Keep a low profile from here on

[Ellipse]

In a video the director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League explain they monitor people and work with the FBI. They also train 20,000 officers every year in the US. At least, this now what is public. Apparently it was recorded on January 15, Greenblatt was hosted for an event at the Sinai Temple in Los Angeles.

So number one, we measure and track. Number two, we monitor and disrupt. We have a whole apparatus. I have 40 analysts working full-time, seven days a week, 24 hours a day, monitoring extremists. We monitor them online, social media, messaging apps, video games, cryptocurrency, podcasts, short-form video, Wikipedia, LLMs. We monitor these people and we share the intelligence with the FBI.

You saw last month, you heard about the thing that happened at Wilshire Boulevard Temple. Our analysts investigated what happened. They said they were Korea town for Palestine. This group of people, they weren't. We were able to ascertain they were from a group called the Turtle Island Liberation Front.

Turtle Island is how left-wing activists refer to the United States. They don't call it America, they call it Turtle Island. Like the Iranians call it the Zionist entity, or they wouldn't call by its name. The Turtle Island Liberation Front, we gave them a whole dossier. Who are, what is Turtle Island Liberation Front? What are their ideas, their goals? Who are they? We identified the people who were in the synagogue. This was on Wednesday, December the 10th. On Monday, December the 15th. This is gonna ring a bell. Cash Patel announced they cracked a terror ring where they arrested four people who were playing New Year's Eve bombings. Turtle Island Liberation Front. At least one of the people I know for certain was in the building at Wilshire Boulevard Temple vandalizing it and disrupting the event.

So we're monitoring left-wing radicals like the DSA and the anti-war crazies and the pro-Palestine crazies. We're monitoring right-wing extremists like white supremacists, armed militia groups. We're monitoring political Islamists and Christian nationalists, all of them. And then we train. We're the largest trainer of law enforcement in America, extremism hate. We train 20,000 officers every year.

"WE TRAIN THE POLICE": Greenblatt Reveals ADL's Grip on Law Enforcement

ADL head Jonathan Greenblatt says Americans who criticize Jews & Israel will be monitored by the FBI "We will monitor social media and check your bank accounts" "I have 40 analysts working 24/7, 7 days a week" "We're the largest trainer of law enforcement in America. We train 20,000 officers...

www.bitchute.com

2025-09-27

A: Make it a point to keep a low profile from here on. Things are about to get stranger than you can imagine.

Q: (L) Does that mean on social media?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So, a low profile about... Do we have to stop talking about Israel? Should we?

A: It would be best.

Q: (L) Should we delete our social media accounts which are full of our rants about Israel?

A: Yes

Q: (Chu) Delete our accounts or just the posts?

A: Posts if possible.

Q: (Joe) So the more inflammatory, accusatory, pointed posts referring to specifically Israel and Jewish deep-stater type things?

A: Yes

 

[Alejo]

I find it noteworthy that they have had these types of surveillance systems for decades, checking in on everyone and what they're saying about any given topic. Yet, we're also expected to believe their lies when they say that some even or other caught them completely by surprise.

And use that to justify the preexisting program to spy on people and then publicize it so that people will self censor.

 

[Ravintsara]

Fear guards the grapes, though. If we can't even talk about the inhuman things happening, what is there left to do? I'm confused right now.

 

[Deneb]

Keep a low profile from here on

That's definitely what they would love us to do, shut up and don't talk
There are ways of resisting evil without risking too much, get creative

 

[palestine]

I see the monitoring as a kind of STS "trend", something akin to "it's cool to monitor people"-"look at me I am a baddie". When aligned within the STS world, such things become valued. It encourages people in their feeling that they are "powerful", or that they have influence [over others].

What's for sure is that a person like this, going public about it, builds himself up an hubristic baggage - and such thing is something that requires "payback". Long time ago, I would be proud to be part of "the baddies", and feel inflated by the power that the STS area can provide. I learned that there is no free lunch and that all those things are paid back, later. For me, it took 20 years before the Universe started to ask for a payback, and every single "bad deed" of mine became under scrutiny.

I understand that even those are not well informed about cosmic mechanisms. If they were, they wouldn't act like that.

That person believes "he has what it takes" to come forward, humiliate normal people and brag about whatever dominative power. Honestly, such display of hubris leads nowhere. A foreign country, having seemingly infiltrated the US, and bragging about the power it managed to get via such motion? I mean - Trump must be boiling when seeing the liberties that those people have.

I don't believe that one can act like that for too long.

 

[Puma]

On January 12, 2026, Miami Beach police detectives visited the home of local activist Raquel Pacheco to question her about a Facebook comment she made criticizing Mayor Steven Meiner's stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict, specifically accusing him of calling for the death of all Palestinians.

Pacheco described the visit as an intimidation tactic violating her First Amendment rights.

Miami Beach Police Chief Wayne Jones defended the visit as a precautionary measure amid national concerns over antisemitism and potential threats, stating it was to assess if there was any immediate risk to the mayor or community, not to suppress speech... yeah sure.​

The Miami Beach Police Department (United States) went to a resident's home to intimidate and harass her for an "anti-Semitic" social media post in which she criticized the mayor.

Long live freedom.​

https://twitter.com/x/status/2013604930515308585

​

 

[dredger]

My little testimony about this topic :

Since the session of September where the C's gave this advise, i did the trick/procedure to delete all my posts on X, the lone "social media" i'm actually on. And since then, i never wrote any post nor comment ... maybe one or two likes.

But i regularly read whether a post or a comment of a post for which my first reaction or reflex is this kind of "urge" to answer, and this is almost always provoked by a stupid or provocative comment ...,like a bait, but a few seconds after I recall that I must resist and avoid to answer and so do I.

What i know (or i could say "we know") is that from all the posts one person can write coupled with all the likes given to other posts it's possible to draw one's profile (which will nowadays be done rapidly with AI), and it's in order to avoid such kind of profiling that I refrained to post since now a couple of months.

The only backdraft with this rule is that sometimes some post/news deserve to be supported, and in such cases, I feel a bit like "guilty" (even if it's not exactly the correct term) to remain silent. But it's like that, i prefer to stick to the rule.

On the other hand, i haven't stopped to discuss about important topic with my relatives, this "rule" concerns only X.

 

[Alejo]

The only backdraft with this rule is that sometimes some post/news deserve to be supported, and in such cases, I feel a bit like "guilty" (even if it's not exactly the correct term) to remain silent. But it's like that, i prefer to stick to the rule.

On the other hand, i haven't stopped to discuss about important topic with my relatives, this "rule" concerns only X.

Maybe part of the C's warning was the implied, potential, fact that we've reached a point where not a lot of people, if anyone at all, will be converted by being presented with the truth. And those obsessed with suppression will target voices as they grow desperate, so why draw attention to oneself?

I think those looking for certain information have potentially already found it and already belong to certain groups online. And that is what they're targeting, I don't think there are many would be converts to be awaken any more.

 

[T.C.]

Maybe part of the C's warning was the implied, potential, fact that we've reached a point where not a lot of people, if anyone at all, will be converted by being presented with the truth. And those obsessed with suppression will target voices as they grow desperate, so why draw attention to oneself?

I think those looking for certain information have potentially already found it and already belong to certain groups online. And that is what they're targeting, I don't think there are many would be converts to be awaken any more.

I agree with this but the way I think about it is that those who had the inclination to look for the truth had plenty of time to find it and to end up in whatever camp they need to be in at this point for their lessons. And that the chaos that we’re living through, and which is going to get worse and worse, will do the rest of the teaching for those who, up till this point, weren’t interested.