Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

I asked Brave AI and Alter.systems AI about this and they both said pretty much the same thing. Alter.systems was a bit more thorough so I'll copy/paste it's comment:
Thank you for that. Not to say that cannibalism isn't taking place, but it seems it's a very important time to check sources and not get sucked into the 9/11 style conspiracy loon-crowd that will undoubtedly be going into over drive right now. For the Epstein files, I've been using the Jmail, logged in as jeevacation@gmail.com G-mail style account Neil posted earlier. Most of the what I see on social media I find within the account, but now and again there is one that you can't find and could be forged to tarnish the integrity of publishers/posters.
 
This is all starting to weigh me down. It’s one thing to have intellectually understood that psychopaths rule the world, it’s something else to come to terms with evidence of the how prevalent the Satanic practices are of the psychopathic social classes.

I feel like I have been red pilled again. This was a big one.
I share your feelings. Elsewhere I mentioned that I feel like there's a black cloud constantly hanging above all our heads since the latest Epstein files release. That is the awareness that all these horrors are very much real and much more widespread than we thought. On the other hand, awareness can only be a good thing - the blackness itself comes from the facts that are being revealed. If those things happen, surely it's better for us to know than to ignore them?

Speaking of horrors, I'm still shocked at Pam Bondi's performance yesterday facing questions of US reps in front of the cameras. Judging from comments on X, lots of other people are too. I came across this eloquent commentary:

Dear Ms Bondi,

I’m writing to you as an American citizen, a former pastor, and the father of a daughter.I spent today, as much of the nation, watching you speak before the House Judiciary Committee in a state of stunned disbelief, which surprised me, as I thought you’d reached a moral bottom many weeks ago.

I witnessed you posturing and protesting, feigning indignation in the face of reasonable questions you repeatedly refused to answer.

I looked on as you deflected and pivoted, performing the wildest verbal gymnastics to keep from providing the simple clarity that our elected representatives asked for and deserved—and wondered why anyone would do that.

I sat incredulous, watching you appear to lie with great ease, even perverse joy, seeming, to my ears, to contradict both irrefutable evidence and your own words in the past. It was a tour de force in distraction, a true masterclass in gaslighting.

And while a thousand thoughts ran through my head, when it was all over, I was left with a single question:

How does someone become Pam Bondi?

I’m not speaking about your education, your professional experience, or your career path, which are easily retrieved with a few keystrokes. I’m talking about the meandering road to losing one’s soul.

I wonder how an apparently intelligent human being finds themselves sitting in that chair in front of the watching world in a moment of such gravity, so completely bereft of empathy, so seemingly unencumbered by other people’s suffering, and so strident in the face of simple accountability.

I try to imagine how you, the person entrusted with stewarding the Law in the highest seat of power here, arrives at a place where that Law has seemingly become irrelevant.

Are the money and the power so intoxicating that they have rendered your conscience inoperable?

Has your journey been filled with a million small moral compromises that burdened you in the beginning, but slowly emotionally anesthetized you to the point that now you feel nothing?

Are you so beholden to the redacted man who enabled your ascension to this lofty space that you are willing to shield him from the litany of heinous sins that you must know well he is guilty of?

Maybe you don’t even have the answers.

Maybe you can’t explain it either, though I’m sure there’s a story you have to tell yourself to keep the self-loathing at bay and let you sleep at night, at least I hope so.

I see that you do not have children of your own. Perhaps if you did, you might see this all differently, I don’t know. It certainly shouldn’t take that, though.

But you are someone’s daughter, and I do wonder how that girl became the woman sitting there at that table today, so dismissive of other women who have survived trauma. I imagine there may be some answers there somewhere.

But as the father of a daughter, I want you to know that I fully detest what you are doing to so many other people’s children right now.

I abhor your callous disregard for the daughters who stood courageously before you today, whose eyes you did not have the dignity to look into; women whose black, cavernous hell you know full well, because you’ve pored over it countless times in words, photos, and videos that are still being concealed.

