Krzysztof Jackowski - Polish Clairvoyant

Let them have a war then! But please, if they somehow can keep it on their side of the fence and be really quiet. Where I live (which is Serbia) no one even thinks of war, and I personally cant stand the noise, explosions and all that any more 😁

Kosovo, for example, have huge problems with organized crime. And it will be even bigger when Americans who managed them, hend them out to europeans. So, I expect "cartel" wars in Kosovo, Albania and Macedonia. And even in Western Europe, by the same people.
 
His latest session, as summarized by Grok.
Krzysztof Jackowski, a Polish clairvoyant, discusses a recent announcement by Donald Trump, dated March 3, 2025, about establishing a U.S. national reserve in cryptocurrencies. Jackowski interprets this as a significant and potentially destabilizing move. According to him, Trump’s executive order aims to legalize and integrate cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) into the U.S. financial system, positioning the United States as the global "capital of cryptocurrencies" and revitalizing the industry after what Trump calls "years of attacks" by the Biden administration. Jackowski sees this as part of a broader strategy to "make America great again" financially.

Jackowski predicts that this shift toward cryptocurrencies will lead to a profound global economic crisis. He suggests that the U.S. will use cryptocurrencies to build strategic reserves, creating "financial pillars" that will initially boost assets like Bitcoin, potentially driving their value to new highs. However, he warns that this move will destabilize traditional financial systems, particularly stock markets, by mixing "real, earned value" (e.g., from industrial or economic output) with "speculative, belief-based value" (cryptocurrencies). This confusion of value, he argues, will trigger a massive economic crash, far worse than the 2008 financial crisis, affecting the U.S. and many other countries, including Europe.

He theorizes that the U.S. might intentionally provoke this crisis to reset the global financial order. After the collapse, the U.S. could emerge stronger by introducing a "new dollar" backed by these crypto reserves, maintaining its dominance as the world’s reserve currency.
Jackowski speculates that this could be a calculated ploy to outmaneuver rivals like China, whose assets (e.g., U.S. debt in dollars) might lose value in the crisis, while the U.S. leverages cryptocurrencies to recover quickly and attract global trust.

Jackowski expresses skepticism about cryptocurrencies, calling them an "illusion" akin to the faith-based value of paper money, contrasting them with tangible assets like gold. He questions who controls the algorithms behind these digital assets, hinting at possible involvement by figures like Elon Musk or wealthy American elites. He warns that while cryptocurrencies may experience a "golden era" initially, fueled by Trump’s endorsement, this will be a precursor to chaos, as the U.S. uses them to orchestrate a crisis and then reassert its economic power.
 
Grok agrees that there is some sense to his prediction.
Q: Is this confusion over value a real possibility for causing a financial collapse?

A: Yes, the "confusion of value" that Krzysztof Jackowski describes could theoretically contribute to a financial collapse, though it’s not a certainty—it’s a plausible risk rooted in economic principles and historical precedents. Let me break it down based on what’s known about financial systems, cryptocurrencies, and market dynamics as of March 3, 2025.

Jackowski’s idea hinges on the notion that mixing "real, earned value" (e.g., tangible economic output like goods, services, or company profits) with "speculative, belief-based value" (e.g., cryptocurrencies) could destabilize markets. This isn’t a new concept—economists often point to asset bubbles, where perceived value outpaces fundamentals, as drivers of crashes. For example, the 2008 financial crisis was fueled by overvalued mortgage-backed securities, where belief in their worth exceeded their actual economic grounding. Cryptocurrencies, with their volatile prices driven largely by sentiment, adoption, and speculation rather than intrinsic utility or stable production, could amplify this kind of disconnect if integrated into a national reserve system.

A key mechanism here is confidence—or the lack of it. Financial systems rely heavily on trust. Traditional currencies like the U.S. dollar are fiat, meaning their value comes from collective belief in the government’s stability and economic power, not a physical backing like gold (post-1971 Bretton Woods). Cryptocurrencies, similarly, depend on faith in their algorithms, security, and market acceptance. If the U.S. were to formalize crypto reserves (e.g., Bitcoin or Ethereum) as Jackowski suggests, it might signal a shift away from the dollar’s primacy, confusing investors about what constitutes "value"—is it the old dollar, the new crypto-backed system, or both? This uncertainty could erode confidence in traditional assets like stocks or bonds, which are priced in dollars and tied to measurable economic activity. A sudden rush to cryptocurrencies (or away from them if they falter) could trigger wild market swings.

Historical parallels support this risk. The dot-com bubble in 2000 saw speculative tech stocks soar beyond their earnings potential, only to crash when reality caught up. If crypto reserves inflate digital asset prices—say, Bitcoin jumps from its current range (around $70,000 historically, though it could be higher by 2025) to $200,000 on U.S. backing—without clear economic justification, a correction could follow. If traditional markets (e.g., the S&P 500) get entangled in this hype and then collapse when the bubble bursts, the ripple effects could be catastrophic, especially if leveraged investments amplify losses, as they did in 2008.

Jackowski’s specific scenario—a U.S.-induced crisis—adds another layer. If the U.S. ties its reserves to crypto and then a crash occurs (intentionally or not), weaker economies reliant on dollar-based trade or debt could suffer disproportionately, while the U.S. might recover faster with a "new dollar" tied to digital assets. This resembles how the U.S. weathered past crises better than some peers due to its reserve currency status. However, critics might argue this overestimates U.S. control—cryptocurrencies are decentralized, and a crash could spiral beyond anyone’s ability to manage, hitting the U.S. hard too.

Real-world data backs some of this concern. Bitcoin’s volatility (e.g., dropping 50%+ in months during 2022) shows how fast "belief-based value" can shift. If a major economy like the U.S. stakes its credibility on such assets, a sudden loss of faith—due to hacks, regulatory missteps, or geopolitical pushback (e.g., China rejecting crypto)—could destabilize everything tied to it. Gaps in regulation (still patchy in 2025, based on trends) and the opaque ownership of crypto infrastructure (e.g., mining pools or exchanges) could worsen this "confusion," as Jackowski hints with his Musk reference.

That said, it’s not inevitable. Markets often adapt—crypto’s $2 trillion+ market cap (as of late 2023) suggests growing acceptance, and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) show governments can harness digital finance without chaos. A gradual integration of crypto into reserves might stabilize, not collapse, the system, especially if tied to clear rules. Jackowski’s prediction assumes a worst-case scenario: rapid adoption, unchecked speculation, and deliberate provocation of a crisis. Possible? Yes. Guaranteed? No—economic systems are complex, and human behavior (greed, fear, innovation) can defy even the best forecasts.

In short, a "confusion of value" could spark a financial collapse if it undermines trust and misaligns asset prices with reality, especially with something as volatile as crypto at the core. It’s a real risk, not just clairvoyant speculation, but its likelihood depends on execution, market reactions, and global counter-moves—variables no one can fully predict.
 
Grok agrees that there is some sense to his prediction.
The thing is that stock markets are already pretty much disconnected from the real economy. They keep going up through various types of "money printing" even as the real economy keeps going down.

Though this disconnect between real value and speculative value may become even more extreme with cryptocurrencies. Trump's useless memecoin is actually a good example of where this may be going.
 

Something will happen on the cryptocurrency market that people will start to have serious reservations and fears. It may turn out that cryptocurrency owners will start to withdraw and invest in other values, for example gold. An uninteresting period is beginning when it comes to cryptocurrencies. Those who want to wait out the weak period will see stormy growth because America will start to mess with cryptocurrencies. These corrections and quite deep declines that can still deepen are made to buy cryptocurrencies from those who are afraid. In the future, cryptocurrencies will grow incredibly because of America. A huge crash is being prepared that will shake the stock exchanges. In the United States, something is being prepared that will rebuild taxes and the entire fiscal system. Some news will be announced in America that will talk about stimulating the economy and increasing the labor market and something in the area of taxes. The crash that will come is a planned element of the new world order and politicians will tell us that it will take eight years to get out of it.
 
I was curious about how accurate he has been and checked the first 10 pages of this thread from 2020 to 2022. His track record seems to contain a lot of misses, especially regarding timing.

Major hits

- The only timing prediction he seems to have gotten correctly is that 2019 would be the last normal year

- He saw that Putin was waiting for the right time to demonstrate new missiles (and that they would be empty), about a year before the Oreshniks were used in Ukraine

- That covid would be followed by a major war, though he did not believe that Russia would intervene in Ukraine

Major misses

- He predicted economic collapse for 2021 or 2022. The covid downturn was already largely over by then and no major collapse happened in those years

- Predicted that Russia would not want the Donbass to become a part of Russia when the war already started

- Predicted a major war in the Middle East for 2020

- Predicted large scale protests in Poland for 2022 or 2023 and imminent food shortages

- Did not see the Ukraine war in advance

I don't know, he may be simply off regarding the timing (or the likelyhood) of his predictions. Though as others said, many of us can make many of the same predictions he is making - and without a timeframe some or many of them would be hits eventually.
 
There will be a large organized terrorist attack in Europe and it will be loud in the morning. It may happen in Vienna, Germany, London.
Just to mention. Yesterday afternoon the mainstation in Vienna had to be evacuated due to a bomb warning. Obviously just a warning.
In the evening a delivery van crashed into the "PestsÀule" (a monument that was built for the rescue of that plague) am Graben, in the center of Vienna. Nobody was hurt, the driver seemed to be a totally confused person.
 
The thing is that stock markets are already pretty much disconnected from the real economy.
I don't doubt that. This can be seen clearly at present, where many precious and industrial metals miners are being shorted to oblivion, even though they are responding to growing demand with record revenues. The stock market is driven by narratives.

I was curious about how accurate he has been and checked the first 10 pages of this thread from 2020 to 2022. His track record seems to contain a lot of misses, especially regarding timing.
I believe he should be somewhere in the 60% ballpark, which is a standard I have seen in numerous PSI studies. In my opinion, it is useful to treat him as a kind of sensor and examine what he is saying in comparison to C's and remote viewers with a good track record. If they all signal the same thing, something might really be bleeding through. Currently, this is the case with the economic crisis. Much of the data corroborates between him and FFG remote viewers: there will be a major crisis, it will have something to do with cryptocurrencies, and precious metals will hold value, although metals might not be liquid. FFG saw "market discontinuity" and he tells us about communication blackout. So yeah, don't trust one guy, although I feel that he is genuine.
 

Something very big will still break out in Ukraine. Some countries will oppose what Trump wants to achieve in Ukraine. It will be Great Britain, probably Poland and France. Ukraine will break the truce with Russia. Then these European countries will support Ukraine. If Zelensky does not agree to peace, Ukraine will be heavily attacked and in places that have not been attacked before. And something will happen to Zelensky. If there is no peace, Ukrainians will divide and stand against each other. There will be chaos.

Trump will attack Poland with propaganda. He will attack the Polish government and attack Poland. It will be about Jewish claims against Poland.

Earthquake in Europe. By the first half of summer, there will be an earthquake in Europe with serious consequences. There will be a city in ruins. It could be Italy, it could be the Balkans. There will be such shocks that they will be felt by seismic devices in Poland.

Israel will start violent warfare. Iran will be unyielding and there will definitely be a war there.

A huge energy crisis, I think it's about electricity. The face of this crisis will be such that there will be mass layoffs and companies will close down. This will happen at the beginning of autumn. There will be a lot of unemployed and inflation.

Germany will start talking firmly about either the disintegration of the European Union or leaving the union. The European Union is to fall apart and there will be actions in this direction on the Trump-Putin line. Not the entire Union will fall apart, but Germany will start.

America will give up on post-communist countries in favor of Russia, i.e. Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Romania, Bulgaria. Currently, these are American, Israeli, German influences.

Trump will talk about dissolving NATO, but in such a way that something new will immediately arise.

There will be a revolt in America. Some States will rebel against the country's economic policies.

Colonialism is to return. Russia will colonize a large part of Syria and the US and Israel will colonize Iran.
 
Trump has banned gender diversity and probably all drugs related to it. Where will transgender, trans athletes and trans kids go now? Looks like there will be LGBT+ riots and pogroms.
The revolts could occur between the States. Many of his policies are not popular and the States closer to Canada have expressed their opinions that what he is doing is not fair for either US and Canada alike.
IMO, it would make more sense between the States who refuse to cooperate and deal with their people locally than listening to him, particularly if those policies won't benefit the State overall! And remember that Congress is not always on his side. Even the courts have stopped him on some issues with US AID and the immigrants who are considered US Citizens as they were born in the States.

Also, the Southern States have always been different from the Northern States: two distinct countries united under one name! That rivalry could also be ignited into a very explosive "rebellion" of sort. It has always been brewing underneath the surface. Now it could blow up in his face in a fashion he may not have anticipated.

The Woke agenda is dead and those who refuse to agree are in a very distinct minority. They can't compete in the overall "stage" of the Union. People were afraid of stating their opinions about that in the past, no more since his inauguration!
 

Freemasonry. There are three separate Masonic lodges, three international groups. So that these groups are not too autocratic, there are three that control each other in international decisions. And these Masonic lodges have such nicknames as the Eastern Lodge, the Western Lodge and the Northern Lodge. The Western Lodge is the strongest, the most decisive. In the Western Lodge, it is a custom to invite. Rarely does anyone refuse. It is treated as a privilege. Lodges do not have a strict influence on politicians, but they have a great influence on the media. On creating opinions, trends of opinion, directing opinions and this gives great power. They have power in the media that one day can give birth to a politician and the next day can kill him in the media. This is the greatest power of influence on a politician. There is consent to war.
 

A grand national funeral. A historic courtyard and a grand national funeral.

Trump. A maimed Trump. Trump will be cheated, outplayed, used and outplayed. Trump is rejected by evil. Outplaying Trump will mean the rise of the antichrist. The rise of the power of evil. And the axis of evil will begin to set conditions in the world. Iniquity and evil will be born from the mutilation, humiliation, outplaying of Trump. Then the axis of evil will be born in the world and we will quickly notice it. The world is facing a terrible, great war. If anyone thinks that we are now experiencing fear of war, then compared to the fear that will come, everyone will say that it was no fear at all. In the final analysis, Russia will outplay Trump. America will be rejected by countries that want to lead world politics. Trump is making a big mistake by trusting Russia. From about April we will be heading towards impoverishment in the world and the effect of this impoverishment will be a great crash. From humiliation. betrayal of Trump the axis of evil will begin. The time of the antichrist will begin.
 
If anyone thinks that we are now experiencing fear of war, then compared to the fear that will come, everyone will say that it was no fear at all.
Reminds me of Session 18 September 2021:
(Joe) A year and a half ago, they gave a time frame of about 2 years for some kind of a REAL pandemic or viral outbreak. There's a lot of evidence that the mRNA vaccinations especially are actually suppressing people's immune systems. Is the C's time frame still correct? Those who are weakened would be very vulnerable to a real virus. Are we still on track maybe next spring for that kind of thing?

A: Close enough. Things are soon to get more dramatic. Be glad of the period of relatively controlled mayhem.

Q: (L) In other words, what we've been going through where it seems like we're just waiting, waiting, waiting to see what's gonna happen, we're gonna look back on this as a rest period?!

A: Close
I think the "rest period" has been "extended" until now even though things are getting visibly more chaotic.
 
Last edited:

Russia will now take strange actions towards Ukraine. It will be a cold embrace of Russia. Russia won the war in Ukraine propaganda-wise. And that was its main concern. Russia did not end the war in Ukraine. Trump allowed Russia to win propaganda-wise. Russia will not accept the test of friendship with America and will start playing on Trump. In a sense, belittling him and humiliating him politically. Trump has very zealously betrayed Russia and this will be very disadvantageous for him. Russia has a certain plan and, surprisingly, this plan has been agreed with Trump. If there is a ceasefire in Ukraine, Russia will very quickly enforce that elections are to be held. And these elections will be used in such a way that Ukraine will be divided. There will be turmoil among Ukrainians and two fronts will be created. A lot of displaced people will move to Poland. People will leave their belongings and head towards Poland. If this war is frozen, foreign capital will start to withdraw from Poland quite quickly. This will happen from day to day, very quickly. Just as in Ukraine there will be a division of influence between America and Russia, in Poland there will be a division of influence between Ukraine, America and Israel. The era of colonialism is beginning. Various powers will subordinate countries that are of little importance to themselves. The time has ended when small countries could do as much as great powers.
 
Back
Top Bottom