Masculinity in crisis

As I make my way through reading about the Tao, I came across this quote in the book I am reading (The Tao of Love and Sex by Jolang Chang). And I thought it was rather interesting in a few levels. Sun S'su-Mo is a physician from AD 581, so it's difficult to find his stuff, however the author quotes him as saying, in response to someone asking him about a man in his 60s who's attempting to forego female companionship.

Sun S'su-Mo: 'No! A man cannot live long without a woman. A woman cannot live happily without a man. Without a woman he will long for a female all the time. This longing will tire his spirit. When his spirit is tired he cannot live long. Of course if he truly does not need or long for any woman that would be very good and he may also live a long life. But such a person is extremely rare. When one tries to suppress one's natural need to emit in a certain interval, it will be very hard to keep the ching, but very easy to lose it. He will lose it during his sleep or pollute his urine. Or he will suffer from the disease of mating with ghosts. When he loses his ching in such a manner it will be a hundred times more harmful.'
Ching is the name for ejaculation. Now, the reason I find it interesting is because the topic of single men comes up when considering the entire idea, optimally yes you would perform these explorations with a partner that you love, but what if you don't have one?

And here's where I think it connects with something the C's have spoken about on several occasions, not just about the individuality of self awareness and recognizing your own cycles and so on, but also about mental hygiene.

The notion of mating with ghosts as a disease, could be interpreted in a few ways, from actual visitations of succibi at night, which is a terrible enough prospect, but if you think about it, things like porn addiction (or overindulgence) could be akin to "mating" with a ghost. Giving up your energy attention and intent to a lie that you participate in by passively letting it go unquestioned. "Falling in love" with something that doesn't exist.

So, the thing with single men doesn't seem to be on unconscious repression based on fear, but on healthy, and maybe that is the keyword, healthy expression. So, I suppose failing having a partner to explore and learn these things with, one could perhaps attempt its next best thing, use the same curious and learning approach with the same intent, love, as defined by the C's as knowing.

Know thyself takes on another dimension when looked at through this lens.

I suppose living alone, or being alone or single is a terrifying prospect for many, and that anxiety can lead one to seek to soothe oneself by overindulging in self gratification, when it doesn't lead to the wrong relationships or ones based on the wrong principles, but I think that's where the healthy aspect of it should be meditated upon. It isn't healthy to seek release simply to soothe one's anxieties about quiet moments, however long they may last, it should be, optimally, with the intent on healthy living.

And that requires a clean mental space, clean emotional space and self-awareness of what is healthy, in general and for the self in particular, as we're all individuals.
 
Patriarchal imbalance exists solely in femi-perturbed minds, battered by usual suspects into formless pulp which only role from now on is to hopelessly try to mold a man into a semi-woman, usual suspects reasons are deeply nefarious but femi-imperative is petty, fueled by crude and unconscious will to harness his power or even wield the same, but here is the biggest paradox of them all, at the moment you gain control over a man you loose interest in him as he instantly became no man anymore, he lost his magic his manliness he became lesser version of you, he became conquered and to be thrown away as used tampon.
There is no imbalance in a man-woman dynamics as there is no in yin and yang interplay, there is only lack of understanding or unwillingness to assume own roles.
We are all within the same alchemical cauldron.
The healthy feminine can hold no imperative, nor can it be petty.
Everything has been a mutual construction.
The interaction between yin and yang is eternal — sometimes we’re just playing with the screws.
Understanding, and the will to understand our movements.
 
As I make my way through reading about the Tao, I came across this quote in the book I am reading (The Tao of Love and Sex by Jolang Chang). And I thought it was rather interesting in a few levels. Sun S'su-Mo is a physician from AD 581, so it's difficult to find his stuff, however the author quotes him as saying, in response to someone asking him about a man in his 60s who's attempting to forego female companionship.


Ching is the name for ejaculation. Now, the reason I find it interesting is because the topic of single men comes up when considering the entire idea, optimally yes you would perform these explorations with a partner that you love, but what if you don't have one?
as far as I know Ching is not the name for ejaculation !

"ching" and "jing" refer to the same Chinese word 精 in Traditional Chinese Medicine.

"Jing" is the modern romanization.
"Ching" comes from the older system of translation more common in the 19th century

Jing/ Ching means essence

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom