https://www.sott.net/article/321391-Lawsuit-filed-against-Californias-mandatory-vaccine-law-SB-277
Lawsuit filed against California's mandatory vaccine law SB 277
The article discusses a lawsuit filed in federal court, in the Southern District of California. There was at least one earlier lawsuit, in California state court. I looked up the status of the California state court case, and not much has happened. I think the lawsuit filed in federal court has a higher likelihood of succeeding, based on the increased sophistication of both the attorneys and nonprofit plaintiffs like the Weston Price Foundation.
California state court case
_http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/casesummary.aspx?
I do not see why the plaintiff's attorney in the state court case would agree to allow the defendant, California, extra time to file a response. I think any extra time puts the kids at a disadvantage because that delays the court from blocking the vaccine law. I think it also looks bad that a nonprofit is giving most of its money to the plaintiff's attorney for the state court case, because critics can argue that the plaintiff's attorney is basically using a controversy and one nonprofit to generate money for himself.
_http://www.revoltrevokerestore.com/faq.html
Lawsuit filed against California's mandatory vaccine law SB 277
The article discusses a lawsuit filed in federal court, in the Southern District of California. There was at least one earlier lawsuit, in California state court. I looked up the status of the California state court case, and not much has happened. I think the lawsuit filed in federal court has a higher likelihood of succeeding, based on the increased sophistication of both the attorneys and nonprofit plaintiffs like the Weston Price Foundation.
California state court case
_http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/ui/casesummary.aspx?
Case Number: BC617766
TAMARA BUCK ET AL VS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filing Date: 04/22/2016
...
Documents Filed (Filing dates listed in descending order)
06/06/2016 Stipulation and Order (to extend time to respond to complaint - granted )
Filed by Attorney for Deft/Respnt
05/09/2016 Summons Filed (for Plaintiffs Tamara Buck et al. )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
04/22/2016 Complaint (for Plaintiffs Tamara Buck et al. )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner
I do not see why the plaintiff's attorney in the state court case would agree to allow the defendant, California, extra time to file a response. I think any extra time puts the kids at a disadvantage because that delays the court from blocking the vaccine law. I think it also looks bad that a nonprofit is giving most of its money to the plaintiff's attorney for the state court case, because critics can argue that the plaintiff's attorney is basically using a controversy and one nonprofit to generate money for himself.
_http://www.revoltrevokerestore.com/faq.html
Where will the funds will go?
Nearly 100% of all funds raised will be used to pay our lawyer. Facebook advertising fees up to $1,000, and small administrative fees such as EVoice, website hosting, etc. may be deducted from the fund.