Kate Middletons-dress / Rosemarys baby

I agree that the dress is some sort of cosmic joke:

FYI, According to this source, the dress is a nod to Princess Diana:

For the reveal, Kate not only chose a dress that is a standout color, but also from one of her favorite designers. According to royal correspondent Richard Palmer, the red dress was designed by British fashion designer Jenny Packham.

The Duchess of Cambridge wore Packham in both of her previous reveals following the births of Prince George and Princess Charlotte. Below she is pictured wearing Packham's in a light blue dress with polka dots for George, and a cream and yellow silk dress with a buttercup print for Charlotte.
 
And on this page Princess Diana and Kate Middleton Have the Same Style - Kate Middleton and Princess Diana's Matching Outfits there is 41 times that Kate wears similiar dress like Diana. Many of this photos aren't similiar, IMO, but this one is really weird:

Very nice collection and it DOES seem that, on many occasions, Kate is using Diana as a model though the outfits are modernized. The 80s was just not a very good time for fashion... but then, neither was the 90s or since then. But some people know how to dress in classic, timeless styles and Kate seems to be doing pretty well at it.
 
I agree that Kate is doing pretty well, though she'll never match Diana's natural grace and class. Well at least, she's a good breeder, is well-behaved, totally bland and pretty – this one sure won't make waves. Which is all they ever asked of future royal consorts.
 
Which is all they ever asked of future royal consorts.
As with Meghan Markle? I wonder if Harry's bride sharing the same birthday with his late great-grandmother (Queen Mother: Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon) was in any way a deciding factor.

I digress...

4th August is also Obama's birthday. I find that interesting given both Meghan and Obama symbolising of black leadership/representative-influence within the traditional white-Anglo sphere of 'power' transitioning into 21Century - and follows on from the late Queen Mother representing ending of 20Century 'old ways'. They're a Trinity.

4th August: 216th day of the year = 6 x 6 x 6.

In the Kabbalah it is the Gevurah and 5th Sephirot. This is significant.

Gevurah - Wikipedia

"Gevurah = 216 = 3 times 72 (chesed). Each of God's 72 hidden names possesses three letters, in all—216 letters"

So we have 3 (trinity) very significant birthdays all comprising day 216 of the year, in turn numerically made up of 3 (trinity) x 72 (also angles of the pentacle) equating hidden names of god in ancient Kabbalah also equating 6 x 6 x 6.
 
Hence the Sandwich

'PHANTOMS & MONSTERS'
Meghan Markle Related to Serial Killer H.H.Holmes?
http://www.phantomsandmonsters.com/2018/05/daily-2-cents-meghan-markle-related-to.html
markle.JPG

Thursday, May 17, 2018

Jeffrey Mudgett, the eighth cousin of Prince Harry's fiancee, claims the family is related to H.H. Holmes...a man once dubbed America's first serial murderer

Serial killer H.H. Holmes murdered at least nine known victims, targeting his victims in a specialist Factory of Death hotel, and was executed in 1896 - with some theories suggesting he had travelled to the UK to unleash the horrific killings in London's East End to become Jack the Ripper.

The eighth cousin of Prince Harry's fiancée lawyer Jeff Mudgett has since claimed the family is related to the notorious killer, telling the Daily Star: "We did a study with the FBI and CIA and Scotland Yard regarding handwriting analysis.

"It turns out he was Jack the Ripper. This means Meghan is related to Jack the Ripper.

"I don't think the Queen knows. I am not proud he is my ancestor. Meghan won't be either. Read more at Meghan Markle ‘is related to Jack the Ripper serial killer suspect H H Holmes’ who killed victims in Factory of Death hotel

NOTE: Since the Windsors (and Prince Harry) are related to Vlad Tepes (Vlad the Impaler) and Meghan Markle is related to H.H. Holmes, it makes for a macabre combination. Lon

Jeffrey Mudgett will be our guest on 'The Existence of Strange Things' this Friday night

457a5eeebe996eda8f69dc9dae07091c.png

Join us this Friday, May 18, 2018 at 11PM ET/10PM CT as Sean, Lon and Butch speak with A.H. Verge and Jeff Mudgett.

First we speak with A.H. Verge, A.H. talks about his Bigfoot encounter and experiences he has had in his life. His website is www.ahverge.com

Secondly, we speak with Jeff Mudgett. Jeff is the Great-Great Grandson of the serial killer H.H. Holmes. Jeff will be discussing his TV show from last summer 'American Ripper' and his plans for the future. Jeff's website is www.bloodstainsthebook.com
This is sure to be a great evening of "Strange Things".
Listen to the show at 'The Existence of Strange Things' on Radio-Memphis.com

Q: (L) Are any of us able to replicate in this manner if we so desire?

A: Could if in same circumstance. The way the process works is thus: When Jesus left the earth plane, he went into another dimension or density of reality, whereupon all "rules" regarding the awareness of time and space are entirely different from the way they are perceived in your realm. At this point in space time his soul which was/is still in the physical realm, was placed in a state of something akin to suspended animation and a sort of advanced form of unconsciousness. From that point to the present his soul has been replicated from a state of this unconsciousness in order that all who call upon him or need to be with him or need to speak to him can do so on an individual basis. His soul can be replicated ad infinitum--as many times as needed. The replication process produces a state of hyper-consciousness in each and every version of the soul consciousness.11

Session 30 September 1994
Q: (L) Who was Jack the Ripper?

A: Dr. Bates.

Q: (L) Did he commit suicide and is that why the Ripper killings stopped?

A: No.

Q: (L) Did he just stop doing it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Why did he do it?

A: Experiment human organs; he was a mad surgeon.12
 
Last edited:
Hmm... And to make a life-size 'Harry and Meghan' wedding-cake to be cut up and eaten!
Kinda weird Harry's dad (descent of Vlad Dracule) is walking his son's Bride-to-be down the aisle.


Q: (L) Who was Jack the Ripper?

A: Dr. Bates.


Could be American "Dr William Horacio Bates" graduated of 'Columbia University's College of Physicians and Surgeons' in 1885.
This is interesting from Wikipedia:

"Bates appears to have suffered from a strange episode of amnesia (or possibly psychogenic fugue)[original research?], referred to in his obituary,[5] perhaps wrongly as 'a strange form of aphasia'. In 1902 he disappeared, was found, and then disappeared again, only to reappear after his second wife, who searched in vain for him, had died. This episode was said to have given him a particular interest in memory, perhaps influencing the direction of his work."

And he may have been familiar with visiting London prior with Masonic connections:

The Mysterious Disappearance—and Strange Reappearance—of Dr. William Horatio Bates

The C's say 'Dr Bates' was a "mad surgeon" - and Dr William Bates seems to have suffered from severe episodes of amnesia or aphasia which equates to brain damage or a 'madness'.
 
I sorta thought that when the Cs said "Dr. Bates" they were suggesting that Jack the Ripper was a "Norman Bates" type only a medical person, not necessarily that "Bates" was really his name. But geeze, that it really a curious case.
 
Megan seems iffy to me. But like Obama, she's giving a lot of "hope" to black people in the UK. There's something phony about her. And I have the feeling that she doesn't truly have any friend and isn't close to anyone in her family. I never thought I'll ever say this, but Kate seems lile the normal one between the two.
 
I sorta thought that when the Cs said "Dr. Bates" they were suggesting that Jack the Ripper was a "Norman Bates" type only a medical person, not necessarily that "Bates" was really his name. But geeze, that it really a curious case.
I find this quite 'telling' too (Wikipedia):

"Bates did other research. He discovered the astringent and haemostatic properties of the substance produced by the suprarenal gland, and its value in medicine, especially in surgeries. The substance would later be commercialized as adrenaline.[6]"
The Use of Extract of Suprarenal Capsule in the Eye - www.Central-Fixation.com

The discovering and understanding of the effects of producing adrenaline, especially via trauma pain and fear, combined with the nature of the murders - could tie him also.

she's giving a lot of "hope" to black people in the UK. There's something phony about her
'Hope' is overall phony if you really think about it...
 
