What Megyn says is objectively true, although I think it probably shouldn't have been said in the context of the discussion. Not the most tactful thing to say, but that teenager's response was an overreaction IMO. She's going after the wrong person. I don't see what Megyn said as meaning a 15yo isn't still a child. She didn't "need" to assert anything cuz Megyn would agree with her.True, but towards the very end, Megan does say, and even stressed, that there is a difference between a 15 year old and a five year old - her words. The girl's point was that even a 15 year old is still a child even if they appear to be "legal". Incredible that a child needed to assert this to the adults involved in this discussion.