental and food) that I get this burst of energy and momentum to be able to take it a step further - which is where I am in the present. I'm soooo inspired by what I read here, and gush with gratitude for the collective research & reflective effort, there's always so much more to learn, even when you think you've plateau-ed.


RyanX on April 25, 2010, 07:11:32 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

slavronin,

There was actually a discussion about this some while back.

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=12491.0

From a personal perspective, I consumed sourdough breads for about 2 years straight. This was about the only source of gluten in my diet since I used other forms of gluten-free pastas at the time. I tried to make sure that all my wheat flour was fermented as per the book Nourishing Traditions by Sally Fallon.

Anyways, long story short, I decided to go gluten free about a couple months ago. I was amazed at the difference it has made, despite the fact that all the wheat I was consuming prior to this was fermented. The mental fog is starting to lift. I feel I can watch my emotional center much easier now. I don't feel as tired after meals as I used to. I also noticed that I don't feel the need to eat as much at meals. I can eat smaller portions and not feel hungry afterward. Ironically, I also managed to gain a modest amount of weight too.
 
HifromGrace said:
Wow - I think the below quote is VERY telling. I really don't think that I even know what it's like to NOT live with a mental fog, etc....

I've made huge progress with cleaning up my diet over the years, and it's tough to let go of what you believe has worked.

Although, I find that once I give up a cruddy part of my daily routine (mental and food) that I get this burst of energy and momentum to be able to take it a step further - which is where I am in the present. I'm soooo inspired by what I read here, and gush with gratitude for the collective research & reflective effort, there's always so much more to learn, even when you think you've plateau-ed.

Hi HiFromGrace,

I take it from your post that you haven't given up gluten yet? Or maybe you just did?
 
RyanX said:
HifromGrace said:
Wow - I think the below quote is VERY telling. I really don't think that I even know what it's like to NOT live with a mental fog, etc....

I've made huge progress with cleaning up my diet over the years, and it's tough to let go of what you believe has worked.

Although, I find that once I give up a cruddy part of my daily routine (mental and food) that I get this burst of energy and momentum to be able to take it a step further - which is where I am in the present. I'm soooo inspired by what I read here, and gush with gratitude for the collective research & reflective effort, there's always so much more to learn, even when you think you've plateau-ed.

Hi HiFromGrace,

I take it from your post that you haven't given up gluten yet? Or maybe you just did?


I haven't tried it yet. Sacred Cows man. I just finished reading these two amazing articles, and it's making the decision more obvious:

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/page/dark-side-wheat-new-perspectives-celiac-disease-wheat-intolerance-sayer-ji
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/content/opening-pandoras-bread-box-critical-role-wheat-lectin-human-disease


I rarely eat wheat anymore - meaning a couple times a week, but I've never liked bread-like things anyway. I've spent years reversing my SAD diet - my body was rotting, as far as i was concerned, yet no doctor though I had anything wrong, and society viewed/s me as the pinical of health ---------- esh is all I have to say! But again, it leaves you confused and floundering.

And I never thought I had a wheat reaction... sigh, famous last words! But anyway, last night I decided to join the family in some natural muffins. My reaction was clear and immediate - UTTER loss of all my energy and glum disposition, and then I was just done for the night, instead of my peppy happy enthusiasm I had just 20 minutes ago.

My reaction was clear as day, I was suspicious anyway, but this sealed the deal. My husband was rather suspect of my reaction. I'm not threatened by that, it's normal in our culture to be in denial - but at least I know I won't have any push back about altering the family diet, I do most the cooking and they just snarf it down without question.

I'm actually looking forward to expanding my diet in some ways too (I've finally stopped looking at this as a pain in the butt, framed in denying myself), and getting creative and fun with the cooking, yeah!!


How's the diet change coming along for you? Is your energy sustained, or is more like a clear lack of funk which allows you to thrive??


Addressing dairy is next on my list, although I don’t think it will be that tough, again, I use it in moderation, and fermented form. But like I said, I don’t even think I know what it feels like to thrive – I mean, I’m not depressed, riddled with anxiety and a hormonal nightmare anymore, but I sure as heck ain’t thrivin’. Again, I’ve blindly followed the Weston Price diet, and am ready to take it up a notch. But Weston Price/Nourishing Traditions totally did what they do best, which is teach you how to get rid of the processed foods and how to actually cook.

After wheat/dairy & Candida (had a resurgence after some a-typical binge drinking/eating, trying to deny my feelings – BUT again, with out that, I would of never seen the direct reaction in my body! Pain is the ultimate teacher!) next will be the detox diet to see what’s really been lurking… plus I need to do EE regularly to help with that pesky programming.


Thanks for the inspiration again RyanX, without your simple comment I quoted, it never woulda pushed me over the edge today, honest, it’s exactly what I was searching for in the archives. (On a side note – things like your serendipitous reflection and side note are deeply helping me overcome my anti-social programming, and helping me extend myself socially. It’s huge for me to see how co-linear interaction, not just spying, can be positive.)
 
dugdeep said:
Here's an interesting article from the Weston Price Foundation website that talks about the ideal pH for soaking legumes. There's a really handy chart at the end that tells you the best soaking liquid for different types of beans. Unfortunately, it doesn't cover grains.

http://www.westonaprice.org/Putting-the-Polish-on-Those-Humble-Beans.html

Hi Psyche, All,

Here is a link to the Weston Price Journal issue entitled Plants Bite Back:

FEATURES

* Plants Bite Back, Kaayla Daniel on why plant-based diets may not be such a good idea
* Fighting Phytic Acid, Ramiel Nagel on the ubiquitous mineral blocker in grains, nuts, legumes and tubers
* Oxalates, William Shaw tells us how to avoid getting stoned
* Nightshades Brought to Light, Garrett Smith on the surprising dangers of some of our favorite foods

http://www.westonaprice.org/journal/1883-journal-spring-2010-plants-bite-back.html
 
dugdeep said:
Here's an interesting article from the Weston Price Foundation website that talks about the ideal pH for soaking legumes. There's a really handy chart at the end that tells you the best soaking liquid for different types of beans. Unfortunately, it doesn't cover grains.

http://www.westonaprice.org/Putting-the-Polish-on-Those-Humble-Beans.html


FYI, they rearranged their site - here is the correct link:

http://www.westonaprice.org/journal/1883-journal-spring-2010-plants-bite-back.html

The article does have a wee bit about grains. I’ve often thought about this process of soaking grains/legumes in slightly acidic mediums, and my guess is that rainwater and/or with dirt has that pH range, i.e., for germination, thus phytic acid neutralization:

“While most cereal grains require a pH between a fairly small range of about 4.0 and 6.0, in other words, of slight acidity (7.0 is neutral), legumes span the scale from 4.0 to 7.5; that is, from acidity to slight alkalinity.”


Pertinent to this discussion was my second thought on this, which was IF non-gluten grains still need the same amount of care in preparation as wheat/oats, etc. Duh, of course they do, due to the phytic acid toxicity.

But I came across a pertinent article worth sharing (if you can disregard their ignorance and neutral stance about wheat):

http://www.westonaprice.org/food-features/497-be-kind-to-your-grains.html

Be Kind to Your Grains...And Your Grains Will Be Kind To You


Written by Sally Fallon and Mary G. Enig, PhD
Saturday, 01 January 2000

The science of nutrition seems to take a step backwards for every two steps it takes forward. When the study of vitamins was in its infancy, researchers realized that white flour lacked the nutrients that nature put into whole grains. One of these researchers was Dr. Weston Price who noted in his studies of isolated, so-called "primitive" peoples that when white flour and other devitalized foods were introduced into these communities, rampant tooth decay and disease of every sort soon followed. But defenders of the new refining process argued that phosphorus in whole grains was "too acid" and was the true cause of bone loss and tooth decay. Warnings against the use of white flour went largely ignored.

Only in recent decades has Dr. Price been vindicated. Even orthodox nutritionists now recognize that white flour is an empty food, supplying calories for energy but none of the bodybuilding materials that abound in the germ and the bran of whole grains. We've take two important steps forward—but unfortunately another step backward in that now whole grain and bran products are being promoted as health foods without adequate appreciation of their dangers. These show up not only as digestive problems, Crohn's disease and colitis, but also as the mental disorders associated with celiac disease. One school of thought claims that both refined and whole grains should be avoided, arguing that they were absent from the Paleolithic diet and citing the obvious association of grains with celiac disease and studies linking grain consumption with heart disease.

But many healthy societies consume products made from grains. In fact, it can be argued that the cultivation of grains made civilization possible and opened the door for mankind to live long and comfortable lives. Problems occur when we are cruel to our grains—when we fractionate them into bran, germ and naked starch; when we mill them at high temperatures; when we extrude them to make crunchy breakfast cereals; and when we consume them without careful preparation.

Grains require careful preparation because they contain a number of anti-nutrients that can cause serious health problems. Phytic acid, for example, is an organic acid in which phosphorus is bound. It is mostly found in the bran or outer hull of seeds. Untreated phytic acid can combine with calcium, magnesium, copper, iron and especially zinc in the intestinal tract and block their absorption. This is why a diet high in improperly prepared whole grains may lead to serious mineral deficiencies and bone loss. The modern misguided practice of consuming large amounts of unprocessed bran often improves colon transit time at first but may lead to irritable bowel syndrome and, in the long term, many other adverse effects.

Other antinutrients in whole grains include enzyme inhibitors which can inhibit digestion and put stress on the pancreas; irritating tannins; complex sugars which the body cannot break down; and gluten and related hard-to-digest proteins which may cause allergies, digestive disorders and even mental illness.

Most of these antinutrients are part of the seed's system of preservation—they prevent sprouting until the conditions are right. Plants need moisture, warmth, time and slight acidity in order to sprout. Proper preparation of grains is a kind and gentle process that imitates the process that occurs in nature. It involves soaking for a period in warm, acidulated water in the preparation of porridge, or long, slow sour dough fermentation in the making of bread. Such processes neutralize phytic acid and enzyme inhibitors. Vitamin content increases, particularly B vitamins. Tannins, complex sugars, gluten and other difficult-to-digest substances are partially broken down into simpler components that are more readily available for absorption.

Animals that nourish themselves on primarily on grain and other plant matter have as many as four stomachs. Their intestines are longer, as is the entire digestion transit time. Man, on the other hand, has but one stomach and a much shorter intestine compared to herbivorous animals. These features of his anatomy allow him to pass animal products before they putrefy in the gut but make him less well adapted to a diet high in grains—unless, of course, he prepares them properly. When grains are properly prepared through soaking, sprouting or sour leavening, the friendly bacteria of the microscopic world do some of our digesting for us in a container, just as these same lactobacilli do their work in the first and second stomachs of the herbivores.

So the well-meaning advice of many nutritionists, to consume whole grains as our ancestors did and not refined flours and polished rice, can be misleading and harmful in its consequences; for while our ancestors ate whole grains, they did not consume them as presented in our modern cookbooks in the form of quick-rise breads, granolas, bran preparations and other hastily prepared casseroles and concoctions. Our ancestors, and virtually all pre-industrialized peoples, soaked or fermented their grains before making them into porridge, breads, cakes and casseroles.

A quick review of grain recipes from around the world will prove our point: In India, rice and lentils are fermented for at least two days before they are prepared as idli and dosas; in Africa the natives soak coarsely ground corn overnight before adding it to soups and stews and they ferment corn or millet for several days to produce a sour porridge called ogi; a similar dish made from oats was traditional among the Welsh; in some Oriental and Latin American countries rice receives a long fermentation before it is prepared; Ethiopians make their distinctive injera bread by fermenting a grain called teff for several days; Mexican corn cakes, called pozol, are fermented for several days and for as long as two weeks in banana leaves; before the introduction of commercial brewers yeast, Europeans made slow-rise breads from fermented starters; in America the pioneers were famous for their sourdough breads, pancakes and biscuits; and throughout Europe grains were soaked overnight, and for as long as several days, in water or soured milk before they were cooked and served as porridge or gruel. (Many of our senior citizens may remember that in earlier times the instructions on the oatmeal box called for an overnight soaking.)

Bread can be the staff of life, but modern technology has turned our bread—even our whole grain bread—into a poison. Grains are laced with pesticides during the growing season and in storage; they are milled at high temperatures so that their fatty acids turn rancid. Rancidity increases when milled flours are stored for long periods of time, particularly in open bins. The bran and germ are often removed and sold separately, when Mother Nature intended that they be eaten together with the carbohydrate portion; they're baked as quick rise breads so that antinutrients remain; synthetic vitamins and an unabsorbable form of iron added to white flour can cause numerous imbalances; dough conditioners, stabilizers, preservatives and other additives add insult to injury.

Cruelty to grains in the making of breakfast cereals is intense. Slurries of grain are forced through tiny holes at high temperatures and pressures in giant extruders, a process that destroys nutrients and turns the proteins in grains into veritable poisons. Westerners pay a lot for expensive breakfast cereals that snap, crackle and pop, including the rising toll of poor health.

The final indignity to grains is that we treat them as loners, largely ignorant of other dietary factors needed for the nutrients they provide. Fat-soluble vitamins A and D found in animal fats like butter, lard and cream help us absorb calcium, phosphorus, iron, B vitamins and the many other vitamins that grains provide. Porridge eaten with cream will do us a thousand times more good than cold breakfast cereal consumed with skim milk; sourdough whole grain bread with butter or whole cheese is a combination that contributes to optimal health.

Be kind to your grains. . . and your grains will deliver their promise as the staff of life. Buy only organic whole grains and soak them overnight to make porridge or casseroles; or grind them into flour with a home grinder and make your own sour dough bread and baked goods. For those who lack the time for breadmaking, kindly-made whole grain breads are now available. Look for organic, stone ground, sprouted or sour dough whole grain breads and enjoy them with butter or cheese.

