Mass Shooting @ Bondi Beach, Sydney

[Ricardo]

On X one of the shooters is being identified as " Naveed Akram" , supposedly former IDF soldier with military service in Gaza #1, also there seems to have been google trend searches on his name shortly before the event ( on X as well ) . fwiw.

#1 Yet to find confirmation of this , according to this webpage the Jerusalem post (!?) , Link , Quote " Akram is a Muslim man of Pakistani origin and studied at Central Queensland University in Sydney. He was also previously associated with Hamdard University in Islamabad and the Al Murad Institute" , of course the question of Cui bono seems pertinent however more so taking in consideration all the MK capabilities of the "Deepstate".

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000175629472313759

 

[Fluffy]

I’m surprised that this antisemitic flavour of false flag took so long to arrive in Australia, it’s been brewing in the pot for years. I suppose Albo recognising Palestine as a State was the tipping point, just in time for more surveillance and the implementation of digital ID.

 

[OpenMindOpenHeart]

I’m surprised that this antisemitic flavour of false flag took so long to arrive in Australia, it’s been brewing in the pot for years. I suppose Albo recognising Palestine as a State was the tipping point, just in time for more surveillance and the implementation of digital ID.

I was thinking the same thing @Fluffy - convenient timing to justify more surveillance and digital ID - we’ll need digital ID soon to access simple web searching it seems, and social media (following the failed launch of the under 16s social media ban)…?

 

[Ruth]

Some more commentary from George Galloway on both recent shootings.

 

[palestine]

This may be a "false positive"

https://rumble.com/v730cpq-what-are-the-chances-the-bondi-beach-psyop.html

At the end of this video, the video editor says "why are there two videos of the same scene?"

I understand that the video editor aligned two different videos, and that he shows that the videos are discrepant. At first glance, it's right, but it could be that one of those two videos skipped some frames (etc).

EDIT: the first part of this video makes fun of Jews, this is none of my interest. Of course, the background is about this billionaire, and I don't know what to think of his presence. But I do not endorse the whole anti-Jew feeling.

 

[Ruth]

The questions this raises are many, but Topher is right, this will be used to "push" whatever agenda each side wants....

 

[Ricardo]

Think this sums up very interesting possibilities with regards to what happened....

Quote "So let me get this straight: You've just been shot at, and your immediate reaction is to whip out your phone and take a selfie? Tell me he is a crisis actor without telling me he is a crisis actor."

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000375143680577829

Edit , reminds me of the similar video selfie from one of CK´s "Staff" that day.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Think this sums up very interesting possibilities with regards to what happened....

Quote "So let me get this straight: You've just been shot at, and your immediate reaction is to whip out your phone and take a selfie? Tell me he is a crisis actor without telling me he is a crisis actor."

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000375143680577829

Edit , reminds me of the similar video selfie from one of CK´s "Staff" that day.

There's a difference between pathological Zionist narcissism and crisis acting, IMO.

 

[Sol Logos]

This may be a "false positive"

https://rumble.com/v730cpq-what-are-the-chances-the-bondi-beach-psyop.html

At the end of this video, the video editor says "why are there two videos of the same scene?"

I understand that the video editor aligned two different videos, and that he shows that the videos are discrepant. At first glance, it's right, but it could be that one of those two videos skipped some frames (etc).

EDIT: the first part of this video makes fun of Jews, this is none of my interest. Of course, the background is about this billionaire, and I don't know what to think of his presence. But I do not endorse the whole anti-Jew feeling.

I had a look at a number of the uploaded videos from a variety of vantage points. What's odd for me is no one captured where the incoming fire came from or whom did it (so far I've seen). This footage shows near the start of the attack (shooters moving to position on the footbridge) and continues past the point both are gunned down (5:55s mark). The incoming fire starts at about 3:45s and comes from the left of the bridge (from footage vantage point).

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000176758843453524

If less than 10 mins was the full span of this attack, its more than likely someone was positioned to take them down and already waiting ahead of time. Given footage of the incoming fire is absent; but every other possible angle was captured, this "sniper" (at least one) was likely hidden from view.

My guess is the back of this pickup truck / ute is where this incoming came from. We see the shots come from left of the bridge and most other spots - just seem less likely to me.

It's also worth noting the range of fire from the bridge (red lines) is over 80m or more. I've heard reports up to about 40-50 people were shot. Even for the most trained, 40-50 people shot in less than 10 minutes from more than 80 metres away is a feat. So I'm guessing someone was at close range doing most of the damage... Possibly was the same individual from the back of that pickup truck / ute.

Drone footage:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000177816151925113

 

[Approaching Infinity]

And what about the 3rd shooter? Where'd he go?

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000201592130183245

What third shooter?

 

[Sol Logos]

What third shooter?

Could be the one that shot the 2 shooters on the bridge? Just a theory:

I had a look at a number of the uploaded videos from a variety of vantage points. What's odd for me is no one captured where the incoming fire came from or whom did it (so far I've seen). This footage shows near the start of the attack (shooters moving to position on the footbridge) and continues past the point both are gunned down (5:55s mark). The incoming fire starts at about 3:45s and comes from the left of the bridge (from footage vantage point).

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000176758843453524

If less than 10 mins was the full span of this attack, its more than likely someone was positioned to take them down and already waiting ahead of time. Given footage of the incoming fire is absent; but every other possible angle was captured, this "sniper" (at least one) was likely hidden from view.

My guess is the back of this pickup truck / ute is where this incoming came from. We see the shots come from left of the bridge and most other spots - just seem less likely to me.

It's also worth noting the range of fire from the bridge (red lines) is over 80m or more. I've heard reports up to about 40-50 people were shot. Even for the most trained, 40-50 people shot in less than 10 minutes from more than 80 metres away is a feat. So I'm guessing someone was at close range doing most of the damage... Possibly was the same individual from the back of that pickup truck / ute.

View attachment 114257

Drone footage:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000177816151925113

 

[Approaching Infinity]

I had a look at a number of the uploaded videos from a variety of vantage points. What's odd for me is no one captured where the incoming fire came from or whom did it (so far I've seen). This footage shows near the start of the attack (shooters moving to position on the footbridge) and continues past the point both are gunned down (5:55s mark). The incoming fire starts at about 3:45s and comes from the left of the bridge (from footage vantage point).

Is there footage of the rifle that the Ahmed al-Ahmed propped up against the tree, after he put it there?

In the video you posted there seem to be at least 4 shooters: the father and son shooting into the crowd, followed by both of them taking fire from front and back. The two or more who were firing at them from both directions obviously weren't snipers. If they were, they would've killed them both in 1 or 2 shots. There were police to the right, judging by the direction them came from after both were shot, so they were probably the source of the fire coming from that direction. As for the left, it could have been more police (a police van drives right to left at 0:21, so there were definitely cops in that direction too), someone who picked up the propped rifle, or some mysterious third party. But that last one seems least likely to me. You can't expect to engage in a shootout over a relatively extended period of time without someone noticing you, and you wouldn't be able to guarantee you're not caught on camera. And the shooters seemed to notice him, since they look like they deliberately aim to shoot him.

 

[Approaching Infinity]

No more DEI cops please:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2000323398724112896