Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

[SlipNet]

Now that the book is out: "Entitled - The Rise and Fall of the House of York" by Andrew Lownie?

Here's a 1hr 30m chat with Lownie on the James English podcast. Lownie is a measured man, and he cites certain details about Andrew in this discussion. He says that there's evidence that "randy Andy" was involved with girls even younger than Giuffre. The picture I have of him is a rather pompous, vain man, and a little dim too. Certainly he has no impulse control. What a fall from grace he's now suffered, but of course it's nothing compared to the trauma of the young girls in question. One point he mentions shocked me big time; that he was taken to a brothel at the age of 11 to "make a man of him"!. From there the rest is sordid history....

 

[SlipNet]

Ian Carroll's latest deep dive is an investigation into how Jewish organised crime ties in with the Epstein blackmail ring. Lots of good historical dot-connecting in this one.

 

[Bluegazer]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1989413208202097003

In a leaked email, Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein's brother, suggests asking Steve Bannon if Putin has "the photo of Trump performing oral sex on Bubba," a nickname used for Bill Clinton.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1989422583255564774

 

[Niall]

For me the single most jarring thing from the recent batch of 'Epstein Files' is that Noam Chomsky and he were friends.

It's like learning that Epstein hung out with and did favors for Jeremy Corbyn or Hugo Chavez.

The only thing Epstein and Chomsky have in common is that they're both Jewish. Which, to some Jews, it seems, is everything.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1989058103686668517

 

[Niall]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1989413208202097003

https://twitter.com/x/status/1989422583255564774

Emails where Epstein himself suggests, implies, or outright claims that Trump is a degenerate like he is, are completely unreliable. Assuming it's accurate that Trump called out Epstein for being a scumbag sometime in the 2000s (the incident where he 'kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago'), then Epstein has likely held a psychopath's grudge against Trump ever since then, and, as we see in other email chains, would not only talk smack about Trump, he'd do whatever he could to support 'Operation Orange Man Bad'.

 

[axj]

This is really surprising:

The US parliament has unanimously voted to force the release of unclassified Epstein files - both the Reps and Dems are now in favor of it:

US House votes to force release of Epstein files​

The development comes a day after President Donald Trump ended his opposition to the move

The resolution was passed 427-1 after being signed by 218 lawmakers in the House, where Republicans hold a 219-214 majority.

US House votes to force release of Epstein files

The US House of Representatives has voted to make the Justice Department publish the remaining documents in the Epstein case

www.rt.com

 

[Navigator]

hen Epstein has likely held a psychopath's grudge against Trump ever since then, and, as we see in other email chains, would not only talk smack about Trump, he'd do whatever he could to support 'Operation Orange Man Bad'.

Was thinking about it, Epstein brags he's "the only one that could take down Trump", and that he's got compromising pictures of him in his kitchen. Yet, neither Trump was taken down, nor the pictures were produced. Did he really have all that evidence on him? Or was just the ramblings of a twisted mind that wishes it had?

 

[gottathink]

This is really surprising:

The US parliament has unanimously voted to force the release of unclassified Epstein files - both the Reps and Dems are now in favor of it:

US House votes to force release of Epstein files

The US House of Representatives has voted to make the Justice Department publish the remaining documents in the Epstein case

www.rt.com

Perhaps that was Trumps strategy, don’t release them, let everyone think he is in them and that’s why he didn’t release them, then everyone cries foul and parliament votes to force the release of them. He Art of the Dealed it.

 

[SasaM]

Was thinking about it, Epstein brags he's "the only one that could take down Trump", and that he's got compromising pictures of him in his kitchen. Yet, neither Trump was taken down, nor the pictures were produced. Did he really have all that evidence on him? Or was just the ramblings of a twisted mind that wishes it had?

It might be he was just wishfully thinking, but there's also the perspective presented by Joe on last NewsReal show.
There could be or really is some sort of compromising material that could damage Trump, although it is not in the interest of those that might have that material to release it, but to keep Trump in subservient position by reminding him every now and then that they have the material and thus the ability to bring him down.

 

[SummerLite]

Perhaps that was Trumps strategy, don’t release them, let everyone think he is in them and that’s why he didn’t release them, then everyone cries foul and parliament votes to force the release of them. He Art of the Dealed it.

Could be! All he did was say he wouldn't release the files and this whole, huge movement was created. This could get VERY interesting. It's looking like a boomerang is coming back for the Dems already.

 

[Ricardo]

This is really surprising:

The US parliament has unanimously voted to force the release of unclassified Epstein files - both the Reps and Dems are now in favor of it:

US House votes to force release of Epstein files

The US House of Representatives has voted to make the Justice Department publish the remaining documents in the Epstein case

www.rt.com

fwiw , My interpretation of these shenanigans is that they´ll turn the legal proceedings into a committee which of course will be subject to whatever applications of state secret laws are convenient , thus everything will be same as before , ie nothing that doesn´t favor whatever political machinations the deepstate wants , will be publicly available. ( ie Warrens commission )

 

[SasaM]

fwiw , My interpretation of these shenanigans is that they´ll turn the legal proceedings into a committee which of course will be subject to whatever applications of state secret laws are convenient , thus everything will be same as before , ie nothing that doesn´t favor whatever political machinations the deepstate wants , will be publicly available. ( ie Warrens commission )

In addition to that, it was also mentioned on the NewsReal that if DOJ and Pam Bondi open an official investigation, then they have a legal excuse not to release any material involved in that investigation. And it seems they already announced that there will be an investigation. FWIW.

