Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

[JEEP]

Another development:

Epsteins web unravels: New $35 Million settlement reveals more architects of a human trafficking empire

The shadowy financial architecture that enabled Jeffrey Epstein’s decades-long sex trafficking operation is being forced into the light, piece by piece, through the relentless pursuit of justice by his survivors. In a significant legal development this week, Epstein’s estate agreed to a $35 million settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit targeting the two men who allegedly built and managed the very systems that facilitated his crimes. This settlement, filed in Manhattan federal court, strikes at the heart of the conspiracy, accusing Epstein’s former personal lawyer, Darren Indyke, and his former accountant, Richard Kahn, of actively aiding and abetting the financier’s abuse of young women and teenage girls. While mainstream narratives often focus on the lurid details, this case exposes the calculated, corporate machinery behind the exploitation, revealing how powerful men operate with impunity until independent legal forces and truth-tellers dismantle their defenses.

Key points:

• Epstein’s estate has agreed to pay up to $35 million to settle a 2024 class-action lawsuit against his former lawyer, Darren Indyke, and former accountant, Richard Kahn.
  
  
• The suit accused Indyke and Kahn of creating a "complex web" of corporations and accounts to hide Epstein’s abuses and pay victims and recruiters.
  
  
• The two advisers, who are co-executors of the estate, admitted no wrongdoing as part of the settlement.
  
  
• This settlement is separate from a prior victim compensation fund that paid $121 million and an additional $49 million in settlements from the estate.
  
  
• The deal aims to provide "finality" for the estate and a confidential financial avenue for victims who have not yet resolved claims.

The enablers behind the empire​

For years, the public spectacle of Epstein’s crimes focused on the man himself and his closest accomplices, like the now-convicted Ghislaine Maxwell. But the recent lawsuit, brought by the firm Boies Schiller Flexner, pulls back the curtain on the essential cogs in the machine: the professional advisers.

According to court filings, Indyke and Kahn were not passive bystanders but active architects. They allegedly constructed a labyrinth of corporations and bank accounts specifically designed to obfuscate the flow of money, allowing Epstein to secretly pay victims and those who recruited them, all while ensuring the facilitators were, in the law firm’s words, "richly compensated" for their work. This is the blueprint of high-level corruption—using the veneer of legal and financial professionalism to cloak monstrous acts. Their lawyer, Daniel H. Weiner, stated they settled to achieve "finality," claiming they were prepared to go to trial because "they did nothing wrong." This is a common legal maneuver, a financial resolution that avoids a public airing of evidence in a courtroom, leaving the full truth partially obscured.

Epstein’s web unravels: New $35 Million settlement reveals more architects of a human trafficking empire

Your Daily Station of Entertainment !!

www.stationgossip.com

 

[Voyageur]

They allegedly constructed a labyrinth of corporations and bank accounts specifically designed to obfuscate the flow of money, allowing Epstein to secretly pay victims and those who recruited them, all while ensuring the facilitators were, in the law firm’s words, "richly compensated" for their work. This is the blueprint of high-level corruption—using the veneer of legal and financial professionalism to cloak monstrous acts. Their lawyer, Daniel H. Weiner, stated they settled to achieve "finality," claiming they were prepared to go to trial because "they did nothing wrong." This is a common legal maneuver, a financial resolution that avoids a public airing of evidence in a courtroom, leaving the full truth partially obscured.

What seems to slip by many is the financial mechanisms, along with the magnitude of those who helped him manage the books - that is not a one man job.

Perhaps that forensic accountant Zach De Gregorio (Wolves and Finance) will have a look at the paperwork.

Joan Helmer adds to what was said above:

THE FIVE SURPRISES BREAKING ON THE WAR FRONTS

By John Helmer, Moscow @bears_with 1. Jeffrey Epstein’s failure to develop any business or political connection to the Kremlin or Rus

johnhelmer.net

Snip(s):

The email record indicates that Epstein didn't have the staff to run these schemes, at least not in New York. The schemes require lawyers and accountants to create the network of entities and bank accounts through which the movement of money is directed. Epstein's 11-person staff in the Virgin Islands may have performed these functions.

In this New York Times investigation of balance sheets and financial reports from the Virgin Island entities, Financial Trust and Southern Trust, the value of Financial Trust peaked at the end of 2004, when it reported $563 million in assets and net income of $108 million. When the Wexner funds were withdrawn, however, a new clientele was created in a successor entity, Southern Trust. Read more: {source} The DOJ files reveal many types of racketeering and tax fraud offences -- “insurance policy” schemes; “art advisory” schemes; and rent-a-name for disguising real estate ownership: rent-a-name for disguising real estate ownership:

According to a published statement last July from Senator Ron Wyden (Democrat, Oregon) of the Senate Finance Committee, “Treasury’s Epstein file details 4,725 wire transfers adding up to nearly $1.1 billion flowing in and out of just ONE of Epstein’s bank accounts… Hundreds of millions more flowed through other accounts”. Wyden claimed that the US Treasury had promised to release these Epstein records, but after allowing Senate investigators to read the files without copying them in 2024, Scott Bessent, Trump’s Treasury Secretary, has refused to go as far in disclosure as the Justice Department (DOJ) has been compelled to do by Congress.

Assuming (on the high side) a 10% yield for Epstein’s dividend stream, the reported numbers suggest Epstein may have been managing up to $3.6 billion over almost twenty years. If the financial transaction evidence is opened to accounting, it is likely to lead to Congressional and public pressure for prosecutions of Epstein’s clients under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The clients who are vulnerable include billionaires like Leslie Wexner and Leon Black, and also Noam Chomsky, Woody Allen, Steven Bannon, and Lawrence Summers.

Epstein claimed in his emails that he wanted to offer his schemes for largescale money transfers, including crypto currency operations, to President Putin and to Russian oligarchs. But none of his offers and indirect approaches led to his visiting Russia, or to meeting Kremlin officials or oligarchs living in New York such as Roman Abramovich, Len Blavatnik, and Victor Vekselberg. For more detail, read this.