James Lovelock, Gaia Theorist, Says It is Too Late

  • Thread starter Thread starter LiathMacha
  • Start date Start date
There are a number of references to HAARP in the transcripts:

17 Feb 1996


Q: (L) Can I ask my other questions? Some people on the net
want me to ask about this HAARP thing... seems to be some
sort of antennae thing...
A: Disguise for something else.
Q: (L) What is that something else?
A: Project to apply EM wave theories to the transference of
perimeters.
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: If utilised as designed, will allow for controlled
invisibility and easy movement between density levels on
surface of planet as well as subterranially.
Q: (L) Who is in charge of building this thing?
A: More than one entity.
Q: (L) What groups?
A: INVELCO is one guise as well as UNICON and banking
interest.
Q: (L) Who is in disguise as INVELCO and UNICON? Are they
just dummy companies for cover?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Can you tell us if this is a human organization or
aliens, or a combination?
A: Human at surface level.
Q: (L) Whose idea was this project?
A: Not applicable.
Q: (L) Is there more you can tell us about this?
A: It has nothing to do with weather or climate. These
things are emanating from 4th density, as we have told you
before.
Q: (L) Is this something like a TransDimensional Atom
Remolecularizer?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is is something like what you said about the whole
South West going into 4th density?
A: No.
Q: (L) So, HAARP has nothing to do with the weather?
A: And also EM associated with same as reported.
Q: (L) So, when is this HAARP thing scheduled to go into
operation?
A: Open.
Q: (L) Is it currently in operation?
A: Experimental.
Q: (L) How long have they been working on this thing?
A: Since the 1920s.
Q: (L) What?! The 1920s?
A: Yes.
23 March 1996

Q: (L) OK, is this so-called HAARP project instrumental in
any of these realm border changes, these realm changes?
A: All is interconnected, as usual.
Q: (L) Anybody got any questions on this? What is the thing
that is going on nowadays... let me ask about this. Roxanne
sent me some information about the Do-ma, or space goddesses
who rule the grays, supposedly. Apparently there is a whole
group of people, including government officials, involved in
this Do-ma cult.
A: Yeah, right!
Q: (L) Well, that was my feeling. I sent...
A: Deception is everywhere! Scrambled brains, anyone?
4 May 1996

(L) Getting back to the
underground bases, is the HAARP project connected to these
underground bases.
A: Not directly.
Q: (L) You once said that HAARP was something that was to be
used to "transfer perimeters." I am assuming that this
means to manipulate space, time and density.
A: Yes.
Q: Is it possible that they are planning to use this to bring
up the Atlantean crystals to utilize.
A: Not so much to "bring up," as to utilize.
Q: Is there anything to BRH's idea about the "harmonics,"
that it must be ready to function on a certain day and
time?
A: No.
9 June 1996

