LiathMacha said:
Speaking of The Wave, Fifth Way, I've listened to Dr. Paul LaViolette and visited his web site. He seems to be serious scientist who says that there are waves coming from the center of the galaxy about every 500 years but the last one was 700 years ago. I'm wondering if he might have corroboration of The Wave.
We first read about LaViolette's theory in Bridges and Weidner's book, A Monument To the End of Time, in which they claimed this Galactic Superwave was coming on Sept 21 or 22 2002, I believe. Interestingly, something DID happen on that day, but it wasn't the "End of Time" as Bridges and Weidner were predicting. From the Sept 22, 2002 Signs page we get this: September 22, 2002 - Strong Earth Tremor Hits Britain - "The shaking and trembling was really quite severe. Quite a few people came out of their houses wondering what was going on. The streets were in darkness." Unfortunately, the story is gone from the Guardian archive.
As for LaViolette himself, and his theories, I had a problem with him from the beginning because after making his super declaration about the Galactic Superwaves, and predicting them, then he had to come up with answers as to why they didn't fit his "time-table." So, he came up with sub-superwaves, and mini-superwaves, and less than super superwaves (not his exact terms, but you get the idea.) In Secret History, I commented about him as follows:
Dr. Paul LaViolette, author of Earth Under Fire, claims that he has discovered evidence of a different sort of cataclysm, a volley of cosmic waves resulting from an explosion in the galactic core. Entering our solar system, this galactic super wave (the most powerful energetic phenomenon in the galaxy) would have interrupted the solar wind's ability to repel most intruding cosmic dust particles.
LaViolette builds a mythological foundation for his scientific theory, the shakiest part of which is that he suggests that galactic core explosions are a cyclical event, recurring every 26,000-year cycles, a period that relates to the precession of the equinoxes. He claims that this is a great clock, and that the precessional cycle is the duration of one Great Year recognized by the ancient Greeks, Zoroastrians, and Chinese. La Violette's theory is weak because galactic core explosions, like other nuclear phenomena, are only statistically probable. Further, the record shows a frequency greater than every 26,000 years, and his attempts to introduce "mini-explosions" to account for this come across as so much prestidigitation of the data. Also his theory does not account for all of the evidence, most particularly the geological evidence of massive bombardments of cometary bodies. What is more, La Violette's claim that the precessional cycle is the "great clock," assumes that the current polar orientation has remained stable for eons, and the very mythic evidence he tries to use as his foundation contradicts this.
Then there is this:
Massive black hole in Milky Way http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/front/1620287 - Scientists said today they have discovered at the center of our galaxy a huge black hole, a mysterious celestial object that sucks in everything around it including light.
"We have been able to exclude some still possible alternative configurations. ... There is nothing left that one would consider realistic and possible, other than a black hole."
Note that Paul La Violette writes: "Hence by eliminating the infinite energy absurdity of subatomic matter, we at the same time dispense with black holes." [p. 144, SubQuantum Kinetics.]
So, we asked the C's about it at one point:
25 Sept 1999
Q: There is also a theory of Paul La Violette, that there is a wave that comes from explosions in the galactic core, and that THIS is what is behind this increased activity.
A: Such waves exist.
Q: Are these waves part of the cataclysmic double catastrophes that are predicted to be "on the way?"
A: Who says?
Q: Well, Paul La Violette and Vincent Bridges, and Jay Weidner, for example.
A: You are not capable of predicting such things yet.
Q: (A) We are not able to predict many things. You are able to predict better than us.
A: Maybe so, but we do so oh so discreetly.
One idea that Ark has had about the Wave, which the C's describe as "Hyperkinetic sensate," is that it is "waiting for us in time." We proceed "toward the future," depending on where, when and how we intersect with this Wave, which depends entirely on us, the Wave will manifest that future that is "seated in us" by virtue of our FRV (Frequency Resonance Vibration). Whoever and whatever you are, in essence, becomes more and more pronounced and "activated" the "closer" you get to it.
Now, there is a pathetic guy "John" in Australia, who regularly posts on our old guestbook, making dire and dreadful pronouncements about us and how we have "lost our way" and fallen prey to ego and so on and so forth. He regularly declaims that the work we are doing with Signs of the Times, is "evil" and STS and "fear mongering" and so on. The poor guy doesn't get it that the Universe is what it is, that it is going to do what it is going to do, and observation tells us that what it does has precious little to do with US, but what WE do with what the Universe does has a LOT to do with what happens to us.
A person who tries to deny what is, who just wants everyone to shush up and not talk about what is going on here on Earth, who wants to deny the TRUTH, basically, is leaving themselves in a horrible position. Because no matter how hard you try to just think about nice things, the Universe is still gonna do what it's gonna do. And if a person cannot deal with what IS and maintain a cool head, they are going to be toast. The Signs page is in the way of not only inoculating people against fear and terror, but also to wake them up to the TRUTH to see, as the C's say, what they will DO. Here's another clip from the sessions on the subject:
17 August 2000
Q: ... We would like to have a little bit of a clue about the progress of the wave. I would also
like to know if this Wave is sort of like the recompiling of a computer program, with the
universe as the program? What is the progress, and is it going the recompile the program
of our universe?
A: So many questions rolled up into one. But, one way it might go is that all of a
sudden, everything that ever was is new, everything that IS is new, and everything that
will be is new. Programs change, oh we suppose, what an awesome event indeed!
Q: Is it important for the information about the potential making new of everything and
the awareness of the state of the planet as it is now, or the state of the universe, be shared
and spread so that as many people as possible will be aware at the point of the arrival of
the wave so that it makes it more likely that beneficial changes will occur, that the
universe will change in a positive way? Or is that simply not even important. It will
change the way it is going to change no matter what anybody does?
A: Closer to 2nd criterion.
Now, notice that they said "closer to 2nd criterion. That is, the closer idea is that the Universe will change the way it is going to change no matter what anybody does." But it seems obvious that there IS some element of the other criterion present. What we have concluded from this is that it is not so much that a person needs to do anything to be "ready," as it is that they will "do what they will do" based on how their "molecules" are "excited" by the wave. A person who is stimulated to DO things is simply doing what is in them to do. And yes, it changes their FRV, and certainly by DOing, they expose themselves to more learning situations which, again, modifies the FRV, and so on. Back to the session:
Q: In other words, we are doing what we are doing, and it doesn't really matter what we
are doing. The Wave will happen, everything will change, become new, and that's that?
A: What matters most is what others are doing, have done and will do.
Q: Who are these others that it matters most what they have done, are doing and will do?
A: Program rewriters, i.e. you and us in the future.
Q: So, what we have done, what we are doing, what we will do - WE - is important? I
think that I missed something. I thought you said that what we were doing simply didn't
matter.
A: You are/will be others.
Read the above over carefully. It is clear that DOing is VERY important, but not in the way that anyone might suspect. I think that the important element is that by DOing in this reality, even if it is done with the non-anticipatory awareness that such DOing is not likely to change anything in any significant way, that what happens is that a person becomes something like a "transducer" or even a capacitor so that at the point of the Wave junction, that creative energy that seeks truth, even in the greatest darkness, will be amplified to a degree heretofore unimagined.
This can relate to the "As above, so below" maxim. That who you are and what you are HERE, reflects who you are and what you are on 4 D. If you are seeking truth, seeing it and not flinching from it no matter how grim it may seem to be, and acknowledging the Universe's right to BE as it sees fit, that this essential element of STO - acknowledgement of the right of ALL to exist, even that which you might not choose for yourself in any respect - acts as an attractor of major STO energy. And if your circuits are "tuned" to those higher frequencies where the "All blinks neither at the darkness nor at the light," then you can survive the inflow of that powerful, creative energy. Back to the session excerpt:
Q: Okay, how is what we are doing now helping or hindering this process?
A: No help/hinder, just is.
Q: So, this has all been done before? It's a foregone conclusion how it is going to turn
out? It's a done deal?
A: No Laura, stop your linearishness!
Q: I don't understand. Is what we are doing making a difference?
A: What is "time?"
Q: Time is an illusion. (A) Is doing also an illusion?
A: If you are thinking in linear "time" terms.
Q: In other words, the best way for an STO future to manifest is for us not to anticipate
that ANYTHING we do will matter. Because, if we are anticipating that what we do will
make a difference, it won't. It is wanting. (A) I can't stop thinking that my working is
going to be useful! (L) I can't stop what I am doing either because it is what I DO. It is
being ME. We have to stop anticipating. We do what is in us to do without expecting it
to matter.
A: And you do it because you are directing you to do it from another plane of existence
where you know the score. Where you are on your present awareness plane, you are
largely, though not completely, scoreless and clueless.
Read this last question and answer over a few times. We DO what is "in us to do" and the C's say that it is IN us because our "higher selves," or "future selves" are directing the action, so to say. Notice that this follows immediately upon both Ark and I declaring that what we are doing is just what we do. Now, certainly, we were not doing the Signs page at that point, but I was already well into the writing of the Wave which was certainly exposing the very difficult reality we are facing. In fact, I think that I had just published "Stripped to the Bone, The Shamanic Initiation" in which the horror of our reality and what it is like to wake up to it after years of illusion was being graphically elucidated. So, it seems a certainty that "telling it like it is" is most definitely being directed "from the future." And the Signs work is just a natural extension of that. We have moved from history to history in the making. Back to excerpt:
Q: So, it is from another level of reality that we create THIS reality?
A: Close.
Q: How much input do we have from this level of reality regarding the creation of a
future reality, and I use the term "future" loosely, but meaning "future" as we perceive it
from this reality? How much input?
A: About as much awareness as a small child does when contemplating how to fly the
plane they are riding on.
Q: Well, you have talked about the Wave before, and I complained that we did not have
time to do certain things that you had suggested that we do. You said that, yes we would,
and that these things were suggested to "prepare" us for this event. Just trying to deal
with it from a linear point of view, we still have to build this pool with the columns, get a
Nobel prize, supposedly, work with people on the crop circles, and all that. Are we still
looking at doing these things in this linear time progression that we exist in; that we are
aware of as small children on a very large plane?
A: If you let it flow, it will flow.
Q: So, you are us in the future, we are you in the past - when you say this, are you "us"
in the future in the sense of ALL mankind, or in the sense of any particular group of
mankind?
A: In between those limited options.
Q: Could you be more explicit?
A: No, because you wold not "get it."
Q: When I post material on the website, those people who resonate to the material
believe that this refers to them also. I have been of the opinion that Unified Thought
Form being must mean a very large group as represented in this density. I know that we
are dealing with limiting terms. But, is this applied to people who CHOOSE the
Cassiopaean option?
A: Maybe it is best to say it applies to those who recognize the application.
This is an important and subtle point: it is obviously not people who THINK that they can just "choose," and make it so. It seems that much depends on recognizing the "application." And certainly that implies a certain "doing."
I'll never forget the time I was whining to the C's about my insurance suit after my accident, and how I was so frustrated that the attorney's and insurance company were just dragging everything on and on and on while my life was going down the tubes. I couldn't work, and quite frankly, we had to be VERY careful just to have enough to eat! So, I asked the C's to "jack up" my attorney and they responded: We DO - THROUGH YOU!
I was rather stunned at this, and then realized: well, heck, that makes sense. If the C's are saying "we are YOU in the future," and they are "thought forms," then how else do they interact in this world if it is not through me?
Q: So, if they recognize it, if they know it is them, they are part of it. (A) But, thinking
in nonlinear terms, its up to us to work to make this precise. You are asking this question
which implies that the answer exists. But, exactly what the answer is may be it is not yet
chosen, and it is up to us to make it this way.
A: Lodestar is a clue for you.
Now, you have NO idea how many dozens of people have written to me to say ME! ME! I'm the ONE! I'm the "lodestar!" and so on and so forth.
Well, heck, I don't know, so I read these messages, correspond a bit with the people, and again and again discover that I am chatting with a schizotypal paranoiac who thinks that he or she is the "Chosen One" in ways that I won't go into here.
But still, I wondered about this mysterious remark. One day, as I was reading through the transcripts I came across this:
18 Feb 1995
Q: (L) Are we building a giant energy bubble around our
area?
A: You are the guidepost of the destiny of the planet.
And just to make the issue of "lodestar" more interesting, have a look at this:
Q: ... (P) Now, I just want to say that I think that we have all of us here traveled back in time to change the way things are now. We inserted ourselves into this time period to wake up and see what is really happening. This is 3rd density thinking, I know, but it is the only way I can describe it. We looked back on the way things happened, the way the world is now, and we have come back to change things. We have come from the future, to wake up now, because we didn't wake up before. (C) Maybe that's our "past life/future life" connection here? (P) Right, we all agreed to insert ourselves in this time line.... (L) So, we ARE from the future... (P) Because the world is going in this direction, and SOMETHING had to be done. That's what I see. (I) Yes. We all decided to come back, but there was a strong possibility that we would not be able to wake up and link up. And that's why so many things happened to attempt to keep us from getting together. (P) Not just that, things happen to keep us from waking up period! We've all been bombarded with stuff all our lives. (I) Yes, and when we started waking up, and realized that we HAD to come together to "link" to DO whatever it is we are going to do, there has to be all kinds of things to prevent it - like Caroline's cats, even! [Laughter] (S) I would like to ask a question about synchronicity...
A: Wait a minute... someone said something a short while ago that is surprisingly close to the truth. Now just a moment... reflect please.
Q: (L) P**** was saying that we have come back from the future and inserted ourselves into this timeline...
A: Yes. That is close to being totally correct!
Q: (L) In terms of reincarnation, that we were talking about a few minutes before that, we are possibly incarnations of ourselves incarnated at different levels. This just happens to be one of the levels of reality that we are occupying, but there are other selves at other levels thinking and doing other level stuff, and these other levels are perceived by us as the future...
A: Maybe for some of you, but let us not get ahead of ourselves.
Q: (P) The C's say that they are US in the future. So, we, being THEM in the future, some of who they are in the future, have come back as us, to do what we are doing, to undo what is happening on Earth...
A: Close, but more complex than that. It would be difficult for you to completely understand at this point, but let us just say that you are close. ...
Q: ... (I) They said I should reflect, so maybe we should reflect on other things...
A: You should reflect upon all that is in the reflection!
Q: (L) Everything. What is the reason for the use of the term "reflection?"
A: "Alice through the looking glass."
Q: (L) When she went through the mirror, she was in an alternate reality. (I) Are we in an alternate reality?
A: Yup. But then again, are not all realities "alternate?"
Q: (I) True, because the source is the REAL reality, everything else is alternate.
A: Pretty close, I*****. You earn a silver star!
Q: (I) You guys are hilarious! I like stars and I like silver.
A: Cool, yes, but the gold ones are even better!
Stop to think: is a "gold star" also a "lodestar?" But it gets more mysterious due to the sudden turn that the discussion took:
Q: (I) I was writing something in my journal about supernovae being steps toward the Big Bang, in the sense that each supernova represents a reflection of ourselves...
A: In a more physiological sense, supernovae present cosmic energies which "up the ante" of awareness, when one is in close enough proximity.
Q: (I) Now, this supernova that happened in fairly recent times - the Cas A supernova of 1658, or thereabouts - does that have anything to do with our awareness thing going on right now?
A: It has some to do with this conduit.
Q: (I) I had that feeling. I went back and read "Supernovae, Vehicle of Ascension?" Did whatever happen with that supernova , is it affecting us....
A: The more interesting question would be, what about the NEXT supernova?!?
Q: (I) There is one coming up, and that's going to be the wave? Or...
A: No, no, no. No anticipation, please.
Q: (L) Well, that's pretty hard when you said "what about the NEXT one!"
A: Reflection, yes, but anticipation? No!
). 
