Making money with electronics

If the synchrometer is built with this schematic, I doubt that it operates the way it is claimed.

http://www.zapperwise.com/e_schema_syncrometer.html

The frequency of this circuit will likely depend more on skin resistance than any kind of resonant effect. Furthermore, what is resonating? This circuit oscillates in the audio range, yet the viruses in question are said to resonate in the hundreds of KHz range. So even if we could detect the resonance electrically, we wouldn't be able to hear it. An audio square wave could produce harmonics at the frequencies in question, but because they are harmonics they would be very weak. It would be much more effective, with less potential for unintended side-effects, just to make a sine wave oscillator and AC voltmeter and be done with it (this would be much less subjective than an audio tone).

If the Clark technology works, it probably does not work as advertized.

Also it might be worth looking into the Positive Offset/Square Wave "Zapper" developed by Hulda Clark and associates which doesn't selectively "zap" organisms according to their individual frequencies, but instead kills all lower life forms that the zapper current reaches/which are not shielded (it's supposed to affect a very broad range spectrum that is still very far from frequencies of higher animals). And Hulda Clark's books also have tables of many organisms' frequencies (ranges) but I think they are much less comprehensive than what Rife was supposed to have made records of. So these frequency tables would be very useful in your further research into these technologies, including the Synchrometer developed by Clark. The Synchrometer also can be used to detect toxins and in specific tissue types in the body, besides pathogenic microbes, by utilizing frequency resonance (to indicate the presence of toxins/pathogenic microbes and in particular tissue types if that parameter is included), by the way.
Click to expand...

This all sounds very dubious to me. What makes our tissue shielded and microbes not? Rife needed to selectively target the pathogens with lab equipment; now with just a few transistors we can sweep them all up and destroy them just like that without danger to healthy cells?

One page I read said that Rife only used audio frequencies because he needed to mix them with the main RF signal to create sidebands, and this was later misinterpreted to create inferior products operating in the audio range. For instance a 100KHz signal, mixed through a nonlinear filter with a 1KHz tone, would produce 99KHz and 101KHz signals along with the first two signals. This makes more sense.

I understand I don't need to make the "best" product right away, just test the market to see what people are looking for, and go from there.
 
As far as I know, Clark's zapper was discovered by accident. She used to use a frequency generator - run on AC power - and go through each organism's selected frequency range individually. Then her son made a more "portable" frequency generator that ran on DC battery power and she noticed that when she used it, not only the selected frequency organisms were killed, but also others that she was going to target next. They hypothesized that it was due to the DC.

And as far as the Syncrometer, the schematic in the link looks very similar to the one in Clark's book The Cure for All Diseases, but not exactly the same. She claimed that if you match, very precisely, the capacitance and inductance properties of an external circuit so that its resonant frequency is the same as the emitted frequency coming from somewhere else, the circuit will oscillate, meaning there will be positive feedback in the amplifier circuit, heard like a PA system's feedback squeal.

She also claimed that the phenomenon could also be produced by an old-fashioned Dermatron, a device which measures body resistance - as opposed to skin resistance which is what lie detectors measure - and was invented decades earlier than her experiments in the late 80's. Using musical notes, Clark claimed that a NO (negative result - no resonance/match) would give the following sequence of notes in both the first and second probes: F-C-B-C#, whereas a YES (positive result - resonance/match) would give the following sequence in the second probe: F-D (must stop probe quickly because resonance is heard). She says you are not merely comparing pitch in the two probes, but that during resonance, a higher pitch is reached faster (it seems to want to go "infinitely high" and there's a small "extra hum" at the high end of the probe).

I've never used a Syncrometer myself because it seems like you have to practice/train with the tests she gives for several months before you become proficient in how to probe properly and properly hear the feedback oscillation/resonance, etc.

monotonic said:
If the synchrometer is built with this schematic, I doubt that it operates the way it is claimed.

http://www.zapperwise.com/e_schema_syncrometer.html

The frequency of this circuit will likely depend more on skin resistance than any kind of resonant effect. Furthermore, what is resonating? This circuit oscillates in the audio range, yet the viruses in question are said to resonate in the hundreds of KHz range. So even if we could detect the resonance electrically, we wouldn't be able to hear it. An audio square wave could produce harmonics at the frequencies in question, but because they are harmonics they would be very weak. It would be much more effective, with less potential for unintended side-effects, just to make a sine wave oscillator and AC voltmeter and be done with it (this would be much less subjective than an audio tone).

If the Clark technology works, it probably does not work as advertized.
Click to expand...

