Is The Suns Sister Star Now Visable?

[Ca.]

This is the recent video from CCTV from China, of the lunch of Shenzhou-8 Spacecraft on Oct 31, 2011 at 21:58 UTC. If you go 9:15 minutes into the video, they show camera view of from the rockets vantage point as it begins its orbit.. In the picture you will see what looks like the suns sister star with an orbting planet.

A Long March 2F rocket blasted off from China today at 21:58 UTC, Launching the Shenzhou-8 Spacecraft.
The spacecraft is due to perform the first Chinese docking ever to the Tiangong-1 Space Station. Tiangong-1 is a single module and was launched a month ago on September 29th

.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lD0J-7oX6A&feature=related

Now one may take it as a lens flare, and it may be. But if the projections of it's appearance are correct for sometime possibly in the end of November' or beginning of December, too when it should become quiet visible to the naked eye.

Now an interesting situation occurred while i was out taking photo's of the moon this last week. i took a number of picture's as the moon was rising, from the east or south east, (at 11-10-11 from 7;33 pm to 7:38 pm was the last one taken), and aim guessing as i did not have a compass, and was using land marks from my vantage point.

These are the results i got. Now i have never gotten a lens flare from taking a pictures of the moon, but it was a number of long exposure's, maybe one, two, and there seconds long at F-8. This very well could be a lens flare, and doubtful it would be the sister star, but what is weird is that both in the video, and picture's are showing show a blue projection of the possilbe planet or sister star........................

PS: if this is crock, please file under Baked Noodles

 

[anart]

The 'orbiting planet' looks like a lens flare to me. I'm also not sure why they think the brighter object is a sister sun? Then, there is also the fact that from what we understand, the solar companion is a brown dwarf at this stage in its life so it wouldn't shine like that... all in all I think you're being taken for a ride, but just my take on it.

 

[Ca.]

The 'orbiting planet' looks like a lens flare to me. I'm also not sure why they think the brighter object is a sister sun? Then, there is also the fact that from what we understand, the solar companion is a brown dwarf at this stage in its life so it wouldn't shine like that... but just my take on it.

all in all I think you're being taken for a ride,

Being a dead star, incapable of producing light of its own, but large enough to reflect the suns light, (including what every electrical energy is shared between the two), it could display of what some have recorded in the past as having wings of fire associated with it, due possibly to the off gassing, associated with its speed of travel, and other unknown cosmic force's.

Thanks anart for your feed back.

Note to self: Avoid going to the carnival of disinformation!

 

[Foxx]

I'm not convinced of the explanation that it's the binary star, since there are some other questions abound and I haven't seen this phenomenon myself, but 'that looks like a lens flare' was the first thing I thought when looking at the pictures, until I watched this video.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sGuIYqiwww&feature=share

That has a guy in Arizona filming the sun, moving his camera, that suggests that it's at least not a lens flare. It hasn't been sunny for the past few days where I've been to see if I can see it which, if it were the binary sun, would presumably be visible everywhere if it's visible in AZ.

 

[mkrnhr]

It's simple. instead of filming directly towards the Sun, he should have put his hand to cover the Sun, put himself next to a building, a mountain, a cloud, and see if the "object" was still there while the Sun was covered.

 

[Ca.]

I'm not convinced of the explanation that it's the binary star, since there are some other questions abound and I haven't seen this phenomenon myself, but 'that looks like a lens flare' was the first thing I thought when looking at the pictures, until I watched this video.

_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sGuIYqiwww&feature=share

That has a guy in Arizona filming the sun, moving his camera, that suggests that it's at least not a lens flare. It hasn't been sunny for the past few days where I've been to see if I can see it which, if it were the binary sun, would presumably be visible everywhere if it's visible in AZ.

i saw that download as well, and was going to include it on my post. But when went to retrieve it, it had been removed. It did show a round object to the right of the sun, ( at 5:00 cloak ) and was viewed with welding screen. The screen reduses the amount of damaging sun light to view the sun safely. Welders use the screen to eliminate being blinded during the production of the welding process, protecting ones eye's from the ark of light that is genarated. It also aides in seeing the welding bead being laid while welding.

He actually did produce a glare ( or flare ) for compassion, but the object in question did not vacillate it's postion. Go figure.

Speedglas 9V
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vf5xCHuKQs&feature=related002