It sickens me to my core to know that thousands of survivors, girls and young women not unlike my daughter, have experienced unspeakable horrors and are finding in you, not a fierce and willing advocate, not a steadfast warrior who will deliver them justice, but an unsuspecting, shame-throwing avatar of the men who brutalized them.

And if you truly do care for survivors, then I’d like to hear how you justify your treatment of them. They deserve that. We all do.

I’m not sure what you believe in, but I am a person of faith, and my religious tradition tells me that we will all face accountability for our misdeeds and transgressions beyond this life, even if we evade them in this one. That possibility does provide a small bit of comfort, but I hope you don’t have to wait that long.

I hope that you will face a legal reckoning for any betrayals of our nation that you are guilty of, for the chaos you are willfully creating, and most of all for the sorrow you are exacerbating for the daughters (and the sons) throughout this nation who feel less safe and less protected.

I stand with and bear witness to those who are afraid because the Law seems to be refusing to drag the monsters out into the light, because people like you appear so willing to curate the darkness.

I hope whatever you got for your soul was worth it to you.

It sure as hell isn’t for the rest of us.

It quite caused an impression in other countries too:


Crazy, dark times we live in.
 
Speaking of horrors, I'm still shocked at Pam Bondi's performance yesterday facing questions of US reps in front of the cameras.
Shocked? I found it hilarious. Especially the shouting match about antisceptism: Pamela Bondi: I hold the antisceptic card hehehe you can't ask me more questions. Some congresswoman: I hold the holowcoast card, it beats the antisceptic card muhahaha got you.
It's ... something.
 
Speaking of horrors, I'm still shocked at Pam Bondi's performance yesterday facing questions of US reps in front of the cameras. Judging from comments on X, lots of other people are too. I came across this eloquent commentary:
I've watched some clips from this hearing and my impression was, here are the Democrats doing what they ALWAYS do. They go on the attack, won't let questions be answered, talk over whoever is being questioned, and twist everything to their agenda. What an appalling bunch. Maybe they'll be a part of the triple bad day, we can only hope. Bondi is on the defensive, but fights back, good for her. Most people get raddled when sitting in the hot seat unless they can keep their cool like Scott Bessant. Some of her answers where inappropriate I thought and besides the point. The criticisms of her in this situation I mostly reject as she's being set up to look bad with the inevitable scorn in the aftermath like this persons comments, so over the top and meant to sway. How does one respond to this character assassination while sitting there? If you can remain calm, not let the petty tyrants throw you off balance into an emotional state then one can respond appropriately. It appears Bondi isn't able to do this to well and I don't hold that against her. Water off a ducks back for me.
 
Last edited:
Bondi is on the defensive, but fights back, good for her
She rightfully was asked why co-conspirators were redacted and why they weren't indicted. Her answer was the DOW is up to 50,000. You think that was a setup? All she had to do was say that was wrong and a mistake. Instead she insults the victims and tells everyone they should focus on how great the economy is. That has zero to do with partisan politics or character assassination. It's a moral failing of character. No clue how you can support that nonsense.
 
I've watched some clips from this hearing and my impression was, here are the Democrats doing what they ALWAYS do. They go on the attack, won't let questions be answered, talk over whoever is being questioned, and twist everything to their agenda.

Democrats or not, they were right to question her. By the way, some of the most prominent people pursuing the Epstein files are Republicans, like Thomas Massie. And both prominent Democrats and Republicans are implicated.

Some of her answers where inappropriate I thought and besides the point. The criticisms of her in this situation I mostly reject as she's being set up to look bad with the inevitable scorn in the aftermath like this persons comments, so over the top and meant to sway. How does one respond to this character assassination while sitting there?

