Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

I see all of this as a sort of purge, a la soviet.

I'm also seeing it and my heart beats in the rhythm of "The Internationale" while I smell gun oil on my hands 😍 . . . oh, no kidding, kidding . . . .

But, I also see how we, here, thanks to Laura knew things that is to happened in our world years ahead. For something its 20 years ahead. Which really is nothing short of amazing. Great tool for the world around us.
 
Whitney Webb has been quoted and talked about a lot here. There is also a third one, George Webb, who seems more shady. All three seem to be unrelated.
I'm really sorry, when I did the research and wrote his name, I didn't have many references. 😣

Thank you very much.

And I just noticed that there was a thread about the WEBB program. I hadn't gone through all the posts on the entire forum because I thought this would have been posted in the Jeffrey Epstein thread.

Please excuse me for this duplicate post and for not doing more thorough research. 🥴
 
@axj

And it's really weird, I just searched for Whitney Webb again and I didn't get the same results as you. Yet I searched the entire forum 🤔

Here are the results of my search Search results for query: withney webb

Is there a problem with my computer?! Or am I not doing it right?
 

Attachments

  • Accord OMS #5.png
    Accord OMS #5.png
    128 KB · Views: 8
Someone created a Wiki-style website using the data from the Jmail compiled into articles. It is AI generated, so there may be some hallucinations in there but it is editable so those can be fixed when discovered. Really good use of AI in my opinion.

 
Interesting about Deepak Chopra

Brittany Page discusses the discovery of famous guru Deepak Chopra's extensive communications with Jeffrey Epstein, in which Chopra refers to "cute girls" and responds to Epstein's email about an accuser dropping a civil case with "good." Deepak Chopra has made a career out of claiming to offer people a pathway to transcendence, healing, and the divine, but his extensive communications and relationship with Epstein reveal not only his depravity and hypocrisy but also the dangers of allowing a man like this to continue to enjoy the massive platform he does. Deepak Chopra made a statement on X denying any criminal wrongdoing and apologizing for the "tone" in his emails to Epstein. You can read his full statement in the pinned comment.

I never read a book by him; I was never interested in him. I do not know about you.

 
I've watched some clips from this hearing and my impression was, here are the Democrats doing what they ALWAYS do. They go on the attack, won't let questions be answered, talk over whoever is being questioned, and twist everything to their agenda. What an appalling bunch. Maybe they'll be a part of the triple bad day, we can only hope. Bondi is on the defensive, but fights back, good for her. Most people get raddled when sitting in the hot seat unless they can keep their cool like Scott Bessant. Some of her answers where inappropriate I thought and besides the point. The criticisms of her in this situation I mostly reject as she's being set up to look bad with the inevitable scorn in the aftermath like this persons comments, so over the top and meant to sway. How does one respond to this character assassination while sitting there? If you can remain calm, not let the petty tyrants throw you off balance into an emotional state then one can respond appropriately. It appears Bondi isn't able to do this to well and I don't hold that against her. Water off a ducks back for me.
Well, everyone knows how much I detest the Dems/libtards/progressives/whatevers, but darned if I'm not on their side on this.

But then, if Bondi is putting on a show for some investigative reason, it might be forgivable. If not...

Taken at face value, the Trump admin, Bondi, Patel, etc, are digging a hole they may never climb out of.
 
Beware of the typos : Whitney and Withney are different ;-)

😅 Oh, thank you! I admit that, not being a native English speaker, I didn't notice the difference. I'll pay even more attention next time, which will prevent me from repeating sources that have already been mentioned. 🙃

Someone created a Wiki-style website using the data from the Jmail compiled into articles. It is AI generated, so there may be some hallucinations in there but it is editable so those can be fixed when discovered. Really good use of AI in my opinion.

Oh yes, it's true, I had forgotten about this very relevant source. Thanks for the reminder.

I have this nagging question: How can they let all this information and several names of people be revealed? There's surely a plan behind all these revelations, and I wonder where this is all leading. We've had access to tons of information for at least ten days now, but I haven't seen any reaction from the ordinary people or in our media in Quebec. No arrests, no protests, and no questioning of those in positions of power. I admit it's mind-boggling, even strange.
 
Donc, je me pose ses questions:
  • Est-ce que ce Ian Carroll est une personne crédible?
  • Croyez-vous que ce programme sera vraiment bénéfique et permettra aux gens de pouvoir faire des liens et des analyses plus en profondeur concernant les fichiers de JF?
  • Ou bien ceci n'est que de la poudre aux yeux et sera plutôt pour pouvoir faire de l'argent?

I think Ian Carroll is a good researcher, with a good head on his shoulders and a good heart. He doesn't have the full banana on some things, but he's a lot better than the majority of alternative media influencers, and doesn't seem to be compromised or ideologically rigid.
 
I think Ian Carroll is a good researcher, with a good head on his shoulders and a good heart. He doesn't have the full banana on some things, but he's a lot better than the majority of alternative media influencers, and doesn't seem to be compromised or ideologically rigid.

Yes, I like Ian Carroll a LOT. See the recent interview of him that Tucker Carlson did.
 
Interesting about Deepak Chopra

I never read a book by him; I was never interested in him. I do not know about you.

Other day I searched for word 'india' (in the email account thread Niall posted )to see who are the indian origin/Indian people involved these files. Of all, Deepak Chopra is the MOST compromised of all (as of now). This is interesting and Deepak Chopra projected himself as a new age guru for Hollywood celebrities. So he is deep into this swamp.

Some looks like a more of a bragging gossip (in case of Modi's name) and some are solicitations (Anil Ambani - bankrupt brother of Asia's wealtheist man Mukesh Ambani) , Mira Nair (Mother of New york city mayor) attended one of his social gathering.
### List of Indian-Origin or Indian Individuals Mentioned in the Epstein Files

The Epstein files, comprising millions of pages of court documents, emails, and other records released by the US Department of Justice, include references to various high-profile figures. Being mentioned does not imply wrongdoing, involvement in Epstein's crimes, or any criminal activity—many are simply social or professional contacts, and several have denied any meaningful association. Below is a compiled list based on publicly available sources, focusing on individuals of Indian origin or nationality. I've included brief contexts from the documents and any notable denials.

NameBackgroundContext in FilesDenials/Notes
Deepak ChopraIndian-American author and wellness advocateMentioned around 3,300 times; met Epstein multiple times after his 2008 conviction. Emails include discussions about Donald Trump's ex-wife Marla Maples (e.g., a $10,000 bet Epstein lost), a 2016 news story on dropped civil charges against Epstein and Trump, and continued communication until at least 2018. Chopra asked Epstein if he knew Maples, and responded positively when charges were dropped.Chopra stated he hopes "all of the truth comes out" and is willing to share information with officials; no evidence of impropriety.
Mira NairIndian-American filmmakerAttended a 2009 after-party at Ghislaine Maxwell's New York townhouse following a screening of her film *Amelia*, alongside Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos. Also listed on the host committee for the 2010 Independent Filmmaker Project Spring Gala, to which Epstein was invited.No allegations of impropriety; appears as a social event attendee.
Anurag KashyapIndian Bollywood directorReferred to as a "famous Bollywood Director" or "Bollywood guy" in a 2015 email thread among Epstein and others (e.g., Giuseppe Bersani, Gino Yu, Ornella Corazza) discussing a congress in Shanghai and potential workshops on Buddhism, technology, and medicine. Also mentioned in plans for a possible Cuba visit.No confirmation of attendance or direct meetings with Epstein; no evidence of wrongdoing.
Nandita DasIndian actor and filmmakerInvited as a speaker to the 2015 Lake District Festival in the UK (organized by Jem Bendell), where Epstein was also invited. The event included wellness activities like yoga, tai chi, and nature walks.No indication of direct association or attendance alongside Epstein; no impropriety suggested.
Anil AmbaniIndian businessmanIntroduced to Epstein in 2017 via Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem; emails discuss business deals, financial advice (e.g., seeking $720 million in funding, bankruptcy-proof structures), and White House connections. In 2017, Epstein suggested sending Ambani a "tall Swedish blonde woman" for a visit, to which Ambani replied "Arrange that." Visited Epstein's Manhattan townhouse in 2019 after Modi's re-election; referred to as "Modi's man" in facilitating US-India ties.No direct allegations of criminal activity; context is primarily business-related.
Narendra ModiIndian Prime MinisterEpstein claimed in a 2017 email to have advised Modi on his Israel visit, stating Modi "took his advice and danced and sang in Israel for the benefit of the US president." Linked indirectly via Ambani's communications about Modi's 2019 election and US access.India's foreign ministry dismissed it as "trashy ruminations by a convicted criminal"; Modi's party denied any contact, noting no direct communications and that the Israel trip was official with no "dancing or singing" beyond the national song.
Hardeep Singh PuriIndian politician and Union MinisterSent Epstein a 2014 email outlining reasons to engage with India after Modi's election. At the time, Puri was retired from the Indian Foreign Service and working with the International Peace Institute.Admitted meeting Epstein 3-4 times as part of delegations, unrelated to Epstein's crimes; denied any deeper involvement.

This list is not exhaustive, as the files are vast and ongoing releases may reveal more. Some mentions are tangential or unverified, and AI-generated or speculative claims (e.g., from chatbots) have fueled misinformation. For full context, reviewing the original documents or official summaries is recommended
 
I was pulled into the rabbit hole last night of all the things people are finding. Once again there are ways the redacted names can be uncovered. My search on the gov site is limiting for me. I can't see the videos for one. Here we have tunnels under NYC.


Under the name Tom Hanks I read a very long correspondence with one of the victims. She's calling out complicit lawyers who haven't helped her and others involved. She wrote many emails to Trump, Kash, Alina Habba for help. Lots of angry words and says she's not suicidal at the beginning. This was March/April 2025. Her name is at the end, not redacted!

Tom Hanks and Jeb Bush are named as being at Zorro Ranch by a witness, a young native girl who was sold to Epstein's clients on many occasions by her mother. The account is hand written and this is an explanation for the names not being redacted by the AI program used for redactions.

 
After a day of letting the Bondi hearing sit with me, I've been reflecting on how bizarre and out of place it was. She had the whole thing planned out in advance with lists of what these Dems where responsible for and that was her response for every question, as far as I know. As I've explained the Dems go into these hearings always with attack in mind and she knows this, so she became the attacker instead ignoring their questions.

That's a very optimistic view. More likely is that this was done to collect more potential blackmail against members of Congress in order to control them. Or maybe it was a 'warning shot' that some of the existing blackmail can be used against them, even if it was just some messages to Epstein.
I'm curious about this tracking of searches and what the purpose is. I couldn't find a video of Bondi saying this out loud but allowed that Jayapal (a shady character) search history to be seen. This was intended to rattle the Dems I'd say, maybe see what they do next. Here is a lengthy post on one persons ideas about it. The bold part I thought was notable. Much does sound overly optimistic as well.

Yup! And every leak that they plan to release will now be fully documented, including exactly who leaked the information, who originally viewed it and passed it along to their mainstream media contacts, who those specific media mouthpieces are, and even the methods they used to relay the details and through which channels they communicated. This creates a powerful deterrent against future leaks or selective obstruction because lawmakers now think twice before aggressively querying to protect allies or tip off contacts, restoring real accountability to the oversight process. It mapped behavioral intent in real time for the DOJ, giving clear intelligence on who prioritizes cover-up over justice and allowing targeted follow-ups based on who panicked most. It has flipped the narrative from congressional pressure on the DOJ to the DOJ holding Congress accountable, turning defense into offense and making opponents look defensive by exposing potential conflicts of interest. It amplified public awareness and kept pressure on for full transparency, forcing ongoing discussion about redactions, victim handling, and protected names so it becomes harder for anyone to bury the scandal. It has strengthened the perception of executive resolve and competence, portraying the DOJ as unflinching, prepared, and serious about trafficking networks and elite accountability instead of endless delays. It isolated extreme obstructionists, creating a chilling effect where others distance themselves from aggressive pushback to avoid similar exposure and possibly making bipartisan cooperation easier on related issues. This outcome is genuinely impressive and strategic because it would never have been possible if the files had simply been released in fully unredacted form to the public without any controls. The fact they just threw it in their faces shows that while this was a clever move to achieve all the above, they've collected what they needed, the trap has snapped shut, and now it's about deterrence, final pressure, and signaling that the game is wrapping up with the good guys in control. These kinds of calculated moves and countermoves are precisely how the larger game gets won, and exactly how we've been winning. The way this was divulged tells me the DOJ and the plan are ready to close the book. We have arrived!


2:37 PM · Feb 12, 2026
·
21.4K
Views
Since Trump has come back investigations have been on going on many government officials showing their criminality in many areas. I won't add a list but its serious if you haven't been following along, guilty as hell which surprises no one, me at least. The Trump admin has been exposing all this corruption which is a massive systemic problem and mainly Democrates are the culprits, but it is a uniparty. What about the Dems questioning Bondi? It's likely they got there through voter fraud and according to Todd Challender none have taken the oath of office which the Constitution requires which he discovered when he obtained those records. So any skeletons in those closets they may already be implicated in? The heat is being turned up on the Dems. and they know it.

So, as usual, I always consider what could be going on as an alternative to what we are presented at face value. I mentioned earlier there are likely psychological operations going on and Trump is willing to present himself as the bad guy to get a reaction, is Bondi doing the same?

I'm not holding fast to any explanation right now and we'll see how things develop which will tell us more. My core belief about Trump and his intentions are positive so I look to see if there is something that fits with that. As is the case for seeing objective reality the door must be held open for new information and if he is not what I think so be it. Once again, its always wait and see for me.




1771100625717.png
 
Back
Top Bottom