Q: (L) Speaking of Montauk, Roxanne quoted at length some
information received from some Native American about
Montauk being used to change the weather on the planet,
and also sending out energy waves to generate anger and
other negative emotions. Is this one of the used for the
HAARP assembly?
A: No.
Q: (L) Once before you said that the HAARP assembly was a
continuation of the Montauk project, and was being used to
'transfer perimeters.' I guess this meant space/time
travel, correct?
A: Yes. And resurrect Antlantean crystal principle.
Q: (L) Do they plan to actually attempt to bring up the
Atlantean crystals?
A: No.
Q: (L) Do they plan to use this for mind control?
A: And other uses.
Q: (L) Can you give us a few of these uses?
A: Technical.
Q: (L) Is the HAARP assembly in operation now?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is there an estimated date of its activation?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is there anything you can tell us about when and if it
will go into operation?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is there anything further you can tell us about this
HAARP project?
A: Time to read Bielek.
Q: (L) But didn't you tell us that Bielek was a
disinformation artist?
A: Yes, but can you weed?
Q: (L) Now, Admiral Boorda recently committed suicide...
A: Time to read Oeschler.
Q: (L) Did Admiral Boorda really commit suicide?
A: Yes. Culmination, as is usually the case.
Q: (L) A culmination of other things?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did any of this have to do with human/alien
interactions? A: No. He was not aware of any of that.
Q: (L) What about Vince Foster? Did he commit suicide?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) For the reasons proposed?
A: Partly.
Q: (L) What was the main reason?
A: Depression.
22 June 1996
Q: (L) Okay, you say "traveling wave," and then you say that
antimatter is the highway. Does this mean moving through
antimatter or interacting in some way with antimatter via
the the impetus of the traveling wave, or realm border?
A: Bends space/time, this is where your unstable gravity
waves can be utilized.
Q: (L) Utilizing antimatter by creating an EM field, which
destabilizes the gravity wave, allows antimatter to unite
with matter, creating a portal through which space/time
can be bent, or traveled through via this "bending." In
other words, producing an EM field, bringing in the
antimatter, IS the bending of space/time? Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Is there a portal for each person, or one large
portal?
A: No.
Q: (V) So we move through a portal in masses?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is this generating of EM fields to destabilize the
gravity wave what the HAARP assembly is designed and built
for?
A: No.
17 August 1996

(T) OK, on the correlations
things, to skip from lightning to another question I just thought
of. Is there a correlation to the massive power blackouts on the
West Coast that have been happening recently, to the government
messing around with the HAARP Project, and other related weapons
testing systems?
A: Not HAARP.
Q: (T) OK, not HAARP. Something else that they're messing
with? (L) Well, why don't we just ask, what's the cause of the
blackouts? (T) OK, what's the cause of the blackouts? Good
question!
A: 4th density bleed through has many "fun" possibilities.
23 November 1996

Q: (T) What did happen to flight 800?
A: This was the result of an experiment gone awry. So was
KAL "007" in 1983.
Q: (L) What was the nature of the experiment?
A: Testing of secret impulse guidance system using civilian
airliner as an arbitrary "bounce" guidance target.
Instead, it became the "homing" target, and a different
aircraft became the bouncer. This was because the
programmers did not anticipate the lower than expected
altitude of the 747. Warning: this must stay in this room
for the present!!!!!!!!!! The facts will eventually be
discussed by others. At that time, the danger is lifted.
[At this point, it has been discussed in the exact same
terms as described here in a reputable, national
magazine.] Now, about KAL 007... that one is not dangerous
to know. The plane was deliberately instructed to fly off
course in order to trigger the Soviet's Pacific air
defense system, to "see what they were made of" in that
area. The plane was lost, but the experiment worked. They
did not expect them to shoot down a civilian airliner.
Now, all moving targets create electronic impuses. These
can be "read" by the proper extremely high tech equipment.
Older radar guided systems are subject to malfunctions in
weather conditions that are severe, as one example. Also,
the impulse system is an offshoot of the electromagnetic
pulse experiments being carried out at Montauk, Brookings
and elsewhere as part of the HAARP project! In connection
with Pentagon missile tests, HAARP has many interesting
tie-ins, not the least of which is your cell phone towers.
Now, the homing target can be any moving object. It can
be whatever is entered on the computer. It can be a
squirrel in a tree, a jogger on the beach, a building,
whatever you want. The system looks for any moving target
in order to establish recognition to the computer, in
order to establish recognition of match pattern of pulse.
TWA 800 was flying at the exact same altitude that was
supposed to be designated for the "drone" craft. The
drone plane was fartehr out at sea. The "bounce" target
was to be any moving object in the air within 400 square
miles.
Q: (L) So, TWA 800, through a series of problems, happened to
find itself at the right altitude, a restricted altitude,
within the parameters of the experiment. Anything further
on this?
A: Not for now.
22 Feb 1997

Q: (Laura) Ok, we have several things that we discussed earlier, is
there anything you wish to say before we launch into questions?
A: Underground bases see dramatic budget increase.
Q: (Laura) Ok, why do they have a budget increase?
A: Because there is much more activity to come.
Q: (Laura) Ok, what kind of activity?
A: Broad range.
Q: (Laura) Can you list, say, the top three?
A: Experimentation, utilization and implementation.
Q: (Laura & Terry) Of what?
A: Human "resources." Plan falling into place for "harvest."
Q: (Terry) The new underground bases, along with all the old ones are for
the coming harvest?
A: And other purposes of STS forces' plans.
Q: (Terry) And other STS plans... (Laura) What is this thing called 'The
Harvest'?
A: What do you think?
Q: (Laura) Well, is that harvest in a negative event, or harvest in a
positive one? I mean, as in the harvesting of the wheats and the
tares...
A: Either/or.
Q: (Laura) Ok, now you say the plans are falling into place. What
specific events of the past, say, several weeks, or months, whatever
period of time set aside, are these plans that are falling into place? I
mean, what's the key in the lock?
A: Have you been paying attention, as we have always
suggested you should?
Q: (Laura) Of course! I just asked you because I wanted you to
enumerate! Of course I'm paying attention!
A: Lately, there has been diversion for you.
Q: (Laura) Well, it doesn't mean I'm asleep! (Violette) Can I ask a
question? If this is because there's much more activity, and things are
dramatically increasing, what has come to them, or whatever...
A: Violette mentioned the weather. Was that a bit "nippy" for you in
central Europe in December and January, Arkadiusz?
Q: (Terry) Violette mentioned the weather, and the changes in it. What
was the name of that movie we watched up in Tallahassee, I forgot the
name of it...

[Terry then spoke about a science fiction movie we saw. Aliens were here
among us, and were plotting to affect the weather in such a way as to
make the planet uninhabitable for us, but perfect for them. Naturally,
there was secrecy and coverups. Then the subject moved to the cell phone
towers that were noted in rural areas of North Florida. This then lead
to a question about the cell phone towers. First part of question lost.]


Q: (Terry)...transmit to us and back... what can be transmitted? Can the
negative energy be focused through these microwave towers? (Violette)
And what was the correlation between the strange weather and the
harvesting? (Laura) Because we were told that the weather changes were
due to the energy buildup of the wave. That was two years ago. And it
had nothing to do with the 'harvest.' (Terry) But it could also be that
HAARP adds to it. (Jan) Ok, well, let's ask... (Laura) Well, they would
love for us to think that HAARP has something to do with weather. 'Yes,
we're having bizzare weather. Let's blame it on HAARP!' because we're
going to think about HAARP... What a perfect... (Terry) Well, HAARP has
a lot more to do than just the weather. They can put all the
energy-based stuff that they've been experimenting on in one place,
because they can do whatever they want, just by changing the
frequencies... (Jan) Or, even just continue to mess the weather up, to
continue to create negative vibrations, worry and uncertainty...
(Violette) I guess the point I'm trying to get at is, are these weather
changes promoting some changes in the physical body, that's making the
physical body more 'harvestable?' (Terry) Could very well be. (Laura)
Well, it's all interconnected, but I wouldn't say that one is the cause
of the other, just to say that they occur... (Terry) But why, as we were
talking about earlier, is all this weird stuff going on all through the
media?
A: We told you that "HAARP" was being designated for
capturing and modulating electromagnetic fields for the purpose of total
control of brainwave patterns in order to establish a system of complete
"order on the surface of the planet" in either 3rd or 4th density.
Q: (Laura) Is HAARP in operation at the present time?
A: Yes, in its early stages.
Q: (Terry) Is the spreading of all these communication towers out across
the country the equivalent of a HAARP program on a continental scale?
A: Back up system.
Q: (Laura) So, they don't need the towers to operate the HAARP system,
but they are there as the backup?
A: Towers serve dual and lateral purposes.
Q: (Terry) Local and regional authorities can use the towers to track
people, amongst other things. (Laura) Is the weather being controlled or
changed or in any way affected by HAARP?
A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.
Q: (Laura) All right, I'll take the bait; give me the three factors, and
also the fourth!.
A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chloroflorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus
affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the planet's axis rotation
orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density
STS forces in a number of different ways. Be vigilant. Be observant. Be
cautious in your planning and be aware. Do not let emotional anomalies
cloud your knowledge base. This is not a "time" to let one's guard down.
Be especially careful of travel to unfamiliar locators, as well as
sleeping in unfamiliar surroundings!!! You are being watched. Or, at
least, it is best to assume you are, and act, think, and prepare
accordingly. Remember what you have been warned about concerning attack.
As you learn more and know more, you become more interesting... and,
when your ranks swell, you are more vulnerable unless you are more
aware!!
Q: (Laura) All right, were those given in the order in which they are
occurring? The fourth being the one that's coming later?
A: Maybe, but remember this: a change in the speed of the rotation may
not be reported while it is imperceptible except by instrumentation.
Equator is slightly "wider" than the polar zones. But, this discrepancy
is decreasing slowly currently. One change to occur in 21st Century is
sudden glacial rebound, over Eurasia first, then North America. Ice ages
develop much, much, much faster than thought.

