Making money with electronics

[monotonic]

Hello Network.

I am just out of high school. Electronics is my hobby and despite having no formal education, I know enough to do design some analog circuits, for instance amplifiers and perhaps radio equipment, and control systems. Perhaps more useful, I can fix household appliances. I found a very nice audio amp in the garbage once and fixed it and I use it now. I may be able to work on alternate energy type electronics, or developing EMI suppression or appliances that don't cause EMI. I am thinking about designing a DC ballast for fluorescent lights that won't flicker and will cause little EMI, if any.

I was wondering if the network knows of anyways I could help support my family with my hobby. What use am I with my current skills to everyday people?

I have also thought about using my skills to help with scientific experiments the network may conduct. However I don't see a demand for this.

I could offer services on the network, but due to my lack of experience I don't want to put myself in a position to be depended on except for mundane things.

 

[StrangeCaptain]

I have a buddy who knows less about electronics than you who gets odd jobs installing security alarms and security cameras for independent businesses. He got his first job because a friend with a medium-level job at a health food store recommended him. So if you are working out of the garage so to speak, then you need to put the word out to your friends what you can do. Shake the apple tree a little and see what falls out... But do so in a social way... Not like "Hey folks! Recommend me to your bosses!" but more like "Yeah... I have been thinking about going into business for myself installing alarms and cameras..."

 

[monotonic]

One possibility is, I understand the electronics involved in alternative health devices such a colloidal silver generators (usually as simple as 9V batteries though) and skin zapping devices which apply electrical pulses to the skin. I also understand some of the stuff involved in EEG, though I would need to do research.

Actually, none of my local friends have jobs or influence... And before I have a job I need a car, and so on... So I'm pretty much looking for something I can do for folks around the block or over the internet.

 

[Ellipse]

Is your goal to live from the money earned from this?

 

[monotonic]

No, I don't know enough for that. But I'm thinking of getting the ball rolling.

 

[Ellipse]

It's fine because owning his own life from electronic at home is certainly wishful thinking today.

I see several fields of interest :
- Research in/selling zapping devices as you already mentioned it. I would suggest to first, check the legislation of your country about it, calculate your cost and see if you can be competitive with other providers on the net, buy a domain name, mount a web page to sell it and see if you have orders before building devices.
- Amateur radio. For me, this is related to this subject: https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,25004.0.html So you can give advices to the forum.

As you talk about amplifiers, this can be related to the field of Rifle machines but it's a dangerous domain to be examined only from a good distance.

 

[monotonic]

Do you mean Rife machines? That would be interesting, but I would need to go into that along with someone with medical knowledge so I would know what I was doing.

I could in fact make kirlian photography machines, but whether these are genuinely useful is hard to say.

 

[paralleloscope]

Perhaps you don't need to know the medicine at the deepest level to start out, but can learn as you go in that department also, making your job even more fun.

See fx Hulda Clarks miscellaneous devices:
_http://www.drclark.net/en/products_devices/devices.php
Maybe also check 'Positive Offset's' zapper sold as DIY shoebox build (sold as seperate parts also) and a more expensive assembled one in custom case- a good site to get real about the economy in a venture like this, OSIT.
_http://www.clarkzapper.net/

I could in fact make kirlian photography machines, but whether these are genuinely useful is hard to say.

Laura implented one in her (and our) learning experience (plays a part in Cass sessions) and the photographer sure got her money back. Maybe leave the usefulness up to the user, if it's a safe technology and there's demand. I don't know how these work but I'd get one if it were possible to make a strap on device for a generic HD cam.

 

[Ellipse]

Do you mean Rife machines? That would be interesting, but I would need to go into that along with someone with medical knowledge so I would know what I was doing.

Yes and yes, so you would be shielded from the dangerous legal part . Pay attention to opportunities.
Nevertheless you can start compiling data for yourself and so the forum. Once I saw an article about making a rife machine from a classic audio amplifier. Perhaps you can do some measurements and cross check data.

I could in fact make kirlian photography machines, but whether these are genuinely useful is hard to say.

I perfectly agree. Time is certainly running short so we have to concentrate ourself on what is important.

Perhaps you don't need to know the medicine at the deepest level to start out, but can learn as you go in that department also, making your job even more fun.

See fx Hulda Clarks miscellaneous devices:
_http://www.drclark.net/en/products_devices/devices.php
Maybe also check 'Positive Offset's' zapper sold as DIY shoebox build (sold as seperate parts also) and a more expensive assembled one in custom case- a good site to get real about the economy in a venture like this, OSIT.
_http://www.clarkzapper.net/

Yes, the Syncrometer principle seem to be a good way to start as it do no imply a curative process and certainly involve amplifiers. If there's really something being this technology, the goal would be to make a modern one with a smartphone for the display. As some digital electronic would be involved here you would have to up your knowledge but I can help for the software. A future hit?

