Massive 'drone swarm' in and around New Jersey: UFO flap, govt tech, or mass hysteria?

[Aeneas]

There was also an intrusion in Sweden on Thursday night.

The area where the drones have been spotted, is located a few miles from the naval base in Karlskrona, sweden.

If it is of hyperdimensional nature, then it looks to be a bit of 'flap' as it has been going on all week over the northern parts of Europe, from the north of France to Oslo.
Again, the fingers are just pointing at Russia as the likely source of these drones, yet NATO or the individual countries are not doing anything to intercept them or shoot them down. Calling for NATO's article 4 seems to be the most they are willing to do apart from observing them. If alien in nature, then it would be hard to do, but if it due to the Deep State, then of course they would have no interest in shooting them down.

Added: I forgot to mention that an eyewitness in the article said, that the drone in Sweden was big and in his mind similar to the one over Copenhagen.

 

[XPan]

Denmark

Here i found an article written 27 Sep 2025 at 12:36 in Extrabladet, that the Danish military exercises in shooting down drones. It doesn't give out much information really, but at least states that they are having exercises at sea near the island of Sjælland.




Foto: Forsvaret.dk


Amid drone drama: Navy practices shooting down drones

Written By Elias August Eliasson

The Navy has announced that it is conducting live-fire exercises with drones at Sjællands Odde
This week, drones have been the hot topic of conversation. And many have asked the question:

Why aren't they being shot down?

The Danish Armed Forces are actually practicing shooting down drones these days.

'The Navy is currently conducting live-fire exercises with the frigate Esbern Snare in the military exercise waters near Sjællands Odde. The training has been planned since the beginning of September and is an integral part of the ship's training program,' writes the Danish Armed Forces on their website.

‘It's an attempt to show that we can do it,’ says Peter Viggo Jakobsen.

He also explains that this is nothing new.

"They have actually demonstrated this in the Red Sea, that they can do it, because that's how they shoot down those drones. So, of course, we know that we have the capacity, but again, if it can't be deployed in the right place, for example, to remove them over Copenhagen Airport, then it doesn't matter.

---

Friday (26 September 2025)

"They're back again: Several drones spotted near several of the Danish Armed Forces' facilities"
Written By Elias August Eliasson

Danish article / source here

One or more drones were spotted on Friday evening at Karup Air Base.

On Friday evening, the Central and West Jutland Police were called to Karup Air Base when one or more drones were spotted circling in the air.

“We have been present at the air base. Flight activity has been observed both inside and outside the fence. There is at least one, maybe two drones,” says duty officer Simon Skelkjær, continuing:

"I can't comment on how big or small they are, or what type of drone it is, but that's only because I'm saying that all drone activity around the air base is, of course, illegal.

The police returned later in the evening when the drones had disappeared. On Saturday morning, Ekstra Bladet contacted the Central and West Jutland Police, who confirmed that drones had been present around the air base. Simon Skelkjær told Ekstra Bladet that there had been illegal drone activity.

"There were one or two illegal drones flying during the evening and night.

The police are asking anyone who has photos or video of yesterday's incident to report it to the Central and West Jutland Police. The decision to take down the drones was made by the Danish Armed Forces, Simon Skelkjær told Ekstra Bladet. The duty officer also pointed out that it was a collaboration between the police and the Danish Armed Forces. Ekstra Bladet contacted the Danish Armed Forces, who confirmed that there had been drone activity last night and during the night.

“It is true that drones have been observed at Karup and other Defense Force locations. A statement will be issued later today on Forsvaret.dk,” the Defense Force told Ekstra Bladet.

“If you have a hobby drone, now is not the time to fly it,” Simon Skelkjær urges.

 

[ivanb]

Testing nuclear-powered drones in controlled environments such as airports and military bases is essential for ensuring operational effectiveness, safety, and regulatory compliance. However, public relations surrounding such testing typically refrains from full disclosure. Instead, testing activities may be veiled in vague discussions or attributed to external actors like Russia to manage public perception and avoid controversy.Necessity of Controlled Environment TestingControlled testing at airports and military bases provides the realistic but secure conditions needed to validate drone endurance, navigation, communication, and nuclear battery safety. These environments combine operational complexity—such as electromagnetic interference, hostile radio environments, and dense air traffic—with robust security and emergency response protocols, minimizing risks associated with nuclear power units.High-fidelity real-time simulations combined with hardware-in-the-loop testing enable engineers to expose drones to extreme scenarios (e.g., GPS spoofing, electronic jamming, or structural faults) without risking assets or personnel. The result is faster iteration, improved mission readiness, and certification evidence grounded in repeatable, rigorous trials.Moreover, proximity to military operational hubs facilitates rapid feedback integration from warfighters, alignment with mission needs, and accelerated technology maturity rates that field testing alone cannot achieve.Public Relations and Disclosure StrategiesDue to societal sensitivities about nuclear-powered devices and military drone capabilities, operators often avoid explicit public disclosure of testing details. Instead, official statements feature vague references to "routine operational testing" or "security evaluations," sidestepping detailed discussions around nuclear propulsion or autonomy levels.In geopolitical hotspots such as Europe, unexplained drone activity or minor airspace incursions are often publicly linked to foreign actors for political messaging. Attribution to Russian or other adversarial forces serves as a convenient explanation to deflect scrutiny from domestic testing programs.This approach controls public narratives, reduces backlash, and allows military developers to conduct comprehensive live trials while maintaining operational security and technological secrecy.Combined BenefitsTesting nuclear-powered drones in controlled settings improves safety validation under the highest scrutiny levels while providing real-world mission data unavailable in simulation alone.Parallelly, limiting public disclosure safeguards sensitive technology and personnel while enabling government agencies to manage national security narratives strategically.Blaming foreign actors for drone activity near airports or bases further supports diplomatic positioning and justifies investments in counter-drone and defense innovations.In conclusion, the need to test nuclear-powered drones near airports and military bases is driven by technical and operational imperatives critical to defense readiness. At the same time, public relations strategies balance transparency with discretion, often framing testing within broader geopolitical narratives to maintain secure and accepted development pathways
-------------------------------------------------------
This article was generated using
Perplexity on Sept. 27, 2025