[Discussion of new scientific theory recently presented that the earth is
expanding.]

Q: (Terry) Is the Earth expanding? That's just putting it bluntly, but,
is the Earth expanding, how did you put that? (Ark) Yes, that's the
theory: the idea is that the continents move away because the Earth is
expanding, and this is much faster than you know, than geologists were
thinking.
A: Continental "drift" is caused by the continual though variable,
propelling of gases from the interior to the surface, mainly
at points of magnetic significance.
Q: (Jan) What causes the change in the axis?
A: By slow down of rotation. Earth alternately heats up and cools down in
interior.
Q: (Laura) Why does it do that? What's the cause of this?
A: Part of cycle related to energy exerted upon surface by
the frequency resonance vibrational profile of humans and others.
Q: (Terry) Now we took it off on a tangent. (Laura) Well, we need to
wrap it up soon here. Is there anything further on this harvest, or on
the planetery changes that we need to get to at this point?
A: Ask.
Q: (Terry) Ok, let's go back to the beginning of the session, when we
were talking about the acceleration/expansion on underground bases in
preparation for the harvest. Is that world-wide, we're talking here?
A: Yes, but United States is focus, due to tparticularly cooperative
power structure profile.
Q: (Terry) Do we want to ask about the power structure profile? (Laura)
No, we know what that is; they agreed to work with them. But, what I
would like to know is what particular steps are being taken, what
particular activities are being stepped up?
A: Acquisition, staging, testing of planned activity.
Q: (Laura) And what is the planned activity?
A: Control of absolutely everything.
Q: (Laura) Well, swell! (Terry) That's the one world government! That's
what they want! (Laura) OK, is there anything in particular that we can
do to...
A: Knowledge protects, ignorance endangers. Awareness makes you less
vulnerable, both directly and indirectly. Heard anything about synthetic
blood, and blood and plasma alteration lately?
Q:(Laura) There's a can of worms for you! All right, I'll bite! Go
ahead, tell us about the synthetic blood and the blood plasma. (Terry)
There's probably been a lot of research into that...
A: Less "mutes" needed.
Q: (Laura) Cattle Mutilations. They don't need as many cattle
mutilations.
9 August 1997

Q: I would like to announce that the web page is started. Do
you have any comments or special requests?
A: Think carefully before broadcasting any and all
information received.
Q: Well, we will do that. Are there any particular
categories that you would suggest we withhold or restrict?
A: Anything that relates to "earth shaking" data, expecially
relative to secrets some do not want uncovered.
Q: Does this mean such things as the Denver Airport, HAARP,
the Nephilim, and underground cities?
A: Just look before you leap!
11 July 1998

Q: (A) We have been told that there is going to be a change
of the magnetic field of the earth. Does this mean that
the magnetic pole will shift?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) About this shift of the poles, is it going to be a
complete pole reversal?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) What is going to happen inside Earth that could cause
this magnetic pole reversal?
A: Is caused by disturbances in the mineral content of the
substrata rock, brought on by the interaction of Earth
with outside forces.
Q: (L) What specific outside forces?
A: Those already discussed.
Q: (L) What is going to be the specific mechanism of this
disturbance? Can you describe for us the steps by which
this pole reversal will take place?
A: Pole reversal is cyclical anyway, these events merely
serve as trigger mechanism.
Q: (L) Let me ask it this way: is there a charge that builds
up in the mineral substrata that requires discharge, or
that becomes excited to the point that it discharges and
then reverses? Is this what we are talking about in terms
of the mechanism?
A: Examine what is needed to magnetize metal. Ask Arkadiusz.
Q: (A) What is needed to magnetize metal. One has to align
the spins of the atoms which means one has to strike the
metal, or one has to bring a magnetic field close. (T)
Strike as in annealing... heating and striking metal or
rock which causes the crystalline structure to decompose
so that the metal becomes pliable. Then, each time it is
hit, it reforms until it cools again. (L) Is this what we
are talking about here?
A: Close.
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align.
But, where is it going to come from?
A: Guess.
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (T) Now, this is just a thought: where would an external
magnetic field strong enough to do something like that
come from? On the earth, if you supercharge the
ionosphere, you create an extremely intense magnetic
field. That's what the ionosphere basically is. That is
what the HAARP group of programs is about. That is what
Tesla was into - the ionosphere - cause there is a large
charge there. (L) Is the HAARP project involved here?
A: No.
Q: (T) They are monkeying around with that stuff. (L) Do the
people in charge of the HAARP project know about all of
this and are they constructing this HAARP array to utilize
this energy in some way?
A: Those who know are at foundation.
Q: (T) To protect us?
A: HAARP is for mind control. It is hoped it can be
successful in 4th density too!
Q: (L) Well, if these people are aware that this sort of
thing is getting ready to happen... never mind. (A) We
have been told that this magnetic disturbance is closely
related to this realm border crossing, and you asked us
the question 'what is the root of realm' and it is
reality. Now, realm has an m at the end. Does this have
something to do with magnetic?
A: Realm border is when the reality shifts for all.
Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic
field disturbance? What is the connection?
A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into
the magnetic state of your environment.
31 July 1999

Q: Okay. You previously have said that the HAARP project is a continuation of the Montauk project.
A: Partly.
Q: What part is not correct?
A: You must remember compartments.
Q: So, the right hand often doesn't know what the left is doing. You also once said that the HAARP project was partly operational. Are some of these wildly extravagant shootings of recent times, or people going off the deep end, a result of some of the HAARP experimentation in mind control, or testing?
A: This is a result of many forces.
Q: Is this something that we ought to pursue: a line of questions about these recent acts of violence?
A: Only if you had a better grasp.
Q: I don't think I have a good enough grasp. Back to Montauk. Is Montauk connected in any way with this Alternative Three idea of transferring groups or perimeters in the event of a cataclysm or disaster?
A: Too complex, but be careful of what you read.
Q: In what sense?
A: Disinformation. This is most of what you hear and read.
Q: (A) Okay, you have mentioned the Navy and the physicists, and then there were these people who simply were producing monsters, which does not seem to be anything that the Navy would want to do, much less physicists!
A: You are confusing subjects and time frames.
Q: (A) Somebody had to plan this experiment, yes?
A: But that was the Philadelphia Experiment.
Q: (L) How did this business of producing monsters and all that even come into this project?
A: Experiments in mind programming and psy-warfare.
Q: So, these were separate experiments. But, did they fall under the Montauk project...
A: Yes.
Q: So, they were compartmentalized things.
A: But the monsters were long after the Eldridge.
Q: When did the experiments with the monsters occur?
A: Late 70s.
Q: Have they continued on with this monster producing business?
A: No need to get hung up on "monsters."
Q: Well, that would give me the heebie jeebies for sure!
A: Other materializations.
Q: They are working on other materializations, or they HAD other materializations?
A: Not just monsters.
Q: Well, that's too good to pass. What OTHER kinds of materializations did they have?
A: You name it!
Q: Were they able to materialize money for themselves?
A: No need.
Q: Were they able to materialize people from the past or the future?
A: Temporarily.
Q: Did they, in fact, do this?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they ask people from the future what kinds of events have occurred between then and now in order to refine their plans and activities?
A: No such.
Q: Why?
A: Variable futures.
Q: So, they could materialize somebody from the future, but it was only as potential, or probable future, so therefore, it meant very little, or was useless?
A: One of 329 decillion.
Q: Probable futures?
A: Yes.
Q: It's a lot.
A: Up to a point...
Q: At which time something collapses into the now. Regarding these folks they materialized from the past: anybody we would know?
A: No.
Q: Could they select who they materialized, or was it random?
A: The materialization was really a duality. Review texts re: abductions between densities for idea.
Q: Could it be possible that, using this technology, the U.S. Government, or Secret Government, has been doing abductions on human beings that the victims THINK is an alien abduction?
A: Maybe in some cases, but the technology is not comparable.
Q: Other than people from the past and future, what other kinds of things did they materialize in the Montauk experiments?
A: Review.
Q: What kinds of things were they interested in materializing more than anything else? (A) Probably technological devices. (L) Did they materialize technology from the future?
A: This is more complex than your questions indicate.
Q: I realize this. I am struggling with this whole idea. I would just like to know what sorts of things they were most interested in materializing so that I would then have a clue as to which direction to go with my questions.
A: Not applicable.
Q: When they were doing this materializing, did they not have direct intent? Were they just experimenting to see what WOULD materialize at various settings?
A: Their knowledge brought them to a level different than your current imaginings.
Q: Well, help me out here! What do you mean?
A: No use comparing apples to oranges.
Q: At any point did their knowledge and materializations incline them toward benevolent acts and tendencies regarding the rest of the human population?
A: This is not working because you are thinking one way and they do not.
Q: Can you give me a word or two that will clue me as to how to change my thinking?
A: Sure. Try to explain calculus to a kindergartner!!
Q: You are saying that this Consortium, these Montauk folks, have a level of knowledge, and a way of thinking, that makes my thinking, and our thinking, seem like ...
A: Poppycock.
Q: My thinking is poppycock relative to theirs?
A: Close.
Q: (A) But this is only because we do not have this knowledge!
A: Right !!!!
Q: And we are trying to get it!
A: You cannot get it without an enormous amount of patience!
Q: Do we have time to have that kind of patience?
A: These experiments have been conducted over a time period you would recognize as about 93 years and have involved thousands of humans and a few hundred NHIs.
Q: Are the people involved in these experiments STS or STO?
A: All "people" are STS.
Q: Well, the people who are working in the direction of STO, what chance do they have of access to this knowledge?
A: They do not need it.
Q: Why don't they need it?
A: They will have it when the elevator reaches "floor number 4."
Q: Are you saying that it is not essential for us to struggle to know these things because it will come naturally?
A: Close.
Q: Well, gosh! You had me worried there! So, these guys are working and digging for knowledge to control others?
A: Close.
Q: Are they trying to develop technology to lock the planet into 3rd density so that it won't go to 4th density?
A: Some may be.
Q: Do they see the moving to 4th density as a threat to their plans and projects?
A: Perhaps.
Q: (A) I believe that there is a lot of this knowledge that would be useful for me to know before I go to 4th density, assuming I will go. I mean, knowledge is knowledge, and I am sure I would make good use of this. Why did you say that this knowledge is not needed for us?!!!
A: We did not say that.
Q: You said that all people are STS, and then we asked about those who are moving to STO, and the answer was 'they do not need it. They will have it after they reach 4th density.
A: But you are not there yet.
Q: You just said that we couldn't possibly get it! We don't have ninety some years and thousands of people to work on, and that what we know now is just poppycock!
A: No, no, no. You are misreading what we said!!!! Your line of questioning bespoke a level of knowledge not on the same level as those directly engaged in the vast experimentation which in part, was conducted at Montauk. If you were to review the transcripts extensively, you would find that you possess much more knowledge on this sort of thing than you apparently have remembered for tonight's session. You have put forth so much energy toward building the website that you have drained some of your conscious recall ability for the moment. And no, we are not criticizing your efforts, we applaud them!!! But, you could use a thoughtful, meditative review!
24 Sept 2001

Q: (L) Can you designate any of the areas where this violence may occur in the near future?
A: Indianapolis.
Q: (A) What is that? (L) Indianapolis is a city in Indiana. Well that's something that has never been mentioned. What kind of violence?
A: Hit by focusing beam of the HAARP array.
Q: (L) Well that's weird. (A) By mistake? An accident?
A: No.
Q: (L) What will be the outcome of Indianapolis being hit by this focusing beam of the HAARP array?
A: Mind controlled violence.
Q: (L) Can we know what form it will take?
A: Shootings.
Q: (L) Are there going to be any other kinds of violence, such as bombs or airplanes being flown into buildings, or release of anthrax, or small pox, or any other kind of chemical or germ warfare activities. Any of those?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Which ones?
A: Fair chance of germ disbursement.
Q: (L) What kind of germ?
A: Influenza.
Q: (L) Do you mean a deadly form of flu?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) But nothing like anthrax or small pox or any of those really sick ones? Is that it?
A: No. Keep looking and listening.
Q: (L) Well we plan to. What is going to happen with the Middle-eastern situation; this Afghanistan or whatever?
A: Herding of population to much finer order of control.
Q: (L) What is the purpose of this control; this increasing control.
A: Preparation for war in Palestine.
Q: (L) But nobody has said anything about having a war in Palestine. They're all talking about having a war in Afghanistan. How does Palestine fit in here?
A: It is the ultimate objective of Israel.
Q: (L) Why would they want to have war in their own country? Well, aside from the fact that they've been having a war in their own country for a long time. I guess they want to bring it to a final conclusion. What is going to be the result of this plan?
A: Destruction of Jews.
Q: (L) Well obviously this is not what THEY are planning, is it?
A: No.
Q: (L) They are planning destruction of Palestinians, right?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) It seems that through out history whenever the jews have plotted and planned to destroy somebody, they are the ones who have ended up being destroyed themselves. Or am I misreading my history here?
A: No.
6 August 2005

Q: (J) How many troops have actually been killed since the beginning of the Iraq war?
A: 7,500
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population actually supports Bush?
A: 36%
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population thinks there was complicity on the part of the US government in 9/11?
A: 47%
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population actually thinks at all?
A: 12% if you define it rigidly. (group amazement at this figure) What do you expect with HAARP turning brains to tapioca?
Q: (J) So it's a Zombie nation then?
A: You took the words right out of 6th density.
Q: (J) so does HAARP only affect the US population?
A: Mostly.
20 October 2005

Q: (J) I want to know about these strange formations on the radar image of Hurricane Rita.

A: 4th density “battle.” Also includes some “practice.”

Q: (L) They’re practicing with new weapons. (J) Some people said Katrina was the product of HAARP heating up the waters in the Gulf.

A: We’ve already dealt with HAARP and weather. Read transcripts.

Q: (W) (Quoting transcripts) “HAARP has nothing to do with the weather or EM associated with same.” (H) Which suggests that there is EM associated with the weather. There could be some EM stuff associated with the weather that isn’t part of HAARP. (L) 4th density. (J) Were any of the storms manufactured from 3rd density or was it a natural storm?

A: Mfg in 3D? No. As we have said… 4D battles represent as weather. But the “veil” is thinning.

Q: (R) So if there is more weather it is due to more battles, and it being thinner. (J) Possibly. The thinning of the veil creates more natural… (L) Or unnatural, depending upon how you look at it. (S) So, I have a few questions. In the last session the C’s had said that 47% of Americans think that the government was complicit in 911. They also said that 12% of Americans can actually think. So, assuming that the 12% that can think are part of the 47% who think the American government was complicit in 911, that would give 35% would think the government is complicit not because they think but because they have been programmed to think it. If that is the case, then why are these people being programmed to be suspicious or against the Bush government?

A: They are not being programmed to be suspicious of Bush et al, the contrary.

Q: (L) In other words, it is the ones who think that Bush is not complicit that are being programmed. The ones who don’t think it, even if they’re part of that 35%, they’ve simply never been programmed. (R) Those who are programmed are programmed to not be suspicious. (A) You can be suspicious, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you can think. (L) The ones who are not suspicious are the ones being programmed, but it doesn’t mean… Ops can just be Ops. They don’t have to be bad or evil, they’re just the ones who, nobody’s gotten to them, there’s been no opportunity…maybe they’re just people who don’t want to watch television so much. Or they are contrary in a certain way. They see that there is a group of people who are suspicious and they follow along with them rather than following along with the ones who are not suspicious. (S) They said that Bush “will try” to become a fuehrer, that he’ll continue on as president until he dies. Does that mean that someone will… Bush will be tossed out and someone else will move in and become fuehrer?

A: Warm water. It would not serve your best interests to know this.
 
Heimdallr said:
Laura said:
The movie, The Day After Tomorrow depicts the heat exchange that can occur with powerful storms and that may be the key. Yes, there is global warming, but that, apparently, can flip in almost an instant.
Also the idea that global warming is a precursor to ice ages is something not only spoken of by the C's, but also by Whitley Strieber who wrote The Day After Tomorrow. He certainly isn't lacking in controversy! I remember reading the C's comments of about Whitely and his proposed ideas...

January 1, 1995
Q: (L) What is the energy fueling Whitley Strieber and his work?
A: Grays.
Q: (L) He is an agent of the Grays?
A: No. Instrument of the Grays.
Q: (T) So, all his writing is compromised by the Grays?
A: Influenced by them.

[...]

March 18, 2000
Q: Whitley Strieber and Art Bell have published a book about a "global superstorm." Is any of the information they have given in this book fairly accurate?
A: Derived from non-human sources known for stark accuracy, when convenient.
Q: What makes it convenient at the present time for them to be "starkly accurate?"
A: Fits into plans.


And me being the naive one actually thought after reading The Coming Global Superstorm that Bell and Strieber were one of the good guys! But this stark accuracy statement has always humbled me, realizing that it's not a question of if, but when the earth changes are going to happen. The fact that Lovelock and others are starting to come forward now really says to me that the PTB are trying to prepare the masses for it. But, it's been "too late" for some time now. I don't think that's exactly a revelation. Even Al Gore has said as much, and he's no better than your average monkey (no offense to the monkee in this forum :cool:).

It's just sad that so many people do not believe it unless it's said by an authority figure.

Was searching the news and found out that Streiber just recently had an interview and posted on his blog about his thoughts on the superstorm and ice age. I thought it was interesting if he's becoming more vocal about it. I'll link it below. I also thought this would be a good thread to bump up since it mirrors a few thoughts recently brought up on the forum.

_http://www.unknowncountry.com/journal/world-weather-way-out-whack

Just a note, if anyone searches and finds an article by the examiner, take care. When I clicked on that link, quite a few pop ups came up.
 
Back
Top Bottom