 

[monotonic]

I would be weary about taking info about rife machines for granted now that it has been so long and so many opportunities for misunderstandings. I like the idea though.

For a rife machine, if the signal is not a pure sine wave there will be harmonics with potential of harming friendly cells.

To test the Rife technology, I would want to have a powerful microscope so I can view cells as they are shaken apart by the resonance. Anything less is a gamble I think.

Also, I don't think it will be more effective than changing lifestyle. Perhaps it will be effective for those who can't or don't want to change their diet. I wonder if it could treat Morgellons?

It would be bad to accidentally destroy taste buds or lung cilia, rather than the intended virus...

Good news is however, I think I have the skill to do this, if I could access the medical equipment along with someone with medical skill.

It is the same with the Synchrometer. I understand the principle, but I would want to verify it.

 

[monotonic]

I just did a frequency sweep test using an anti-static wrist strap and holding a wire to see if the resistance of my skin (wrist to fingers) had any interesting frequency dependence. I did not see anything interesting, except a seeming decrease in resistance above 2Khz, and a very slight headache (I usually don't get headaches). This makes sense as I read once that our nerves don't respond well to frequencies above 2KHz. This would seem to indicate that our nerve's normal response to electrical stimulation is to actively resist. This makes sense as this decreases the amount of power dissipated through tissues and seems to be a protective action. However it also provides an opportunity to manipulate the nervous system. This was a very crude test. There was too much interference to distinguish the waveform at very low frequencies so I was not able to tell if there were any interesting effects.

If the high resistance at LF is a result of nerve response, I can say that 60Hz mains interference is not a laughing matter.

 

[broken.english]

For a rife machine, if the signal is not a pure sine wave there will be harmonics with potential of harming friendly cells.


It would be bad to accidentally destroy taste buds or lung cilia, rather than the intended virus...

Rife machines are not known to do such harm and they have been in use since the 1930's.
I have one myself and my test runs with various frequencies(square waves with harmonics) amount to approx. 200 hours. I am still in one piece and it never caused me any problems. The problem is rather to find the right frequencies for a specific pathogen. Also the device used should have a suitable output. Some time ago I hit the jackpot with a very bad cold, which disappeared within hours. It was sheer luck and some intuition.

It is an interesting field of research and I would encourage you to continue, if you like the subject. For serious testing you could use bacteria cultures.

 

[monotonic]

What kind is yours? What are the controls? Apparently there were spin-offs and stuff.

It would certainly be neat to experiment. Square waves have odd-numbered harmonics. Saw waves contain all harmonics. I wonder if there is an important distinction here?

There is the possibility of making electronic jewlry that gives off this type of energy. A Rife necklace?

In any case all this will require lots of R and D before it is economically viable.

 

[Ellipse]

I agree both about the debunk work which have to be done and the fact that it's a lot of work but, at first, you can eventually build and sell devices based on plans already existing.
The trap, which I felt myself regularly, is to try to have the perfect product from the start.

Anyway, there's another trap before this one: to forget to see first if you can have customers and then how you can bill them.

 

[SeekinTruth]

To my understanding, Rife cataloged very many microorganisms' inherent frequencies, and selectively destroyed them with the selected electromagnetic frequency (with his apparatus) while watching it occur with his improved high power microscope. I'm not sure if his research notes still survive including the frequencies of different organisms.

Also when I first read about Rife, in the book The Rife Report: The Cancer Cure That Worked, over twenty years ago, the author gave the background of the true science of microorganisms developed in the 19th century by Antoine Bechamp and his colleagues who developed the pleomorphism theory of microbes which posits that all types of microorganisms (e.g. rod shaped bacteria, spiral bacteria, viruses, fungi, etc.) have the ability to change/mutate into any other types of microorganisms depending on the conditions of the environment/medium in which they live - including beneficial microbes becoming pathogenic (oversimplified just to put it in a nut shell). There's more info in the thread Debunking Pasteur, the Stalin of medicine about pleomorphism theory of microbes (and also a bit about Rife that I posted).

Also it might be worth looking into the Positive Offset/Square Wave "Zapper" developed by Hulda Clark and associates which doesn't selectively "zap" organisms according to their individual frequencies, but instead kills all lower life forms that the zapper current reaches/which are not shielded (it's supposed to affect a very broad range spectrum that is still very far from frequencies of higher animals). And Hulda Clark's books also have tables of many organisms' frequencies (ranges) but I think they are much less comprehensive than what Rife was supposed to have made records of. So these frequency tables would be very useful in your further research into these technologies, including the Synchrometer developed by Clark. The Synchrometer also can be used to detect toxins and in specific tissue types in the body, besides pathogenic microbes, by utilizing frequency resonance (to indicate the presence of toxins/pathogenic microbes and in particular tissue types if that parameter is included), by the way.