Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

This is a hard listen from Jena Lisa Jones, who many have heard of as one of Epstein's early victims that she had only brought attention to his crimes late. For her, though, trauma was a long time ago - it was over in a day with Epstein, yet the ripples...

The warning here is not to watch if similar things have happened, yet one can understand the trap she entered that day that would affect her whole life going forward at the age of 14.

If viewing, one needs to hear her right to the end because something has to be done (watch your kids at least) and it is not being done. In terms of the subject of trauma, this is nothing new on this forum, but the words simply capture just how bad it is.


At the end, she is asked because she has heard that possibility, that if Epstein was still alive what would you want to say?

Share it as best you deem fit.

In case it does not play or is removed or something, this is the direct link.
 
This is a hard listen from Jena Lisa Jones, who many have heard of as one of Epstein's early victims that she had only brought attention to his crimes late. For her, though, trauma was a long time ago - it was over in a day with Epstein, yet the ripples...

The warning here is not to watch if similar things have happened, yet one can understand the trap she entered that day that would affect her whole life going forward at the age of 14.

If viewing, one needs to hear her right to the end because something has to be done (watch your kids at least) and it is not being done. In terms of the subject of trauma, this is nothing new on this forum, but the words simply capture just how bad it is.


At the end, she is asked because she has heard that possibility, that if Epstein was still alive what would you want to say?

Share it as best you deem fit.

In case it does not play or is removed or something, this is the direct link.
Damn, I feel for her, I really do, I really hope she finds healing. It seems though it’s not clearly understood what kind of person Epstein is, I wonder how many of his living victims are still handing over their power to him by wanting to tell him how much he destroyed their lives and the continued trauma they experience. I’m sure he’d love to hear that they are still suffering.

I hope he doesn’t watch this video, coz he’s probably enjoy it a lot.
 
I have decided to respond in this thread because it has less to do with TPUSA than with JE. First on the subject of the email naming Melania, according to some sources, Melania Trump is presumably" an Epstein girl like others he spread and infiltrated into the nobility and political positions.
Secondly, Richard Kahn, accountant, together with Darren Indyke, JE's lawyer, are in the background and under the radar. Both deny knowing anything, and during the federal investigation of Epstein and Maxwell, neither Indyke nor Kahn were questioned. Indyke is a lawyer for the Parlatore Law Group—a group with legal ties to Donald Trump—and he says that his skills with JE were “doing a lot of things” such as buying yachts and planes and structuring finances. According to a WSJ investigation, R. Kahn said he stayed with Epstein after his first trial because he was “a new father in a bad economy.”
(...)
fwiw/ imo. Impression i get is, that those two Kahn and maybe Indyke fit a profile of being some sort of middle management apparatchiks for an agency ( for example Mr. John Perkins author of " Confessions of an economic hitman" , had for initial guidance and training No Such Agency personnel /handlers ) , managing all the little details for the front/face psycho JE, who by all accounts had no (formal) education , for one i doubt such an unrestrained psycho could even attend any institutions for long without standing out , absent a lot of social engineering and bribes/blackmail as cover, his time in the Dalton School serves as an example of this i think.
 
although no offical link to epstein it illustrates an altogether similiar pattern....

Three Real Estate Titans Convicted in Shocking NYC Sex Trafficking Case​



The Alexander brothers were primarily involved in luxury real estate and private security businesses:
1. Luxury Real Estate

Douglas Elliman: Tal and Oren Alexander began their real estate careers at Douglas Elliman, a major luxury brokerage. In 2012, they formed The Alexander Team, brokering high-profile deals for clients like Kim Kardashian, Kanye West, Ken Griffin, and Lindsay Lohan.

Record Sales: They were involved in some of the most expensive U.S. residential transactions, including the $238 million sale of a penthouse at 220 Central Park South in Manhattan (2019) and the $50 million sale of a Miami estate, then the priciest single-family home in Miami-Dade County.

Official Partners: In 2022, Tal and Oren co-founded their own ultra-luxury real estate firm, Official, with other former Elliman agents. The company operated in New York and Miami and was marketed as a premium brokerage for the elite.