Copyright: From: Nourishing Traditions: The Cookbook that Challenges Politically Correct Nutrition and the Diet Dictocrats by Sally Fallon with Mary G. Enig, PhD. © 1999. All Rights Reserved. To order Nourishing Traditions, go to _www.newtrendspublishing.com.



Here is the entire Bean article mentioned above, it’s rather detailed. [I don’t know about you, but I don’t always have the time to click on the links sometimes (like now when I’m actually at work), and unfortunately sometimes never get back to them]:

Putting the Polish on those Humble Beans

Katherine Czapp
Wednesday, 28 February 2007

Legumes comprise a family of some 13,000 species characterized by their ability to absorb nitrogen from the air and convert it into protein within the plants' seeds. They also return nitrogen to the soil for the benefit of nearby plants, and legume cover crops are plowed into the soil as valuable green fertilizer around the world.

High Quality Nourishment

The high protein content of legume seeds, such as in beans, peas and lentils, make them a potential source of high quality nourishment, enhanced by impressive stores of minerals, including magnesium, potassium, phosphorus, iron and molybdenum, as well as B vitamins such as folate and thiamine. All legumes contain both omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, with kidney and pinto beans particularly high in omega-3.

Many nutrition information sources tout the fairly high content of both soluble and insoluble fiber in legumes as a foil against heart disease, surmising that the fiber lowers serum cholesterol by binding with cholesterol-containing bile in the intestine and removing it from the body.

Arguably much more important to cardiovascular health is legumes' contribution of potassium and magnesium to the diet--minerals chronically deficient in the standard American diet, and vital for the normal functioning of the heart and circulatory system, helping to regulate blood pressure as well as electrical impulses of nerves and muscle (including heart) contraction. Further, legumes, and especially lentils, contain high amounts of folic acid, a B vitamin which, along with vitamins B6 and B12, convert homocysteine in the bloodstream to innocuous forms. Homocysteine is a byproduct of protein metabolism; it can damage arterial walls and is a marker of heart disease with much more predictive value than serum cholesterol levels.

At Wise Traditions 2006, the seventh annual conference of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Dr. Ross Welch spoke of the decline in legume consumption that has accompanied the huge increase in grain production and consumption during the last twenty years. As grains tend to be lower in nutrients than legumes, and are mostly consumed in refined form, this change in cultivation pattern represents a huge loss of nutrients, especially in Third World countries.

The Digestive Challenge

Legumes prepared in meals with whole grains and some animal protein and fat can comprise a healthy, inexpensive nourishing diet, and in fact have been favored in cuisines the world over for thousands of years. However, some detractors of "modern" innovations in the diet occurring over the last 10,000 years or so argue that our relatively recent use of grains and legumes is not healthy or appropriate fare for humans and our digestive systems.

It is certainly true that legumes have their own agenda, which is to germinate, grow and perpetuate their genetic inheritance, rather than go softly into your cassoulet. These seeds are well-armed with anti-nutrients such as phytates and trypsin inhibitors, and some have specialized complex sugars that can wreak painful revenge upon the mammalian gut that consumes them without proper disarming. But long ago clever humans devised ways to coax these sometimes headstrong legumes into many safe, savory and nutritious transformations.

Legumes were used as food, along with the early grains, at least beginning with the Bronze Age. Early Egyptians built and dedicated temples to the life-supporting attributes of legumes, and later the ancient Greeks and Romans favored beans and lentils in their pantheistic festivals. In fact, four of the most prestigious families of Rome were named for highly valued legumes: Fabius (fava beans), Lentulus (lentils), Piso (peas) and Cicero (chickpeas).

Preparation of some of the softer legumes, such as lentils and peas, is accomplished with relative ease. The legumes are soaked for several hours before cooking gently until soft. The soaking helps denature phytic acid, and gentle cooking makes the vegetable protein digestible, especially if served with digestion-enhancing spices (typical of Indian cuisine, for example), pickles, chutneys or fermented dairy products such as yogurt or sour cream.

The harder beans, such as kidney beans, black beans or navy beans, require more careful treatment, as they contain certain oligosaccharides (large, complex sugars) that can completely confound digestion. Mammals do not produce the enzyme alpha-galactosidase in their digestive tracts, which is necessary to break down these sugars. When consumed, these oligosaccharides reach the lower intestine largely intact, and in the presence of anaerobic bacteria ferment and produce carbon dioxide and methane gases, as well as a good deal of discomfort, not to mention embarrassment in polite society. The solution has been to prepare the beans in a way to neutralize or otherwise get rid of these sugars in the resulting cooked beans, but as most of us know from experience, results can vary widely.

Innovations of the "brave new world" type at the Food Technology Division of Bhabha Atomic Research Center in Mumbai, India show that low-dose gamma irradiation successfully degrades raffinose oligosaccharides in mung beans, while increasing their content of glucose, fructose and galactose. This dose of radiation does not inhibit germination, so the irradiated beans can also be used as sprouted food. The authors claim that "gamma irradiation at insect disinfestation dose levels improved the digestibility and nutrition quality of mung beans by reducing the content of oligosaccharides responsible for intestinal gas production" (_http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/68000109/ABSTRACT). One of course worries about the other unmeasured effects of gamma radiation on a commonly consumed food item. A healthy dose of skepticism is in order.

The Science of Bean Preparation

By contrast, in May of 2001, the US Patent Office granted a patent to a small team of researchers who devised a way to remove flatulence-causing oligosaccharides in legumes for the commercial bean canning industry(http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6238725-fulltext.html). Their paper is long, detailed and almost numbingly precise, but contains important insights into the process of "perfect beans, every time." These bean technicians describe a process gleaned from careful observation, and precise measurement, and without special effects or secret ingredients, which makes use of just water, heat and time.

Hallmarks of their research, which can greatly aid the home cook, include first of all choosing your beans with great care. Beans that are more than 13 months old after harvest will have declining nutrient levels, will be harder to rehydrate and therefore more difficult to cook completely. The result will be largely indigestible and not worth your effort. The best age for "fresh" dried beans is from harvest to four months old. Since it's almost impossible to know how long beans have been sitting in storage at the store or when and under what conditions they were harvested, look for lighter colored beans, no matter what type. Older beans will be darker in color. Also, younger beans will have fewer cracked skins and less splitting overall. Store beans at home in glass or earthenware jars in a dry, cool place; when dried beans either absorb moisture or dry out excessively, nutrition and cooking qualities will suffer.

The key to this "flatulence-free" method of bean preparation is to utilize maximally two actions. One is the leaching out of oligosaccharides into a warm, slightly basic soak water, and the other is to initiate the activity of endogenous oligosaccharide-reducing enzymes to digest the sugars inside the bean.

In Step 1, beans are covered with four times their weight in water which has been warmed to about 120°F. This was the optimal temperature for rehydrating navy beans. Different bean varieties rehydrate best at slightly different temperatures, but the range is from 90°F to 130°F and represents the optimal temperature for rehydrating beans to between 50 and 95 percent of their fresh weight.

The water used in this stage should be soft; specifically with a calcium carbonate content less than 90ppm (parts per million), with a pH between 6.5 and 9.0, in other words, just slightly acid to alkaline. These last two particulars may seem inconsequential, but exert invisible important effects. Cookbooks from the 19th century often noted the type of water to be used in recipes, with references to river water, pond water and well water. Well water was often the least favored choice for cooking, as it was likely to be high in minerals, and therefore very hard. Hard water, or water with 200 ppm or more of calcium, will hinder the rehydrating and other processing effects of the warm water on beans.

The time it takes to rehydrate the beans will vary, but can range from one to four hours or so. A well-rehydrated bean has tissues that will allow migration of the endogenous enzymes throughout the entire bean to digest the sugars in Step 2.

After draining the beans, soft, neutral to slightly alkaline water is again added to the beans at a ratio of 4 parts water to one part beans by weight. This time the water is heated to a temperature that the authors have determined to be optimal for maximum activity of the endogenous enzyme, which is 147°F. The enzymes are inactivated and destroyed at 150°F, so this is a bit tricky for the home cook to monitor. The water during Step 2 is changed two or three times to allow for continuous diffusing of the sugars into the water. If the water were not changed, and equilibrium between beans and soak water reached, the sugar might start diffusing back into the beans. The authors note soaking times for Step 2 that range from 2 to 6 hours or so, depending on the type of beans used. At the end of Step 2 the beans were tested and shown to have no oligosaccharides present, at which point the beans were then briefly blanched (to firm their protein) and then proceeded to the canning process.

Traditions

These industrial techniques can shed some light on small scale bean preparation in the home kitchen. Lacking the temperature-controlled vats of commercial operations, we unfortunately also no longer have the traditional hearth for heating and cooking that would provide a similar slow, even heat that so many dishes benefit from. Edda Servi Machlin, in her fascinating book, The Classic Cuisine of the Italian Jews, describes home bean preparation: "When the hearth was not only a source of heat, but also the only way to cook meals, a pignatto was used to cook beans. A pignatto was a tall earthenware pot with a very small bottom, a large belly, and a small opening on the top. It had only one handle. Beans were placed inside the pot with hot water; then the pot was placed at the edge of the hearth with a few red coals very close, under the belly, on the side opposite the handle. The beans cooked to a gentle, even simmering."

The preparation of cholent, a traditional Sabbath dish of Ashkenazi Jews, involved a very slow cooking--often for as long as 24 hours--of a stew containing beans, vegetables and meat that was meant to provide warm and quite substantial nourishment on a day when lighting fires for cooking was proscribed. In the shtetls of Eastern Europe, the family's cholent cooked gently in the community baker's cooling wood-fired oven after the bread had been baked. Modern-day cholent is most often prepared using a slow-cooker, and this device can also be one of the best ways to prepare beans in general. It is important to avoid boiling beans since this will coagulate their vegetable protein and result in permanently hard, unpalatable beans.

Another trick to cooking beans and minimizing those troublesome oligosaccharides is to add a 4-to-6-inch strip of the sea vegetable kombu (Laminaria of various species, a member of the kelp family) to the bean pot during the warmed soak period. Kombu helps alkalinize the water, and also contains alpha-galactosidase, the enzyme needed for digesting these complex sugars, and therefore enhances that process in the pot. I like to add even more kombu during the slow cooking period, as it lends a delicious, meaty flavor to the beans (not at all fishy) and is mineral-rich, with additional B vitamins and trace elements, as well as a digestion-soothing gel that literally melts into the bean sauce.

Phytates

The high phytate content of legumes creates nutritional problems, especially for populations that rely on them--along with cereal foods--as major protein sources. While legumes are generally high in minerals such as magnesium, calcium and iron, they are also high in phytic acid, which can be a potent inhibitor of mineral absorption, especially of iron and zinc. Deficiencies of both these nutrients are common in the developing world, and particularly in the case of infants, deficiencies of iron can cause developmental problems that persist throughout life. Neutralizing phytic acid thus becomes a crucial necessity for vegetarians and for populations that must subsist primarily on legumes and grains without adequate food from animal sources.

Absorption of minerals from legumes also depends to a large extent on the total composition of the meal. Balancing legume consumption with animal products as well as with foods containing vitamin D and ascorbic acid (such as fresh and fermented vegetables) can enhance mineral absorption and prevent deficiencies.

Soaking legumes before cooking is a very useful step in promoting the release of phytase, the enzyme responsible for phytate degradation. It is interesting to note that different varieties of legumes have different optimal levels of acidity or alkalinity to maximize this process. (Germination also effectively converts phytic acid, as does fermentation via yeast or other fungal agents.) While most cereal grains require a pH between a fairly small range of about 4.0 and 6.0, in other words, of slight acidity (7.0 is neutral), legumes span the scale from 4.0 to 7.5; that is, from acidity to slight alkalinity. Phytate degradation will certainly occur at many ranges of pH, but the table below shows various legumes and the best pH levels for each to achieve the greatest breakdown of phytic acid. Tests have shown that the optimal functioning temperature for phytase activity in all legumes measured is 113° F (British Journal of Nutrition (2002), 88, Suppl. 3, S281-S285).

Cooking Those Beans

How does all this science translate into perfect beans? Soak legumes in plenty of water that has been brought to a simmer and poured over the beans; add about 1/4 cup of something acidic (lemon juice, vingear or whey) to black beans, lentils and fava beans but soak other types of beans (white beans, brown beans and dried peas) in plain water--preferably soft water or water with a pinch of baking soda added. You don't need to worry about having the optimal pH if your diet contains animal foods and if the soaking is followed by a long slow cooking. Use the table below to determine approximate soaking times. For beans that require a long soaking time, you may wish to drain, rinse and add more water at least once during the process.

After soaking, drain the beans and rinse well, then add to a pot with more water and bring to a simmer. If digestibility is a problem for you, kombu added to the pot should take care of any pesky oligosaccharides still lurking. Cook those beans gently until completely tender.
The following recipes will transform the humble legume into a delectable, body-and-soul-satisfying dish of epicurean proportion. And very much worthy of polite society.

Cholent

Cholent may be one of the most ancient and best-preserved of all traditional Jewish foods. For at least two thousand years, this slow-cooked dish was served on the Sabbath, when lighting of fires for cooking was proscribed by the Torah. The cholent cooked very, very slowly over Friday night to be served warm the next day. There are dozens of recipes in existence, reflecting the influences of many different cuisines from various corners of the globe, but they all contain beans, a grain and usually meat. As an interesting note, the Pilgrims who later sailed to the New World had spent time with the Jews in Holland--long a haven for religious dissenters and minorities--and recreated cholent with ingredients they found here, in a version we now call Boston Baked Beans.