From all the clips I saw, all of her answers were inappropriate. Deflecting to the point of the absurd. She is being asked about the Epstein files and goes 'but the Dow Jones!'. Really? I suppose she figured that she should do it Trump style. In her mind he's great at it. She doesn't realize how bad he looks when someone asks about Epstein and he says 'Why are you still talking about that? There's all this wonderful things I'm doing! Why are you attacking me!' Well, it's not all about Trump. Some things are about justice, truth and protecting the innocent on their own right. And this one in particular is a *huge* one.

It seems to me that there is no need to set her up to look bad. She already looks bad by minimizing and covering up stuff about the most horrendous crimes imaginable.

Surely the Democrats will try to get political advantage out of all of this, but the crux of the matter is that we have very clear evidence of child abuse, torture, murder and possibly even cannibalism among members of the elite, as well as political and social manipulations on a global scale, and the Trump administration is pretending like nothing happened and it's time to move on. Seriously I cannot think of a single reason why people shouldn't know all about this and justice be served, quite regardless of who's in power and who's gaining political points or not.
 
The Bondi ‘outburst’ would seem completely mental, but looking at it through the lens of what the guys were saying on this week’s News Real - it’s like seeing the cup and ball game being done with transparent cups. The theory being that Trump and Bondi’s attitude of ‘nothing to see here’ is to make the Dems beg for everything to do with Epstein so that they don’t label what’s released as being fake.

If you take that idea seriously, her performance is actually pretty impressive. I couldn’t have stood there and done what she did.

That is, if the theory is actually correct.
 
The theory being that Trump and Bondi’s attitude of ‘nothing to see here’ is to make the Dems beg for everything to do with Epstein so that they don’t label what’s released as being fake.
Seems quite far-fetched to me. It would be at the expense of setting a large part of his base against him and probably losing the midterm elections. It would also imply that Trump is skillful at playing reverse-psychology games and strategizing. So far I haven't seen any of that - rather, a random flip-flopping behaviour and lots of praise for himself. Also, since Trump promised during his campaign to release the Epstein files, the Trump-thing-to-do would be to proclaim he has done great and awesome by actually releasing them, etc. Finally, how important would it be to get the Dems to demand for the files when all he had to do was release them fully and let the evidence lead where it may? He is in power after all (...or is he?).

I think that he is simply trying to protect people close to him and perhaps even himself. There are accusations against him in there too. Even if he turns out to be innocent of those, they don't look good at all, hence he would rather people not know about that.
 
She rightfully was asked why co-conspirators were redacted and why they weren't indicted. Her answer was the DOW is up to 50,000. You think that was a setup? All she had to do was say that was wrong and a mistake. Instead she insults the victims and tells everyone they should focus on how great the economy is. That has zero to do with partisan politics or character assassination. It's a moral failing of character. No clue how you can support that nonsense.

Some of her answers where inappropriate I thought and besides the point.
The Dow answer was what I was referring to here, it was dumb. But I didn't get the impression she was insulting the victims. She answered Massie and said Wexner's name was unredacted in 40 minutes after it was pointed out to her which was a good point.

All she had to do was say that was wrong and a mistake.

Yes, I agree. I said she wasn't able to handle the pressure well and if she could perhaps this would have been her answer, I don't know. She could very well have moral failings in her character and I wouldn't be surprised in the least and I have my doubts about her job performance as well. From what I saw mistakes where made in the release of the files, the victims names being released where a big one. And I expect there will be corrections after these have been shown. There are 5 million pages altogether and I expect there will be mistakes.

My comments are directed at the Democrats primarily and how they handle their interrogations and how different people respond to this. They come out attacking, always. My apparent defense of Bondi is in response to these tactics which disgust me, they are a big part of the problem here. Character assassination is one of their main mo's and that will come out in the "press" afterwards. It doesn't matter who the person is, if your not one of them its the way it goes. Congress and their theatrics are always the same.

Hopefully this clarifies my intentions here which you have mistaken it seems. .
 
Back
Top Bottom