2. Private Security

Kent Security Services: Founded by their parents, Shlomo and Orly Alexander, in 1982, this family business provided private security services. Alon Alexander worked in this firm and was reportedly an executive before his arrest.
 
fwiw/ imo. Impression i get is, that those two Kahn and maybe Indyke fit a profile of being some sort of middle management apparatchiks for an agency ( for example Mr. John Perkins author of " Confessions of an economic hitman" , had for initial guidance and training No Such Agency personnel /handlers ) , managing all the little details for the front/face psycho JE, who by all accounts had no (formal) education , for one i doubt such an unrestrained psycho could even attend any institutions for long without standing out , absent a lot of social engineering and bribes/blackmail as cover, his time in the Dalton School serves as an example of this i think.

I think the JE network is something that exceeds to The Pulp or the Safari Club —global crime intelligence services, global operations,—with a profile in finance and, and him as its handler who managing resources from what we might call ‘investors’ such as the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, Rothschilds, MIT, etc. Ironically, these investments made him one of the main promoters of science, technology, and culture in the United States. In that context, I would not underestimate the fact that he had no formal education. I would say that being an outsider worked in his favour, as he was a very astute, intelligent and informed guy and a psychopath with a high IQ. I remember that they seek each other out to compare and feed their corrupt ideas (Leon Black, Gates, Wexner, etc., etc.).

The difference between the status of the ‘economic hit man’ you mentioned with JE is that Mr. John Perkins is a state agent (official) who causes enormous economic damage and who, as an individual, has some morals. JE was or is a completely immoral individual, and I will refrain from using epithets to describe him... He acted as the fixer for the elites with an agenda of human destruction, which suited him very well as a paedophile, where he invested a great deal of money to manipulate (distort) viable technology projects for (human) development and steer them in a certain direction. For example: transhumanism (modelling human behaviour), AI (data centres), genetics (Crisper technology), political surveillance (Palantir), the digital economy, which, for example, recalls the case of the Bitcoin Foundation, where he managed to get its developers to go and work at MIT under his funding. All to capture, divide, destroy or monopolise any form of research for human advancement.

In that sense, having lackeys like Kahn and Indyke is equivalent to the economic and legal arm of Epstein's small nation. They were not only agents (word puzzle) responsible for his movements, his honeypots, his parties, his deaths, they (and Maxwell) carried out the most important part of the operations because they covered up for those behind Epstein, those for whom he was managing the money. And yes, they are agents, one under the umbrella of Parlatore Law Group and the other seemingly coming forward to sing:
 
The ex elite insider Florian Homm has recetly revealed/claimed that he will stop being silent now and spell the beans. In the Epstein case he for example it souds like he saying that could have become the husband of Ghislaine Maxwell BEFORE she got involved with Epstein because her father Robert Maxwell asked Homm if he would like to become her man (which he declined). Homm also managed billions worth of money and Maxwell was one of his positions while working for someone and he needed to decide to keep them or kick them out. Rothschilds are mentioned too. He also is revealing what he calls "the Epstein Modell" which seems to include much more than just what the public knows about:

 
Last edited:
Another piece in the epstein puzzle:
UKColumn (3/16/26 video, relevant section = minutes 21-35) posted a link to a substack. The substack has an article on Robert Maxwell that offers new twists about Epstein's operations. It's not a quick read. The basic premise is:
The thing that connects every thread in this [Rothschild/Maxwell/Epstein] story — the publishing programme, the intelligence operation, the banking architecture, artificial intelligence, the centralised ‘social good’, the research funding, and the institutional machinery now running through the BIS and the NGFS — is systems theory itself. General systems theory. Input-output analysis. Cybernetics. The idea that you can manage any complex system through feedback and control, including humanity. It has a name: The Total Human Ecosystem’ — humanity as a managed specie, subject to permanent surveillance and enforcement, not least programmable CBDCs.

The operation described in this essay was built alongside — and shielded by — the sexual exploitation of children and young women. This essay is about the system those crimes were used to protect. Blackmail, bribery and ideology alone could not have delivered the end result. The more fundamental tool is general systems theory itself.
Below are some quotes from the article, but they only skim the surface of the article:
I. Robert Maxwell distributed PROMIS, a piece of software, to more than twenty countries. The programme had been stolen from the US Department of Justice and modified with a hidden backdoor, allowing Israeli intelligence to secretly monitor every government database it was installed on. Robert Maxwell had personal access to Margaret Thatcher’s Downing Street, Ronald Reagan’s White House, and the Kremlin — all at the same time. Maxwell also used sexual blackmail — including material involving underage girls — to control politicians and other powerful figures.
II. Robert Maxwell was the main publisher of books [Pergamon Press] that laid out how to govern large systems using information instead of force general systems theory, input-output analysis, and cybernetics. These are not the kind of books which arrive unsolicited in the post. They are governance frameworks, plans for how to run complex systems, commissioned by an organisation whose explicit purpose was to model resource management on a global scale. That is what Maxwell’s publishing catalogue amounted to. Not a collection of academic books, but the complete intellectual infrastructure for a governance system that could operate without elections, without legislation, and without the consent of the people living inside it. — a managed planet, governed by experts, justified by science. Gregory Bateson, told the Epstein-funded Brockman directly that cybernetics was ‘the most important idea since Jesus Christ.

III. General systems theory, input-output analysis, and cybernetics are the intellectual ancestors of artificial intelligence.

IV. Robert McNamara operationalised the systems concept across the entire US federal government as PPBS — the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting System — by 1965. It restructured government spending around measurable performance against externally defined objectives: funding became conditional on compliance.

V. Maxwell ran an intelligence operation whose structure matched the architecture his press was publishing. Before he died, he introduced his daughter Ghislaine to the man who would carry the operation forward. She embedded him within the social fabric, carrying on the operation her father had set in motion. Lynn Forester — embedded in the Clinton administration and later married into the Rothschild family — provided the bridge between the two worlds.

VI. Jeffrey Epstein — a man with no qualifications, no institutional position, and no public profile — was placed at the centre, where his very blankness drew attention away from the structure behind him. David Rockefeller personally put him on the board of Rockefeller University and invited him onto the Trilateral Commission. The Rothschild banking house provided financial scaffolding.

The operation was never really Epstein’s. Whether it was designed this way or simply evolved, the system could survive the loss of any single part — including him. But it was never really Maxwell’s either.

VII. Robert Maxwell did more than publish. He controlled the distribution infrastructure through which local innovations became global standardsthe press that determined which methods were legitimate science. He funded the institution in Santa Fe where the theory was being applied to governance and economics. Jeffrey Epstein carried the programme from theory into operation — funding the researchers who built the components, carrying the specifications between the people writing the rules and the institutions enforcing them, and maintaining the intelligence architecture that protected the relay.

Maxwell controlled what the world accepted as knowledge. Epstein controlled what was built from it. The Rothschild financial line ran through the whole thing.

EndNote: Yet, the architecture has a structural weak point. Networks built on compartmentalisation keep each participant inside their own field. When someone challenges the network in a single field, the system can handle it easily. There is always a specialist available to respond.

The only people who can see across disciplines are the fixers such as Epstein — the people whose job it is to move between the specialists and connect them. The act of explaining how the pieces fit together would confirm that the architecture exists. Those who understand the wiring cannot describe it without describing their own role in it.

The wiring does not stop working because someone published the diagram. But the system was never designed to be seen whole — and it has no defence for when it is. [i.e., knowledge protects]

There is significantly more in the article. Dozens of other relevant articles are also linked/embedded in it. Below is a link where Asa provides key points from a few of these other articles.
I found these substack articles very interesting, carefully reviewed and quite revealing. I asked AI to summarize the three part series, as they are long and detailed.
Epstein's 7 is an interesting article too, where the author lays out Epstein's seven research projects and the people 'invited' to investigate and materialize them. Basically, it describes the sophisticated coordination of people, ideas and technology to choreograph the design, construction and implantation of the global control system architecture, with Epstein flitting about like a hummingbird injecting (and extracting) ideas, projects and relationships. to make it all come together.