1 1/4 cups brown or white beans
2 tablespoons olive oil
1 large onion, coarsely chopped
3-6 cloves garlic, minced
1 1/2 tablespoons Hungarian paprika
1 1/2 teaspoons salt
11/2 teaspoon pepper
3/4 cup barley soaked for 6-8 hours in water plus 2 tablespoons lemon juice, vinegar or whey, and then drained
1 1/2 pounds potatoes (such as Yukon gold or similar waxy type),
cut into large chunks
1 pound beef brisket
1 smoked beef bone or marrow bone
6 raw eggs in the shell, washed

Rinse beans and place in a bowl or pot. Add about 6 cups simmering water and soak for 18-24 hours. For best results, drain a couple of times during the soaking process, rinse the beans and add more simmering water.

Heat oil in a large heavy skillet over medium heat and sauté onion until transparent. Add garlic, stir for several minutes then add paprika, salt and pepper, and continue to cook for a minute. Remove from heat. Combine beans, onion mixture, barley or buckwheat, brisket and bone in a large baking dish or Dutch oven with a tightly-fitting lid. Carefully slip in raw eggs in their shells and bury them under cholent mix. Add water to cover mixture.

Place tightly covered pot in oven (seal lid with aluminum foil if not absolutely tight) and bake at 200° F overnight or up to 18 hours (if baking for the longer time, you might want to reduce heat to 180° F). Check liquid level occasionally to prevent cholent from drying out and replenish if needed.

When ready to serve, dig out eggs, shell them and serve in quarters as the first course with fresh raw vegetables. These eggs will have absorbed the flavors and colors of the cholent, and acquired a most delicious taste. Remove the brisket and slice. Serve the brisket and beans family style on a large serving dish.

The best accompaniment for cholent is an assortment of good lacto-fermented pickles and sauerkraut. Yields 6 to 7 generous servings. (Recipe adopted from _www.jewishmag.com/43mag/cholent/cholent.htm.)

Black Bean Soup

2 cups black turtle beans
2 tablespoons or more lemon juice, vinegar or whey
several 6-inch strips of kombu (optional)
6-8 cloves garlic, mashed
2-3 bay leaves and several sprigs fresh thyme, tied together
3-4 tablespoons olive oil or lard
1-2 medium onions, diced
3-4 sticks celery, diced
1 sweet red pepper, diced
2-3 jalapeno peppers, seeded and diced
1 large can tomatoes or 4 or 5 medium-sized fresh tomatoes
1 quart chicken or beef stock
2 teaspoons (or more, to taste) ground cumin seed
black pepper and sea salt to taste
cilantro and sour cream or crème fraiche for garnish

Place beans in a bowl or pot and pour about 8 cups simmering water over the beans. Add lemon juice, vinegar or whey and soak 18-24 hours. For best results, drain a couple of times during the soaking process, rinse the beans and add more simmering water plus lemon juice, vinegar or whey. Drain beans, rinse and place in a large soup pot with water to cover by a couple of inches.
Bring to boil, skim off any foam that appears, then immediately lower to simmer, adding the mashed garlic cloves, bay leaf and thyme, and optional strips of kombu. Cook gently until beans are soft and just starting to fall apart--one hour or more depending on beans. Meanwhile sauté the onions, celery, red pepper and jalapeno pepper in a large skillet in olive oil or lard. Stir in the groudn cumin seed and cook together for about 15 minutes, or until onions are translucent. Add the sautéed vegetables to the beans, along with the beef or chicken stock, tomatoes and salt. Continue to simmer another half hour. The kombu will have melted into the broth by now. Remove bayleaf and thyme, and season to taste with sea salt and pepper. Garnish with minced cilantro and sour cream or crème fraiche. Makes 6-8 servings.

Lobio Tkemali
(Georgian red beans with sour plum sauce)

Georgian cuisine is typical of others of the Caucasus, featuring spices and exotic fruits and nuts in combinations often unexpected to most western tastes. Georgians often utilize beans in their menus, where they usually play the role of accompaniment to meat or fish entrées, but they are never boring! There are many variations of lobio recipes, some with walnut sauce and some with mixed, piquant herbal dressings. The plum sauce traditionally used in Georgia would have been made from an unsweetened paste of wild plum. This paste is rarely available in the US, but tamarind paste will approximate the flavor quite well in this recipe.

1 1/3 cup kidney beans
1 medium onion, peeled
1 medium carrot, peeled
3 celery sticks
6-inch piece of kombu (optional)
5 large dried prunes
1/4 cup balsamic vinegar
2 teaspoons tamarind paste (available in
Indian or Middle Eastern food stores)
1 clove garlic, pounded to paste
1/3 cup extra virgin olive oil
3/4 teaspoon ground coriander seed
1/4 teaspoon ground fenugreek seed
sea salt to taste
1/2 cup finely chopped cilantro
red onion rings

Rinse beans and place in a bowl or pot. Add about 5 cups simmering water and soak for 18-24 hours. For best results, drain a couple of times during the soaking process, rinse the beans and add more simmering water.

Drain the beans, rinse and combine with onion, carrot, celery and optional kombu in a soup pot. Add enough water to cover the beans by 3 inches and bring to a boil. Add the salt, then immediately reduce the heat to low, cover and cook the beans until tender but not mushy--about an hour or more, depending on the beans.

Meanwhile combine the prunes and the balsamic vinegar in a saucepan and simmer for about 15 minutes. Remove the prunes with a slotted spoon and reserve the vinegar. Finely chop the prunes (removing pits if they are unpitted). Add the tamarind paste to the vinegar and let stand until dissolved, about 10 minutes. Stir well and set aside. Drain the beans and discard the onion, carrot, celery and optional kombu. Place the beans in a serving dish and allow to cool. In a small bowl, whisk together the diluted tamarind mixture, garlic paste, and the olive oil, blending well. Add the chopped prunes, ground coriander and fenugreek, again blending well. Toss the beans with the tamarind mixture. Taste and correct the seasoning, and stir in the 1/4 cup cilantro leaves. Refrigerate, covered, for at least 2 hours before serving to allow flavors to develop. Garnish with remaining cilantro and the red onion rings. Serves 6. Recipe courtesy _www.recipeland.com/recipe/13829/.



Sidebar

Neutralizing Phytic Acid

Legume variety Optimal water pH Soaking time Best Soaking Medium
Black beans 5.5 18-24 hours Water with lemon juice, vinegar or whey added
Lentils 5.0 10 hours Water with lemon juice, vinegar or whey added
Fava beans 4.0 10 hours Water with lemon juice, vinegar or whey added
Dried and split peas 7.0 to 7.5 10 hours Plain soft water with pinch of baking soda
Brown, white & kidney beans 7.0 18-24 hours Plain soft water


This article appeared in Wise Traditions in Food, Farming and the Healing Arts, the quarterly magazine of the Weston A. Price Foundation, Winter 2006.
 
HifromGrace said:
I'm actually looking forward to expanding my diet in some ways too (I've finally stopped looking at this as a pain in the butt, framed in denying myself), and getting creative and fun with the cooking, yeah!!

That's the spirit! Go out there and kick some gluten butt! :) Seriously though, baking w/o gluten is a challenge, but learning is fun, no?

HifromGrace said:
How's the diet change coming along for you? Is your energy sustained, or is more like a clear lack of funk which allows you to thrive??

I'm doing very well with the changes I've made. I feel like my energy is much more sustained since I've eliminated gluten. It is more of a plateau now instead of a roller-coaster. Although, I'm not sure how much I can attribute to diet versus EE or it might be the combination of the two.
 
HifromGrace said:
Addressing dairy is next on my list, although I don’t think it will be that tough, again, I use it in moderation, and fermented form. But like I said, I don’t even think I know what it feels like to thrive – I mean, I’m not depressed, riddled with anxiety and a hormonal nightmare anymore, but I sure as heck ain’t thrivin’. Again, I’ve blindly followed the Weston Price diet, and am ready to take it up a notch. But Weston Price/Nourishing Traditions totally did what they do best, which is teach you how to get rid of the processed foods and how to actually cook.

I wouldn't get too down on the Weston A. Price people, HifromGrace, and I wouldn't call what you were doing "blindly following". The very fact that you recognized as truth dietary recommendations that go completely against mainstream dogma should be commended. Give yourself some credit! The knowledge about gluten and dairy has been building slowly and I don't think it was until quite recently that people realized they are detrimental for everyone as opposed to just a sensitive few. Most people, even those in the holistic health field, still believe the majority of the population handle these things without issue.

My view of the Weston Price Foundation is that they're working well with the information they have - they're using the wisdom of traditional cultures to model diets that are much closer to ideal then mainstream interpretations. I think they're really only one step away from full paleo, but they do seem to be quite attached to raw dairy (and I guess, considering they use Weston Price's findings as the gold standard, who can blame them. I'm still not really able to reconcile the fact that WP came across many cultures who were thriving with vibrant health who were big dairy consumers knowing what we know now about casein). Traditional cultures figured out soaking and fermenting foods was what was best considering what they were given (and considering that they would probably starve were it not for these foods). It's only now that we're starting to see that what they were given wasn't ideal.

My 2 cents...
 
Back
Top Bottom