 

[SummerLite]

In addition to that, it was also mentioned on the NewsReal that if DOJ and Pam Bondi open an official investigation, then they have a legal excuse not to release any material involved in that investigation. And it seems they already announced that there will be an investigation. FWIW.

The Senate has to approve the release, so there could be a hold up there. I don't think Trump wants to stop the files from coming out because its already making some Democrats look very bad. I heard it's possible a real investigation has already been done (Trumps first term) and there's the fake files that made Trump and others look bad, the Dems planned to release. This fits with the very odd interview with Patel and Bongino at the very start where they said the files clearly show Epstein killed himself which caused such an outrage. They seemed like they where lying but it was the bad files. It's a interesting theory and would be awesome if true. Or another convoluted BS scenario of some sort.

A few other details that haven't gotten much attention. Steve Bannon interviewed Epstein for 17 hours (?) for a series called Monsters after he was forced out of the Trump admin during the first term. Being very loyal to Trump, what was recorded then? The spin is Bannon is a pervert or some other nonsense.

The other thing is Bill Barr, Attorney General first Trump term, was said to have visited Epstein the day before he died and he could have signed paperwork for the witness protection program which ties in with he's not dead. Did he give them everything in return for his life? Who has him, the good or bad guys?

The Barr story appeared in the NY Post and was then retracted. Kasman was a CIA contact as well.

Former mobster says Bill Barr made a secret visit to jail before Epstein’s death: ‘Something’s not right there’

Update: The New York Post has all but retracted their story in which a former mobster alleged that Attorney General Bill Barr may have made a visit to Epstein's onetime jail, saying: "This story has been updated to remove references to a purported visit to the MCC by Attorney General William...

www.alternet.org

Lewis Kasman, a former mobster and top associated of John Gotti Sr., told the Post that Barr made a secret visit to Metropolitan Correctional Center two weeks ago “about the time Epstein was found in his cell with bruises around his neck.”

“When does that happen?” Kasman asked. “The attorney general never visits jails. Something’s not right there.”

 

[Ricardo]

The other thing is Bill Barr, Attorney General first Trump term, was said to have visited Epstein the day before he died and he could have signed paperwork for the witness protection program which ties in with he's not dead. Did he give them everything in return for his life? Who has him, the good or bad guys?

The Barr story appeared in the NY Post and was then retracted. Kasman was a CIA contact as well.

Somewhat already has been answered in transcripts ( session 28 June 2025 ) :

(...)

(Niall) So Epstein's death was staged. Why?

A: Money and blackmail dead man switch.

(...)

Bill Barr being offhand connected to Epstein years before by way of his father , Donald Barr who hired J. Epstein into The Dalton School while acting as headmaster , makes somewhat likely (?) that he was the bureaucrat that actively intervened to release and make formal police and federal authorities to cover it up , at least in formal legal bounds ( ie declare it state secret or similar rubber stamp to hush it ) . fwiw /blah

# Donald Barr from Brave Browser AI search/ summary

Bill Barr's father was Donald Barr, an American educator and writer who served as the headmaster of the Dalton School in New York City and authored science fiction novels, including "Space Relations." Donald Barr was also involved in the Office of Strategic Services during World War II.

Donald Barr was an American educator and author, born on August 8, 1921, in Manhattan, New York. He passed away on February 5, 2004, in Langhorne, Pennsylvania. He is best known for his role as the headmaster of the Dalton School in New York City and the Hackley School in Tarrytown, New York.

• Education: Barr graduated from Columbia College in 1941 with degrees in mathematics and anthropology. He later earned an M.A. in English in 1950.
• Career: He served in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) during World War II. After the war, he worked at Columbia University, where he initiated the Columbia University Science Honors Program. He was headmaster of the Dalton School from 1964 to 1974.

Donald Barr had four children, including:

• William Barr: He served as the 77th and 85th U.S. Attorney General.
• Stephen Barr: A physicist.

Barr was married to Mary Margaret Ahern. He was born into a Jewish family but later converted to Catholicism.

 

[Alejo]

Emails where Epstein himself suggests, implies, or outright claims that Trump is a degenerate like he is, are completely unreliable. Assuming it's accurate that Trump called out Epstein for being a scumbag sometime in the 2000s (the incident where he 'kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago'), then Epstein has likely held a psychopath's grudge against Trump ever since then, and, as we see in other email chains, would not only talk smack about Trump, he'd do whatever he could to support 'Operation Orange Man Bad'.

Yeah I am getting that sense as well, there's apparently more to be revealed but... it's like two people gossiping about a third person and then using that as the revelation.. the gossipers knew the one being gossiped about, and I feel like.. I mean yeah, otherwise there would be no gossip.

This is like russiagate all over again, a lot of noise, not a lot of substance. And it's not like there's much new information, or rather the information isn't really new.