Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

[Ruth]

Yeah I am getting that sense as well, there's apparently more to be revealed but... it's like two people gossiping about a third person and then using that as the revelation.. the gossipers knew the one being gossiped about, and I feel like.. I mean yeah, otherwise there would be no gossip.

This is like russiagate all over again, a lot of noise, not a lot of substance. And it's not like there's much new information, or rather the information isn't really new.

Or what's being "revealed" is just a distraction. Legally they can redact a lot of information if there's and "ongoing investigation" and Donald Trump has asked Pam Bondi to do just that. This isn't about Left versus Right, it's about long term Israeli embeddedness in the entire US establishment, politics as well as law enforcement.

 

[Cosmos]

It is interesting in which way “the files“ are now being pushed “to be published“. First I think that is a reaction towards the public loosing the trust in government and that Candace and others are the biggest pushers for such sentiments.

The fact that congress has now voted in one voice (all voted for it without exceptions) to “publish it“ suggests to me a couple of possibilities:

- A pretension from the PTB “that there is still a democracy“ and that people can still trust mother government “with all its faults“.

- Probably the word has gone round in congress before the vote. Meaning, that they were probably either pressured and/or assured that they all should vote that way. Maybe because they were promised that they can easily hush up very revealing stuff about themselves even when it gets “published“.

- It is another good way to put all the blame on Trump and thereby hide and distract from the true evils others and “the government“ are involved in.

- It might also serve as a distraction of what Candace and others are revealing about Kirk and other things related to “Israel“. And also to reassure people that they don’t need to worry about the conspiracies Candace, Tucker and others are presenting because you see “there is almost nothing there in the Epstein files“ even though Candace, Tucker and others claimed there is.

 

[mkrnhr]

- Probably the word has gone round in congress before the vote. Meaning, that they were probably either pressured and/or assured that they all should vote that way. Maybe because they were promised that they can easily hush up very revealing stuff about themselves even when it gets “published“.

The other possibility is that they were assured that the truly compromising material will be redacted/doctored for "national security" or to shield "our greatest ally" or some other reason.

 

[Cosmos]

The other possibility is that they were assured that the truly compromising material will be redacted/doctored for "national security" or to shield "our greatest ally" or some other reason.

A likely possibility IMO.

 

[axj]

The other possibility is that they were assured that the truly compromising material will be redacted/doctored for "national security" or to shield "our greatest ally" or some other reason.

Maybe now they had finally enough time to do all the "necessary redactions"? Goes to show what kind of a complex web it likely is that they needed another half a year to finally declare that Epstein is not a "hoax". Since both parties voted in favor, I guess nobody will be implicated - or only those who are already dead or irrelevant?

 

[Jones]

Was thinking about it, Epstein brags he's "the only one that could take down Trump", and that he's got compromising pictures of him in his kitchen. Yet, neither Trump was taken down, nor the pictures were produced. Did he really have all that evidence on him? Or was just the ramblings of a twisted mind that wishes it had?

Maybe he didn't have any evidence on Trump, but was attempting to add weight to his Deadman's switch by claiming that he did.