I agree that Kate is doing pretty well, though she'll never match Diana's natural grace and class. Well at least, she's a good breeder, is well-behaved, totally bland and pretty – this one sure won't make waves. Which is all they ever asked of future royal consorts.

I could be wrong, but I suspect that Meghan Markle will be making waves, globalist waves that is. But we just have to wait and see how this marriage will turn out and if she will disappear in the background. Anyway,The Daily Mail and the new couple have been turning this event into a leftist happening. At least that is my impression.
 
I could be wrong, but I suspect that Meghan Markle will be making waves, globalist waves that is. But we just have to wait and see how this marriage will turn out and if she will disappear in the background. Anyway,The Daily Mail and the new couple have been turning this event into a leftist happening. At least that is my impression.

I get the feeling that as someone who chose to pursue a career in acting Maghan isn't likely to disappear in the background. Pushing her way to the foreground is more likely me thinks. Hollywood is a big player in pushing the agenda for all thing leftist so this is likely to be yet another drama to watch in those crazy times we are living in.
 
I wonder, if the UK taxpayers are aware that they are footing the Bill for around 40 Million for Security? (WHY?)

19.05.2018 - Security Isn't CHEAP: Royal Wedding Cost Tops $42 Million
Security Isn’t Cheap: Royal Wedding Cost Tops $42 Million

The royal wedding was no average affair. In fact, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s wedding cost around $42.8 million.

However, most of that money didn't go toward beautiful flowers, luxurious decorations or a massive cake. Instead, it paid for keeping the happy couple and their guests safe and sound.

According to UK wedding side Bridebook, the cost of security for the royal wedding, including rooftop snipers, undercover police and a counter-UAV system, topped out at around $40.1 million. Other expenses, such as food, flowers and that fabulous dress, tallied some $2.7 million, according to luxury wedding planner Aimee Dunne cited by "CNBC Make It."

While the royal family announced that it paid for the church service, the musicians, the flowers, all those decorations and the sumptuous reception party, the staggering security tab is expected to be picked by UK taxpayers.

The blushing bride — an independent woman of means in her own right — was reported to have footed the bill for the gorgeous $550,000 wedding dress.

The pure white silk wedding gown was designed by renowned British designer Clare Keller of the French fashion house Givenchy, while the spectacular five-meter veil was embroidered with flowers of the Commonwealth and held in place by a diamond bandeau tiara, lent to her by the Queen.

Although the royal wedding will be costly for the UK government, the royal family and Markle, it is also expected to generate money.

According to Brand Finance, a business valuation consultancy, the lavish event is expected to sweep some $1.43 billion into the UK economy through tourism, retail, fashion and merchandising.

On Saturday, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry — exchanging vows and rings at the altar — were declared husband and wife in a top-tier celebration on Saturday, with the fabled Windsor Castle filled with distinguished guests.


20.05.2018 - Anti-Royalists Liken Harry and Meghan to Kardashians Amid Calls to End Monarchy
Anti-Royalists Liken Harry and Meghan to Kardashians Amid Calls to End Monarchy

The head of Republic has drawn parallels between the fuss around the royal wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle and the “Keeping up with the Kardashians” reality TV show.

“They want to use it as a public relation event, and that’s not in no way ok. We have no objection to a happy couple getting married, but it’s the way the royal household do it that we object to. The figures that have been made up from the audience around the world are fantasy figures. Of course there will be plenty of people who watch it on the day, but the same is true of the Kardashians,” Smith told the Mirror.
 
Back
Top Bottom