Israel's war on Lebanon, 2006

  • Thread starter Thread starter NEUROSIS
  • Start date Start date
Fear. If you target the emergency services, you are likely to stop people from travelling in an ambulance. The end result is it takes longer for the people to receive medical help, thus they tend to not make it.

Although, during the Bosnian crisis in the early 1990's, after the no-fly zone was established , there were many helicopters painted with the red cross on the side. The peacekeeping airforces couldn't open fire on these helicopters due to the red cross on the side even though they were firing on ground positions.
 
Thats what I was pondering too, only I had a gut feeling that they were using these weapons as a forerunner. to test the international will and try to see how much they could get away with, my only fear is that if they get away with using Phosphorus and cluster bombs on civilians and call it legal, then what is to stop them using biological agents next and claiming the same "We are using legal weapons, we are the most legal and respectfull army in the world", and the sheeple will belive what ever their given government spins their way. Its beyond words how sick and twisted this is, and its only getting worse. I hear Condalizzard has given the Israeli pathocrats a green light to wage as much war as they like, for as long as they like and willrush any munitions to Israel that is needed to accomplish this gran masterplan.

Sometimes I feel like stopping to look at whats going on, it really disgusts me that much that I feel physically sick/ill from watching it all happen, but I won't ever stop, I can't anymore.
 
in french (sorry) in a canadian website :
http://www.mondialisation.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MAD20060724&articleId=2811

I'm not sure of the viability of the cited sources but the now obvious use of banned weapons cannot be directly dismissed. Otherwise, both banned and not-banned (authorized??) weapons are weapons to kill and make suffer people after all. It appears that the two main aims of this killing is first to kill, and to make a violent psychic impress because you can kill as many people by onle imposing a blocus on a contry that does not have no natural nor agricultural ressources, but direct mass killing is most effective in one's mind. or maybe it is only sadness comes with such thoughts...
 
If true, then the article below from Al-Jazeera shows evidence that there is no 48 hour ceasefire by the IDF. They have continued bombing and the ground offensive against the Lebanese, so the ceasefire story is just a load of propoganda in the (Jewish owned) MSM that there is one in effect, whilst the opposite is true. Ground operations, air strikes and naval operations are continuing their offensives. Maybe this was simply a ploy by the Zionist Neocons to lull the lebanese into a false sense of safety, so that they might come out of hiding for 48hrs and let the IDF know where they are?

Also Peretz says Israel is to expand it's offensive? Would this mean a possible plan to expand to say Syria or Iran (which I belive the US is pushing for)...hmmm it has me wondering. Or maybe this just means that now they have more US supplied armaments, that they are going to increase the scale of the bombing campaign or reach into the more northern parts of Lebanon.

Story Here http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/820EE303-ADAB-44E7-AA4D-DFE985238B6C.htm


Israel is to expand its offensive against Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon, Amir Peretz, the Israeli defence minister, has said, less than a day after its deadly attack on Qana provoked outrage.

Peretz said in a speech to the Israeli parliament that Israel must not agree to an immediate ceasefire in the almost three-week long conflict, despite a decision on Sunday to observe a 48-hour halt in airstrikes in southern Lebanon.

The suspension followed a wave of protest from around the world over the bombing of a building in the southern town of Qana which killed more than 50 people, including more than 20 children.

But Israeli aircraft carried out raids in the Taibe area of southern Lebanon on Monday to support ground forces fighting Hezbollah guerrillas, the Israeli army said.

Also on Monday, one Lebanese soldier was also killed on Monday and three wounded by Israeli naval fire north of the port city of Tyre, police said.

Three Israeli soldiers were also wounded when Hezbollah fighters attacked two tanks with missiles near the Lebanese border town of Kila, the Israeli army said.

At least two rockets fired by Hezbollah fighters also hit an area near the northern Israeli town of Kiryat Shmona, Israeli media reported.

In Lebanon, people were observing a national day of mourning following the deaths in Qana.

Banks and public offices were closed, while flags flew at half mast in memory of those killed in Sunday's attack, the biggest single loss of life since Israel's bombardment of Lebanon began almost three weeks ago.

Lebanese newspapers printed large pictures of dead children being retrieved from under the rubble in the town, some framed in black in a sign of mourning.

Rescue workers reportedly called off a search for survivors after spending hours digging by hand to find the corpses of those killed.

Arab and Islamic leaders have condemned the attack.

In Beirut on Sunday, protesters smashed their way into the United Nations headquarters as thousands massed outside chanting "Death to Israel, Death to America".

Gunmen also stormed and looted the UN compound in Gaza City during a protest over the bombing. At least two people were wounded.
 
Lebanon - French minister for foreign affairs "adjusts" his stance

Iran is partly responsible for the Lebanese conflicts and now must "contribute to pacify the region" declared Philippe Douste-Blazy last Wednesday.

In Beyruth last Sunday, the French minister for foreign affairs had declared that Iran was playing a "stabilizing role in Middle East"

Iran "in the Israelo-Lebanese conflict and in the nuclear conflict must play a stabilisation role and not a destabilisation role", he stated on Radio J (French jewish radio), repeating the fundamentals of a thesis developed on Tuesday in Bruxelles after the European Foreign Affairs ministers meeting.

"Iran is partly responsible for the current conflicts (...) so Iran can bring solutions and therefore can contribute to pacify this part of the world. It's now up to Iran to take its responsibilities, Philippe Douste-Blazy added. "It is now or never".

Journalists asked him if is he was aware that his declaration on Wednesday could have shocked the French jewish community and Israel, the leader of the French diplomacy estimates that the nature of his explanations should not be considered as shocking.

"We can see that the risk is the destabilization of Lebanon. Israel has nothing to win in such an evolution. Israelis should better talk to a strong Lebanese government rather than to a weak one".
Source : http://fr.news.yahoo.com/02082006/290/philippe-douste-blazy-recadre-ses-propos-sur-l-iran.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*Not Satire* SWC: Investigate Lebanon for war crimes

The Simon Wiesenthal Center on Thursday called on the UN Human Rights Council to investigate the negligence and complicity of Lebanon in the commission of war crimes against Israel by deliberately failing to stop the transfer of Katyusha rockets to Hizbullah and in failing to alert the Security Council about the amassing of such weapons - a direct violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1559.

"There never would have been a war in Lebanon had Beirut done its due diligence under Resolution 1559," said Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Wiesenthal Center. "Therefore, Lebanon is guilty of complicity with Hizbullah in the commission of war crimes against the people of Israel because of its failure to disarm Hizbullah or to even alert the UN of such violations.

"It is hypocritical that the only country the UN Human Rights Council investigates is the State of Israel, and it is also tragic that so many innocent people in Lebanon had to lose their lives because of the unwillingness and negligence of the Lebanese government to stand up to Hizbullah. The time has come for the UN to turn its spotlight on Lebanon."
I think this pretty much speaks for itself.
ETA: Do'h forgot link http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1154525850270&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bad news... Well, I'm not sure about the "news" part.

Invasion of Lebanon as a prelude to war on Iran - Hersh


Seymour Hersh said:
WATCHING LEBANON

by SEYMOUR M. HERSH
Washington's interests in Israel's war.
Issue of 2006-08-21
Posted 2006-08-14

In the days after Hezbollah crossed from Lebanon into Israel, on July 12th, to kidnap two soldiers, triggering an Israeli air attack on Lebanon and a full-scale war, the Bush Administration seemed strangely passive. "It's a moment of clarification," President George W. Bush said at the G-8 summit, in St. Petersburg, on July 16th. "It's now become clear why we don't have peace in the Middle East." He described the relationship between Hezbollah and its supporters in Iran and Syria as one of the "root causes of instability," and subsequently said that it was up to those countries to end the crisis. Two days later, despite calls from several governments for the United States to take the lead in negotiations to end the fighting, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that a ceasefire should be put off until "the conditions are conducive."

The Bush Administration, however, was closely involved in the planning of Israel's retaliatory attacks. President Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney were convinced, current and former intelligence and diplomatic officials told me, that a successful Israeli Air Force bombing campaign against Hezbollah's heavily fortified underground-missile and command-and-control complexes in Lebanon could ease Israel's security concerns and also serve as a prelude to a potential American pre
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Amnesty International said:
Embargo Date: 23 August 2006 00:01 GMT


Israel/Lebanon: Evidence indicates deliberate destruction of civilian infrastructure
Amnesty International today published findings that point to an Israeli policy of deliberate destruction of Lebanese civilian infrastructure, which included war crimes, during the recent conflict.