FWIW, I figure this kind of operation is not theory. It's real. For decades, I watched (and participated in) the gradual "re-training" of the minds of corporate "leaders" (in German, "fuhrers") via conferences, executive development, Aspen Institute type "training," thinktank publications, etc., etc.

I can also surmise how the perverted sex stuff may have got mixed in with this. The physical perversities actually mirror the ideological perversities. One involves physical abduction, raping, flaying, abuse and murder of the weaker, naive and innocent (plus subsequent feelings of superiority, power and satisfaction); the other involves the same perversions but to the abusers' minds (weak, naive, STS and uninformed), with the concomitant feelings of superiority, power and satisfaction. Flip sides of the same coin, in a sense.

I'd venture the Dodd-Frank scheme to steal everything Americans "own" was spawned by this evil intermingling set of characters. (In short, if the investment fails, the public loses. If it succeeds, the private investors profit.......i.e., socialisation of all risk and the privatisation of all return -- all coded into law.) The scheme also illustrates (frog in boiling water analogy) how the citizen is lured into the systems theory matrix voluntarily, with an eagerness founded in ignorance and self-interest (e.g.,credit cards, airplane miles, grocery discount cards, covid behaviorism, vaccine acceptance, etc., etc.,). Each token offered by the matrix lets you take a ride on the merry-go-round, but underneath the veil is the devil's finger motioning, "Come hither, you lazy, useless, suggestible, stupid little greedy slug." And, of course, the process is punctuated with a "Gotcha!"

March 11, 1995 transcript
A: If someone opens a door, and behind it you see a pot of gold, do you worry whether there is a poisonous snake behind the door hidden from view, before you reach for the pot of gold?
In the same transcript: A: Free will could not be abridged if you had not obliged.

Epstein's Big Seven are:
  1. Evolutionary Code Dynamics — ‘a brand new field that encompasses, game theory, virus dynamics, (both computers and biological), cryptography, and genetics’.
  2. Synthetic General Intelligence — ‘encompassing, signal processing, statistical and machine learning, virtual world robots. new programming architecture. Ants termites wasps’.
  3. Power — ‘Its definition political, financial, intellectual, physical, includes reputation, awe, trust, deception, reciprocity. How it is used, why it is sought, group selection and behavior’.
  4. The World Financial System — ‘is it archaic, can you use the Internet to create a new model, social repercussions. What is value, worth, mark to market, what is money, the new debt. Computers and their effect on the system — including unemployment. Markets and sophisticated derivatives’.
  5. The Power Laws — ‘their derivation and possible implications. Zipf, Pareto etc. Scaling. Metabolism, human trait distributions (including intelligence), the ecology of economic systems. Their geometric equivalents.'
  6. Why Happiness Is Overrated — ‘cultural definitions, contentment, fulfilment, narcotics, hallucinogens, psycho-pharmaceuticals’.
  7. Music and the Brain — ‘is anticipation — resolution, rhythm vertical and horizontal (melody) harmonies an insight into the structure of the brain’.
John Brockman’s Edge Foundation was already doing work that covered at least four of the topics, including the science of nudging [shaping behavior and pre-programming desired "choices"] and reading genetic code into computers, changing it, and turning it back into living organisms.

The article discusses much that UKColumn has been harping on for years, including the Palantir-type tracking of everything (genes, medical interventions, movement, $pending, agriculture, even every seed, plant and piece of fruit), and implementation of "unified ledgers" where values of things change depending on context - who holds it, where they are, what they want to use it for, and whether they’ve met whatever rules are in place. And it's all done "for the public good," with political “legitimacy” and “philanthropic” oversight, it's blessed by "moral fuhrers," and it ensures we can take moral titillation in being "good stewards" over their concept of a dead, raped earth.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom