30 July 1994
Q: (L) Will there be a war in the sky with the aliens?10
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will it be between Orions and the Federation?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Will it be visible on earth?
A: Oh, yes.
Q: (L) When will this be?
A: It has already started. Will intensify steadily.
Q: (L) Why are we not aware that it has already started?
A: Disguised at this point as weather. Fighting part still in other dimension. Will go to this one within 18 years. Anytime within this period. Not determinable exactly when. Could be tomorrow or 18 years.
and
19 Nov 1994
Q: (T) Is the government planning to stage an invasion by
aliens to cause the populace of the world to go into such
a fear state that they will accept total control and
domination? A: Open. But if so, will "flop".
Q: (T) Why?
A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and
will have "glitches". 2. Real invasion may take place
first. 3. Other events may intercede.
Q: (T) Such as what?
A: Earth changes.
Q: (T) Am I correct in assuming that some of these hot-shot,
big-wig guys in the government who have plans for taking
over the whole world and making everything all happy and
hunky-dory with them in charge, are just simply not in
synch with the fact that there are some definite earth
changes on the agenda? Are they missing something here?
A: Close. They are aware but in denial.
Q: (T) Are these earth changes going to occur prior to the
arrival of the cometary cluster?
A: No. But "time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined.
Q: (T) Am I correct in saying that if they knew what was
really going to happen that they would still continue with
their stupid little plans to make money and try to control
the world?
A: Yes. Greed is a sickness.
and
17 Feb 1996
Q: (L) Can I ask my other questions? Some people on the net
want me to ask about this HAARP thing... seems to be some
sort of antennae thing...
A: Disguise for something else.
Q: (L) What is that something else?
A: Project to apply EM wave theories to the transference of
perimeters. {As in FREQUENCY FENCE}
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: If utilised as designed, will allow for controlled
invisibility and easy movement between density levels on
surface of planet as well as subterranially.
...
Q: (L) So, HAARP has nothing to do with the weather?
A: And also EM associated with same as reported.
and
4 May 1996
Q: (L) You once said that HAARP was something that was to be
used to "transfer perimeters." I am assuming that this
means to manipulate space, time and density.
A: Yes.
Q: Is it possible that they are planning to use this to bring
up the Atlantean crystals to utilize.
A: Not so much to "bring up," as to utilize.
Q: (T) Is there such a thing as "alternative three" the plan
to take all the brains off the planet?
A: No.
Q: (T) Is that more disinformation?
A: Yes. So is Mars landing but not Mars monuments.
Q: (TL) Who made the monuments on Mars?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (T) So, the Atlanteans had inter-planetary ability?
A: Yes. With ease. Atlantean technology makes yours look
like the Neanderthal era.
Q: (T) Who created the structures on the moon that Richard
Hoagland has discovered?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (T) What did they use these structures for?
A: Energy transfer points for crystalline power/symbolism as
in monuments or statuary.
Q: (T) What statuary are you referring to?
A: Example is face.
Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering
stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their
power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a
million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans
were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about
their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will
overpower you.
Q: (V) Is it similar to them gaining a life and intelligence
of their own?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You mean these crystalline structures came to life, so
to speak?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And then what did they do?
A: Destroyed Atlantis.
...
Q: (T) Are the crystals still active?
A: Bermuda triangle.
Q: (L) I thought that was a myth?
A: No.
Q: (L) And what does that crystal do? Is it continuously
active?
A: No. Erratic.
Q: (L) Is it still active in the sense of being a conscious
or sentient entity?
A: No.
Q: (L) What activates it?
A: Many factors.
Q: (L) And when it is activated, what does it do?
A: Transdimensional window is blasted open.
17 August 1996
Q: (L) OK, is there any correlation between the extremely high
lightning strikes in this area and our work? In this area?
A: Maybe.
Q: (T) Is there a correlation to the lightning strikes in this
area, in this immediate area; not right here, around this house,
but in the Bay area, because it’s so built up, because there's so
much metal around?
A: Maybe.
A: (L) Is there any correlation between the lightning strikes and
so forth that have been going on, seemingly coincidental
moments in the communications I've been having with Ark?
A: Lightning has been striking elsewhere a lot more too.
Q: (L) So, just in general. There's been more lightning
strikes all over the place in general. (T) OK, on the correlations
things, to skip from lightning to another question I just thought
of. Is there a correlation to the massive power blackouts on the
West Coast that have been happening recently, to the government
messing around with the HAARP Project, and other related weapons
testing systems?
A: Not HAARP.
Q: (T) OK, not HAARP. Something else that they're messing
with? (L) Well, why don't we just ask, what's the cause of the
blackouts? (T) OK, what's the cause of the blackouts? Good
question!
A: 4th density bleed through has many "fun" possibilities.
23 Nov 1996
Q: (T) About Flight 800. Pierre Salinger claims that the
info floating around on the internet is accurate. He says
that the Navy downed the flight.
A: Close. Pierre Salinger is an impeccable journalist and
not one to "fly off the handle."
Q: (T) Very true. And that is why I am amazed that the rest
of the journalism community is attacking him.
A: Why should you be amazed? They are "bought and paid for."
Q: (T) What did happen to flight 800?
A: This was the result of an experiment gone awry. So was
KAL "007" in 1983.
Q: (L) What was the nature of the experiment?
A: Testing of secret impulse guidance system using civilian
airliner as an arbitrary "bounce" guidance target.
Instead, it became the "homing" target, and a different
aircraft became the bouncer. This was because the
programmers did not anticipate the lower than expected
altitude of the 747. Warning: this must stay in this room
for the present!!!!!!!!!! The facts will eventually be
discussed by others. At that time, the danger is lifted.
[At this point, it has been discussed in the exact same
terms as described here in a reputable, national
magazine.]
Now, about KAL 007... that one is not dangerous
to know. The plane was deliberately instructed to fly off
course in order to trigger the Soviet's Pacific air
defense system, to "see what they were made of" in that
area. The plane was lost, but the experiment worked. They
did not expect them to shoot down a civilian airliner.
Now, all moving targets create electronic impuses. These
can be "read" by the proper extremely high tech equipment.
Older radar guided systems are subject to malfunctions in
weather conditions that are severe, as one example. Also,
the impulse system is an offshoot of the electromagnetic
pulse experiments being carried out at Montauk, Brookings
and elsewhere as part of the HAARP project! In connection
with Pentagon missile tests, HAARP has many interesting
tie-ins, not the least of which is your cell phone towers.
Now, the homing target can be any moving object. It can
be whatever is entered on the computer. It can be a
squirrel in a tree, a jogger on the beach, a building,
whatever you want. The system looks for any moving target
in order to establish recognition to the computer, in
order to establish recognition of match pattern of pulse.
TWA 800 was flying at the exact same altitude that was
supposed to be designated for the "drone" craft. The
drone plane was fartehr out at sea. The "bounce" target
was to be any moving object in the air within 400 square
miles.
Q: (L) So, TWA 800, through a series of problems, happened to
find itself at the right altitude, a restricted altitude,
within the parameters of the experiment. Anything further
on this?
A: Not for now.
22 Feb 1997
Q: (Terry)...transmit to us and back... what can be transmitted? Can the
negative energy be focused through these microwave towers? (V***)
And what was the correlation between the strange weather and the
harvesting? (Laura) Because we were told that the weather changes were
due to the energy buildup of the wave. That was two years ago. And it
had nothing to do with the 'harvest.' (Terry) But it could also be that
HAARP adds to it. (Jan) Ok, well, let's ask... (Laura) Well, they would
love for us to think that HAARP has something to do with weather. 'Yes,
we're having bizzare weather. Let's blame it on HAARP!' because we're
going to think about HAARP... What a perfect... (Terry) Well, HAARP has
a lot more to do than just the weather. They can put all the
energy-based stuff that they've been experimenting on in one place,
because they can do whatever they want, just by changing the
frequencies... (Jan) Or, even just continue to mess the weather up, to
continue to create negative vibrations, worry and uncertainty...
(Violette) I guess the point I'm trying to get at is, are these weather
changes promoting some changes in the physical body, that's making the
physical body more 'harvestable?' (Terry) Could very well be. (Laura)
Well, it's all interconnected, but I wouldn't say that one is the cause
of the other, just to say that they occur... (Terry) But why, as we were
talking about earlier, is all this weird stuff going on all through the
media?
A: We told you that "HAARP" was being designated for
capturing and modulating electromagnetic fields for the purpose of total
control of brainwave patterns in order to establish a system of complete
"order on the surface of the planet" in either 3rd or 4th density.
Q: (Laura) Is HAARP in operation at the present time?
A: Yes, in its early stages.
Q: (Terry) Is the spreading of all these communication towers out across
the country the equivalent of a HAARP program on a continental scale?
A: Back up system.
Q: (Laura) So, they don't need the towers to operate the HAARP system,
but they are there as the backup?
A: Towers serve dual and lateral purposes.
Q: (Terry) Local and regional authorities can use the towers to track
people, amongst other things. (Laura) Is the weather being controlled or
changed or in any way affected by HAARP?
A: Climate is being influenced by three factors, and soon a fourth.
Q: (Laura) All right, I'll take the bait; give me the three factors, and
also the fourth!.
A: 1) Wave approach. 2) Chloroflorocarbon increase in atmosphere, thus
affecting ozone layer. 3) Change in the planet's axis rotation
orientation. 4) Artificial tampering by 3rd and 4th density
STS forces in a number of different ways.
11 July 1998
Q: (A) We have been told that there is going to be a change
of the magnetic field of the earth. Does this mean that
the magnetic pole will shift?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) About this shift of the poles, is it going to be a
complete pole reversal?
A: Yes.
Q: (A) What is going to happen inside Earth that could cause
this magnetic pole reversal?
A: Is caused by disturbances in the mineral content of the
substrata rock, brought on by the interaction of Earth
with outside forces.
Q: (L) What specific outside forces?
A: Those already discussed.
Q: (L) What is going to be the specific mechanism of this
disturbance? Can you describe for us the steps by which
this pole reversal will take place?
A: Pole reversal is cyclical anyway, these events merely
serve as trigger mechanism.
Q: (L) Let me ask it this way: is there a charge that builds
up in the mineral substrata that requires discharge, or
that becomes excited to the point that it discharges and
then reverses? Is this what we are talking about in terms
of the mechanism?
A: Examine what is needed to magnetize metal. Ask Arkadiusz.
Q: (A) What is needed to magnetize metal. One has to align
the spins of the atoms which means one has to strike the
metal, or one has to bring a magnetic field close. (T)
Strike as in annealing... heating and striking metal or
rock which causes the crystalline structure to decompose
so that the metal becomes pliable. Then, each time it is
hit, it reforms until it cools again. (L) Is this what we
are talking about here?
A: Close.
Q: (A) One can also have an external magnetic field to align.
But, where is it going to come from?
A: Guess.
Q: (L) The wave?
A: All are interconnected.
Q: (T) Now, this is just a thought: where would an external
magnetic field strong enough to do something like that
come from? On the earth, if you supercharge the
ionosphere, you create an extremely intense magnetic
field. That's what the ionosphere basically is. That is
what the HAARP group of programs is about. That is what
Tesla was into - the ionosphere - cause there is a large
charge there. (L) Is the HAARP project involved here?
A: No. {Notice that Terry was making a lot of assumptions about HAARP based on disinformation.}
Q: (T) They are monkeying around with that stuff. (L) Do the
people in charge of the HAARP project know about all of
this and are they constructing this HAARP array to utilize
this energy in some way?
A: Those who know are at foundation.
Q: (T) To protect us?
A: HAARP is for mind control. It is hoped it can be
successful in 4th density too!
Q: (L) Well, if these people are aware that this sort of
thing is getting ready to happen... never mind. (A) We
have been told that this magnetic disturbance is closely
related to this realm border crossing, and you asked us
the question 'what is the root of realm' and it is
reality. Now, realm has an m at the end. Does this have
something to do with magnetic?
A: Realm border is when the reality shifts for all.
18 July 1998
Q: (A) Well, we started with the increased mass of the Sun,
and we came to UFT which is hidden from us because it
would make us free; there is this tendency in me to follow
this road because it is science and would open a new road.
The question is whether such activity or knowing such
things will lead to other densities? Is it just for
satisfaction, or is there real value in knowing more in
this direction?
A: Well, the Unified Field Theory unlocks the door completely
to the higher densities.
Q: (T) But there are parts of this that have yet to be
discovered by the general research books because it is
being kept secret?
A: No.
Q: (T) Has science acknowledged that gravity is a wave, as
something that can be measured, quantitative?
A: Controversy.
Q: (L) What gravity is and what it is not is a controversy.
(T) But if gravity is part of the UFT, and somebody knows
what it is... (L) They are building HAARP. (T) I think
there is more to it than this HAARP. UFT is a major
step...
A: Grids.
Q: (L) What kind of grids... (T) They keep jumping off...
wait a minute...
A: We are not "jumping off."
Q: (L) What kind of grids?
A: The planet has been enshrouded with EM grid.
Q: (T) Are these the ley lines?
A: No.
Q: (L) Are they artificially generated?
A: Contoured.
Q: (L) They are artificially contoured. What is the result
of this shrouding?
A: Manipulated for use by 3rd/4th Consortium.
Q: (A) What kind of EM grid? (L) The natural EM grid is
being contoured...
A: Like a gently waving geometric "blanket."
Q: (T) Is it on the surface of the planet, through the
planet, or where?
A: Above.
Q: (J) Do microwave towers factor into this?
A: Indirectly discovered by same principal. [person?]
Q: (A) Who is this principal? A name? (T) The gravity
waves, whether they exist or not, are a controversy, yet
they are part of the UFT, and someone already knows how it
works. Therefore, it is only controversy to those who
don't know what the answer is, and it is not a controversy
to those who know. They know what it is and how to
measure it and how to use it.
A: Of course.
Q: (T) So, it is only a controversy that is allowed to be.
(L) Or created. (A) Some power is used to sustain this
grid. What is it?
A: Land and space based generators.
Q: (T) What can it be used for?
A: Multiple uses.
Q: (L) Well, what are the top three, for example?
A: No "top three."
Q: (T) Just an example, give us an idea? How does this
affect us?
A: Broaden concept.
Q: (T) Can this grid be used by other objects as a power
source? (J) Can it be tapped into?
A: Net.
Q: (L) It is a net that traps things?
A: Broaden.
Q: (L) It is a net that...
A: Calculates...
Q: (J) Internet? (T) Is it like a big fence to keep us in?
A: You are dancing on the 3rd density ballroom floor. "Alice
likes to go through the looking glass" at the Crystal
Palace. Atlantean reincarnation surge brings on the urge
to have a repeat performance.
Q: (T) The Atlanteans who have reincarnated are getting ready
to do the same thing they did before with the crystals.
So, this is an Atlantean type thing that is being done
now? Different equipment, but the same type of thing?
A: All lessons must be learned before you can move onto
bigger and better things.
Q: (L) Is that a general statement about the Atlanteans
repeating the lessons, or that once we learn this lesson,
we can move onto bigger and better things in counteracting
this grid?
A: All that is present and future too.
Q: (T) Well, maybe it is a defensive shield that has been put
up to protect us since we have monkeyed with the ozone so
much...
A: No. Better to contemplate and meditate. No linear
thinking please, you know better.
Q: (J) I think they just slapped your hand. (A) I want to
ask if there is something that we can and should do about
this grid for ourselves?
A: Why? To know was all you need.
Q: (A) Well, it was said that this was for the purpose of
control and manipulation. So, knowing is all that we
need. Or, we could try to shield... (L) But, to know IS
the shield. I don't know how that works, but it seems to
be so.
A: Yes.
Q: (A) Now, how did we come to this grid from UFT?
A: Grid construction represents application of...
Q: (L) Somehow we went from the increased gravity of the Sun,
to UFT, to the grid...
A: UFT explains the "increased" gravity of Sol. But, is
there not something in UFT about increase/decrease???
Q: (A) There is no reason for it to increase or decrease...
but this is Einstein's theory which we were told is
incorrect... (L) Well, maybe it is speed? When two things
are rotating in tandem, when they come together, wouldn't
it increase their speed, and doesn't speed increase
gravity? (A) No, we were told that there is some
interaction between gravity and EM wave, and this is what
UFT is about... If we use other dimensions which we are
supposed to use in this UFT, going with Kaluza-Klein, then
the very concept of mass is something which is not so
clear, and mass can be variable...
A: Yes, variability of physicality.
Q: (T) Fourth density. (A) We were told earlier that this
UFT opens the door to other densities...
A: Yes.
31 July 1999
Q: Now, you told us that the Montauk experiment was something that began in the 1920s. All of the stories say that the Navy was trying to make ships invisible to radar for defensive purposes. That's the story. My question is: is that just a cover story?
A: No.
Q: Is that, in fact, what they were attempting to do?
A: Close.
Q: Can you get me any closer to it? What were their intentions?
A: Convergence of interests: US Navy, Secret Government, Esteemed physicists.
Q: Did they actually, even accidentally, discover through this work something about time travel?
A: Yes, but it was more an accident for the Navy than for others involved.
Q: Okay, was the accident and following fiasco fairly accurately represented in the various books about it?
A: Fairly.
Q: After all of this, did they bring the project to a halt, even if only temporarily?
A: No.
Q: Did they decide that 'oh, we have discovered something really fantastic; let's see what we can do with it?'
A: Closer.
Q: Did this actually take place at Montauk?
A: Some.
Q: Were Russians and/or Germans working on similar projects at the same time, or even a little later?
A: Germans earlier, Russians later.
Q: Are the efforts of the Germans, Russians, and the Americans combined at the present time?
A: At some levels they are combined, yes.
Q: Would you be able to evaluate the efforts of the three and say which one, at the present time, is the most advanced?
A: Does not work that way.
Q: Why does it not work that way?
A: Advanced goes to Consortium.
Q: Are you saying that when work of this kind gets to a certain level, it gets absorbed into the Consortium?
A: Close.
...
Q: Back to Montauk: the Montauk project continued. Did they ever, at any point in time, produce monsters as some of these stories I have heard relate?
A: Maybe.
Q: Was this a result of opening portals between densities or dimensions and having cross-density window fallers dropping in, so to speak?
A: Partly.
Q: Were any of these supposed monsters that they were supposed to have created, productions or creations of their minds?
A: Other densities afford a degree of one and the same thing.
Q: Okay. You previously have said that the HAARP project is a continuation of the Montauk project.
A: Partly.
Q: What part is not correct?
A: You must remember compartments.
Q: So, the right hand often doesn't know what the left is doing. You also once said that the HAARP project was partly operational. Are some of these wildly extravagant shootings of recent times, or people going off the deep end, a result of some of the HAARP experimentation in mind control, or testing?
A: This is a result of many forces.
Q: Is this something that we ought to pursue: a line of questions about these recent acts of violence?
A: Only if you had a better grasp.
Q: I don't think I have a good enough grasp. Back to Montauk. Is Montauk connected in any way with this Alternative Three idea of transferring groups or perimeters in the event of a cataclysm or disaster?
A: Too complex, but be careful of what you read.
Q: In what sense?
A: Disinformation. This is most of what you hear and read.
Q: (A) Okay, you have mentioned the Navy and the physicists, and then there were these people who simply were producing monsters, which does not seem to be anything that the Navy would want to do, much less physicists!
A: You are confusing subjects and time frames.
Q: (A) Somebody had to plan this experiment, yes?
A: But that was the Philadelphia Experiment.
Q: (L) How did this business of producing monsters and all that even come into this project?
A: Experiments in mind programming and psy-warfare.
Q: So, these were separate experiments. But, did they fall under the Montauk project...
A: Yes.
Q: So, they were compartmentalized things.
A: But the monsters were long after the Eldridge.
Q: When did the experiments with the monsters occur?
A: Late 70s.
Q: Have they continued on with this monster producing business?
A: No need to get hung up on "monsters."
Q: Well, that would give me the heebie jeebies for sure!
A: Other materializations.
Q: They are working on other materializations, or they HAD other materializations?
A: Not just monsters.
Q: Well, that's too good to pass. What OTHER kinds of materializations did they have?
A: You name it!
Q: Were they able to materialize money for themselves?
A: No need.
Q: Were they able to materialize people from the past or the future?
A: Temporarily.
Q: Did they, in fact, do this?
A: Yes.
Q: Did they ask people from the future what kinds of events have occurred between then and now in order to refine their plans and activities?
A: No such.
Q: Why?
A: Variable futures.
Q: So, they could materialize somebody from the future, but it was only as potential, or probable future, so therefore, it meant very little, or was useless?
A: One of 329 decillion.
Q: Probable futures?
A: Yes.
Q: It's a lot.
A: Up to a point...
Q: At which time something collapses into the now. Regarding these folks they materialized from the past: anybody we would know?
A: No.
Q: Could they select who they materialized, or was it random?
A: The materialization was really a duality. Review texts re: abductions between densities for idea.
Q: Could it be possible that, using this technology, the U.S. Government, or Secret Government, has been doing abductions on human beings that the victims THINK is an alien abduction?
A: Maybe in some cases, but the technology is not comparable.
Q: Other than people from the past and future, what other kinds of things did they materialize in the Montauk experiments?
A: Review.
Q: What kinds of things were they interested in materializing more than anything else? (A) Probably technological devices. (L) Did they materialize technology from the future?
A: This is more complex than your questions indicate.
Q: I realize this. I am struggling with this whole idea. I would just like to know what sorts of things they were most interested in materializing so that I would then have a clue as to which direction to go with my questions.
A: Not applicable.
Q: When they were doing this materializing, did they not have direct intent? Were they just experimenting to see what WOULD materialize at various settings?
A: Their knowledge brought them to a level different than your current imaginings.
Q: Well, help me out here! What do you mean?
A: No use comparing apples to oranges.
Q: At any point did their knowledge and materializations incline them toward benevolent acts and tendencies regarding the rest of the human population?
A: This is not working because you are thinking one way and they do not.
Q: Can you give me a word or two that will clue me as to how to change my thinking?
A: Sure. Try to explain calculus to a kindergartner!!
Q: You are saying that this Consortium, these Montauk folks, have a level of knowledge, and a way of thinking, that makes my thinking, and our thinking, seem like ...
A: Poppycock.
Q: My thinking is poppycock relative to theirs?
A: Close.
Q: (A) But this is only because we do not have this knowledge!
A: Right !!!!
Q: And we are trying to get it!
A: You cannot get it without an enormous amount of patience!
Q: Do we have time to have that kind of patience?
A: These experiments have been conducted over a time period you would recognize as about 93 years and have involved thousands of humans and a few hundred NHIs.
Q: Are the people involved in these experiments STS or STO?
A: All "people" are STS.
Q: Well, the people who are working in the direction of STO, what chance do they have of access to this knowledge?
A: They do not need it.
Q: Why don't they need it?
A: They will have it when the elevator reaches "floor number 4."
Q: Are you saying that it is not essential for us to struggle to know these things because it will come naturally?
A: Close.
Q: Well, gosh! You had me worried there! So, these guys are working and digging for knowledge to control others?
A: Close.
Q: Are they trying to develop technology to lock the planet into 3rd density so that it won't go to 4th density?
A: Some may be.
Q: Do they see the moving to 4th density as a threat to their plans and projects?
A: Perhaps.
Q: (A) I believe that there is a lot of this knowledge that would be useful for me to know before I go to 4th density, assuming I will go. I mean, knowledge is knowledge, and I am sure I would make good use of this. Why did you say that this knowledge is not needed for us?!!!
A: We did not say that.
Q: You said that all people are STS, and then we asked about those who are moving to STO, and the answer was 'they do not need it. They will have it after they reach 4th density.
A: But you are not there yet.
Q: You just said that we couldn't possibly get it! We don't have ninety some years and thousands of people to work on, and that what we know now is just poppycock!
A: No, no, no. You are misreading what we said!!!! Your line of questioning bespoke a level of knowledge not on the same level as those directly engaged in the vast experimentation which in part, was conducted at Montauk. If you were to review the transcripts extensively, you would find that you possess much more knowledge on this sort of thing than you apparently have remembered for tonight's session. You have put forth so much energy toward building the website that you have drained some of your conscious recall ability for the moment. And no, we are not criticizing your efforts, we applaud them!!! But, you could use a thoughtful, meditative review!
24 Sept 2001
Q: (L) Are we going to have more terrorist attacks in the US? They already said no, but that's because we already know it wasn't terrorist. Are we going to have more violence in the US that may not be as a results of terrorists?
A: Yes.
Q:(L) Can you designate any of the areas where this violence may occur in the near future?
A: Indianapolis.
Q: (A) What is that? (L) Indianapolis is a city in Indiana. Well that's something that has never been mentioned. What kind of violence?
A: Hit by focusing beam of the HAARP array.
Q: (L) Well that's weird. (A) By mistake? An accident?
A: No.
Q: (L) What will be the outcome of Indianapolis being hit by this focusing beam of the HAARP array?
A: Mind controlled violence.
Q: (L) Can we know what form it will take?
A: Shootings.
6 August 2005
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population actually supports Bush?
A: 36%
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population thinks there was complicity on the part of the US government in 9/11?
A: 47%
Q: (H) What percentage of the US population actually thinks at all?
A: 12% if you define it rigidly. (group amazement at this figure)
A: What do you expect with HAARP turning brains to tapioca?
(J) So it's a Zombie nation then?
A: You took the words right out of 6th density.
Q: (J) so does HAARP only affect the US population?
A: Mostly.
20 October 2005
Q: (L) They’re practicing with new weapons. (J) Some people said Katrina was the product of HAARP heating up the waters in the Gulf.
A: We’ve already dealt with HAARP and weather. Read transcripts.
Q: (W) (Quoting transcripts) “HAARP has nothing to do with the weather or EM associated with same.” (H) Which suggests that there is EM associated with the weather. There could be some EM stuff associated with the weather that isn’t part of HAARP. (L) 4th density. (J) Were any of the storms manufactured from 3rd density or was it a natural storm?
A: Mfg in 3D? No. As we have said… 4D battles represent as weather. But the “veil” is thinning.
20 June 2009
Q: (Ark) In fact I was thinking about this today because yesterday there was three strange event. Namely, today I look at statistics on my blog, and like normally I have like, you know like, 600 or 700, you see? Unique visitors. And then, three days ago there was 1500. Two days ago there was like 1700, and yesterday it was 4000. (Anna) Really? (L) So it was like telling you something? (Ark) Yes, so it was like quantum jump. It started to grow, grow, grow. It was not just one day, you know? It started growing, growing, growing, and then BOOM to 4000 yesterday. (L) Can you explain the exponential growth of Ark's readership on his blog?
A: Mass consciousness is aware and driving seeking from many quarters.
Q: (L) Well, in that respect, there's also some other things that are very strange that are going on. For example, I would like to know what is going on with D****? D*** has been writing us many e-mails that are more or less incoherent. We tried at one point to communicate with him and to persuade him that he needed to get counseling, to do something, and I don't know whether he has or whether he hasn't. But he seems to be mentally deteriorating. At the same time, I also got an e-mail today from a former member of the forum, and he has also been a member of QFS for a very short time, although he never participated - or very little - over a period of a couple of years. But anyhow, he says his name is M****, and he says he lives in Lebanon, but his IP address points to Washington DC. His e-mails are very similar to D****'s: fairly incoherent, and actually threatening. I mean, reading his e-mail, I thought this was strange. If your name is M**** in this day and age, you don't go around vaguely threatening somebody with end of the world scenarios saying that something big is gonna happen. Nevertheless, that's what he did. And I would like to know is there any relationship between the apparent deterioration of the minds of these two people?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What is the relationship?
A: It is not just "waves" beamed by such things as HAARP or microwaves, it is also a quickening of the cosmos. Those who are not integrated will disintegrate at an even faster rate than ever.
