sitting said:
Buddy said:
obyvatel said:
This is about stumbling or slipping and falling (literally). Falls are common cause of injuries especially among the elderly.
So, a post with helpful info like this is always timely, I'd say. Thanks for sharing.
I'm exceeding my own post limit. But I sincerely hope this illustrates my point about
analytical discipline (effort.)
I did not find it so.
[quote author=sitting]
This
falling issue is critical. My next door neighbor -- lady in her late 60's -- died from a fall. (Rushing to pick up ringing phone.) I know numerous hip replacement victims. It's so widespread that it's scary.
[/quote]
Indeed.
[quote author=sitting]
I believe I know something about falling. Eight years of karate, 18 years of taichi, 45 years on the ice, 45 years on the slopes. Plus close observation of judo (Olympic caliber) and jujitsu. (This may sound like bragging -- but it's a fact.)
[/quote]
ok
[quote author=sitting]
The techniques in the police video are actually dangerous.
It's all from judo. The hard hand slap is for (kinetic) energy dissipation. Great on a judo mat,
bone breaking possibly on any hard surface. For non-believers, just try it. On concrete (sidewalk), or hard wood (home.) And do give it a real good whack!
[/quote]
Maybe. I have tried it on hard tiles and hard wooden floors. I did not give it a "good whack" as it was not the point. The idea as far as I understand it is to meet the ground with the flat palms in such a way that the elbows or the wrist do not hit the ground. Or that is the way I look at it.
[quote author=sitting]
That 95 year old (demonstration) was indeed impressive. But it's all done on a mat (mattress,) or trampoline. It isn't real life. (And I'm in no way downplaying his obvious agility.)
[/quote]
Given that you have such extensive experience in martial arts this comment is quite surprising to me. One practices techniques in a safe environment to prevent injury. One practices so that if ever they need it in real life, they can react automatically based on muscle memory of training.
[quote author=sitting]
Anyone (advanced in age) falling, will face unknown risks. And that brings up the subject of
prevention. A greater
balance awareness can reduce (not eliminate) the chances of falling. That needs to be stressed as well.
[/quote]
Sure. It is better not to lose one's footing and learning to balance better is a very useful skill.
Now coming back to the topic of "analytical discipline", IMO it would include at its outset the context. People without martial arts or some type of gymnastic background are generally not trained or aware of falling properly. So the first step is to bring the topic of falling into awareness.
The next step is to have some instruction which would hopefully help people to think about it in a real way. The skill involves physical movement, not thinking. So a video is useful to see how it can be done. Without any instruction, it is just another piece of information, like so many others vying for the readers' attention. Adding the video does not mean it will have the intended effect but it increases the chances.
Buddy just acknowledged the above two factors and that for some reason provoked a response from you.
Was the police video the best example of falling instruction? I do not think so. I was looking for something which would be suitable for more people and would not involve advanced martial arts training. There could be better ones out there. After Loreta's comments, I could find another one. Others in this thread have contributed by posting some more examples. None of them are perfect. But if it gets a few people who did not think about this topic earlier to pay attention and do something about developing the skill, it would more than serve its purpose.
Now I am not sure but the tone of your post suggested that it was dangerous to post the video on police training. If someone were to use it, they would get hurt in real life. I do not agree. Assuming someone was going to practice the technique from the video, I reiterated two points one of which was explicitly covered in the training video snippet itself and the other was more implicit. They are: start from close to the ground and use a soft surface to prevent possibility of injury. Besides, my thinking was that policemen, for their own good, have motivation to learn this skill as they have far more chance of ending up in the ground unexpectedly and violently than any martial arts practitioner in a dojo. If what they are learning do not work, they would be breaking their own bones left and right and that would lead to a modification in their training routines.
So in case your point was that something "dangerous" was being suggested and others like Buddy were lapping it up without "analytical discipline or effort", it is debatable. BTW, Buddy has martial arts experience and if my memory serves me right, some emergency/police service experience as well. The point is he may be in a position to know something practical about this topic as well.
If you know this topic well, share your input skillfully so that others can potentially benefit in a practical way.