The organization's latest publication shows how Israel's destruction of thousands of homes, and strikes on numerous bridges and roads as well as water and fuel storage plants, was an integral part of Israel's military strategy in Lebanon, rather than "collateral damage" resulting from the lawful targeting of military objectives.

The report reinforces the case for an urgent, comprehensive and independent UN inquiry into grave violations of international humanitarian law committed by both Hizbullah and Israel during their month-long conflict.

"Israel's assertion that the attacks on the infrastructure were lawful is manifestly wrong. Many of the violations identified in our report are war crimes, including indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks. The evidence strongly suggests that the extensive destruction of power and water plants, as well as the transport infrastructure vital for food and other humanitarian relief, was deliberate and an integral part of a military strategy," said Kate Gilmore, Executive Deputy Secretary General of Amnesty International.

The Israeli government has argued that they were targeting Hizbullah positions and support facilities and that other damage done to civilian infrastructure was a result of Hizbullah using the civilian population as a "human shield".

"The pattern, scope and scale of the attacks makes Israel's claim that this was 'collateral damage', simply not credible," said Kate Gilmore, Executive Deputy Secretary General of Amnesty International.

"Civilian victims on both sides of this conflict deserve justice. The serious nature of violations committed makes an investigation into the conduct of both parties urgent. There must be accountability for the perpetrators of war crimes and reparation for the victims."

The report, Deliberate destruction or 'collateral damage'? Israeli attacks against civilian infrastructure, is based on first-hand information gathered by recent Amnesty International research missions to Lebanon and Israel, including interviews with dozens of victims, officials from the UN, Israeli Defence Force (IDF) and Lebanese government, as well as official statements and press reports.

The report includes evidence of the following:
Massive destruction by Israeli forces of whole civilian neighbourhoods and villages;
Attacks on bridges in areas of no apparent strategic importance;
Attacks on water pumping stations, water treatment plants and supermarkets despite the prohibition against targeting objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population;
Statements by Israeli military officials indicating that the destruction of civilian infrastructure was indeed a goal of Israel's military campaign designed to press the Lebanese government and the civilian population to turn against Hizbullah.

The report exposes a pattern of indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks, which resulted in the displacement of twenty-five percent of the civilian population. This pattern, taken together with official statements, indicates that the attacks on infrastucture were deliberate, and not simply incidental to lawful military objectives.

Amnesty International is calling for a comprehensive, independent and impartial inquiry to be urgently established by the UN into violations of international humanitarian law by both sides in the conflict. It should examine in particular the impact of this conflict on the civilian population, and should be undertaken with a view to holding individuals responsible for crimes under international law and ensuring that full reparation is provided to the victims.

To see the report: Deliberate destruction or 'collateral damage'? Israeli attacks against civilian infrastructure,please go to:http://web.amnesty.org.library/index/engmde180072006


Public Document
****************************************
For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566
Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW. web: http://www.amnesty.org

For latest human rights news view http://news.amnesty.org
 
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2006-09-05T084628Z_01_L05402770_RTRUKOC_0_US-LEBANON-BLAST.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHome-C3-worldNews-2

Lebanon bomb blast kills two
Tue Sep 5, 2006 4:46am ET147

BEIRUT (Reuters) - A senior Lebanese intelligence officer was seriously wounded and two companions were killed by a bomb that exploded in their car near the southern city of Sidon on Tuesday, security sources said.

The officer, identified as Colonel Samir Shehadeh, works for the Interior Ministry's intelligence branch. Police said one of the two men killed was in uniform, the other in plainclothes.

There was no claim of responsibility for the attack in the coastal village of Rmeileh. Shehadeh was among officers involved in Lebanon's investigation into last year's assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik al-Hariri.

The attack occurred ahead of a report this month by U.N. investigator Serge Brammertz on his inquiry in Hariri's killing. The Lebanese government plans in the next few weeks to authorize an international tribunal to try the culprits.

An initial U.N. report said Syrian security officials and their allies in Lebanese security agencies were involved in the bomb blast that killed Hariri in Beirut on February 14, 2005.

Damascus has denied any role in the assassination, which led to the withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon in April 2005.

Hariri's death was followed by more than a dozen bombings that killed or wounded anti-Syrian politicians and journalists. The last such attack killed prominent Christian journalist and member of parliament Gebran Tueni on December 12.
Mossad, anyone?
 
Devar said:
Mossad, anyone?
No way! Never! Mossad, like Israel, only DEFEND themselves! Didn't you know? They would never do something like this :-D

Joe
 
IDF commander: We fired more than a million cluster bombs in Lebanon

Has anyone of you heard about "Indymedia"? I found it on lot of "alternative/radical/anti occupation" Israel sites.

Here one of the articles there. Original is from Haaretz, comments by Indymedia:

The Olmert Extremists unleashed banned Weapons of Mass Destruction against a civilian population, in a war planned a year in advance, which violates International Law. The world is beginning to understand who the real Terrorists are.

IDF commander: We fired more than a million cluster bombs in Lebanon
By Meron Rappaport


"What we did was insane and monstrous, we covered entire towns in cluster bombs," the head of an IDF rocket unit in Lebanon said regarding the use of cluster bombs and phosphorous shells during the war.

Quoting his battalion commander, the rocket unit head stated that the IDF fired around 1,800 cluster bombs, containing over 1.2 million cluster bomblets.

In addition, soldiers in IDF artillery units testified that the army used phosphorous shells during the war, widely forbidden by international law. According to their claims, the vast majority of said explosive ordinance was fired in the final 10 days of the war.

The rocket unit commander stated that Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) platforms were heavily used in spite of the fact that they were known to be highly inaccurate.

MLRS is a track or tire carried mobile rocket launching platform, capable of firing a very high volume of mostly unguided munitions. The basic rocket fired by the platform is unguided and imprecise, with a range of about 32 kilometers. The rockets are designed to burst into sub-munitions at a planned altitude in order to blanket enemy army and personnel on the ground with smaller explosive rounds.

The use of such weaponry is controversial mainly due to its inaccuracy and ability to wreak great havoc against indeterminate targets over large areas of territory, with a margin of error of as much as 1,200 meters from the intended target to the area hit.

The cluster rounds which don't detonate on impact, believed by the United Nations to be around 40% of those fired by the IDF in Lebanon, remain on the ground as unexploded munitions, effectively littering the landscape with thousands of land mines which will continue to claim victims long after the war has ended.

Because of their high level of failure to detonate, it is believed that there are around 500,000 unexploded munitions on the ground in Lebanon. To date 12 Lebanese civilians have been killed by these mines since the end of the war.

According to the commander, in order to compensate for the inaccuracy of the rockets and the inability to strike individual targets precisely, units would "flood" the battlefield with munitions, accounting for the littered and explosive landscape of post-war Lebanon.

When his reserve duty came to a close, the commander in question sent a letter to Defense Minister Amir Peretz outlining the use of cluster munitions, a letter which has remained unanswered.

'Excessive injury and unnecessary suffering'

It has come to light that IDF soldiers fired phosphorous rounds in order to cause fires in Lebanon. An artillery commander has admitted to seeing trucks loaded with phosphorous rounds on their way to artillery crews in the north of Israel.

A direct hit from a phosphorous shell typically causes severe burns and a slow, painful death.

International law forbids the use of weapons that cause "excessive injury and unnecessary suffering", and many experts are of the opinion that phosphorous rounds fall directly in that category.

The International Red Cross has determined that international law forbids the use of phosphorous and other types of flammable rounds against personnel, both civilian and military.

IDF: No violation of international law
In response, the IDF Spokesman's Office stated that "International law does not include a sweeping prohibition of the use of cluster bombs. The convention on conventional weaponry does not declare a prohibition on [phosphorous weapons], rather, on principles regulating the use of such weapons.

"For understandable operational reasons, the IDF does not respond to [accounts of] details of weaponry in its possession.

"The IDF makes use only of methods and weaponry which are permissible under international law. Artillery fire in general, including MLRS fire, were used in response solely to firing on the state of Israel."

The Defense Minister's office said it had not received messages regarding cluster bomb fire.

www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/761781.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here another article about it in Haaretz:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=Meron+Rappaport&itemNo=762427
Shooting without a target

During the final days of the war, when it became clear that the Israel Defense Forces had no solution to the ongoing launchings of Katyusha rockets, a decision was made to "flood" the area with cluster bombs, delivered by artillery shells and rockets. This was non-target specific shooting, based on the assumption that the bomblets would cover a large area, possibly destroy Hezbollah rocket launchers and cause as many casualties as possible among its fighters.

A soldier who fired 155mm artillery shells delivering cluster bombs told Haaretz that he was ordered to "flood" the area with these bombs, without having a specific target. A commander of a Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) told Haaretz that his order was to "saturate the area." These statements were published in stories by Meron Rapoport on September 8 and 12. More than a million cluster bomblets were dropped in southern Lebanon. Each M-26 rocket fired by an MLRS contains 644 cluster bomblets, capable of covering an area the size of a football field.

Firing at undefined targets is a problem in and of itself. The dilemma it entails is reflected in statements by soldiers who fired cluster bombs during training and recognized that this type of weapon should be used only in a war against a regular army, for the purpose of hitting arms supply convoys or missile batteries - not against civilian areas. But beyond this dilemma, the committee investigating the war should find out whether anyone considered what would happen to the thousands of cluster bomblets that failed to explode, and were therefore transformed into mines spread throughout southern Lebanon.

The cluster bomb is not a banned weapon, but it is described as an "indiscriminate" weapon, which should not be used against targets in civilian areas because, inter alia, it continues to kill once the war is over. Since the cease-fire went into effect, 12 Lebanese civilians have been killed by duds that exploded unexpectedly. Since the percentage of unexploded cluster bomblets ranges from 5 to 30 percent, according to various assessments, southern Lebanon is now an area littered by thousands of bomblets that have not yet exploded.

Questions regarding the IDF's conduct during the war have many implications, both moral and practical. Israel's ability to rally international support depends in part on the distinction it makes between innocent civilians and the enemy. While Hamas and Hezbollah attack civilians as part of their strategy, Israel declares that it does not do so, and that it makes an effort to avoid harming civilians. The decision to drop cluster bombs on villages, with no specified targets; the decision to use these bombs over a large area, making it impossible to know in advance who will be there; and the well-known fact that a large percentage of these munitions will not explode on impact, and will therefore be transformed into mines in an area to which civilians will return, are all further testimony to the flawed decision-making of those who managed the war.

Now, Israel can do little except accede to UN Secretary General Kofi Annan's request and assist in marking the areas hit by the cluster bombs, so that there will be no further casualties among Lebanese civilians, who have already been hurt by the war. Significant portions of southern Lebanon have now become minefields. Annan's condemnation was not without basis.
 
And another one:
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArtVty.jhtml?sw=Meron+Rappaport&itemNo=760246

What lies beneath

By Meron Rapoport

Last Update: 08/09/2006 11:40

S.is a reservist in an artillery battalion, and he is not at ease with what he did during the second Lebanon war. He fired shells, sometimes at a rate of one per minute. He and his fellow soldiers fired 200 shells one night and on other nights, "only" 50 or 80. S. doesn't know what damage was done by the shells he fired. He didn't see where they fell. He doesn't even know exactly where they were aimed. Artillery gunners like him only receive coordinates, numbers, not names of villages. Even those commanding the team or the battery don't know exactly what they're firing at.

"Tell me, how do the villages there look? Are they all destroyed?" S. asked me after I told him that I was in contact with UN personnel who were patrolling the villages. What really made something inside S. snap was when his battalion was given an entire village as a target one night. He thinks it was Taibeh, a village in what is called the eastern sector, but he's not sure. The battalion commander assembled the men and told them that the whole village had been divided into parts and that each team was supposed to "flood" its alloted space - without specific targets, simply to bombard the village.

"I told myself that the people left in that village must be the weaker ones, like in Haifa," says S. "I felt that we were acting like Hezbollah. Taking houses and turning them into targets. That's terror. My soul is important to me. When I hug my girlfriend, I want to feel good about myself. And I don't feel good about what I did in the war. I felt like I really should have tossed my weapon and run away."

According to the UN, S. has good reason not to feel at peace with himself. One reservist artillery officer estimated that the Israel Defense Forces fired about 160,000 shells during the recent war. By comparison, in the Yom Kippur War, the IDF fired less than 100,000 shells. Moreover, in addition to the tens of thousands of regular shells, Israel fired several hundred cluster rockets and cluster bombs. These kinds of munition break apart in the air as they approach the ground, and spray dozens or hundreds of bomblets, each about the size of a large battery, within a radius of up to 100 meters. Most of these bomblets explode when they reach the ground, but a significant portion do not, and effectively become something like land mines. UN personnel who have been patrolling in south Lebanon in recent days say that a good part of the villages and towns there have been turned into large mine fields.

As of this past Wednesday, UN mine-sweepers in southern Lebanon had identified 450 sites where cluster shells had fallen, and that's only in settled areas. In open areas, in fields, say the UN people, there are many more such sites. Each of these sites may contain hundreds or even thousands of small unexploded bombs. The UN estimates that about 100,000 of these little mines are now scattered about that part of Lebanon. Since the cease-fire, 12 Lebanese civilians, including two children, have been killed by the explosion of these "duds" and 78 people (22 of them children) have been wounded, some losing limbs in the process.

Bombs all over

In Tibnin, a town in the central part of southern Lebanon, a cluster bomb landed opposite the main entrance to the hospital. A member of the UN's mine-sweeping team told Human Rights Watch that in just 10 minutes, he had counted 100 unexploded bomblets; after that he just didn't bother.

David Shearer, the UN humanitarian coordinator in Lebanon, toured the Tibnin area on Wednesday. "I saw these kinds of bombs on houses, inside houses and next to houses," he says. "I saw them clear 16 or 17 away from a school soccer field. I saw them on the road and in orchards next to the road, caught in t0he trees." Since the cease-fire, he adds, nearly every day a death is reported, and three or four people are wounded, as a result of someone stepping on parts of a cluster bomb.

International law expert Dr. Yuval Shani of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem explains that there are international conventions that prohibit the use of chemical or biological weapons, of dumdum bullets and other types of weaponry, but that cluster bombs are not expressly prohibited. However, says Shani, Section 57 of the first protocol of the Geneva Convention, to which Israel is a signatory, prohibits the use of "indiscriminate" weapons, a definition that fits the cluster bombs.

"Cluster weapons cannot be used in a place where there are liable to be civilians," says Shani. The only justification for using such bombs in an area where there are civilians is in cases when they are the only type of arms by means of which the desired military result may be achieved. "It's hard to believe," he continues, "that in the hundreds of instances discovered in Lebanon, cluster bombs were the only possible weapon."

The Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), which filed a request this week for Attorney General Menahem Mazuz to investigate the matter, puts it more forcefully: "The dropping of cluster bombs in built-up areas, in complete disregard for the danger they pose to the lives of innocent civilians, seems to meet the basic mental requirement for committing a crime that involves deliberate killing or deliberate harming of civilians," says the petition, sent by attorney Sonia Boulos on behalf of the association.

S. did not fire cluster bombs, but he heard over the radio orders being given to use them. He also met a friend from another battalion who excitedly told him that he had fired such bombs. The friend's excitement is understandable given that these weapons are not customarily used in IDF operations and are a rarity even in training exercises. Says one reservist officer: "Cluster bombs are only used in training in one firing range in the south of Israel, and this area is treated as if it's a mine field."

Y., a reservist in the same battalion, fired at least 15 cluster shells. "It was in the last days of the war," he says. "They gave us orders to fire them. They didn't tell us where we were firing - if it was at a village or at open terrain. We fired until the forces that requested the shelling asked us to stop."

More duds

Another peculiarity involves the type of shells that were used. The 155-mm. artillery batteries use two types: American-made shells, known in the IDF by the acronym matzrash, and Israeli-made shells, called tze'if. Y. learned that with the Israeli cluster shells, the percentage of duds - i.e., of bombs that essentially became land mines - was lower than that of the American-made ones, and yet they fired only the latter kind. But the major portion of the damage wasn't done, apparently, by the 155-mm. guns that S. and Y. fired, rather, apparently, by the new MRLS rocket launchers that the IDF used in operations for the first time in the second Lebanon war.

In the late 1990s, the IDF purchased 48 of these launchers from the United States. Each one holds 12 rockets, which act essentially like large cluster bombs. According to the official specifications, each such rocket contains no fewer than 644 tiny bomblets that are supposed to disperse in a 100-meter radius above the target. "Like a soccer field full of bombs," is how one artillery reservist described it.

Y. says that his battalion commander said that when the IDF Apache helicopter came down near Ramot Naftali, killing its two pilots, one suspicion was that it had been hit by such a rocket that had been fired in the area at the time. It was later determined that this was likely not the cause, but the discussion of such a possibility basically amounted to an official admission that such rockets were indeed being used against southern Lebanon. How many exactly? It's hard to know. The UN people have no precise data on the breakdown of unexploded ordnance from MRLS rockets, or American or Israeli cluster shells.

Shearer says it's clear that most use of the cluster weapons was made in the final 72 hours of the war. "In the beginning of the war, too, there were reports on the use of cluster bombs," he says. "But only a few. In the three last days, a tremendous amount of them were fired. It's also hard to know where they were aimed. The dispersion of the bombs is so wide that even if the original target were outside a populated area, many bombs fell amid the houses."

Y. and S. confirm this appraisal of events. "In the last 72 hours we fired all the munitions we had, all at the same spot," says Y. "We didn't even alter the direction of the gun. Friends of mine in the battalion told me they also fired everything in the last three days - ordinary shells, clusters, whatever they had."

Members of the UN mine-sweeping team estimate that the rate of unexploded ordnance from the cluster shells and rockets fired by Israel at Lebanon is very high, about 40 percent. This means that if each of these bombs that were fired at Lebanon left over 250 tiny bomblets around, then scores of them remain unexploded.

"In the Israeli shells there's supposed to be a mechanism that detonates the duds shortly after they reach the ground," said a UN official who toured Sidon and Tibnin this week. "But this mechanism didn't work. They're all over the place - near hospitals, schools, private homes."

Israel is not the only country that has used cluster bombs. Human Rights Watch claims that the United States and Great Britain made massive use of MRLS rockets during the second Gulf War, causing hundreds of casualties among the Iraqi civilian population. The organization estimates that about 30 million of these tiny bombs were dropped on Iraq. This may make the U.S. State Department's decision to launch an inquiry into Israel's use of such shells and rockets in the recent war seem somewhat hypocritical. The inquiry, whose existence was revealed about a week ago by The New York Times, is supposed to determine whether Israel reported to the Americans on its use of cluster bombs and on whether the targets hit were clearly defined in military terms, in keeping with a classified agreement signed when the United States began supplying Israel with cluster bombs in the early 1970s.

A similar investigation, following the first Lebanon War, led to a six-year ban on sales of cluster bombs to Israel. The New York Times reported that in the final days of the second Lebanon War, the American administration refused to transfer to Israel an emergency shipment of cluster rockets, apparently for this reason.

The UN mine-sweeping team currently working in Lebanon arrived there from Kosovo, where NATO forces used cluster bombs. But team members says that in Kosovo the situation was a lot simpler, and that the UN received from NATO precise maps of the targets at which the bombs were fired. The UN requested such maps from Israel, but the ones they received, says a senior source in the UN, "were very general. We need maps with coordinates and quantities, so we can locate the sites and know how many bombs we're supposed to find in each place. I don't think we'll get maps like that from Israel."

David Shearer says that the cluster bombs are the main obstacle to getting life in Lebanon back on track. "We'll finish fixing the water and electricity within two weeks," he explains. "But it will be 12 or even 15 months before we make southern Lebanon a safe area. Right now the residents are afraid to return to their homes. The farmers are afraid to return to the fields."
 
Lebanon: an incident between French & Israeli forces barely avoided

The incident occurred on the 31/10 but it has only come out today.
Translated from : LCI - Vous êtes au cœur de l'info

"Two seconds more, and there was a shooting at the planes, which thus would have directly threatened our forces", Michele Alliot-Marie addressed the [French] National Assembly on Wednesday, reporting this incident during a discussion about the budget of her ministry. "A catastrophe was only just avoided by our soldiers" added the minister.
On October 31, in the Lebanese sky, U.N. French peace-keeping forces were 2 seconds from shooting at Israeli fighters which had dived on their position in southern Lebanon. "This is not tolerable", the minister solemnly addressed, denouncing "the risks taken by irresponsible pilotes acting this way".
A serious incident was thus just avoided. The French soldiers "had indeed removed the masks of the missiles battery", and were finding themselves in the conditions "where they must execute shootings of self-defence ". "It is a miracle that nothing serious occurred, because there could have been a riposte from the French units ", declared Philippe Douste-Blazy at the Senate.
"A warning to the Israeli authorities is necessary so that such actions won't happen again ", he added in front of the Commission of Foreign Affairs, stressing that "Israeli overflights of Southern Lebanon are causing serious concern ".
He invited on Thursday morning the Israel ambassador in Paris, Daniel Shek, to the Quay d'Orsay. He reiterated the request of France that Israel ceases its overflights on Lebanon, which nearly caused a "serious incident" with the U.N. French peace-keeping forces.
[...] Michele Alliot-Marie wished to draw the attention "to the necessary respect of the forces of Finul", the Temporary Force of the United Nations in Lebanon. The minister specified that the Israeli F-15's "had presented themselves in a dive position" before immediately straightening up their path, which in an extremely clear way, is a posture of attack normally corresponding to the dropping of bombs or to bullet shooting ".
The minister mentioned several other incidents which "could have been extremely serious" with Israeli planes which "had taken a hostile attitude towards French then German maritime buildings". Overflights led by the Israeli army on Lebanon in spite of the cease-fire between the Hebrew State and Lebanese Hezbollah in force since August 14, after more than one month of fightings, are causing increasing criticisms among the international community. On thursday, in spite of France's call for the stopping of overflights of Lebanon, Israeli air force violated the airspace again on thursday. Two Israeli bomber fighters have flown at high altitude over the coastal town of Naqoura, in the south of the country, the headquarters of the Temporary Force of the United Nations in Lebanon (Finul), close to the Israeli border. The Israeli planes then have flewn over areas of southern Lebanon before flying at low altitude over Baalbeck, in the east of Lebanon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anti-Syrian Lebanese minister killed in Beirut. Just when we thought that Bush might be forced to make friends with Syria in order to stop the mess in Iraq.

http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aJdYDXb6JPdU

Lebanon Industry Minister Gemayel Is Killed in Beirut (Update1)

By Daniel Williams and Dania Saadi

Nov. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Lebanese Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel was shot dead in an ambush on his car, Lebanon's National News Agency reported.

Lebanese television showed pictures of the left windows of Gemayel's silver sedan riddled with bullets.

The death of Gemayel, a Maronite Christian, coincides with rising tensions in Lebanon over a government power struggle. Among the stakes are Lebanon's participation in a United Nations tribunal to prosecute suspects in the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri. Syrian security officials are among the suspects.

The National News Agency quoted Hariri's son, Saad, as blaming today's death on Syria. ''Syrian hands are behind the killing of Pierre Gemayel,'' Hariri said.

The conflict in Lebanon pits the March 14 coalition of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora against opposition forces allied with Hezbollah, the Shiite Muslim party and militia. Hezbollah's cross-border raid into Israel triggered last July's war with the Jewish state.

On Nov. 11, Hezbollah and allies walked out of the cabinet just before the government adopted a UN plan to try Hariri suspects. Hezbollah pledged to topple Siniora.

'Terrorism'

The U.S. considers the murder ''an act of terrorism,'' Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns told reporters in Washington. ''We have to redouble our efforts and those of our friends in the Arab World as well as in Europe to support the Siniora government.''

The assassination ''is against the interests of everyone in the region,'' U.K. Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said in London. French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said it was ''a new attempt to destabilize Lebanon,'' Agence France- Presse reported.

''It's a catastrophic event. Pierre Gemayel was a rising hope and we were counting on him,'' said Rashad Salameh, deputy head of Gemayel's Phalange party, a Maronite political group.

Gemayel, 34, was a member of the March 14 political bloc that coalesced after the Hariri assassination. The bloc, named for demonstrations that took place a month after Hariri's car bomb killing, dominates the current parliament and Siniora's cabinet.

Pierre Gemayel's father, Amin, a former president, had been outspoken against Syrian occupation of Lebanon and the continuation of Hezbollah's armed militia. Amin Gemayel heads the Phalange Party.

Pierre's uncle, Bashir Gemayel, was killed in a massive 1982 Beirut bombing widely blamed on Syria. Bashir Gemayel was about to assume Lebanon's presidency in the wake of Israel's invasion of the country that year to oust the Palestine Liberation Organization.
One thing that the article doesn't mention is that Bashir Gemayel's death sparked the Sabra and Shatila Palestinian refugee camps massacres by Phalangists under the surveillance of the Israeli army. Ariel Sharon, Israeli Defense Minister at the moment, is regarded to be responsible, since he and his staff knew what was going on from the start and allowed it to happen. Anyway, that was in 1982.

Notice that the murder of Pierre Gemayel has just happened and Syria is already being blamed. Of course, I suppose that Syrian involvement is a possibility, but considering what we know of the Hariri case and the timing, I kind of doubt it. Who benefits?
 
Back
Top Bottom