If you can make a more effective device, all the better. You just have to design a bunch of tests for accuracy/consistency, I guess, and you'd be set to go.

This all sounds very dubious to me. What makes our tissue shielded and microbes not? Rife needed to selectively target the pathogens with lab equipment; now with just a few transistors we can sweep them all up and destroy them just like that without danger to healthy cells?

One page I read said that Rife only used audio frequencies because he needed to mix them with the main RF signal to create sidebands, and this was later misinterpreted to create inferior products operating in the audio range. For instance a 100KHz signal, mixed through a nonlinear filter with a 1KHz tone, would produce 99KHz and 101KHz signals along with the first two signals. This makes more sense.

I understand I don't need to make the "best" product right away, just test the market to see what people are looking for, and go from there.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure, but as I said above, Clark hypothesized that the reason the zapper works as it does is probably because of DC battery power. I've also read from other sources who make and sell these 9 volt battery zappers that they are Positive Offset/Square Wave Generators that have an output in the range of 30 kHz. I don't know how it actually works (I've also read claims that it is because of the Positive Offset/Square Wave aspect), but it does work in some circumstances and not in others. Clark herself claimed that certain stages of parasites that are cysts/encysted are shielded and not killed by the zapper, as well as, certain viral infections and also organisms in the intestines, eyeballs, and testicles are not killed. But I've known many instances where someone had a fever, and within an hour or two of zapping, they had no fever.

There's a bunch of semi-technical things in Clark's writings about how she made her discoveries and the theories of how her electronic devices work (including some of the issues you've raised, e.g. the far different frequency ranges re the Synchrometer, the principles of high frequency energy as opposed to high energy frequency, etc.), if you're interested, you might want to have a look at her books/explanations.

One more thing that you may already know related to shielding, you're supposed to zap 7 minutes, wait 20 to 30 minutes, zap again for 7 minutes, wait 20 to 30 minutes, and zap a final 7 minutes. This she claims is because parasitic/pathogenic organisms tend to carry an entourage of their own parasites - e.g. bacteria could be infected by viruses, different worms by bacteria, etc. When the larger organism is killed it spews the infection/parasites into your system and therefore must be mopped up with the next 7 minute zap.
 
What if the zapper acts sort of like smoking, to stimulate nervous system response? The synchrometer instructions warn of inflammation around probe points. An aggressive signal like a square wave would serve to cause this, not just at the probe point, but at at any point affected by the signal.

If so this is a fundamentally different approach than Rife. Rife's idea was to bypass the body's defenses entirely and target the viruses.

There is no question the synchrometer will oscillate, and this oscillation can only be caused by feedback, but I doubt it oscillates in response to resonance (of course it will respond to carefully designed resonators, but they will have radically different properties than skin). More likely the oscillation will be caused by the time constant developed by the resistance of the object probed and the capacitors included in the object. Therefore as the resistance decreases, when pressing harder into the skin, the time constant will decrease, causing a higher pitched tone.

Actually, I watched a few videos of the synchrometer, with Clark herself. I will say that does not sound like resonance at all. If the device has any merit, it is that it acts like a subconscious tool like a dowsing rod, pendulum or ouija board, except the dynamic is the strength with which the probe is pressed into the object. Or in the worst case, the technician is a psychopath taking advantage of the ease with which you can create a false positive.

The whole Clark business has red flags all over, not just in the circuits or science. I would not waste my time with it, even if the devices are somewhat effective. I would look for accurate information on Rife machines and go from there.
 
monotonic said:
What kind is yours? What are the controls? Apparently there were spin-offs and stuff.

It would certainly be neat to experiment. Square waves have odd-numbered harmonics. Saw waves contain all harmonics. I wonder if there is an important distinction here?

There is the possibility of making electronic jewlry that gives off this type of energy. A Rife necklace?

In any case all this will require lots of R and D before it is economically viable.
Click to expand...

Of Rife's original devices very few are left. What is called a Rife machine today is a combination of a frequency generator with an applicator, which can be hand held electrodes, magnetic coils or plasma light devices with various noble gases.

What I have is a digital frequency generator(square waves only) with three channels(3,9/3,9/50 MHz), which allows to run a carrier frequency. This generator drives a plasma lamp unit with four tubes(different gases) and 10 MHz capability. As for controls, the generator allows a multitude of settings such as offset, duty cycle, dwell time, sweep a.s.o.

Rife allegedly believed that some pathogens need very high frequencies, above 40 MHz. This is probably why he always used a carrier frequency. If actually high frequencies are needed, it is necessary to create harmonics, which is possible by using square waves. Saw waves have even more harmonics. The problem is that few generators can do this and only in the lower frequency ranges.

