Landmark Education

Mark7

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Landmark Education is a company that offers unique weekend
courses for the new age spiritual shopper set, (I was one such).
I have done the Landmark Forum and Advanced Course
at the insisting of my girlfriend who was quite obsessed
with this new age/human potential movement - founded by
Warner Erhart who's original version of the forum was called
EST. I haven't got alot out of either of these courses and
thankfully, my girlfriend is losing interest in these programs.
My take on these courses was that they were basically a
waste of time. A hodge-podge of existentialism and pop
psychology that claim such platitudes as "All we are is
a network of coversations", and "Life is empty and meaningless
and its empty and meaningless that its empty and meaningless"
I was wondering if anybody out there has heard of this company/
movement and has any stories or opinions they would like to
share. This is a for-profit company who uses unpaid volunteers
to do alot of the grunt work for the organization. I believe they
do about fifty million dollars in business per year - so somebody
is making alot of money. Some people swear by the program.
I only hope it's just a way for a few greedy people to make
some money from some naive individuals and nothing more
insidious... At least no more so than the Masons. :)
 
I did some research on EST some time ago I'll have a look around and see what I can dig up on my hard drive. There were some pretty weird associations though..... from memory.
 
This guy is an ex-Scientologist and ex-used car salesman apparently. He also has links to Sarfatti and the SRI gang.

http://www.experiencefestival.com/a/Werner_Erhard/id/578895

In California in the 1960s, Erhard engaged in a wide variety of spiritual disciplines including Zen Buddhism. Pressman details some of Erhard's connections with Scientology in this and subsequent periods (Pressman, 1993, pages 25 - 26, 30 - 31 and 125 - 126). Erhard had a revelation while driving on U.S. Highway 101 in Marin County, California in 1971. He started to see the world as perfect the way it is and had the insight that his attempts to change or modify either his physical circumstances or his mental outlook had their basis in a conception of the world (that it should differ from the way it is) that precluded or at least limited one's experiential and creative appreciation of it.

In the 1970s Erhard maintained financial links with Jack Sarfatti and the Physics/Consciousness Research Group.

He also attempted to foster links with Michael Murphy and the Esalen Institute, and allegedly contributed funds to the SRI remote viewing project.

Erhard became an instructor of Mind Dynamics (Pressman, 1993, pages 33 - 34).

Dale Carnegie, Werner Heisenberg, Hanns Lilje, hypnosis (Napoleon Hill, Maxwell Maltz), Human Potential Movement (Maslow & Rogers and Esalen Institute), martial arts, Scientology (L. Ron Hubbard), Subud, Zen (Alan Watts)
 
someone recently invited me to a Landmark Forum introductory night (I didn't go!)

here is an informative video of a disillusioned ex-member/instructor that I found:

http://lgattruth.blogspot.com/
 
I went to 'The Forum' over 20 years ago at the prompting of my boyfriend at the time, who also paid my tuition. There was a lot of pressure afterwards to sign up for another event, which I refused to do. Although a lot of people were very enthusiastic, it was obvious to me that it was just another brainwashing session designed to make unpaid volunteers out of the majority, and some serious bucks for the few at the top. I once read the biography of Werner Erhard, and to be honest, got the impression he was a real con man. Unfortunately, I don't remember the details, but I remember finding it surprising how so many people could admire him on the basis of his 'success story'. Anyway, he's a real hit in California along with the likes of Tony Robbins, who does NLP, and the whole Essalon crowd.

Hi Vinny,

I don't have ADSL. Any chance you'd be willing to summarize what the x-instructor has to say?
 
A belated thank you to all who have posted links and feedback about this subject. Too many people are suckered into organizations like Landmark. From my perspective it seems that a lot of people who become involved with Landmark are disillusioned with traditional religion(s). It's sad that so many who suspect something wrong in church nevertheless fall prey to the false authority of movements like Landmark that promise easy "secret insider" formulas for life's problems and challenges - for a price. The price in terms of money is considerable but nothing compared to the price one pays when one submits one's mind and will to sweet lies.
 
I did the Landmark Forum just over a year ago and still feel very ambivalent about it.

On the up side, I'd say that the people who "got it" (and what they "got" I'm not exactly sure), seemed to become more present, confident and vibrant. They had a real glow about them. During the weekend, a lot of participants made contact with and reformed relationships with people that they maybe hadn't talked to for several years. £350 is a lot to shell out, but most commercial management training course that run over several days cost over £1K, so relatively it seems OK value for money. I really did learn a lot about myself, seeing how I perpetuate patterns of behaviour - for example why I overreact when anyone suggests that my opinion isn't "important". I saw several aspects of why I am the way I am. I spoke to a lot of people coming out the end of the course (a few days later) and didn't hear anyone say they thought they'd wasted their time or money.

Some of the philosophy in the course reminded me of 4th Way precepts - you are a machine, you have no control over your actions, even your positive behaviours are just as conditioned as your negative ones.

On the down side, the sales pressure is intense and extremely irritating. Participants are encouraged to question everything, but are torn to strips if thy actually stand up and criticise. Everyone who gets into it starts speaking "Landmark-cult-speak" which creates something of a barrier when discussing it with anyone who hasn't been on the course, or rejected what they got out of it. In my opinion, the material uses an element of coercion forcing conformity. There is also an element of trying to "break" participants which...well could have unexpected results. I haven't been involved in the "volunteer" side of the business, but that does have an air of exploitation about it.

I took something of a funny turn in the last few hours of the course and was sent home early with my money refunded, but that's another story. I think it was an important life experience for me, but I don't think I'd recommend it personally. On the other hand, I wouldn't try and talk anyone out of going if they wanted to - just suggest that they do the reading about it first, there's a lot of negativity out there on the Web.
 
Rats wouldn't eat the poison if there was not at least some "goodies" added to entice them.
 
Miss Isness said:
Hi Vinny,

I don't have ADSL. Any chance you'd be willing to summarize what the x-instructor has to say?
sorry it took so long for me to get back to you.

anyway, the basic gist is that the Landmark Forum uses a method of breaking people down emotionally and building them up again. Now, the idea of 'rebirth', that one has break down the old before building up the new, IS a useful concept (and is part of 4th way) - BUT it is very different with Landmark: the basis on which they are built up again, is centered around a rather 'pop-psychology' set of ideas, is focussed on the idea that fullfilment can only come via further recruitment ie pyramid selling (successfully so, it seems), there is extreme peer pressure, the system cannot be questioned, and it is about turning everyone basically into models of the instructors, so they all end up coming out of this as 'clones'.

nice, huh?
 
vinny said:
there is extreme peer pressure, the system cannot be questioned, and it is about turning everyone basically into models of the instructors, so they all end up coming out of this as 'clones'.
When I went to the forum for teens a long time ago, "Don't think about what Im saying, think what I'm saying", was a very popular thing the instructors said. Pretty scary since that probably carried over into their school, social and recreational (television/video-game) lives.
 
Someone close to me in my family joined Landmark about a year ago. She called me on her lunch break from the initial seminar and was 'elated by her 'transformation' that she had gone through. While talking to her I remembered hearing about Landmark; it was from this thread. She doesn't talk to me about it anymore although for a period she did try to recruit me in going to a seminar.

I came across the french documentary, "Vogage to the Land of New Gurus" which is mentioned in the blog Vinnie posted. Here's a link to the video and below is the transcript. It's well worth reading or watching.

_http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1243&Itemid=12

_http://www.culthelp.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1281&Itemid=12&limit=1&limitstart=1
Pieces a Conviction

"Voyage to the Land of the New Gurus"

Open on set of Pieces a Conviction

HOST ELISE LUCET

Good evening. Tonight, a special edition of “Incriminating Evidence.” An unprecedented investigation of the secret world of the new merchants of happiness.

In a society that’s losing its bearings, there are more and more of them, coaches promising to improve your performance, live better with others. We are going to dive into the heart of one of those companies. It never opens up to television cameras. Maybe this is what they don’t want you to find out.

CUT TO LANDMARK FORUM LEADER ALAIN ROTH, LEADING SEMINAR

Let the fear enter your body, your breathing, your gut.

NARRATOR

This is a company with surprising methods. 80 people closed up in a big hotel for 3 days, subject to the whims of one man.

CUT TO ALAIN ROTH
(coaching a woman in The Forum)

You’re an asshole.

WOMAN

Yes I’m an asshole, but I love her.

ALAIN ROTH

It’s serious. No, you don’t love her! You love yourself!

NARRATOR

Try to imagine. We made our preparations in utter secrecy. With this miniature camera and high-tech equipment, we got inside this company. It’s called Landmark Education. Started in America, it’s in 26 countries. At least 700,000 people have been seduced by it.

CUT TO ANONYMOUS LANDMARK PARTICIPANT

They made me feel I was valued, exceptional. I would open a four-lane highway in my life.

NARRATOR

But it’s not harmless, at least that’s what French authorities think. Since 1995, Landmark Education has actually been considered a cult.

CUT TO PSYCHIATRIST JEAN-MARIE ABGRALL

These guys aren’t trained, as if tomorrow you set up shop as a psychotherapist. That’s what’s shocking.

NARRATOR

Improving your life, happiness, reconciling with loved ones. Everyone wants that. This company understands that well. But in the voyage through life, no one walks away unscathed.

CUT TO COUPLE SITTING AT DINING TABLE, WIFE:

Anyone could be taken in. Anyone could be taken in by this.

HOST ELISE LUCET

In a few moments, we’ll go inside Landmark Education’s world. Or rather, we’ll infiltrate this organization. The images you’ll see are sometimes shocking, Some of the people you’ll see are mistreated, destabilized. They crack. We’ll talk with our guests: lawyers, experts in brainwashing and cults, but also with men and women like you and me, who once thought Landmark Education could help them feel better. But first, the facts. Here we begin our unique voyage.

FIRST DAY AT LANDMARK

NARRATOR

On a cold morning in December, we were given an appointment in a three-star hotel in Paris. Inside, a company is offering a 3 day personal development workshop in exchange for 395 euros. Disguised as an unemployed man looking for direction, we arrived that morning equipped with hidden cameras. We are immediately directed by several people…wearing name tags bearing their first names, toward a meeting room. The first test on the road to personal development is signing a document that’s referred to here as a contract. Six pages, actually written by Landmark Education, the real organizer behind this big working weekend called The Forum. This is what we can read to you from it.

VOICEOVER, READING EXCERPTS, LANDMARK FORUM CONTRACT

Each client certifies that he/she will take responsibility for any physical or psychological damage or emotional disturbances that may occur during or after The Forum. Each client also agrees that Landmark Education is free and clear of any liability.

NARRATOR

And an even more unsettling question:

VOICEOVER, READING CONTRACT

Have you ever been hospitalized for psychiatric care or mental problems?

NARRATOR

If the answer is yes, the document recommends not taking part in The Forum. Once this matter is taken care of, the workshop can begin. In a room completely cut off from the outside world, over 80 people will spend 72 hours together. The rules are strict: no note-taking, no leaving without permission, and only one meal per day. The staging is exact. Facing the audience is a director’s chair. On this chair is a man. His name is Alain Roth. He calls himself a coach. He’s actually the director of Landmark Education in France. On the first day, he explains the agenda to us, which is called The Forum.

LANDMARK FORUM LEADER ALAIN ROTH

The Landmark Forum is a place, for 3 days, for you to fuck with the course, be unreasonable, do the things that you have never done, and abandon all your reasons and explanations for not doing it. Are you interested to win a game called: “You bust out and nothing’s the same”? Is that possible? It is. And there are things that produce these results: Technology itself. We invented a technology - a conversation that literally revolutionizes what is possible. If you do The Forum as it is meant, there’s a 99.99% chance it will work for you. If you do it your own way, I can’t guarantee it.

NARRATOR

A life transformed in 3 and a half days. A life where everything becomes possible. In these first three hours, Alain Roth never lacks for arguments to lure in his audience. First break. A chance to find people who’ve come here to become coaches in their daily lives.

FORUM PARTICIPANT 1, MAN

What I want is to succeed in selling myself, to say OK, this is what I want to do, this is what I’m doing. A sort of recognition.

NARRATOR

More confidence in yourself?

FORUM PARTICIPANT 1, MAN

Yeah.

FORUM PARTICIPANT 2, MAN

For me it’s about knowing if I make good decisions at the right time. I don’t always feel like I make good decisions.

FORUM PARTICIPANT 1, MAN

It’s funny because I’m also wondering - Is Landmark a cult?

FORUM PARTICPANT 2, MAN

Yes, I asked myself the same question.

FORUM PARTICIPANT 1, MAN

Where are we?

NARRATOR

Among the participants, doubt already exists. The question has already been asked. A chance to continue forming an opinion, because everyone is to return to their seats. Now, they tell us, is when the course really begins. In the first exercise, everyone is asked to take the floor to divulge their personal problems to the audience. Daniele is the first to give it a try. Alain Roth invited her to confide to the attendees. Her troubles: she doesn’t get along well with her daughter.

DANIELE, FORUM PARTICIPANT, AT MICROPHONE

My daughter, right now, when everything could be going well, right now, what I’ve told her applies: “You can’t trust men.” So, she’s with a man who’s no good for her, and I can’t stand him.

ALAIN ROTH

What’s this? She’s going out with a man you’re not in love with?

DANIELE

Well, I control her since, in any case…

ALAIN ROTH

You are right that men…

DANIELE

that men cannot be trusted.

ALAIN ROTH

Exactly.

DANIELE

She’s heard that all her life. She was barely born when it was: “They’re all bastards.” I’ve always made sure to – secretly – to make her believe that men are difficult.

ALAIN ROTH

So you do that subtly. You release the poison slowly.

DANIELE

I realize that she’s totally taken it in…

ALAIN ROTH

You used your daughter to show your point of view. You ruined her life. It must be hard to look in the mirror. That’s the cost, huh? And what’s more, you claim you love her. Are you kidding or what?

DANIELE

I love her. I warned her about it.

ALAIN ROTH

You’re getting your revenge by living through her. You’re an asshole. Yeah.

DANIELE

No, no. She…

ALAIN ROTH

Wait. You have to wake up a little and start to accept how much of an asshole you are. Really. And stop pretending otherwise. What’s controlling your life is a mechanism that’s about destroying your daughter’s happiness to get your revenge on men. And you tell yourself, you tell yourself you love her. It’s a disgrace!

DANIELE

Yes, I’m an asshole. But I love her.

ALAIN ROTH

It’s serious. No, you don’t love her. You love yourself! No, no, no. You are a…

DANIELE

I sacrificed myself for her.

ALAIN ROTH

No, you didn’t sacrifice yourself. You sacrificed her for you!

NARRATOR

This public humiliation has now been going on for 30 minutes. Under the violent words, Daniele cracks.

ALAIN ROTH

You spend your life whining. It’s not a pretty sigh: “Bo, hoo, hoo. I’m not happy.” At the same time, you assassinate everyone. Seriously, there are limits.

DANIELE (crying)

I admit, I admit that I managed to –

ALAIN ROTH

You’re the one who did it!

DANIELE

I admit that I managed to convince her that men are jerks –

ALAIN ROTH

No. To destroy her romantic life!

DANIELE

Yes.

ALAIN ROTH

Bravo! And to make her feel guilty. Bravo! So don’t be indecent and say you love her.

DANIELE

But since I didn’t want her to –

ALAIN ROTH

You claim you want her to be happy. You make it so she’s unhappy. It’s a racket. It’s inauthentic.

DANIELE

But she’s in a relationship and needs to –

ALAIN ROTH

And now you want her to get away from this guy who you got her together with. Or some other guy, or to make it so she isn’t with any others. You have destroyed what is possible in her life. You! And you have the indecency to say you love her.

DANIELE

I admit it. Yes, I admit it. But what do I do about it?

ALAIN ROTH

Stop feeling guilty, to begin with.

NARRATOR

50 minutes later, Daniele is worn out. It doesn’t matter, he pushes even harder.

ALAIN ROTH

Guilt is even more disgusting. You spend your life kicking yourself to make yourself feel better, by letting those you’ve destroyed die off. If you want to do something for her, I don’t know, you could kill yourself. No, that’s not good enough. No, kick yourself. Find something that makes you suffer. Get cancer. Make it last for 29 years, so you suffer and die. That way you’ll feel better about your daughter croaking. So you have to accept it.

NARRATOR

Alain Roth now takes the opportunity to teach everyone a lesson, in his own words.

ALAIN ROTH

We are criminals when we feel threatened. This is called “a racket.” That’s the distinction “racket,” when you feel threatened in your identity. It’s not even a physical threat. No one is dying. You’re rejected, not wanted anymore. You write off all men, and you instill this in your daughter. You use her for revenge. It’s about destroying. It’s not about loving!

(END OF FIRST DAY)

CUT TO SET OF PIECES A CONVICTION

HOST ELISE LUCET

In a few moments, we’ll continue this voyage into the heart of Landmark Education, and witness the rest of it hour by hour. But after this particularly violent scene, we should discuss what happened with out guests: Brigitte Thelier, who attended a Landmark Education workshop, Pierre, who lived through the same experience and wants to remain anonymous, and Jean-Pierre Jougla, a lawyer and a specialist in brainwashing in cults. First, I turn to you, Brigitte and Pierre, because I saw you react very strongly during that clip, as if it still hurts to see these images.

BRIGITTE THELIER, PAST PARTICIPANT, THE FORUM

That’s true, I attended this workshop in ’96. And seeing Alain Roth again in his chair, really, it makes my stomach turn.

ELISE LUCET

It hurts you?

BRIGITTE THELIER

It hurts me a lot.

PIERRE, PAST PARTICIPANT, THE FORUM

It’s very, very difficult to see that again. I’ve seen even worse. But this sets the tone well. They put someone in the hot seat for 50 minutes and destroy them.

ELISE LUCET

You have also see students break down on stage? You mean that this is what really happens in these Forums?

PIERRE

Yes, it’s even a little watered down. It’s worse than that sometimes. That’s about a mother-daughter problem, we see how abusive it is. There’s no reason to make a scene. So, imagine about subjects that are much more painful. There, they can’t take it.

ELISE LUCET

And how was it for you, for the 3 days inside this workshop?

BRIGITTE THELIER

Well, I think I’m like anyone else. I have my share of problems, now and then. But when I saw some people, like in the clip, how they were able to explain their problems in depth, how he was able to say, “How you’ve ruined your life! Do you realize the destruction you’ve created around you? All problems come from you. But, now I’m going to fix it. That’s why I’m here, to fix everything.” I didn’t want to. I found myself with 200 people that I’d never seen before, with a character who knew absolutely nothing about me. And even if deep inside I had problems, I didn’t want to air them there.

ELISE LUCET

Did either of you ever just want to get up and walk out of the room?

PIERRE

No, because at that price you stay until the end.

BRIGITTE THELIER

Maybe so. But you’re also being watched closely. The point is that you just don’t leave the room like that.

ELISE LUCET

So, Jean-Pierre Jougla, you’re a lawyer and also an expert in brainwashing. Could it be said that what happened between Alain Roth and Daniele is brainwashing?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA, COMMENTATOR

First I'd like to go back to your question, "Did you ever want to leave the room?" No. They were simply in a state that made it impossible to leave. From the beginning you saw the brainwashing set in motion, through things that seem harmless. For example, confining people for 3 or 4 days in a room with no windows. No sense of time passing.

ELISE LUCET

No bearings?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

No bearings. And, commitment to a completely objectionable contract.

ELISE LUCET

But a valid one?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

No. If you brought it to court, if would be thrown out immediately. But people there don't know that it's invalid, and so are put in a position of inferiority, passivity.

ELISE LUCET

Is it dangerous to put a person through that in front of 200 people?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

Of course it is. No one would think of playing around with this. Roth using techniques that could be used in behavioral psychology groups, but where people know it's reciprocal.

ELISE LUCET

Meaning “face-to-face”?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

Face-to-face, removed from any public confessions. That's where you get into totalitarian methods.

ELISE LUCET

For breaking down the mind?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

It completely breaks a person down, while preventing most people from realizing it. But brainwashing is just that: it happens without the victim knowing it

ELISE LUCET

In a few moments we will continue our infiltration of Landmark Education, and you will see the surprises that lie ahead. But you are surely wondering where Landmark Education comes from. Who created it? How many students does it have? Is it a cult, as some speakers have wondered? Here are the answers to your questions.

AN UNDER-REPORTED COMPANY

NARRATOR

Landmark Education: To know more about it we did a quick search on the internet. In the Yellow Pages, this company is just a continuing education firm. On its website, this American company, based in San Francisco, provides films that sing its praises. Smiles and applause, the workshops seem to take place in a perfectly good mood.

CLIP FROM PROMOTIONAL VIDEO

“Created in 1991, Landmark Education is one of the global leaders in personal development.”

NARRATOR

The company confirms it is present in 25 countries with more than 475 employees. As of today, Landmark Education has over 700,000 clients around the world. In France, Landmark Education is directed by an HEC [business school] graduate, by this man, Alain Roth. Registered with the Registry of Commerce in 1993, the French subsidiary today occupies offices in the 10th district of Paris.

But as early as 1995, the company’s name appeared in a parliamentary report [Les sectes en France], that listed 172 movements with a cultish nature. Between the river bank suicide and the About-Men Club, is Landmark Education. To establish this list, the Assembly members relied on work conducted by police officers in the General Information Division, where they considered 10 criteria that define a cult. In the investigation notes, there is a question of brainwashing and mind control at Landmark Education.

We contacted the French headquarters by phone, asking to speak with Alain Roth.

ALAIN ROTH

Hello?

REPORTER FROM PIECES A CONVICTION

Mr. Roth?

ALAIN ROTH

Yes, hello.

REPORTER

I’m calling because we are preparing a show –

NARRATOR

At the same moment, the reporter we planted is next to him, in the Landmark Education offices.

REPORTER

- so I wanted to contact you to have a chance to meet with you.

ALAIN ROTH

So, what needs to happen in that case is that you go to our department that deals with the media.

NARRATOR

Impossible to ask Alain Roth the slightest question, he sends us to his superiors in the U.S.

ALAIN ROTH

Listen, you’ll have to speak with them first.

REPORTER

Very well. Thank you.

ALAIN ROTH

You’re welcome.

REPORTER

See you soon.

ALAIN ROTH

Good bye.

ALAIN ROTH (TO STAFF)

OK, well, Yeah, they’re doing a show on cults.

NARRATOR

As soon as the call is over, Alain Roth tells his American superiors about it.

ALAIN ROTH [ENGLISH]

This is Alain Roth. I don’t know if we know each other.

NARRATOR

Negotiations last for a few weeks. In the end, Landmark Education agrees to an interview. But surprise, it will not be with Alain Roth. Instead, the company offers us an interview with this woman, Sophie McLean. Coming from New York for the occasion, here is how she presented the company’s activities to us.

SOPHIE MCLEAN, SPOKESPERSON, LANDMARK FORUM LEADER

It is an international personal development company for which we created this teaching that is known to have a first course called The Forum. 3 days and an evening that examine what it means to be a human being. So, in general, you come and look at your life. You look at your values. You think. It’s a weekend that was designed to examine what a human being is. And it gives extraordinary results in the areas of your life that interest you.

NARRATOR

Landmark Education also wants to point out that its courses are meant for people in good emotional and physical health, as signified in the contract signed by every client.

SOPHIE MCLEAN

People who are not doing well do psychology or psychotherapy. Right? People who are doing well do personal development.

NARRATOR

As for the classification by the French Parliament of Landmark Education as a cult, Sophie McLean disputes it.

SOPHIE MCLEAN

First of all, it’s totally untrue of course, but I will tell you that we learned about it in the newspapers that we were considered a cult. No one did an inquiry. We were not – No one came to observe our seminar.

NARRATOR

According to Sophie McLean, several international experts say the same thing in different studies: that Landmark is not a cult.

SOPHIE MCLEAN

There is this extraordinary person in America, his name is Dr. Raymond Fowler. And we also have someone in Germany, Dr. Nedopil.

NARRATOR

According to her, a French expert also vouches for Landmark Education.

SOPHIE MCLEAN

The expert on cults in France is Jean-Marie Abgrall. We allow you complete freedom, you can take all the notes you want. And then let us know. Make us a report and then tell us – huh? – what you think.

NARRATOR

Jean-Marie Abgrall: A psychiatrist and legal expert, who has, according to Sophie McLean, written a report stating that Landmark Education is not a cult. But Landmark refuses to release this report. To try and learn more, we met with Jean-Marie Abgrall. He says he’s never really taken a stance.

JEAN-MARIE ABGRALL, PSYCHIATRIST, LEGAL EXPERT

It's not true that I said it's not a cult! I neither wrote that it is a cult nor that it's not a cult. I haven't taken a stance.

NARRATOR

According to our information, for his work Jean-Marie Abgrall was paid more than 45,000 euros. He agreed to let us in on the important points of his report. In the report, he says that during a Forum he has not found any element of constraint or allegiance to a charismatic leader. Nevertheless, he confirms that he warned the company about insufficient selection and monitoring of the students at Landmark. He says that such methods could put some participants in danger.

JEAN-MARIE ABGRALL, M.D.

My critique is of techniques that haven't been mastered at all. There is no control of a psychologist. They just put anyone in there, which means that if this guy takes a blow, he leaves alone in a daze, there's no one to take control for him. They don't exchange information - there's no real inspection of the technique. These guys aren't trained, as if tomorrow you set up shop as a psychotherapist. I mean, that's what's shocking

REPORTING
Laurent Richard
Elise Galano
Marc Felix
Jean-Antoine Boyer

BACK TO SET, PIECES A CONVICTION

HOST ELISE LUCET

You have surely gathered by now that we wanted to invite Alain Roth to the set. Despite multiple phone calls and repeated faxes – and I have the latest one here – he refused to come on the set, and of course we’re sorry about that. Let’s go back to Brigitte Thelier and Pierre who are, I remind you, former students of Landmark Education. Since both of you attended your workshops, have you also asked yourself the question: cult or not a cult? – Pierre?

PIERRE

Yes, because that’s what motivated me to register for The Forum. When I first heard about Landmark, I had two close friends who were doing it. And when we got together I asked questions. It was never possible to get the least bit of information. I only heard it’s “what happens”, it’s “what was said”, it’s “extraordinary.” The responses, the vocabulary used was completely incomprehensible. The questions were only a “racket”, a “winning formula”, etc. When you don’t have the keys, you can’t detect it. So when you ask for details, it wasn’t possible. They told me, “Do it! You’ll see how good it is.”

ELISE LUCET

So we’ve heard Pierre. Brigitte, as far as you’re concerned, was it important for you to know whether Landmark Education is a cult?

BRIGITTE THELIER

I would simply answer that, having lived through those three days, my experience tells me it is a cult. It’s a cult because it’s a place where you’re treated like a puppet or marionette. As soon as I’m treated like a puppet – like an object – I’m not myself anymore. It means someone has power over me. And in that case it’s a cult.

ELISE LUCET

On that note, Jean-Pierre Brard, you are deputy mayor of Montreuil. You were vice-president of the investigating committee on cults in the Assembly. As we heard, Landmark Education says that you classified them as a cult, without having investigated it. What’s your response?

JEAN-PIERRE BRARD, DEPUTY MAYOR, MONTREUIL

I say that Ms. McLean must be Pinocchio's little sister and that, little by little as she's talking, her nose must be growing longer. Because, obviously, she's lying.

ELISE LUCET

But precisely what are the criteria that lead you to say it’s a cult?

JEAN-PIERRE BRARD

It's very simple. Clearly, there's a guru who destabilizes people to enslave them, to make them subservient, which has been said by witnesses. You can also see that they make you relinquish critical thought, and break the person down so that they can pick up the pieces. You can also see that there's a network of money. This hasn't been mentioned yet: The ultimate goal is to press its power and clean out the students' wallets. And by using the students, to attempt to earn more. So, there are the criterion of domination, a network of money, subordination and brainwashing. So it's a cult.

ELISE LUCET

But you know, for those watching, it’s far removed from the caricature they have of a cult. It’s not The Mandarom Sect. It’s far from The Order of the Solar Temple. Why?

JEAN-PIERRE BRARD

It’s not that far. You still have a group, you have a pyramid structure. You still have jargon that separates you from your family and society. And you still have the element of money from people that are victims.

ELISE LUCET

Jean-Pierre Jougla?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

What influences public opinion is only the storefront. The cults you cited have a religious pretense, and hide behind that screen. Here, there’s no religious element. But there’s still a doctrine. The basis of Landmark’s doctrine essentially rests on a philosophical concept. It’s the concept of authenticity. “We’re going to teach people to be authentic.”

ELISE LUCET

We’ll see that.

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

So, we’ll get back to it.

ELISE LUCET

Now with these initial explanations, we return to our immersion back at The Forum. Despite what we saw, no one objected. Everyone decided to return. But this time, the session begins with questions that are not necessarily welcomed, as you’ll see.

SECOND DAY AT LANDMARK

NARRATOR

Back to the workshop. Before continuing with the course, Alain Roth makes a proposal. For those who want to leave the workshop, the door is open. For those with questions, they should ask them now.

ALAIN ROTH

So, if you have a question, raise your hand and ask it.

NARRATOR

Up front, a woman voices a criticism.

MURIELLE, WOMAN WITH QUESTION

Yes, I would like to know why there is so much harassment.

NARRATOR

Murielle complains of being harassed by the Landmark staff, of incessant phone calls to get her to register for the workshop.

MURIELLE

When people –

ALAIN ROTH

Wait, wait. Turn on the microphone. Don’t destroy the microphone. Thanks.

MURIELLE

What I wanted to say was –

ALAIN ROTH

Wait a second. Where’s your name tag? Because I don’t want to harass you too much. Thanks. You don’t make a distinction between what’s happening and your interpretation. You confuse the two, as we’ll see: There is no harassment. There is what happens.

MURIELLE

May I say something?

ALAIN ROTH

Wait, wait. You will say what you want, The Forum isn’t “I go to the microphone and I talk.” There’s a leader who leads the discussions and I’m the leader. So, I will give you the floor, but let me create a certain context first. So, “harassment” never happened. That’s an interpretation.

MURIELLE

So, if you tell me “It’s not true,” I don’t see how I can talk to you.

ALAIN ROTH

Yes, but hold on. You didn’t have ten people demanding, “You will enroll, you will enroll.”

MURIELLE

No, I also had someone call to ask me if I had a problem. Another one asked something else.

ALAIN ROTH

Ok!

MURIELLE

But when you get three, maybe four calls in the same week, you’re overwhelmed.

ALAIN ROTH

Ok, but you call that harassment?

MURIELLE

Yes, I call that harassment.

ALAIN ROTH

But is it harassment?

MURIELLE

Well, yes.

ALAIN ROTH

That’s because you interpret it that way. You could interpret it another way.

MURIELLE

How?

ALAIN ROTH

That people are calling to support you, they’re committed to making something happen for you.

NARRATOR

In all, an exchange of 15 minutes. Clearly, it is difficult to make criticisms.

LANDMARK STAFF MEMBER

We’re going to take a 30-minute break. It’s now 4:10 pm. Be back in your chairs, ready to start, at 4:40 pm. Thank you.

NARRATOR

During the break, we head to the hotel bar. We find Murielle, who was complaining about harassment. For her, Alain Roth’s verbal abuse is unacceptable.

MURIELLE

I feel a bit of something. The approach is a bit terrorist.

REPORTER, PIECES A CONVICTION

Why terrorist?

MAN, PARTICIPANT IN THE FORUM

Wait. He’s coming. Suddenly we’re interrupted. Alain Roth comes by in person to convince Murielle not to leave the workshop.

ALAIN ROTH

What’s happening with you, Murielle? You tend to go it alone, instead of looking for people who can support you. It would be good if, before leaving, you spoke, since you’re suffering and worn out because you resist.

NARRATOR

A few minutes later, the operation of seduction is successful. Murielle has changed her mind.

MAN, PARTICIPANT IN THE FORUM

Still alive?

MURIELLE

Yes. No, he’s very nice. I was afraid he wasn’t listening, but he was. He head it. All of it. I felt – not kindness – but I felt something very human.

MAN, PARTICIPANT IN THE FORUM

Lending an ear?

MURIELLE

No. More. Guys in communication are taught to lend an ear. No, I felt something searching on a deeper level.

NARRATOR

It’s 9:30 pm. The day is almost over. But before leaving, there’s one more exercise in store for us. For this one, Alain Roth asks us to close our eyes.

ALAIN ROTH

No one will enter this room, so you don’t have to worry. There are two people sitting next to you. Create an experiment where you fear the two people next to you. Get ready to do this experiment, where you’re terrified, terrified of the two people sitting next to you. Let the fear enter your body, your breathing, your gut, your entire life.

NARRATOR

This introspection is perfectly orchestrated by the coach. No improvisation, everything is written down.

ALAIN ROTH

You are trying to escape. There is no place to go. How to continue to be with yourself, and be present?

NARRATOR

In this row, the man in red is going to crack.

ALAIN ROTH

When you were a little boy or a little girl, you said to yourself, “Never again. I won’t go through that again.”

NARRATOR

With these words, he starts to sob.

ALAIN ROTH

You decided it is better not to feel anything again, so suffer as you have. And your whole life became about making sure you would never suffer again. At that moment, you sentenced yourself to death.

NARRATOR

It’s been more than 48 hours since the workshop began. The students are beginning to feel the physical and emotional fatigue. Years later, those who went through it still remember the experience.

PIERRE, ANONYMOUS FORUM GRADUATE

It was very annoying, very annoying, because we’re cut off from everything. We start at 8 am and finish at 10 pm. There’s a meal break at 5 in the afternoon. We are only allowed to drink, and only at certain times. We have no contact with the outside world, with curtains and only inside lights. So, we don’t know any more. We lose our sense of time.

LAURENT MOURNAIS, FORUM GRADUATE

It’s difficult to get a perspective – impossible. And that’s what I understood. At Landmark, they don’t let you get a perspective.

REPORTER, PIECES A CONVICTION

Critical thinking isn’t possible?

LAURENT MOURNAIS

That’s just it, we don’t have the time to.

PIERRE

At any given moment you defenses are down and, It’s not that you accept it, but you enter into it, If you don’t go along with it, it can’t work.

(END OF SECOND DAY)

SET OF PIECES A CONVICTION

HOST ELISE LUCET

Brigitte Thelier and Pierre, as former students of Landmark Education, You lived through this moment of returning to early childhood fears. What were you feeling at that moment?

BRIGITTE THELIER

I took it as a game of his, a game that makes you very, very scared, But still a game, so, I didn’t want to be a part of this mechanism. I understood that it wasn’t the right place for me.

ELISE LUCET

Already?

BRIGITTE THELIER

Already. So, of course, I did what everyone else was doing. And it’s frightening to see again, as in the clip, people breaking down, crying. It’s emotional abuse. Why, in a personal development workshop, bring out suffering through abuse, bring out fears?

ELISE LUCET

Same for you, Pierre?

PIERRE

I remember the exercise very well, but I didn’t do it. I thought it was stupid. I didn’t get into it at all. I opened my eyes and looked around, and when you open your eyes, it’s appalling. There’s a little bit of giggling and some more or less go along with the game, But some people are completely taken in who break down like that man, absolutely.

ELISE LUCET

So, Christian Lujan, you are a psycho-sociologist and psychoanalyst. Why did Alain Roth bring out these fears from childhood? What’s the purpose?

DR. CHRISTIAN LUJAN, PSYCHOANALYST

He is in a position of total power. And we're in a mechanism that has no place for the subject. Individuals are objects, objects of this total power. Everything is in coded language. Everything is organized, everything is structured. The goal is to destabilize the individual and to negate - and I emphasize this - the notion of the subject. The individual doesn't own his own past. Only they know what's good for him. At any moment, an exercise like this can take away a person's introspection.

ELISE LUCET

So, Jean-Pierre Jougla, you’re an expert in brainwashing. We’re quite struck at the beginning of this clip where Murielle can’t even ask a question. What’s happening there?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

He makes fun of any response of hers. But that’s not the problem. It’s the stranglehold he puts in place. And what frightens me is that in very little time, 3 or 4 days, we’re seeing what takes a cult 2 to 3 years to instill. The cult phenomenon is gaining momentum. And reviving childhood fears is not harmless. It puts the students, at least the ones who go along with the game, in the position of a child. This sets up the strangle hold of the guru. Because there’s an incest-like relationship between an all-powerful father and a child who is not even allowed to doubt, to question, to think critically. The only thing left is to listen.

ELISE LUCET

Let’s return to our voyage into the heart of Landmark Education. The students are beginning their third day of The Forum. Many of them are worn out, awaiting new ordeals. But the tone is going to change radically.

(THIRD DAY AT LANDMARK EDUCATION) 37:17

NARRATOR

Sunday morning, in the north of Paris, the Landmark Education personal development workshop continues, on the third day. At the entrance to the room are two assistants. Their mission: hand out name tags to the participants. For the, volunteering for Landmark changed their lives.

REPORTER

I’ll keep the name tag.

LANDMARK VOLUNTEER ASSISTANT 1, MAN

Oh! Bad boy.

NARRATOR

You’re a volunteer here? For a long time?

VOLUNTEER ASSISTANT 1

No, this is the second time. In any case, the second Forum.

NARRATOR

And really feeling the change?

LANDMARK VOLUNTEER ASSISTANT 2, MAN

My family says I’m completely transformed. In my professional life, they trust me like they didn’t trust me before. For people who live an ordinary life, I’ve become the guy they go to. But I don’t have more technical skill than before.

NARRATOR

Because you got the possibilities you wanted to create?

VOLUNTEER ASSISTANT 2

Yeah, because I confirm, because I take into account what people say, because I’m present for people, present for everyone, for my colleagues as well as my bosses. It’s Landmark that transformed me.

NARRATOR

This man admits that he is heavily recruiting people around him.

VOLUNTEER ASSISTANT 2

My ex-wife and daughter are coming, I have colleagues that are coming, There are people I work with in other associations that are coming, They go nuts. They ask me “How do you do it?” You want to see? Fine. I’ll invite you to a presentation. It’s no mystery.

NARRATOR

Today the workshop takes a new direction. Forgotten are the insults and public humiliations. Today, Alain Roth offers the workshop participants what, according to him, is a different way of life.

ALAIN ROTH

So, how to be authentic? Here’s the bad news: For everyone, without exception, it starts by being authentic through your inauthenticity. That’s how it starts. We enroll people by saying, “I’m a great guy.” Thinking positively by saying, “I’ll talk about myself, and reveal I’m an asshole.”

NARRATOR

To make his point, Alain Roth prompts Jacques, a doctor and father, to call his son to ask his forgiveness. Word for word Jacques rehearses his lesson with Alain Roth.

JACQUES

I’m calling because I’m thinking about you. I was reflecting on the relationship we have and I’m not on a good course with you. What I wanted was for you to make me happy, and I didn’t really think of you. I’d like that to end. Would you help me do that?

ALAIN ROTH

No! And I created the possibility – I created the possibility…

JACQUES

And I created the possibility by calling you, so we can discuss it.

ALAIN ROTH

No. To be -

JACQUES

- to be your father.

ALAIN ROTH

Will he be moved?

JACQUES

Oh yes.

ALAIN ROTH

Not, “Oh yes!” Will he be moved?

JACQUES

I will make sure he is.

NARRATOR

Once these phrases are learned, Alain Roth asks everyone to write to their parents, or call up friends with only one goal: to ask forgiveness. Most of the students do it.

LANDMARK FORUM PARTICIPANT, WOMAN

I just wanted to talk with Mom just for 3 minutes, if she has time.

NARRATOR

Back in the room, Jacques, the father, is relaying to the audience the details of his conversation with his son.

JACQUES

Hey big guy, I’m doing something that’s about you. I talked about you because that was why I came to this Forum. And I noticed something, that I’ve spent my life doing this shit to you to make you into this gem, into an image that flatters who I am. The kid cracks. He cries. And I say, “I propose a solution. Now I will be your father, and be there to help you, and not give you shit all the time. Do you want me as a father like that?” “Oh,” the kid says, “Yes, I’ll take it.” “Good. Listen, we’ll talk. I love you.” He says, “I love you.” I haven’t said that in 25 years.

NARRATOR

There’s general euphoria. Like Jacques, many students are under the spell. The rest of the exercise is instructive. We now have to learn to help others. How? By inviting them to an evening at Landmark Education.

ALAIN ROTH

Ultimately, what creates dignity in being human is to be prepared to make a difference in others’ lives. If you could bring your parents together again, your father and brother the joy of being brothers. And for you and your brother, and for your wife, a taste for life. Nothing would make you happier than that. That takes the courage to say, “It shall be.” Now, there’s a path that takes you there, and it’s called The Forum. It’s necessary, and effective. It lasts 3 and a half days. Does it mean more clients for Landmark Education? Yes. So what?

NARRATOR

It’s almost midnight. Before the workshop ends, surprise! Alain Roth has homework for us to do. With at least three people who haven’t done Landmark Forum, share what is has done for you, and invite them here for your graduation Tuesday night.

(END OF THIRD DAY)

PIERRE, ANONYMOUS LANDMARK FORUM GRADUATE

It was part of our exercises and that’s what we had come for, the exercises. So I spent my evenings on the telephone, at work too. Sure. It wasn’t difficult, since it’s why we were there, part of our exercises.

LAURENT MOURNAIS, FORUM GRADUATE

I wasn’t pushed to invite my parents. It was I who decided to, but they did push us to invite people close to us, with whom we weren’t authentic, and be able to explain ourselves.

(TUESDAY NIGHT)

NARRATOR

Tuesday night. Another big Paris hotel, where the last evening of the Landmark workshop is taking place, which began four days earlier. Jacques, the doctor, is here with an acquaintance who is pretending to be a guest.

GUEST

I’m his mom.

JACQUES

She’s my mom.

REPORTER

How are you?

NARRATOR

He has also heeded Alain Roth’s advice, his mother is with him.

REPORTER

You’re bringing –

LANDMARK PARTICIPANT, MAN

My best friend, a boy who decided to live.

NARRATOR

True to their commitment, each of the participants arrives accompanied by one, two even three people they’ve invited. In all, over 250 people are here this evening. Gathered in a large room, Alain Roth asks the students to approach the microphone to praise Landmark with the aim of getting new guests to sign up.

LANDMARK FORUM PARTICIPANT, WOMAN, AT MICROPHONE

I made the decision and what I’m going through is, Well I really woke up and I feel alive, like never before in my life. Right now, what’s happening is really very strong.

FORUM PARTICIPANT, MAN, AT MICROPHONE

I promise you it’s extraordinary. No? He’s gonna tell me it’s not extraordinary. It’s the choice you make to be responsible for your life.

ALAIN ROTH

It’s the possibility – Yes – It’s the possibility –

FORUM PARTICIPANT, WOMAN, AT MICROPHONE

It’s the possibility to be happy to be alive, whatever the circumstances.

JACQUES, DOCTOR, FORUM PARTICIPANT

Today I went to operate. I operated like never before. In complete simplicity. All was in good form. My assistant didn’t recognize me. So, if you have 5 minutes or 3 days, Don’t hesitate. Do it. Whatever your purpose in life, it’s really worth it.

NARRATOR

After this set of testimonies, each with more praise than the other, each new guest is taken aside. In another room, following a well-oiled ritual, the facilitators attempt to convince them to sign up.

PIERRE, ANONYMOUS FORUM GRADUATE

They had a gathering with presentations, there, I understood nothing. I said, “They’re crazy.” Then the guests are isolated into groups in little rooms, where they’re told how it will change their lives, etc. The rest of the time was nothing but the seduction. I had to sign up at all costs. They put all their energy into it. They made me feel I was valued, exceptional. I would open a four-lane highway in my life.

LAURENT MOURNAIS

They promised exceptional results, the kind that would change your life, without explaining what that means. But still, it’s “You’ll see exceptional results!” That’s what my two friends told me, so I’m still into it. So I think I will see exceptional results. Yea, why not? We’ll see.

NARRATOR

As for the students in The Forum, personal development has only begun. He (Alain Roth) strongly recommends that we continue by signing up for another workshop.

ALAIN ROTH

This will revolutionize your existence, without changing the circumstances in your life. It’s worth every euro, every single euro, and every minute that you spend. And I’m certain that if you knew the kind of results that the Advanced Course produces, everyone would have signed up. The Advanced Course, which your Forum has prepared you for, it’s this one with these dates. It costs 625 euros. But if you sign up tonight or by Friday at 3PM, it costs you only 525 euros.

(END OF TUESDAY NIGHT, END OF THE FORUM)

BACK TO SET OF PIECES A CONVICTION

HOST ELISE LUCET

Jocelyne Berthelot is with us. You also participated in the Landmark Forum. And you still volunteer for the organization today. You have watched this show from the beginning. What do you think about everything that has been said?

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT, FORUM GRADUATE, VOLUNTEER FOR LANDMARK

Well, I’m stupefied. I didn’t – All that I saw, on the television, I didn’t see anything like what I went through. For me it was a wonderful experience. And I’m stupefied.

ELISE LUCET

Your involvement in Landmark Education goes back many years?

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT

I took part in a Forum in December 2002. Then I did 4 seminars with them.

ELISE LUCET

Yes?

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT

And then – Well I’m not really a Landmark volunteer. I only volunteered at a Forum, because – it was a good experience for me, so I wanted to relive it.

ELISE LUCET

So, what did they do for you?

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT

Made me feel more at peace with who I am. People talk about self-confidence. It gave me confidence in myself. I came here right away because I thought I could be part of a debate. Well, I would have been until a while ago. I’m not saying that you’re wrong, simply that I didn’t see it.

ELISE LUCET

Mona Vasquez, you’ve been listening for a few minutes. And I see you were listening intently. Your experience is totally different. You spent several years in Scientology. You entered when you were 20 years old. Are there similarities with what you’ve heard so far? Did you go through this?

MONA VASQUEZ, FORMER SCIENTOLOGIST, AUTHOR

Yes, I was also stupefied, I should say. But not in the same way as her. First I’d like to correct one point: I didn’t “enter” Scientology. Someone lent me a book It didn’t contain the word “Scientology.” A friend lent me this very interesting book, So there wasn’t any question of me getting into a movement –

ELISE LUCET

But you spent 7 years there –

MONA VASQUEZ

7 years I didn't see go by. But it's important to point out that the follower doesn't realize he's in a cult. If he did, he'd run the other way. Once he's put under, bamboozled, hypnotized, you're in a sort of haze, and you don't realize it. The follower is the last to realize it. The family takes action, but not the follower. To answer you, I was glued to the video clips. I was a little uncomfortable because I heard all the terminology from Scientology. There was a whiteboard at the beginning with exactly the same words that Hubbard would use, the founder of Scientology. I worked in Denmark at the parent organization of Europe. So I was at the heart of Scientology. So I know the terminology very well, and all of it's the same. On the other hand, I think they may have diversified. If I may –

ELISE LUCET

That’s why you’re here.

MONA VASQUEZ

I think that cults are very quick. As soon as they sense they are being labeled by the press, or in government reports, they rush to diversify, to take another angle.

ELISE LUCET

We’ve obtained a document, obviously kept secret by Landmark Education, from a presentation of the Landmark Forum that you must have attended, Jocelyne. And it’s pretty shocking, because right from page 1, for example, it says that the introduction doesn’t last more than two minutes. On page 2 it says that you have to write key words on the board. On page 16, it says you have to move the chair to the right. On page 22 you have to move the chair to the left. There are even possible answers from participants so the facilitator knows exactly what to say. Did you realize this, Jocelyne?

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT

Um, I’m absolutely stupefied, again. What you said seems impossible because every person, when he goes to share his experience, will say something different. That means it’s not possible that Alain, for whom I have the utmost respect –

ELISE LUCET

- You call him “Alain?” -

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT

Yes, for me he’s a very great person. That there was a plan, um, for his entire seminar, I totally agree. But he can’t plan what he’s going to say, since he doesn’t know what they’ll say. Everyone is different.

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA, ATTORNEY, VICE PRESIDENT, UNADFI

He doesn’t care at all what the response is. He take’s a word from what you say, and develops it, embellishes it and makes it personal. Since you’re involved in a situation, you don’t notice. You just saw a clip in which they ask each of you to make two or three family members or friends come to The Forum. For Roth, that means getting new followers who are immediately trusting. They are brought by someone close to them, Dad, Mom, sister, brother. You bring people you don’ hesitate about. This makes it even harder when you realize that someone has pulled a fast one on you. You would bear guilt for the fact that you personally brought people into something that you suddenly discover is negative, or even harmful, for personal development. With that, the mechanism of brainwashing is clinched. The circle is complete, and it will be very difficult for the person in it, who has come to love Alain Roth, to see him as a manipulator.

ELISE LUCET

You seem completely shocked.

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT (Crying)

Yes, yes. I almost want to – I want to cry. But I didn’t see any of that. And, for me he’s a great person. What you’re telling me –

ELISE LUCET

I assure you it’s not meant to cause you any problems Jocelyne, honestly.

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT

Well, it has. I’m fine. We have the right to have problems. But I can’t seem to explain how – I feel like – I’m fifty years old, I feel like I don’t even have half a brain.

ELISE LUCET

No, no. You seem OK.

JOCELYNE BERTHELOT

I – I came here to tell you my experience. For me it’s great. What I’m seeing, I’m floored. I’m having a hard time believing you – Very difficult.

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

Absolutely.

ELISE LUCET

I also want to talk to you all about something you hear both in Landmark Education and Scientology: vocabulary that, for people on the outside, is completely incomprehensible. You’ve heard this of course, Jocelyne. Alain Roth says you have a “racket,” you must be “authentic,” you “create a possibility.” Why control vocabulary like that?

JEAN-PIERRE JOUGLA

There are several reasons. I’m sure Mona could add examples from Scientology. Mainly, it lets them say things that only mean something to those who share this knowledge. It’s a feeling of superiority, because when you use these terms, you know very well that people who haven’t been initiated, can’t understand it.

ELISE LUCET

So now, we continue our voyage. As I mentioned, we didn’t stop at filming the Landmark Education Forum. A second inquiry was conducted at their offices, and chance really helped things when our investigator, Laurent Richard, was asked to become a volunteer for Landmark.


(THE INFILTRATION)

NARRATOR

In the 9th district of Paris, a building like any other: the French headquarters of Landmark Education. The Forum finished a week before. Someone called to offer a chance to master the teaching without paying a thing, by becoming a volunteer assistant. Still equipped with a hidden camera, I accept the offer, and continue my voyage to the heart of the company. My first meeting is with the Financial Director of Landmark Education. She’ll be supervising my work at the company’s financial department.

LANDMARK FINANCIAL DIRECTOR, PARIS OFFICE

Would you be interested? For being an assistant, it’s an agreement for 13 weeks, at 3 hours per week. As we discussed, it can be at different times of the week. What there is to do – Well, there’s data entry. It looks like this, in fact. It’s called the “DFC”, or the “Daily Financial Controls.” It’s the receipts for the previous night’s course.

NARRATOR

A real accountant’s job. No contract or salary, no health insurance and nothing to sign. In this apartment, 20 people work full time. Most seem to have the same status: volunteer. They’re everywhere, even in the bathrooms.

[Laurent Richard, reporter for Pieces a Conviction, speaking with a Landmark Education volunteer who is cleaning the bathroom]:

LAURENT RICHARD, REPORTER, PIECES A CONVICTION

You're a volunteer too?

PHILIPPE, VOLUNTEER, LANDMARK EDUCATION

Yes.

LAURENT RICHARD

And this is volunteering?

PHILIPPE, VOLUNTEER

As you can see. So here I am, an assistant. And it's OK. I'm happy to do it because it's why I'm here. I'm here. This needs to be done. So I do it. It's not hard, you can say. –

NARRATOR

I've already met this man, on the third day of the Forum. He was handing out nametags to participants, already as a volunteer.

PHILIPPE, VOLUNTEER

It's a little hot. I'm tired, but otherwise ok. It's true, I don't want to do this all the time. I have other things to do, you know. But stuff like this here, I chose it. I said, "OK, I'll do it." I like a challenge. You know, try to come up with something. And to see what brings me, to see into my life. As it brings me things that are real. Yeah. Really. Given that I can share with people, and when there's a person here at the same time, like a coach, we share things that are happening in our lives, make challenges. In fact, I notice that it has really changed things. And concretely. Because, sometimes you just say, "It's changing."

LAURENT RICHARD

But yeah it really, it changed things?

PHILIPPE, VOLUNTEER

Yes. It really taught me things - a breakthrough. Because you train yourself to live differently from before, you know?

NARRATOR

Suddenly we are interrupted. A man pokes his head in.

PHILIPPE, VOLUNTEER

Yes Antoine?

ANTOINE, SUPERVISOR, ALSO VOLUNTEER

It's sparkling. Bravo!

PHILIPPE, VOLUNTEER

Yes, it's sparkling. I didn't use water, because drying takes forever. With "Mr. Clean" everywhere, I got off as much as I could.

NARRATOR

He's a supervisor; and also a volunteer. In fact, his job is to supervise Philippe's work. Volunteers, assistants, constantly being overseen by other volunteers: another side of the Landmark company.

LAURENT RICHARD

How many assistants are there right now?

FINANCIAL DIRECTOR

Well, I have no idea. I – I don’t know. I know from Guillaume, there are a lot. Maybe 25.

LAURENT RICHARD

25 assistants?

FINANCIAL DIRECTOR

I don’t know. But they told me once. It’s a lot.

NARRATOR

Volunteers working in the headquarters of a commercial company, is it legal? Officers from General Information, in this confidential note about Landmark, were worried about undeclared associates in violation of the Labor Code. The document dates from 1994, so the situation is not new. More recently, the National Assembly report on cults and money emphasized the problem once again, but apparently didn’t change anything. [Les sectes et l’argent].

To make the organization known and help recruit, the methods vary. Today, for example, I’m asked to organize a gathering at home.

MAN, VOLUNTEER, LANDMARK PARIS OFFICE

Do you know about “Introduction to The Forum” at home?

LAURENT RICHARD, REPORTER

Uh, No.

VOLUNTEER, PARIS OFFICE

We have to talk about it. When are you here until?

LAURENT RICHARD

Well, I’m doing a group later, but I’m eating here around 6:00.

VOLUNTEER, PARIS OFFICE

You’re eating at 6:00? So maybe we’ll get a few minutes. Otherwise, another time. It’s something I take care of. It’s the possibility to have an introduction to The Forum at your place.

LAURENT RICHARD

Okay.

VOLUNTEER, PARIS OFFICE

To organize it, invite some friends. A facilitator will come. At the same time, your job is to organize a nice event where you invite 3 or 4 friends, family, parents.

LAURENT RICHARD

But in my apartment?

VOLUNTEER, PARIS OFFICE

In your apartment.

LAURENT RICHARD

And how many of you come to my place?

VOLUNTEER, PARIS OFFICE

No, no. You can decide. It’s just a facilitator who comes.

NARRATOR

Presentation meetings, dialogs with people close to you, phone calls to family, to friends.

VOLUNTEER, PARIS OFFICE

That’s why it’s better to first call, people from your address book.

NARRATOR

To make Landmark known and recruit even more followers, everyone pitches in, the boss as well as the volunteers. After all, that’s their mission when they’re at headquarters. My job as junior accountant doesn’t exempt me.

PLAYS ANSWERING MACHINE, LAURENT RICHARD

FIRST MESSAGE

Laurent. I’m the communicator, and I’m offering you to do a summary of the course for you. So you can get back to me.

SECOND MESSAGE

Hello, I’m calling on behalf of Landmark Education.

NARRATOR

He also asks me to enroll everyone around me. The harassment is ever-present.

THIRD MESSAGE

I’m calling to see if you have people you’ve invited, or people to contact.

NARRATOR

One day, I’m asked to call back for a workshop on perfection. A chance to invest myself more by attending a very strange course, called the ILP.

LANDMARK VOLUNTEER, ON PHONE

I’d like to speak to you about coming to a presentation of ILP.

LAURENT RICHARD

ILP. Remind me, what is it?

LANDMARK VOLUNTEER, ON PHONE

It’s the most remarkable, and the most crazy, program that we have at Landmark Education. It’s training for mastery of the conversation of enrolling and getting sign-ups. It consists of 4 weekends that are in Amsterdam.

LAURENT RICHARD

How long does it last?

LANDMARK VOLUNTEER, ON PHONE

The program? That’s the thing. It lasts 6 months.

LAURENT RICHARD

6 months!

LANDMARK VOLUNTEER, ON PHONE

Yes.

NARRATOR

Six months of unpaid labor for Landmark Education, an offer I’m going to refuse, like all the others.

My infiltration has lasted a month now. Tonight, I have an appointment with a Forum participant, from the weekend when it all began. It’s the doctor, the father who went up in front of everyone to talk about reuniting with his son. The workshop changed his life. That’s why, he tells me, he launched a large recruitment operation.

JACQUES, DOCTOR, FORUM PARTICIPANT

When I left I was ecstatic, ecstatic. But at the same time, since I know I tend to want to impose on others, I said to myself, this time, I won’t be stupid, and say, “You’re going to do it! It’s amazing!” I tried and I managed to do the enrollment. I said to people, “I had an amazing experience. I’d really like you to experience it, I won’t make you do it. I don’t want it because I told you to do it, but for you to be at peace.” Really sharing it does me good.

LAURENT RICHARD

It does you good?

JACQUES

It does others good, too. It’s going to bust out everywhere!

LAURENT RICHARD

Who did you enroll?

JACQUES

My whole family. My wife, my kids, my associate, my assistant.

NARRATOR

But this doctor doesn’t only enroll people close to him. With trust built through common experience, he reveals that he’s been recruiting well beyond his family circle.

LAURENT RICHARD

Your associate is a surgeon?

JACQUES

Yes.

LAURENT RICHARD

Is she signed up for The Forum?

JACQUES

Well, she hasn’t signed up yet, but she’s coming to the presentation.

LAURENT RICHARD

There are a lot of doctors here!

JACQUES

Lots! You saw them. Doctors, nurses, psychiatrists.

LAURENT RICHARD

Why are there so many doctors and nurses?

JACQUES

Because we’re all in the shit. When we’ve tried every possible treatment on a patient, and they’re useless, what do we do? We give up. We do nothing. We don’t care. And it bugs you.

NARRATOR

In a few seconds this doctor admits that he just sent his first patient to Landmark Education.

JACQUES

You share it with the patient. And I can tell you, these guys are great for enrollment.

LAURENT RICHARD

Just like that? A patient you see?

JACQUES

I did it. Just like that.

LAURENT RICHARD

Meaning?

JACQUES

I did it once. I said, I can’t let him miss out on it. It’s too obvious that he needs it. So I told him about it. But I kept him guessing. I told him, “What you need is relaxation, self-confidence.” “Oh yes,” said the patient. “Well, there is something that could interest you.” I don’t know if he did it, I didn’t ask about it. I didn’t take responsibility.

LAURENT RICHARD

Did you want him to do it?

JACQUES

Oh yes. The guy needs it. If he does it, he’ll be transformed.

(END PART ONE)
 
Since Landmark has been known to suppress information it does not like... and has the funds to do so, I think it's worth posting the information from the blog Vinnie mentioned for posterity.

Controversial development training cited in religious discrimination lawsuits
_http://lgattruth.blogspot.com/2008/06/controversial-development-training.html

Friday, May 23, 2008

A controversial development training course called "Landmark Forum" is cited in religious discrimination lawsuits in United States federal courts in New York and Washington, D.C. The seminars are run by a San Francisco, California-based for-profit training company called Landmark Education. The company evolved from Erhard Seminars Training "est", and has faced criticism regarding its techniques and its use of unpaid labor. The sperm bank and surrogacy company Los Angeles-based Growing Generations is named as a defendant in the New York lawsuit, and the Democratic political action committee Twenty-First Century Democrats is a defendant in the Washington, D.C. case.

In separate lawsuits filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan, New York, and in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C., former employees are suing their employers for monetary damages and claiming religious discrimination after their employers allegedly mandated that they attend courses at Landmark Education.

In the US$3 million federal lawsuit filed in New York, Scott Glasgow is suing his former employer Growing Generations and its CEO Stuart Miller. Growing Generations maintains sperm banks and also arranges surrogacy for gay couples who wish to have children. The company has offices in New York and Los Angeles, and has done business with celebrities including actor B. D. Wong of Law & Order: SVU.

Glasgow was marketing director of Growing Generations, and claims he was fired in June 2007 after refusing to continue attending Landmark Education seminars. Glasgow is also suing for sexual harassment, and claims Miller came on to him in September 2006. He made approximately $100,000 per year as the company's marketing director, and was the company's only employee based out of New York City. The company's main offices are in Los Angeles.

"I was shocked when I was fired. It took me months to right myself. I want them to stop imposing Landmark on the employees, and I want an apology," said Glasgow in a statement in The Village Voice. Brent Pelton, one of Glasgow's attorneys, stated that: "The Landmark philosophy is deeply ingrained in the culture of the company". Glasgow said that the Landmark Education training courses were "opposite" to his Christian beliefs. According to Glasgow he was questioned by Miller in May 2007 after he walked out of a Landmark Education course, and was fired shortly thereafter. "We stand by the allegations contained in the complaint and we look forward to proving them at trial," said Pelton in a statement to ABC News.

Ian Wallace, an attorney who represents Growing Generations, claimed that Glasgow wasn't fired but walked away from his position. "Growing Generations and Mr. Miller are very confident that these claims will be dismissed ultimately, and there's no factual basis for them whatsoever," said Wallace in a statement to The Village Voice. Lawyers representing Growing Generations and Stuart Miller declined comment to The New York Post, and did not immediately return a message from ABC News.

In Glasgow's complaint, entered into federal court record on April 18, he asserts that Landmark Education constitutes a "religion", and "perceived their philosophy as a form of religion that contradicted his own personal beliefs". He states that when he was promoted to Director of Marketing, he asked Miller if he could stop attending the Landmark sessions but was told that they were mandatory for all of the company's executives and that Landmark is "very much the language of the company." Glasgow said his performance at the company was assessed based on how he was "touching, moving and inspiring" others, a phrase from the Landmark philosophy, as opposed to his business accomplishments at the company. The complaint claims that the actions of Miller and Growing Generations violated Federal, New York State and New York City civil rights laws.

The lawsuit filed in federal court in Washington, D.C. deals with a separate plaintiff and company, but the plaintiff in the suit also claims that religious discrimination took place for allegedly being mandated to attend Landmark Education courses. Kenneth Goldman is suing the United States Democratic political action committee Twenty-First Century Democrats (also 21st Century Democrats) and its former executive director Kelly Young. Goldman was formerly the communications director of 21st Century Democrats.

According to Goldman's complaint, three employees of 21st Century Democrats were fired after refusing to attend the Landmark Forum course. The complaint asserts that Landmark Education has "religious characteristics and theological implications" which influenced the mission of 21st Century Democrats and the way the organization conducted business. Goldman's complaint states that in addition to himself, a training director and field director were also fired after they made it clear they would not attend the Landmark Forum.

Goldman says executive director Young infused Landmark Education jargon terms into staff meetings such as "create possibilities", "create a new context", and "enroll in possibilities". He also claims that Young "urged" staff members to participate in Landmark Education events outside of the workplace, drove employees to and from Landmark functions, and used funds from 21st Century Democrats to pay for employees to attend those functions. Goldman's complaint asserts that he was discriminated against in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act.

In a statement in The Washington Times, the executive director of 21st Century Democrats, Mark Lotwis, called the lawsuit "frivolous" and said: "we're going to defend our organization's integrity". Landmark Education spokeswoman Deborah Beroset said that the Landmark Forum "is in no way religious in nature and any claim to the contrary is simply absurd," and stated: "While we are not a party to this lawsuit and have no firsthand knowledge of it, we can only assume that we are being used as a legal and political football to further the plaintiff"s own financial interests."

The New York lawsuit was filed April 14, and is still in early filing stages. A conference with the federal court judge in the case has been scheduled for June 17. The Washington, D.C. suit began in November 2007, and entered mediation this past March. As of April 15 the parties in the case were due back to court on July 11 to update the court on the mediation process.

Landmark Education is descended from Erhard Seminars Training, also called "est", which was founded by Werner Erhard. est began in 1971, and Erhard's company Werner Erhard and Associates repackaged the course as "The Forum" in 1985. Associates of Erhard bought the license to his "technology" and incorporated Landmark Education in California in 1991.

This is not the first time employees have sued claiming mandatory attendance at "Forum" workshops violated their civil rights. In a lawsuit filed in December 1988 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, eight employees of DeKalb Farmers Market in Decatur, Georgia sued their employer claiming their religious freedom and civil rights were violated when they were allegedly coerced into attending "Forum" training sessions. "Many of these training programs, particularly at large corporations, claim to be purely psychological, aimed at improving productivity and morale and loyalty. But in fact they are religious," said University of Denver religious studies professor Carl Raschke in a statement to The Wall Street Journal.

The DeKalb Farmers Market employees were represented by lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union. Consulting Technologies Inc., an affiliate of Transformational Technologies Inc., was named as a party in the lawsuit. Transformational Technologies was founded by Werner Erhard, and was not named as a party in the suit. The "Forum" course that the employees claimed they were mandated to attend was developed by Werner Erhard and Associates. Employees said that they were fired or pressured to quit after they objected to the Forum courses.

The workers claimed that the Forum course contradicted with their religious beliefs. The plaintiffs in the suit included adherents of varying religious backgrounds, including Christianity and Hinduism. "The sessions put people into a hibernating state. They ask for total loyalty. It's like brainwashing," said Dong Shik Kim, one of the plaintiffs in the case. The plaintiffs said they lost their jobs after objecting to a "new age quasi-religious cult" which they said was developed by Werner Erhard.

The DeKalb Farmers Market denied the allegations, and an attorney for the company Edward D. Buckley III told The Wall Street Journal that employees were encouraged, not coerced, to attend the training sessions. According to The Wall Street Journal, The Forum said it would not sanction workers being coerced to attend its training sessions.

The parties in the DeKalb Farmers Market religious discrimination case came to a settlement in May 1989, and the case was dismissed with prejudice in June. The terms of the out-of-court settlement were not made public, but the employees' attorney Amy Totenberg told The Wall Street Journal that the case "has made employers come to grips with the legitimate boundaries of employee training".

According to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers must "reasonably accommodate" their employees' religious beliefs unless this creates "undue hardship". In September 1988, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a policy-guidance notice which stated that New Age courses should be handled under Title VII of the Act. According to the Commission, employers must provide "reasonable accommodation" if an employee challenges a training course, unless this causes "undue hardship" for the company.

In October 2006, Landmark Education took legal action against Google, YouTube, the Internet Archive and a website owner in Queensland, Australia in attempts to remove criticism of its products from the Internet. The company sought a subpoena under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in an attempt to discover the identity of an anonymous critic who uploaded a 2004 French documentary of the Landmark Forum to the Internet. "Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous" (Voyage to the Land of the New Gurus) was produced by Pièces à Conviction, a French investigative journalism news program. The Electronic Frontier Foundation represented the anonymous critic and the Internet Archive, and Landmark withdrew its subpoena in November 2006 in exchange for a promise from the anonymous critic not to repost the video.

Landmark Education itself has come under scrutiny for its controversial labor practices. The company has been investigated by the United States Department of Labor in separate investigations originating out of California, Colorado, and Texas. Investigations focused on the heavy reliance of unpaid labor in the company's workforce, which Landmark Education calls "assistants" and deems volunteers.

An investigation by the U.S. Dept. Labor based out of Colorado found that activities performed by Landmark Education's "assistants" include: "office, clerical, telephone solicitation and enrollment, as well as greeting customers, setting up chairs, handling microphones during the seminars and making coffee. Additionally, a number of volunteers actually teach the courses and provide testimonials during and after the courses." The Colorado investigation's 1996 report found that "No records are kept of any hours worked by any employees." According to a 1998 article in Metro Silicon Valley: "In the end the Department of Labor dropped the issue, leaving Landmark trumpeting about its volunteers' choice in the matter." Metro Silicon Valley reported that Landmark Education at the time employed 451 paid staff, and also utilized the services of 7,500 volunteers.

After an investigation into Landmark Education's labor practices by the U.S. Dept. Labor's offices out of California, the company was deemed to have overtime violations. According to the Department of Labor's 2004 report on the investigation, back wages of $187,569.01 were found due to 45 employees. An investigation by the U.S. Dept. Labor in Texas which concluded in 2005 stated: "Minimum wage violation found. Volunteers (Assistants) are not paid any wages for hours worked while performing the major duties of the firm. The assistants set up rooms, call registrants, collect fees, keep stats of classroom data/participants, file, they also are answering phones, training and leading seminars."

The Texas investigation also discovered an overtime violation. Landmark Education agreed to pay back wages for the overtime violation, but did not comply with the overtime violation found by the U.S. Dept. Labor for the "assistants". Landmark Education denied that the "assistants" are employees, though the Department of Labor report concluded: "Interviews reveal that the employees are taking payments, registering clients, billing, training, recruiting, setting up locations, cleaning, and other duties that would have to be performed by staff if the assistants did not perform them."

According to the 2004 investigative report by Pièces à Conviction in the "Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous" program, Landmark Education was investigated by the French government in 1995. In the "Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous" program volunteers were filmed through a hidden camera and shown performing duties for Landmark Education in France including manning phones, recruitment and financial work for the company, and one volunteer was shown cleaning a toilet.

Le Nouvel Observateur reported that after "Voyage au pays des nouveaux gourous" aired in France, labor inspectors investigated Landmark Education's use of unpaid volunteers. According to Le Nouvel Observateur, one month after the labor investigation took place the French branch of the company had disbanded. A former "Introduction Leader" to the Landmark Forum, Lars Bergwik, has recently posted a series of videos to YouTube critical of the company and its practices. Bergwik appeared on a 2004 investigative journalism program on Sweden's Channel 4, Kalla Fakta (Cold Facts). According to Bergwik, after the Kalla Fakta program on Landmark Education aired, "Landmark left Sweden".
Related news

* "Australian Defence Department funds controversial development training". Wikinews, April 3, 2008

Sources

* "Lawsuit Claims Sex Harassment, Cultish Behavior". ABC News, May 23, 2008
* "Sperm bank employee claims harassment". United Press International, May 22, 2008
* Kati Cornell "Bondage Boss Is A Bad Seed: Suit". New York Post, May 22, 2008
* Graham Rayman "Suit Against Sperm-Bank Firm Claims Sexual Harassment and Cult-Like Behavior". Village Voice, May 20, 2008
* Lars Bergwik "Landmark Education Lars Bergwik part 1". YouTube, May 6, 2008
* Jim McElhatton "Democratic PAC faces lawsuit for employee 'religious events'". The Washington Times, November 27, 2007
* David Wachtel (attorney for plaintiff) "Kenneth Goldman v. Twenty-First Century Democrats". United States District Court for the District of Columbia, November 19, 2007
* Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Dept. Labor (Texas) "Compliance Action Report - Landmark Education". United States Department of Labor, June 26, 2007
* Marie Lemonnier "With the gurus wearing neckties: 395 euros for three days". Le Nouvel Observateur, May 19, 2005
* Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Dept. Labor (California) "Narrative Report (FLSA) - Landmark Education". United States Department of Labor, December 8, 2004
* Traci Hukill "The est of Friends: Werner Erhard's protégés and siblings carry the torch for a '90s incarnation of the '70s 'training' that some of us just didn't get". Metro Silicon Valley, July 9, 1998
* Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Dept. Labor (Colorado) "Compliance Action Report - Landmark Education". United States Department of Labor, May 4, 1996
* Margaret Singer "Intruding into the Workplace". Cults in Our Midst, 1995
* "'New Age' Training Suit Against Market Settled Out of Court". The Wall Street Journal, May 31, 1989
* George White (Los Angeles Times) "Employees strike back against 'human potential seminars'". Times Union, March 25, 1989
* Martha Brannigan "Employers' 'New Age' Training Programs Lead to Lawsuits Over Workers' Rights". The Wall Street Journal, January 9, 1989
* Martha Brannigan "Training Course Sparks U.S. Suit By Market Workers". The Wall Street Journal, December 8, 1988
 
Thanks Shane and Vinny for your informative posts. Having the experience and an objective analysis of it, clear in mind is useful to say the least. How often are people suckered into getting high off the feeling that they are contributing to the greater good when they are actually just lining the pockets of the manipulative? We truly are addicts to our own emotions, and need to learn to discern when good feelings do nothing other than keep us enslaved.
 
Oh, does this topic ever bring back memories! I was involved for a few years with another EST spinoff, and much about the "form" of that organization was the same as what I have been reading here. As one of those "volunteers," I have a different view of the issues, from the perspective of my own experiencs.

I put in a great many hours of volunteer time, with no monetary compensation, but I was there to learn things and I did. That was my compensation. It gave me the opportunity to try things that I didn't think I could do, and that probably no one would have hired me to do. Three of the experiences that I remember most are those of receptionist, workshop logistics manager, and telemarketer. While I don't do any of those jobs today, I continue to apply things that I learned while doing them, and that was 25 years ago.

There are, I think, important differences in details between the organization I was involved with and Landmark. Mine was started by a teacher, and operated as a school. The founder had at some point in his life worked with Werner Erhardt and then gone on to do something of his own, borrowing much of the outward form of EST. He did not start with EST, but rather he worked for them for a while later in his life and then moved on. The learning I did there was either with people that had learned from the founder, or with the founder himself.

There are also important differences between students. Two people can have very different experiences within the same organization.

I don't know anything about Landmark beyond what I read. I never felt any attraction to it, or to EST, even though I knew people that belonged (to both EST and later Landmark) and they invited me to try it. But some of the issues raised here might have other sides that are not being explored.
 
TheSpoon said:
I did the Landmark Forum just over a year ago and still feel very ambivalent about it.
On the up side, I'd say that the people who "got it" (and what they "got" I'm not exactly sure)
Ha... Its so funny you mention the words "got it"... I was duped into going into one of their "intro" sessions at their Toronto forum. I was told I was going to a lecture on climate change. From the second I walked into the door, it was like they were expecting me, 10 women smiling like maniacs took me to a small room and began telling me what they "got" out of the landmark forum, and how I could reach new heights if I would only sign up for the forum... I was like Huhhh, what? Climate change? ummm what happened to the lecture???

After quickly figuring out I had been duped, I was curious to find out what the hell it was that they all "got".

I pretended like I was very interested and tried to make some notes and ask questions to see if I could figure out where the heck I had found myself that night. The women seemed very excited with our little pre-screen session and invited me to the main stage area, where there was about 150 people all seated waiting for the speaker. About half of the people in attendance were "forumers" and the other half, as far as I could gather, were family members of forumers or just average run of the mill lost/wounded souls, and of course a few dupes like myself.

The basic platform of the intro session seemed to be as follows:

1. 15-20 minutes of the "head master" going through what I considered to be pretty basic life problem solving skills, however the speeches were laced with repetition, with words like "LANDMARK FORUM", "what you GET". In a 20 minute speech the word "get" along with "Landmark Forum" were used hundreds of times... (pretty old school branding technique but hey it worked, I will never forget the damn name)

2. After the mind numbing Hitler speech. The forum leaders then pair the "newbies" off with some of the leaders, where they can have some one on one time. They then try to find out that one key thing in your life that could use some work (does not matter to them what it is) but once they find it, they exploit it. (It seems like a pcychopathic methodology of identifying people's weakest emotions in order to more aptly gain the emotional upper hand over the person to later exploit for money.)

3. Once they identify your weak spot the seminar then moved into the testimonials where people with similar problems (to yours) talk about what "THEY GOT" and once "THEY GOT IT" how the LANDMARK FORUM changed their lives forever...

4. Next came more one on ones... and then the intense $300 pressure to join.

To me, the whole method behind getting people hooked on the Forum reminded me of an old card trick I used to play with people. The dealer knows where your card is but through a series of card eliminations, the dealer tricks you into choosing your own card. LANDMARK will teach you nothing about your self that you don't already know. Some thoughtful self reflection will save you 300.00 bones.

Oh one other interesting thing that I noted in the intro speech, Landmark claims to have worked with many FORTUNE 500 companies, and the US MILITARY... I nearly spit out my free cup of instant coffee when I heard this

I suspect Donny Rumsfeld may have taken the Landmark Fourm, as they illustrated his famous "known knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns" concept.
 
Back
Top Bottom