Javier Milei has been elected president of Argentina: Madman or genius?

I would like to do a parenthesis to the thread. There is a military figure from Argentina who, in his time, warned us about what is happening today.

I am talking about Mohamed Ali Seineldin.
Colonel Seineldín was tried by a military court, which found him guilty. During the trial, he assumed responsibility for the deaths caused by the confrontation and made a statement known as “The New World Order” on August 7, 1991, in which he alleged the supposed machinations of US imperialism and its servant Menem in dismantling national defense, the promise of establishing a Second Republic, and the diagnosis of a process of destruction of the productive apparatus of the economy promoted by the Process between 1976 and 1983, by Martínez de Hoz.​

Insecurity: Seineldin explains the deterioration of national defense


Geopolitics of Drugs: By Colonel Seineldín (Part 1)


Geopolitics of Drugs: By Colonel Seineldín (Part 2)


Geopolitics of Drugs: By Colonel Seineldín (Part 3)
 
Argentinian President Javier Milei met with his new Cabinet on Monday at the Casa Rosada in Buenos Aires. The enthusiasm shown by the president when he greeted Defence Minister Luis Petri, an elected national deputy, caught the attention of internet users. As soon as he saw him, Milei jumped up and down a little before embracing him warmly, as if it were a reunion of former schoolmates.​


🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
 
Scott Bessent confirmed that the US intervened in Argentina's elections in favor of Milei, that the swap line generates profits for Americans, and that it will continue to operate to maintain the illusion of stability.
Milei is one of Trump's cronies, and our people are paying for his little party.​

 
AGREEMENT WITH THE US: WHAT IS THE TRANSFER OF ARGENTINIANS' PERSONAL DATA?

The bilateral agreement with the United States includes enabling the transfer of personal data without restrictions, which would allow companies to operate more freely but raises risks about how citizens' data will be protected.

Experts warn of a lack of detail and point out that the US does not have a federal privacy law, which creates regulatory asymmetries and doubts about digital sovereignty.

Testimonials:

Lucas Barreiro (lawyer specializing in personal data protection)


"Our Personal Data Protection Law (25,326) is based on a fairly simple rule: as a general principle, personal data cannot be transferred to countries that do not offer an adequate level of protection."

"Countries that do have this 'adequate status' can receive data from Argentina without special restrictions, because it is understood that their level of protection is equivalent to ours. Adequacy decisions are usually made by each country's data protection authority; in our case, the Agency for Access to Public Information. However, when a country is not considered 'adequate', the law requires additional safeguards for the transfer to be lawful."
"If an Argentine company wants to transfer personal data to another company based, for example, in Texas, then it has to implement additional safeguards or verify whether the operation falls under any of the exceptions provided for in the law."

"Once that adequacy decision takes effect, the scenario changes. Controllers established in the United States will no longer be required to provide additional safeguards to receive personal data from Argentina. This will remove a regulatory barrier that makes it easier for companies to transfer personal data anywhere in the United States, simplifying contracting and promoting commercial traffic."

"Added to this is another uncomfortable element: the United States maintains very intrusive surveillance rules. It is true that during the Biden administration some limits and control mechanisms were introduced, but we cannot in any way say that it is a privacy paradise."

Pablo Palazzi (Director of CETYS – University of San Andrés)

"The agreement could be very positive for the country and its economy."

"We will have to see the fine print once it is implemented, because there could be many variations on how to do it."
"Argentina has been following the European data protection system for a quarter of a century."

Daniel Monastersky (lawyer specializing in personal data)

"When an Argentine citizen transfers their data through a digital platform, it may end up in California (where there is robust regulatory oversight, independent authorities, and significant penalties for non-compliance) or it could end up in any other US state where there is virtually no protection."

"The current framework would allow both scenarios to be treated as equivalent. That is inaccurate. That is unfair. And that is precisely why the window to correct it is open now."

"In either case, the entire content of the agreement is to Washington's benefit. I don't think we have any benefit. The relationship that is proposed is totally and absolutely asymmetrical."

Tomás Pomar (Argentine Computer Law Observatory – O.D.I.A.)

“The discussion about data traffic in today's world is a discussion about political and technological sovereignty. I believe that the biggest problem is that human rights are being discussed under the heading of 'Digital Commerce': it is a mercantilist view of data protection, which goes against the discussions that have been taking place around the world for 15 years now, since the Edward Snowden case."

"The weakest point of something like this is that an agreement of this type has to go through Congress."


TL;DR: Argentina is a vassal state...
 
Back
Top Bottom