I would not expect much effect from electronic jewelry. I cannot imagine that their whatsoever output would be strong enough to penetrate the body. And then, what would be the frequency?

What would make more sense to me is to build a driver for a plasma lamp, which delivers an EM field of sufficient strength and can be coupled with a frequency generator. This seems to be a shortcoming of some devices and some researchers at the Rifeforum are playing around with this. More details on this including circuit plans for drivers can be found in the mentioned forum, but one has to register to have access.
 
A capable RF designer could create oscillators to reach frequencies higher than 40MHz; it is not hard with modern devices. What power levels are necessary? I think it is better to manually create the frequency needed rather than relying on harmonics. For me to do this would require some sort of spectrum analyzer however, and I cannot obtain one currently.
 
Necessary power levels for plasma lamps can vary quite some but it is realistic to have something around 150-200 Watts. Some lamps may need more.

If you should decide to have a look into the Rifeforum(.com) there is an interesting thread on the subject titled "Simple phanotron driver".

When using high frequencies one thing is very important: whatever applicator is used, plasma lamps or else, it should be taken care that the signal from the generator is not distorted by the applicator. Further, in case of using plasma lamps, the EM field seems to be of greater importance than the emitted light. Therefore it makes sense to measure the strength of this field and its extension. After all it must penetrate the body. Otherwise it is useless.
 
Using a plasma lamp as an RF transmitter antenna is about the worst idea I can think of. Unless of course the intent is to produce a large electrostatic field and as little magnetic field as possible. The paradigm seems to be high-voltage low-current but I wonder why. In any case using a step-up transformer will defeat this, because the high currents in the primary will cause the magnetic field. Thus a plasma bulb seems to be a big waste of energy, if essentially the same result is produced, and the light given off is not important. Perhaps it is the inordinate amount of power required to drive such a bulb and the resulting magnetic fields that are what makes it work? I just read that the bulb is used for it's ultrasonic emissions. A modulated DC arc through air would probably be more effective. If the bulb is stimulated using AC, then the sound and light frequencies will be twice as high as the driving frequency. I found these:

http://w5jgv.com/downloads/fm2.pdf

http://www.dfe.net/images/DF_EMEM/Sch-EMEM-DFE-1-ChassisWiring-cw.jpg

I hope this is not like MMS, where the philosophy seems to be to drink poison to kill the pathogens, since the body can heal and the pathogens cannot.
 
At least the two circuit plans you found are from well known persons in the Rife community, but may not be exactly, what you are looking for.

- Dave Felt's EMEM circuit
EMEM devices have a good reputation, but the ones I know of all work in the audio frequency range. If their good reputation should be justified, it can only come from harmonics and/or EM field strength.

- Aubrey Scoon's circuit
The late Aubry Scoon actually reverse engineered an original Rife machine. Unfortunately nothing really useful came out of this work. It was speculated that the reason for this lies in the fact that Scoon could not really copy Rife's original components and had to use contemporary ones, which may not work exactly the same way. The circuit plan you have may be close to one of Rife's original designs but may not be the optimal solution for that reason. Research in this business is like opening a can of worms.

I can understand that you are reluctant towards the use of plasma lamps. Other solutions may be possible, if one can overcome common problems such as heat, blowing up Mosfets and radio interference. I am very curious, if you should find something.

As you are still worried about possible damage to body cells, I wish I had a suitable reference for you, which explains, why this does not happen but I don't have anything at hand right now. I can only give you some snippets from my memory: body cells are much much bigger than bacteria and viruses, interconnected and flexible. The weak force from Rife machines does not affect them but it can affect the tiny and relatively inflexible pathogens.
 
The circuit which creates more interference and more heat must have the strongest transmitting power, to radios and to the human body. If plasma lamps don't cause interference or heat then it's quite possibly because they don't transmit much. If plasma lamps have a strong effect, it must be for a reason other than their EM transmission. Is it possibly the modulated light causing a photoelectric effect on the body? If this is it, then LEDs might work better. I wonder if there are FIR LEDs?

Your explanation makes sense. However I doubt it's so general. I've heard that research indicates that all EM frequencies cause stress response chemicals to be released from cells. I've heard DNA acts as an antenna.
 
monotonic said:
I've heard that research indicates that all EM frequencies cause stress response chemicals to be released from cells. I've heard DNA acts as an antenna.
Click to expand...
This article talks about that research and resulting data:
http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2011/01/19/the-hard-core-science-of-how-cell-phones-and-other-emf-damages-you.aspx
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom